Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05NAIROBI4506, GIFTING AMBOSELI FOR VOTES - A BAD ENVIRONMENTAL,

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05NAIROBI4506.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05NAIROBI4506 2005-10-31 07:18 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Nairobi
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 NAIROBI 004506 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
DEPT FOR AF/E, AF/EPS, AF/PD, AND OES/ENV 
USAID FOR AFR/EA 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: PGOV SENV PREL EAID ECON KCOR KE
SUBJECT:  GIFTING AMBOSELI FOR VOTES - A BAD ENVIRONMENTAL, 
ECONOMIC, AND POLITICAL PRECEDENT 
 
REF:  A. NAIROBI 4143 (NOTAL), B. NAIROBI 4436 (NOTAL) 
 
Sensitive but unclassified.  Not for release outside USG 
channels. 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary:  Hoping to create support among the 
Maasai community for Kenya's draft constitution, on 
September 28, Kenya's Ministry of Tourism and Wildlife 
degazetted (declassified) Kenya's renowned Amboseli 
National Park and handed over administrative control to the 
local county council.  This blatant political ploy was done 
without consultation and did not follow proper legal 
procedures.  To curry votes, President Kibaki and his pro- 
draft constitution advisors have jeopardized the Kenya 
Wildlife Service's revenue base and its momentum for 
effective reform.  Further, it is unclear whether this 
"gift" to the Maasai will actually deliver their vote. 
What is certain is that the move sets a dangerous precedent 
and has encouraged other ethnic groups to call for local 
control of other national parks.  End Summary. 
 
---------------- 
GIVE IT AWAY NOW 
---------------- 
2.  (U) As noted in ref A, one of the President Kibaki's 
inducements for a "yes" vote from Kenya's Maasai community 
for the November 21 referendum on a new constitution was 
the September 28 degazetting (declassification) of Amboseli 
National Park to a locally-controlled National Reserve, 
handing over the management, and, presumably, much or all 
of the revenue, from one of Africa's best known wildlife 
preserves to the Ol Kejuado County Council.  While the near- 
and-long-term consequences of this move are not yet known, 
there real alarm among conservation groups, donors, the 
Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), and others about the likely 
negative impact on Amboseli's flora and fauna.  In the 
opinion of am umbrella conservation group focused on this 
action, "Amboseli National Park is a UNESCO `Man and the 
Biosphere Reserve' which should mean that it is accorded 
the highest possible national priority in terms of its 
conservation . . . downgrading the Park's status to that of 
a National Reserve is inconsistent with that obligation." 
(See www.saveamboseli.net.) 
 
3.  (U) Last year Amboseli National Park generated 
approximately 240 million Kenyan Shillings (approximately 
US$ 3.5 million) in revenue.  Prior to September 28, these 
funds were collected by the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) 
and used, in part, to meet the revenue sharing requirements 
for the seven community group ranches neighboring the park 
and to support other national parks in the KWS system that 
are less well known and less able to generate revenue.  It 
is almost certain that KWS' other parks, reserves, and 
conservation programs will suffer following this loss of a 
key income source. 
 
------------------------------ 
A Tangled Historical Grievance 
------------------------------ 
4.  (U) At the same time, however, the Ol Kejuado Maasai 
contend, and there is ample evidence to support their claim 
that Amboseli National Park was illegally carved out of 
their titled land - the larger Amboseli Game Reserve - and 
as a community, they have not benefited much from 
Amboseli's status as one of the most visited game parks in 
East Africa.  In 1974, Amboseli was declared "State Land," 
and a national park was created by Presidential decree 
against a backdrop of protest by local Maasai communities 
and the Ol Kejuado county council.  To appease the 
community and the county council, the GOK agreed to a five- 
point benefit-sharing scheme:  i) provision and maintenance 
of water for livestock outside the park, ii) an annual 
payment to the community from gate receipts, iii) payment 
of all revenue accrued from hunting, iv) building a park 
headquarters at edge of the park to double as a community 
centre and v) a grant of 400 acres in the park to the 
county council that could be developed to earn revenue; 
e.g., from tourist lodges. 
 
5.  (SBU) This scheme worked from 1976-1981 when it began 
to break down.  Today, only a partial sharing of revenue is 
practiced.  Because of the GOK's failure to honor its part 
of the bargain, the community filed a case in court to have 
ownership of Amboseli returned to them.  The presidential 
decree downgrading Amboseli's status was not, however, part 
of any negotiated agreement to settle the case.  It simply 
came out of the blue as a transparent political attempt to 
buy the Maasai vote. 
 
---------------------- 
A CONSENSUS OF CONCERN 
---------------------- 
6.  (U) One of the most pressing worries, now that the Park 
is under local control, is whether the Council will be able 
to enforce the current practice of minimal livestock 
grazing within the park.  Currently, Maasai cattle and 
goats are permitted limited access to the park for water 
and when forage outside is in short supply.  If controls 
are removed from stock entry, there will be increased 
competition with wildlife for pasture and the incidence 
of human-wildlife conflict will likely mount.  Currently, 
KWS is still manning the gates at Amboseli without a clear 
mandate or revenue-sharing agreement.  Should there be a 
push for greater livestock use of the park, it is unlikely 
that KWS will push back. 
 
