Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05PANAMA2351, NATIONAL ASSEMBLY DISMISSES CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05PANAMA2351.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05PANAMA2351 2005-12-02 17:10 2011-05-29 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Panama
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PANAMA 002351 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
DEPARTMENT ALSO FOR WHA/CEN AND INL 
SOUTHCOM FOR POLAD 
 
E.O. 12958:N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL PINR SNAR PM POL SPECIALIST
SUBJECT: NATIONAL ASSEMBLY DISMISSES CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 
AGAINST EIGHT SUPREME COURT JUSTICES 
 
REF: PANAMA 2294 
 
Summary 
------- 
1.  (U) In a decision that surprised no one, on November 29 
the National Assembly Judicial Affairs Committee decided to 
dismiss Alianza Pro Justicia's criminal complaint against 
eight Supreme Court Justices.  November 29, the Panamanian 
press was quick to point out, also was the day that the U.S. 
Embassy informed Supreme Court Justice Winston Spadafora 
that his U.S. visa had been revoked.  A December 1 editorial 
cartoon showed two gangsters ("National Assembly" and 
"Supreme Court") deep-sixing accusations of corruption 
against the Court in the deep of night.  Civil society is 
disappointed with the Assembly's dismissal of the complaint, 
yet not surprised.  President Torrijos, who commented only 
that he respected the decision of the USG to revoke one of 
its visas, has appointed a Committee to screen candidates 
for two upcoming vacancies at the Supreme Court.  End 
Summary. 
 
Background 
---------- 
2.  (SBU) On November 14 Alianza Pro Justicia (the 
"Alianza", comprising 15 civil society organizations), 
submitted a criminal complaint against eight Supreme Court 
Justices based on an independent legal audit of six cases 
regarding narcotrafficking.  The audit was sparked by and 
referred to a denunciation made by former Chief Justice Adan 
Arjona last March against eight of his colleagues for what 
he considered questionable rulings (to say the least), 
related to notorious narcotics cases, in which known 
criminals were freed on apparently flimsy pretexts. 
Alianza's audit alleges "serious concerns" about the rulings 
in two of the six cases.  (See Reftel.) 
 
A Committee Deliberates 
----------------------- 
3.  (U) After meeting initially on November 22, the 
Assembly's Judicial Affairs Committee (comprising PRD 
legislators Freidi Torres (Chairman), Juan Hernandez, Marina 
de Laguna and Jerry Wilson, and opposition legislators 
Argentina Arias, Ruben Beitia and Hector Aparicio), finally 
voted to dismiss the complaint on November 29, citing lack 
of evidence.  Right after the complaint was submitted 
Legislative President Elias Castillo and the Committee 
Chairman Freidi Torres (a former majority leader) publicly 
stated that unless the complaint was accompanied by strong 
"evidence" the National Assembly would not admit it. 
 
"None of Your Business" 
----------------------- 
4.  (U) Commissioner Jerry Wilson (former Assembly president 
and former Supreme Court justice under the Noriega military 
regime) also publicly criticized the complaint and claimed 
that the Alianza had no right to submit such a complaint as 
it was not a party affected by any of the rulings.  (Note: 
Panamanian law specifically permits any individual to submit 
complaints against Supreme Court Justices before the 
National Assembly.)  Moreover, current Chief Justice Jose 
Troyano, a former member of the governing PRD, and one of 
the eight Justices accused, sarcastically stated in public 
that "whoever wanted his job would have to wait until his 
term was over (in December 2007)" as he had no intention to 
resign or any expectation that the complaint would prosper 
at the National Assembly. 
 
Where's the Beef? 
----------------- 
5.  (U) In an interview broadcast live, Chairman Torres 
talked without restraint against the criminal complaint and 
called it "imprudent and too vague," arguing that it did not 
comply with Panamanian law.  The Committee members 
unanimously agreed that the complaint had to be dismissed 
immediately as it was not accompanied by solid evidence 
("prueba sumaria," essentially a smoking gun).  (Note: 
Panamanian law specifically calls for evidence to accompany 
criminal complaints at the moment the complaints are 
submitted.  Alianza considered that they had provided enough 
evidence when they filed the complaint.  See Reftel.) 
Torres went further, saying that the Assembly could only 
admit the complaint if it was accompanied by evidence "that 
the Justices had received money for the rulings they issued" 
and defended Supreme Court rulings as "final and 
unchallengeable."  (Note: Torres has requested a meeting 
with Ambassador Eaton to explain his committee's decision.) 
 
Reactions 
--------- 
6.  (SBU) Alianza Executive Director Magaly Castillo was 
upset by the decision, though in private she had confided 
that she had little reason to expect the National Assembly 
to take action against the Justices.  Castillo argued that 
corruption does not leave evidence behind and therefore is 
very difficult to prove to the standard that Torres 
demanded.  "The least the National Assembly could have done 
was to summon Justice Arjona to ask for more information on 
his public denunciation against his colleagues," Castillo 
said.  Alianza will focus on pushing for penal laws to make 
it easier to convict people for corruption and to require 
less evidence in the presentation of a complaint. 
 
7.  (U) Transparency International Executive Director 
Angelica Maytin stated that the Assembly's position showed 
"complicity between the Justices and the legislators," as 
Panama's constitution establishes that the National Assembly 
can impeach justices and the Supreme Court may investigate 
and try legislators.  Catholic Church Peace Commission 
Executive Director Maribel Jaen also was disappointed but 
said that the decision "will encourage civil society to keep 
close watch on public servants." 
 
8.  (U) More dispassionately, Methodist Bishop Pablo Morales 
of the Ecumenical Council, a member of Alianza, said that 
the complaint did not charge the Justices specifically with 
corruption but raised serious questions about certain Court 
rulings that should have been clarified for society's 
"tranquility." 
 
Evaluating Committee 
-------------------- 
9.  (U) On November 23, nine days after the Alianza's 
criminal complaint was submitted, President Torrijos issued 
a Cabinet Decree establishing an "Evaluating Committee" 
(Comision Evaluadora), following the recommendation of the 
Commission for Judicial Reforms, to help the GOP screen 
candidates for the two upcoming vacancies at the Supreme 
Court.  (Note: Justices Arturo Hoyos and Jorge Federico 
Lee's terms both expire on December 31, 2005).  The 
Committee is formed by seven members from civil society. 
 
Comment 
------- 
10.  (SBU) The National Assembly's decision surprised no 
one.  On the contrary, the Assembly would have shocked 
Panamanians if it had accepted the complaint.  Nonetheless, 
Panamanian skepticism regarding the country's judicial and 
political authorities to take ethical actions increases by 
the day.  Civil society leaders made passionate public 
declarations that signaled their deep disappointment at the 
Assembly's decision to dismiss the case but privately they 
were reconciled that "nothing would happen."  In Panama, the 
PRD-controlled Assembly in fact has little independence from 
the executive.  The Assembly's dismissal of the complaint 
against the magistrates rather reveals the Torrijos 
administration's reluctance to pursue high-profile 
corruption cases against the Court.  Is that because several 
cases before the Court, which either have been dismissed or 
remain pending, allegedly link administration officials to 
corrupt acts?  Is the executive as afraid of the Court as 
the Legislature? 
 
Arreaga #