Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05PARIS7230, USUNESCO: UNESCO VOTES TO ADOPT CULTURAL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05PARIS7230.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05PARIS7230 2005-10-21 15:31 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Paris
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 007230 
 
SIPDIS 
 
FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS 
STATE PASS USTR C.BLISS, S. MCCOY 
NSC B. WILLIAMS 
ROME FOR C.BERNINI, PLEASE PASS TO A/S SILVERBERG'S 
PARTY 
 
E.O. 12958:     N/A 
TAGS: ETRD PREL SCUL FR UNESCO
SUBJECT:  USUNESCO:  UNESCO VOTES TO ADOPT CULTURAL 
DIVERSITY CONVENTION:  U.S. VOTES NO 
 
Refs: A) Paris 7109, B) Paris 7128 
 
1. (U) Summary.  On October 20, by a vote of 148 in 
favor, 2 (U.S. and Israel) opposed, and 4 (Australia, 
Honduras, Liberia, and Nicaragua) abstentions, the 
UNESCO General Conference, meeting in plenary session, 
adopted the highly controversial Convention on the 
Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural 
Expressions ("the Convention").   Apart from the U.S. 
explanation of vote (EOV), 10 other EOVs also 
underscored in various ways that the Convention must be 
applied in a manner consistent with rights and 
obligations under other international instruments.  The 
need to protect human rights in implementing the 
Convention, however, was given less stress in those 
interventions.  The tone and substance of EU dealings 
with the U.S. on this issue remained hard-edged and 
unyielding down to the bitter end, as reflected in the 
UK's plenary EOV (on behalf of the EU), "This is a 
great day for UNESCO.  With one country, we have agreed 
to disagree on this issue."  End Summary. 
 
2. (U) The vote took place in a room filled with 
delegation representatives, NGOs and press in an air of 
high anticipation.  There were no catcalls or other 
undignified acts of which we are aware, after the 
results were announced. The States whose EOVs 
underscored the importance of respecting rights and 
obligations under other international agreements 
included Afghanistan, Albania, Australia, Iraq, Japan, 
Korea, New Zealand, Oman, Philippines, and Thailand. 
Only Australia, New Zealand, Philippines, and Thailand 
made explicit references in their EOVs to the need to 
protect trade rules, WTO agreements, and/or 
intellectual property obligations.  Notably, the out- 
going president of the Executive Board (a German) made 
an impassioned intervention appealing to the room not 
to speak of victories and defeats and calling for a 
Convention text that could eventually be accepted by 
all Member States, "otherwise it won't be credible." 
He went on to say that we "owe respect to different 
opinions" about the Convention, that the supporters of 
the Convention should take seriously the concerns that 
have been expressed, and noted his hope that the 
convention would be applied "in good faith." 
 
3. (U) Before closing the plenary session on this item, 
Kadr Asmal, the South African who chaired the 
negotiating sessions of inter-governmental experts, was 
invited to the podium to make a final statement 
(Comment: many elements of which were clearly 
disingenuous).  For instance, he said that the 
Convention should not be seen as a "French, or EU, or 
Canadian" convention and that it was "not part of a 
power play."  He stated that the Convention was about 
more than radio and TV control and access, and also 
about "respect."  He asserted that the Convention was 
"not adopted light-heartedly, frivolously, or rapidly." 
He said the Convention does not supercede other 
conventions, but rather is complementary to them.  He 
thanked the Director General "for his steadfastness" 
during the negotiations of the Convention.  He urged 
quick ratification of the Convention for its entry into 
force. 
4.  (U) Prior to the plenary session vote on the 
Convention's text, Commission IV met to review and 
approve a written report of its proceedings and to hear 
an oral report on its proceedings from the rapporteur. 
At that meeting, the U.S. delegation sought to add 
either a footnote or an additional paragraph to the 
written report to reflect the discussion and vote 
relating to a key U.S.-proposed amendment to improve an 
unhelpful Japanese Draft Resolution that provided an 
ambiguous interpretation of the Convention.  The U.S. 
effort to have the record reflect this part of the 
Commission's proceedings was roundly opposed on the 
ground that it was inconsistent with UNESCO's practice 
regarding defeated draft amendments. 
 
5. (U) For contextual background, the U.S. amendment 
had sought to include in the final paragraph of the 
Japanese resolution the verbatim wording of two 
principles enshrined in the UNESCO Constitution, 
namely, "the free flow of ideas by word and image" and 
the "free exchange of ideas and knowledge."  As 
amended, the amended paragraph would have read: 
"Expresses its confidence that the Convention shall be 
implemented in a manner consistent with the principles 
and objectives of the Constitution of UNESCO, in 
particular the free flow of ideas by word and image" 
and the "free exchange of ideas and knowledge." 
However, our proposed amendment was defeated by a vote 
of 116 (opposed), 3 (Afghanistan, Israel, U.S.) in 
favor and 3 abstentions, and the written report of 
Commission IV remained silent regarding that telling 
vote.  For the record, it is worth noting that 
Afghanistan, Australia, and Israel were also among 
those States (in addition to Kiribati, Korea, 
Philippines, Rwanda, Thailand) that had voted to 
support, or to abstain on, a number of the U.S.'s 28 
proposed (but rejected) amendments to the Convention 
text (see reftels). 
 
6. (U) However, at the plenary session, taking 
advantage of the fact that all plenary intervention are 
fully recorded, the U.S. delegation made an 
intervention that recalled the U.S. proposed amendment 
to the Japanese resolution and that verbatim wording 
taken from UNESCO's Constitution had been rejected by a 
vote for inclusion in the Japanese resolution. 
 
7. (U) Comment. The full import of this convention on 
"culture" has, from its inception, too often been 
underestimated, misrepresented, and widely 
misunderstood by many.  Despite an assiduous if 
unsuccessful U.S. Government effort to prevent this 
result, the Convention's adoption is now a fait 
accompli and its potential entry into force only 30 
ratifications away from becoming a juridical reality. 
In many important respects, this Convention can be seen 
and exploited as a clarion call to take serious note of 
indicative diplomatic developments that have critical 
implications for U.S. multilateral diplomacy, for trans- 
Atlantic policy, and for U.S. outreach to the 
developing world. 
 
8. (U) Comment continued. A key observation about the 
process that led to adoption of this instrument is the 
disturbing trend within UNESCO towards regional-group 
block voting that is either aimed at, or has the 
practical effect of, completely shutting out U.S. 
capacity to influence group decisions before they are 
reached.  The adroit European Union maneuvering to land 
this Convention, tinged with complete disregard for its 
impact on the U.S., cannot be ignored.  Nor can this 
victory's potential for emboldening the EU to pursue 
further such victories in multilateral forums, where it 
can once again count on surrogate supporters such as 
Canada, Brazil, India, and the G-77. 
 
 
OLIVER