Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05MONTREAL1196, FRENCH PROPOSAL TO TAX AIRLINE TICKETS - USICAO

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05MONTREAL1196.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05MONTREAL1196 2005-09-09 15:07 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Consulate Montreal
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MONTREAL 001196 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
FROM USMISSION ICAO 
 
USUN FOR IO DAS TERRY MILLER; DEPT FOR IO/T, EB/TRA, AND 
SA/A; FAA FOR FELDMAN AND CAPESTANY 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: EAIR ECIN EAID EFIN UNGA ICAO
SUBJECT: FRENCH PROPOSAL TO TAX AIRLINE TICKETS - USICAO 
RESPONSE TO DEMARCHE REQUEST 
 
Reftel:  State 162146 
 
This cable is Sensitive But Unclassified.  Please handle 
accordingly. 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary.  The Acting US Representative to the 
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) met with 
the representatives of Canada, Austria, Saudi Arabia, Japan, 
Korea, Russia and Egypt to notify them of the demarche 
(reftel) being delivered in their capitals and to request 
their support.  She also discussed the matter of proposed 
airline taxes and other "innovative" means of financing 
development with ICAO Council President Kotaite.  All 
Representatives with whom she spoke opposed the ticket tax. 
President Kotaite said that for procedural reasons, he would 
not be in a position to offer a statement unless something 
comes out of New York that mentions ICAO.  He said that he 
had met recently with the French Foreign Ministry's 
Secretary General on the proposed airline tax, noting its 
 
SIPDIS 
inconsistency with ICAO policy, and suggesting that payment 
of the tax be voluntary.  End Summary. 
 
2.  (SBU) Per reftel, the Acting US Representative held a 
series of meetings on September 7 on the draft declaration 
on innovative sources of financing to deliver the US 
position and request support. 
 
3.  (SBU) ICAO Council President Dr. Assad Kotaite agreed 
with the US's evaluation of the proposed airline tax as 
contained in reftel in that it is inconsistent with ICAO 
Council resolutions on taxation -- the most recent of which 
was published in ICAO Document 8632, Third Edition, Section 
1, Council Resolution on Taxation of International Air 
Transport (OP 3).  US Rep asked if the President would issue 
a statement on the proposed tax.  Kotaite recalled that 
France had requested insertion of the matter on the next 
(October-November) Council Session agenda in the event of 
"new developments" -- presumably the initiative in New York. 
If/when a UN resolution on the matter mentions ICAO, he 
would be in a position to respond.  He said that if the 
proposal had been for a new "charge" to support 
development/HIV/AIDS research, it would clearly have been 
ICAO-illegal, but an additional tax, Kotaite said, is not 
illegal.  The most ICAO has been able to achieve in 
opposition to taxation of airline tickets is the Council 
Resolution cited above. 
 
4.  (SBU) Kotaite suggested that for political reasons, the 
United States should consider accepting a voluntary tax, 
such as UNICEF contributions requested of (but not required 
from) departing passengers at certain airports.  He said 
that he had recently met with the Secretary General of the 
French Foreign Ministry about the GOF's airline tax 
proposal.  Kotaite said that he had told him that the tax 
would be inconsistent with ICAO policy and therefore the GOF 
should consider instead a voluntary contribution.  He said 
the French official appeared to like the idea and would 
raise it with others in his government.  The US Rep 
responded that even a voluntary tax poses problems, 
including the difficulty of insuring clarity and 
transparency on management and distribution of the proceeds. 
 
5.  (SBU) The US Rep then met with likely Council 
supporters:  Austria, Canada, Japan, Russia and Korea 
(Australia, China and Singapore, also allies, are away on 
vacation).  The Austrian Representative said that her 
government did not favor the tax, but this was a matter on 
which there was no EU consensus.  The airline ticket tax had 
been discussed in the EU's Financial Council in June, but no 
agreement had been reached.  Thus, as far as she knew, it 
was still an "open subject." 
 
6.  (SBU) As far as Japan was concerned, the proposed ticket 
tax went beyond the competence of ICAO (all others agreed 
with him).  His government was "very negative" on the 
subject, and believed the matter should be discussed in the 
broader context of development assistance. 
7.  (SBU) The Canadian Ambassador agreed with the objective 
(of providing increased development assistance), but not the 
means, as a global tax is "not the appropriate way."  Given 
differences in tax laws from country to country, the 
proposal would require a harmonization of fiscal regimes 
before it could be implemented.  This is something that 
should be left up to the political leadership in New York, 
not ICAO.  The current price of oil was another 
consideration.  He promised to forward the US talking points 
to Ottawa. 
 
8.  (SBU) The Korean said that his government was flatly 
opposed to the ticket tax.  Implementation of the tax would 
be difficult, particularly in view of the increasing price 
of oil and the deteriorating state of the aviation industry. 
Additional taxation will only further reduce demand for 
travel by air.  He said he would ask his capital to support 
the United States on this in New York. 
 
9.  (SBU) The Russian Ambassador said that his government 
was also opposed to the tax, with his Civil Aviation 
Authority "strongly opposed."  ICAO was not the appropriate 
forum to discuss development assistance; implementation 
would be very difficult. 
 
10.  (SBU) Egypt and Saudi Arabia opposed the tax, Egypt 
because of difficulties of implementation and lack of 
transparency on use of the proceeds, Saudi Arabia because it 
is opposed to any tax on airline tickets.  Both said they 
would forward our talking points to their capitals for 
further guidance and to request support for the US position 
in New York. 
 
11.  (SBU) While discussion with ICAO Reps focused 
overwhelmingly on the proposed ticket tax, there was also 
interest in the US position on the IFF and the 0.7 percent 
GDP commitment.  They also asked for a copy of the New York 
Declaration, which the US Rep has provided, so that they 
could forward the entire package to capitals. 
 
Serwer Marshall