Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05WELLINGTON658, NEW ZEALAND FIRST: A PARTY OF THE OLD STILL MAY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05WELLINGTON658.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05WELLINGTON658 2005-08-29 03:28 2011-04-28 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN Embassy Wellington
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000658 
 
SIPDIS 
 
NOFORN 
 
STATE FOR EAP/ANP, EAP/RSP, EAP/EP, INR/EAP 
NSC FOR VICTOR CHA AND MICHAEL GREEN 
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISA LIZ PHU 
PACOM FOR J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/28/2015 
TAGS: PREL PGOV NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND FIRST: A PARTY OF THE OLD STILL MAY 
CHARM 
 
Classified By: Acting DCM Katherine B. Hadda, 
for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). 
 
1. (C) Summary:  As New Zealand gears up for September 17 
general elections, neither Labour nor National are likely to 
get enough votes to win a majority outright.  Of all New 
Zealand's small parties, only two, the New Zealand First 
party and the Green Party, have enough current support to win 
more than 5% of the vote.  Either could play the role of 
"kingmaker" by giving one of the two major parties enough 
Parliamentary seats to govern. 
While NZ First has not said which party it would prefer to 
back, it is widely assumed that National is the more likely 
partner.  When the parties shared rule in the 1990s their 
government fell apart, however. 
 
2.  (C/NOFORN) Led by the unpredictable and charismatic 
Winston Peters, New Zealand First paints itself as the party 
that will preserve New Zealand's traditional way of life. 
The party is populist, anti-immigration, and against special 
rights for minority groups, although in recent weeks it has 
toned down its rhetoric somewhat in response to flagging 
support in the polls.  The United States could face 
difficulties in dealing with any coalition government 
beholden to NZ First: the party wants to restrict foreign 
investment and supports New Zealand's anti-nuclear policy 
(though would back a referendum to change it).  Then again, 
Peters is pragmatic: he tends to back any policy that he sees 
as raising his public profile, and he was considered a steady 
hand as Finance Minister in the '90s. The party also favors a 
strong defense establishment.  End Summary. 
 
----------------- 
Who Are NZ First? 
----------------- 
 
3.  (SBU) New Zealand First party leader Winston Peters may 
be dabbling in irony when he labels the major Labour and 
National Parties as the "two tired old parties" competing for 
the country,s September 17 elections.  Peters himself could 
be tagged as the election,s graybeard: At age 60, he is the 
second-oldest candidate for prime minister and is one of 
Parliament,s longest tenured members, serving 24 years. His 
party,s motto "placing New Zealand and New Zealanders first" 
has been marched out in slightly different forms for every 
campaign since Peters split from National and formed NZ First 
in 1993. 
 
4.  (C) The party,s core support rests with elderly voters, 
and its five policy priorities appeal to an older 
constituency that seeks personal security and is cheered by 
nostalgic references to a largely bygone New Zealand.  Down 
in the polls with three weeks to go (support has plummeted 
from about 12% to 5% in the last weeks), NZ First stands in 
familiar territory.  At this point in previous campaigns, 
Peters uncorked his personal charm and laid out his 
appealing, if shopworn, populist messages, proving on 
election night that pollsters had judged his party far too 
pessimistically.  His tireless, tried-and-true campaign 
methods may pull off another hurrah -- possibly not Peters, 
last -- making NZ First a potential kingmaker in a coalition 
with either Labour or, more likely, National. 
 
------------------- 
Grey First policies 
------------------- 
 
5. (SBU) The public sees NZ First as a party for older New 
Zealanders.  In the 2002 election, 52 percent of NZ First 
voters were over 50.  In an August poll, its voting-age 
supporters were three times more likely to be over 55 (40.9 
percent) than under 24 (13.6 percent).  The party,s promises 
to battle crime, limit immigration, constrain privatized 
asset sells to foreign investors and manage race relations 
resonate most strongly with seniors.  This year, it has added 
a senior-specific campaign pledge: to raise the rate of 
social welfare support for the elderly.  As a result, NZ 
First has won the not-insignificant support of Grey Power, a 
100,000-member political group for age 50-plus New Zealanders 
that is a key component of NZ First's campaign success. 
 
-------------------------------------- 
Policies as protection for NZ identity 
-------------------------------------- 
 
6. (C) NZ First policies generally seek to protect and 
preserve a distinct New Zealand identity.  Foremost among 
them, NZ First pitches an anti-immigrant message, with Peters 
often saying that New Zealanders have "the right to stop 
being swamped by a flood of immigrants."  Peters recently 
said that New Zealand is replacing its first-world emigrants 
of the postwar period with third-world workers and 
threatening the Kiwi way of life.  NZ First calls for a 
drastic reduction in immigrants, especially refugees.  Peters 
often has used the mechanism of parliamentary privilege to 
name immigrants he thinks pose threats to national security, 
without supporting evidence or disclosure of his sources. 
 
7. (SBU) Peters, who inherited Maori lineage from his father 
and once was ticketed as the likeliest prospect to become the 
country,s first Maori prime minister, is labeled by some 
critics as being Maori in name only. He first came to 
national prominence in the mid-1980s by uncovering scandal in 
the government,s Maori loan programs.  He has since attacked 
what he calls the "bro-racracy" of Maori that seeks large 
government payouts to settle treaty claims, and he has also 
criticized some  tribe Maori leaders as nepotistic and 
corrupt. However, ever since National Party leader Don 
Brash's January 2004 Orewa speech stole much of the thunder 
on this issue, NZ First has struggled to further distinguish 
its race policy.  For example, the party still promotes Maori 
language and culture as a vital part of New Zealand,s 
national identity. 
 
