Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05PRETORIA3930, SOUTH AFRICA EXPROPRIATES FIRST FARM IN LAND

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05PRETORIA3930.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05PRETORIA3930 2005-09-26 05:14 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Pretoria
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PRETORIA 003930 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
DEPT FOR AF/S M. TABLER-STONE 
DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USAID/AFR 
DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USTR P. COLEMAN 
TREASURY FOR OASIA B. CUSHMAN 
COMMERCE FOR ITA J. DIAMOND 
AGRICULTURE FOR ITP 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PHUM ECON EAGR SF
SUBJECT:  SOUTH AFRICA EXPROPRIATES FIRST FARM IN LAND 
 
REFORM PROGRAM 
 
This message is Sensitive but Unclassified.  Not for Internet 
distribution. 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary.  The South African Government initiated 
expropriation procedures against the first farm as part of 
its land reform program, but will compensate the farmer for 
his property.  The land restitution program seeks to restore 
land, which was seized by the apartheid regime, to its 
original black owners or their descendants.  To date, the 
Government has restored land largely through negotiated 
purchases, but the farmer in this case sought 63 percent more 
than the independent auditor value for the land.  Through 
this expropriation action, the South African Government is 
sending a signal to other farmers to play ball on land 
reform.  The Government is also playing to its political 
base, which strongly supports land reform, proving that it is 
serious about accelerating reform.  Zimbabwe-type land 
seizures remain highly unlikely, as the SAG is committed to 
market-based reform and the protection of private property. 
End Summary. 
 
2.  (U) The South African Government announced September 22 
that it had started expropriation procedures against 
Leeuwspruit farm, marking the first time the government has 
exercised its right of eminent domain to expropriate as part 
of its land reform program.  The 500-acre farm in North West 
Province, now owned by Hannes Visser, was seized by the South 
African government in 1942 from black farmers.  The 
descendants of the original owners filed a restitution claim 
in 1997 under the Restitution of Land Rights Act of 1994. 
This Act allows those dispossessed of their land between 1913 
and 1994 "as a result of past racially discriminatory laws or 
practices" to bring a restitution claim for either 
compensation or the return of the land.  In the case of 
restored land, the law requires the Government to pay farmers 
the fair market value of land. 
 
3.  (U) In the Leeuwspruit case, the Commission on Restitution 
of Land Rights determined nearly three years ago that the 
restitution claim was valid.  The Government entered into 
negotiations with Visser to purchase the land through a 
negotiated sale, but have been unable to reach agreement on 
the fair value.  (Visser continues to dispute the validity of 
the claim itself, but was willing to negotiate for the 
transfer.)  Visser claimed that the improved portion of the 
land was worth Rand 3 million (approximately USD 500,000), 
while independent auditors valued it at Rand 1.75 million 
(approximately USD 300,000).  As a "last resort," and 
consistent with the Restitution Act and South African 
Constitution, the Government announced September 22 that it 
was expropriating Visser's farm and paying him the 
independent auditor value.  Visser has the right to appeal 
the decision to the Minister of Agriculture and Land Affairs, 
and then the courts. 
 
4.  (U) The major farmer's union in South Africa, AgriSA, 
suggested that the Government was making an example of 
Visser.  They argued that the Government had not exhausted 
all avenues before the expropriation.  The opposition 
Democratic Alliance emphasized that the value of the 
compensation was the critical factor; the state had the 
burden of proving that the compensation offered was fair and 
market-related. 
 
5.  (SBU) While Visser has challenged the independent 
auditor's valuation, Government and several land NGOs have 
argued that commercial farmers often inflate the value of 
claimed land in a bid to take advantage of -- or slow down -- 
the land reform program.  Marc Wegerif of Nkuzi Development 
Association, a land reform organization, told PolOff 
September 23 that he believes that the independent auditor 
prices are often tilted in the farmers' favor; the (largely 
white) auditors have long-standing relationships with the 
(largely white) commercial farms, so they err on the side of 
over-valuing farms slated for restitution or redistribution. 
 
6.  (SBU) COMMENT:  By pursuing the expropriation claim, the 
South African Government sending a signal to white farmers to 
play ball on land reform.  Land remains an emotional, 
political issue in South Africa, and the Government needs to 
show progress.  The transfer of land from the white farmers 
to blacks is moving slowly.  While many South Africans are 
impatient with the pace of reform, we believe that 
Zimbabwe-like land seizures remain highly unlikely.  The 
Constitution and legal framework protect property rights, and 
the Government is committed to reform through market-based 
transactions.  END COMMENT. 
 
------------------------- 
Background on Land Reform 
------------------------- 
 
7.  (U) South Africa's land reform program has three planks: 
restitution, redistribution, and tenure reform.  Each is 
summarized below: 
 
-- Restitution:  Significant progress has been made on 
restoring land to those who filed claims under the 
Restitution of Land Rights Act.  Of the 79,693 claims lodged 
before December 31, 1998 (the cut-off date for such claims), 
80 percent have been settled.  Most of the settled claims 
were in urban areas (e.g., District Six and Sophiatown).  The 
more difficult rural cases (like the Leeuwspruit farm) have 
not yet been settled.  Most of the remaining rural claims are 
in Limpopo, Mpumalanga, and KwaZulu-Natal.  The Government 
wants to settle all restitution claims by 2008. 
 
-- Redistribution:  At the end of apartheid in 1994, white 
farmers held 87 percent of the commercial farm land.  The 
Government committed to transferring 30 percent of the land 
to black farmers by 2014, but has succeeded in redistributing 
only 4.2 percent by the end of 2004.  The Government supports 
redistribution through grants and other mechanisms to 
encourage black farmers to purchase land on the market.  Some 
have criticized the "willing seller/willing buyer" process as 
slow and ineffective. 
 
-- Land Tenure Reform:  Parliament passed the Communal Land 
Rights Act (CLRA) in 2004 to provide increased tenure 
security to those living on traditional, tribal, or community 
land.  Most of this land is in the former "homelands," where 
30 percent of the population live and poverty is most 
serious.  Implementation of CLRA is a politically-sensitive 
issue because it challenges the power of local traditional 
leaders, and is only now beginning. 
 
TEITELBAUM