Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05QUEBEC183, QUEBEC STEAMING OVER CANADA'S KYOTO STRATEGY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05QUEBEC183.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05QUEBEC183 2005-11-10 23:27 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Consulate Quebec
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 QUEBEC 000183 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: SENV ENRG PGOV CA
SUBJECT: QUEBEC STEAMING OVER CANADA'S KYOTO STRATEGY 
 
1. (SBU) Summary:  On Nov. 9, Quebec CG Friedman and TDY 
Montreal officer Anne Coleman met with GOQ Environment Ministry 
Director for Air Policy Robert Noel de Tilly, who confirmed 
media reports of deep GOQ frustration with Ottawa's approach to 
Kyoto.  Quebec's main complaint is that Canada's federal climate 
change policy, which calls for reductions in three sectors (oil, 
coal/natural gas, and manufacturing), does not take into account 
past voluntary efforts undertaken by Quebec manufacturing 
companies to reduce their GHG emissions, or Quebec's 
emissions-friendly hydroelectric power source.  Quebec recently 
submitted to Ottawa thirty-two GHG reduction projects for 
funding, all of which were rejected by Ottawa.  End Summary. 
 
2. (SBU) GOQ Environment Ministry official Robert Noel de Tilly 
confirmed to CG media reports of a rift between Quebec and 
federal officials over Canada's climate change policy.  Quebec 
objects to the way Ottawa has set its base targets for GHG 
emission reductions.  In 1999, he explained, Ottawa began 
encouraging provinces and companies to get ahead of the curve 
and undertake GHG reduction measures.  At the time, the GOC 
indicated that any future climate change policy would take into 
account the progress being made by the provinces on a voluntary 
basis.  But in 2002, Ottawa shifted its strategy and, according 
to Tilly, established 2010 as the base year against which to 
evaluate greenhouse gas reductions.  Ottawa has set emission 
reductions of 15 percent measured against the 2010 level for 
three sectors: oil, coal/natural gas and manufacturing.  As 
Quebec has no oil or coal/natural gas industry, its bone of 
contention with Ottawa is in the manufacturing sector. 
 
3.  (SBU) Tilly argued that Canada's approach benefits provinces 
or companies that have made no efforts at GHG reduction as they 
will be able to claim major reductions in 2010.  Quebec 
manufacturing companies, by contrast, have been reducing 
emissions and becoming more efficient all along.  By 2010, it 
will be impossible for them to reduce by another 15 percent. 
Quebec must find a way to reduce its manufacturing GHG emissions 
by 15%, or buy permits from companies who are able to outstrip 
these benchmarks.  Tilly is convinced that some Quebec 
manufacturers will go under, especially in the pulp and paper 
sector. 
 
Alberta and Ontario over Quebec? 
--------------------------------------------- -- 
 
4.  (SBU) Tilly stated that the federal government's decision to 
move the "base year" of emissions calculations to 2010 was taken 
in order to benefit the booming Alberta oil industry and Ontario 
coal producers.  Under the GOC approach, Quebec's absence of oil 
or coal/natural gas energy production is in no way rewarded. 
Oil and coal companies, who according to Tilly have not taken 
voluntary steps to reduce emissions, will be able to fairly 
easily and cheaply reduce their GHG emissions by 30-40%, in 
2010, thereby leaving them with many "emissions permits" to sell 
on the market.  Manufacturing companies in Quebec will be 
penalized, in contrast, as they would be hard-pressed to make 
further reductions and will be forced to purchase emissions 
permits.  Asked by CG why Ottawa would be favoring Alberta and 
Ontario, Tilly replied, "It's pure politics." 
 
Quebec Project Requests: 0 for 32 
--------------------------------------------- - 
 
5. (SBU) According to Tilley, press reports of Ottawa's signing 
agreements with all provinces other than Quebec on the 
allocation of Kyoto implementation funds are exaggerated.  The 
federal government, he said, simply requested provinces to 
submit projects proposals and Ottawa would select those it found 
the most attractive.  Quebec submitted thirty-two projects, all 
of which were dismissed by Ottawa for not being ambitious enough 
to meet the Kyoto reduction strategy.  Tilly explained that 
here, too, Quebec is being penalized.  The first changes a 
company makes to reduce emissions usually result in the most 
dramatic GHG emissions savings, at least cost.  But Quebec's 
manufacturing companies have already introduced these 
inexpensive and effective technologies.  (Tilly buttressed his 
argument by noting that Canada-wide manufacturing sector GHG are 
expected to increase 2 percent in the 1990-2010 time frame, but 
in Quebec the estimate is for a decrease in emissions of 9.5%.) 
Further reduction proposals from Quebec are necessarily more 
expensive, with limited returns.  (Comment: While Tilly credited 
Quebec companies' voluntary measures for the decrease in GGE, we 
wonder how much of this reduction is a result of manufacturing 
operations closing or moving overseas. End comment) 
 
6. (SBU) CG Friedman noted that the U.S., like Quebec, adopted a 
voluntary initiatives strategy to reduce GHG and, like Quebec, 
we were showing better results than some countries who are 
signatories to Kyoto such as Canada.  Tilly said he viewed the 
U.S. as being very active in its approach to climate change and 
noted the high quality of climate change research being 
undertaken in the U.S.  He added, however, that while Quebec is 
opposed to Canada's Kyoto implementation plan, it continues to 
support the Protocol itself. 
 
Comment 
------------- 
 
7. (SBU) Tilly said that the GOC program is supposed to be 
implemented in 2008, but he is doubtful that Canada will meet 
this self-imposed deadline.  He pointed out that the deadline is 
only two years away and that Canada's program is vague.  We 
agree that the GOC's climate change plan appears short on 
details.  The fairness debate among provinces, which has really 
just begun in earnest, is likely to further slow Canadian 
implementation.  End comment 
 
8. (U) Drafted by TDY Montreal officer Anne Coleman. 
FRIEDMAN