--------------------------------------------- 
Party,s strengths, vulnerabilities are Peters 
--------------------------------------------- 
 
8. (C) Arguably the most charismatic figure in Parliament, 
Peters propels the party,s populist policy.  Coupled with 
his long experience in Parliament, Peters is well positioned 
to deliver polling gains in the remaining weeks of the 
election campaign.  Four weeks out from the 2002 elections, 
NZ First polled between 4 and 5 percent.  Largely on Peters, 
charisma, it received 10.4 percent of the party vote.  A 
similar performance remains possible this campaign, 
especially as older voters appear to be disengaged from the 
two major parties and other minor parties. 
 
9. (C) Peters, charisma, the party,s populist platform and 
its support among the elderly notwithstanding, NZ First,s 
message and its leader have worn thin on many New Zealanders 
who may be sympathetic to its views but not convinced of its 
effectiveness.  Other parties, especially National and ACT, 
have cannibalized the party,s core policy messages 
(anti-corruption, anti-immigration and race relations), 
leaving the party with little new or different on offer. 
 
------------------------------------------ 
Anti-First: issues of coalition government 
------------------------------------------ 
 
10. (C) As in the last three elections, Peters is promoting 
NZ First as a potential coalition "king-" or "queen-maker," 
suggesting that he could help Labour or National reach a 
Parliamentary majority.   However, Labour leader Helen Clark 
and National,s Brash have both distanced themselves from 
Peters, who has said he would not commit to a coalition plan 
before the election.  National likely worries voters will 
remember how after the 1996 election, it took 10 weeks for 
National and NZ First to form a coalition, which then 
essentially fell apart in 1998.  Labour,s Clark stands 
further apart from Peters, political philosophy and, since 
the Green and Progressive Parties already have agreed to back 
a Labour coalition, needs him less. Given Peters, reputation 
as a political lone wolf, some commentators have suggested a 
more casual collaboration with NZ First would better serve 
Labour or National.  This might the form of an agreement by 
NZ First to work with a minority government on an 
issue-by-issue basis, and this arrangement, some insiders 
believe, would be Peters, preference. 
 
11. (C) Another factor complicating NZ First,s position is 
that NZ First,s rank-and-file increasingly are signaling 
that Labour would be their first choice for a coalition 
partner.  As a conservative in centrist clothing, Peters 
feels more at home with National, his former party, and 
without Peters, NZ First would likely go extinct. 
--------------------------------------------- - 
New Zealand "First": implications for the U.S. 
--------------------------------------------- - 
 
12. (C) Consistent with its overall strategy to protect the 
national identity, NZ First supports New Zealand,s 
anti-nuclear policy.  However, the Party's MPs have told us 
they could support a public referendum concerning the policy. 
 NZ First remains skeptical of free trade agreements, 
especially arrangements with developing nations.  It believes 
deals with "low-wage economies," such as the one being 
negotiated with China, threaten the New Zealand way of life, 
although it favors increasing New Zealand,s association with 
the South Pacific. 
 
13. (C/NOFORN) On the whole, a coalition government obliged 
to draw on NZ First policies would be neutral to the United 
States.  However, some policies, notably Peters, call for 
expanded intelligence sharing within Parliament and his 
party,s policy to cap foreign ownership of key 
infrastructure to 24.9 percent, might be a problem for us. It 
is rumored that National might tap Peters as Foreign Minister 
in a coalition government, which would make this prospect 
less than academic.  Then again, Peters is basically 
pragmatic.  We believe he would support any policy that makes 
him look good. 
 
----------------------------------------- 
Winston First: leader as person and party 
----------------------------------------- 
 
14. (SBU) Winston Raymond Peters, 60, studied history, 
politics and law at Auckland University before working as a 
teacher and a lawyer.  In 1978, age 33, he entered Parliament 
as a National Party member.  After losing in 1981, he 
returned to Parliament in 1984 by winning in Tauranga, a seat 
that he continues to hold.  He resigned from the National 
Party in 1993 over policy differences, especially those 
involving privatization of state infrastructure.  He founded 
NZ First that same year, just before the general election. 
 
15. (SBU) In the 1996 election, NZ First captured 17 seats, 
six of which were electorate seats (including five dedicated 
to Maori), demonstrating it had a solid party foundation.  It 
joined in coalition with National, making Peters deputy prime 
minister and Treasurer.  However, old tensions reappeared 
between Peters and National leadership, resulting in Peters, 
sacking from cabinet.  A collapse in NZ First followed, with 
some members of Parliament breaking in favor of National.  In 
the party,s current incarnation, Peters has firmly 
established himself in opposition, where some say he performs 
best. 
 
16. (C) Although Peters exercises autocratic control over the 
party, there are signs he may be losing touch with his home 
district in Tauranga.  A recent poll of the Tauranga 
electorate indicates their preferred party is National, with 
26 percent; Labour, 18 percent; and, NZ First, 10 percent. 
However, extrapolating party vote to electorate seat outcome 
is tenuous.  In the 2002 election, Labour had 32 percent of 
the party vote while National and NZ First posted 22 percent 
each.  Peters decisively won the seat with 52 percent of the 
electorate vote.  The next closest contender, a prominent 
sitting Labour MP (Speaker Margaret Wilson), took 21 percent. 
Burnett