7.  (U) Dr. David Western, one of Kenya's most renowned 
conservationists, was intimately involved with designing 
the five-point plan in favor of the Maasai in 1974 when he 
served as Director of KWS.  He was a key speaker at an 
October 19 meeting of environmental donors at which he 
explained the history and range of issues that form the 
backdrop for Amboseli's management and for the moves on the 
part of the Maasai to recover it.  While never contesting 
the right of the Maasai to seek redress for Government's 
abrogating much of the five-point agreement, he has been 
outspoken in his opposition to the manner in which the 
recent degazettement took place. "Amboseli was illegally 
degazetted, and puts all other national parks in jeopardy; 
virtually every other national park in Kenya has now come 
under renewed pressure for degazettement by local 
authorities." 
 
8.  (U) The donors were also informed of a civil suit that 
four conservation NGOs and one private citizen have filed 
with the High Court of Kenya challenging the procedures and 
legality of the degazettment vis--vis the provisions of 
the Wildlife Management and Conservation Act and the 
Environmental Management and Coordination Act.  [Note:  on 
October 28 a Kenya High Court Justice acted on this suit 
and ordered a temporary halt to the transfer.  However, a 
previous court ruled that the suit "lacked merit," and it 
is not yet clear which ruling will be upheld.  End note.] 
The environment donors resolved to develop a joint 
statement that will be forwarded to their respective Chiefs 
of Missions and Directors with the aim that these 
ambassadors and high commissioners will present a joint 
position to President Kibaki. 
 
------------------------------------ 
THE KENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE SIDELINED 
------------------------------------ 
9.  (U) There is broad agreement that the change of 
Amboseli's status was done improperly.  Specifically, 
Kenyan law requires consultations with relevant 
stakeholders (including KWS), a 60 day public comment 
period, and ratification by the National Assembly - none 
which took place.  The apparent illegality of the move has 
done nothing to faze the GOK.  The Ministry of Tourism and 
Wildlife, which took the administrative action to change 
Amboseli's status, claims it is resolving a historic 
injustice, and has simply unilaterally asserted that it has 
the authority to do so. 
 
10.  (SBU) For KWS, the move on Amboseli not only threatens 
its revenue base (22 percent of its annual income, by one 
estimate), but also its current efforts to secure Cabinet 
commitments and international partnerships for upgrading 
Kenya's National Parks and reserves.  Three days before its 
degazettment, KWS Director Julius Kipng'etich was reveling 
in Amboseli's new label as a "World Class Park".  KWS' new 
approach to enhance the global visibility and attractions 
of its Protected Areas, termed "Branding of Parks," focuses 
on scientific management of park ecosystems, engaging local 
communities to keep wildlife dispersal areas and movement 
corridors open, rehabilitating park infrastructure and 
emphasizing interpretive services to enhance a positive 
visitor experience. 
 
11.  (SBU) Such an approach, however, hinges on KWS control 
of these areas.  During an October 21 meeting with the 
Ambassador, KWS Director Julius Kipng'etich confided that 
the President's "gift" of Amboseli to the County Council 
made him "distraught."  Kipng'etich believed that his 
Presidential appointment to KWS was done with a clear 
understanding that he could pursue a reform mandate based 
on sound management practices, long-term planning, and 
broad participation among stakeholders.  He views the 
degazettement action as a reversion to the political 
patronage of previous administrations that clearly 
undercuts KWS' ability to reform itself.  Kipng'etich 
confessed that the Amboseli situation, and the precedent it 
sets, has him considering resigning. 
 
---------------------------- 
THE OL KEJUADO ARE NOT READY 
---------------------------- 
12.  (SBU) In addition to asserting its historic claim on 
the Amboseli land, the Ol Kejuado County Council argues 
that it can manage the Park effectively.  It cites the 
"Mara Triangle" in the Maasai Mara National Reserve as an 
example of effective local management.  However, Joyce 
Engoke, Senior Programmes Officer, Kenya Organization for 
Environmental Education (EOEE), an organization dedicated 
to community-based conservation, told Econoff that "giving 
Amboseli to the county council is a shame.  The Ol Kejuado 
Council does not have the expertise, capacity, or ability 
to properly manage the park; it is not like the Maasai Mara 
where there is an established local conservancy to manage 
the park on behalf of the community".  In addition to 
managing the park with sound practices, the County Council 
is challenged to equitably and transparently share the 
benefits accruing from Amboseli with the Maasai group 
ranches that surround it. 
 
--------------------------------------- 
WHAT THE GOK GIVETH, IT MAY TAKETH AWAY 
--------------------------------------- 
13.  (U) Ironically, an article of the draft constitution 
states that lands held by district governments are `public 
lands' and, as such, will be administered on behalf of 
local people by a National Land Commission.  If the draft 
constitution passes, it is quite possible that the Ol 
Kejuado County Council could be forced to relinquish its 
newly-gained control over Amboseli. 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
14.  (SBU) Even following other controversial vote-seeking 
moves, including Kibaki's gift of land title deeds in 
direct contradiction to a standing court order (ref B), and 
promises of significant pay raises to county councilors 
(septel), the move on Amboseli is shocking.  It was done 
without the consent of the Ministry of Environment and 
Natural Resources and KWS.  And yet, most observers believe 
the Maasai will still vote overwhelmingly against the 
referendum. 
 
15.  (SBU) Giving this amazing asset to a county council 
with no track record of effective management or fiscal 
accountability is no guarantee of improved livelihoods for 
the local communities.  At the same time, the Amboseli move 
is a terrible precedent, possibly clearing the way for more 
of the kind of land grabbing and gifting that characterized 
the economically disastrous Moi era.  If the Ministry of 
Tourism and Wildlife can unilaterally degazette a park, it, 
or other ministries, could claim the authority to create 
new public land designations without the input of local 
communities or wider stakeholders and without observing the 
rule of law. 
 
BELLAMY