Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05WELLINGTON594, LABOUR AGAIN WAVES ANTI-AMERICAN CARD IN ITS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05WELLINGTON594.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05WELLINGTON594 2005-08-03 05:17 2011-04-28 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Wellington
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 WELLINGTON 000594 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR D (CASTRO), EAP/FO, EAP/P AND EAP/ANP 
STATE PASS DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 
NSC FOR VICTOR CHA AND MICHAEL GREEN 
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISA LIZ PHU 
PACOM FOR J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ 
USDA FOR SECRETARY JOHANNS AND FAS/ELLEN TERPSTRA AND MIKE 
CONLON 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/02/2015 
TAGS: PREL PGOV NZ
SUBJECT: LABOUR AGAIN WAVES ANTI-AMERICAN CARD IN ITS 
CAMPAIGN 
 
REF: WELLINGTON 566 
 
Classified By: Charge David R. Burnett, 
for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). 
 
1.  (C) Summary:  During Parliament's last "Question Time" 
before election recess, Foreign Minister Phil Goff again 
highlighted tidbits of Codel Nickles' January 2004 meeting 
with National Party leadership to claim National has a hidden 
agenda to lift the country's nuclear ban.  No doubt in 
response to the Embassy's protests after Minister Mallard 
claimed US-interests were funding National's campaign, Goff 
limited his criticism to remarks allegedly made to the Codel 
by the Nat's foreign affairs spokesman, Lockwood Smith. 
While quoting Senator Nickles' response, Goff characterized 
it as "appropriate."  The Embassy has not yet been asked to 
comment on the latest outburst, but if we are we will reissue 
our previous statement that the U.S. Government has neither 
sought nor received assurances from any NZ political party. 
Labour clearly believes that stirring up anti-American 
sentiment is a vote-getter, and will continue to play the 
anti-U.S. card in the run up to September's elections.  End 
Summary. 
 
2.  (SBU) During Parliament's final question and answer 
session on August 2, Foreign Minister Goff claimed that Smith 
had asked the visiting U.S. Senate delegation if assistance 
from a United States think tank would be worthwhile for a 
public campaign on New Zealand's nuclear-free policy.  Once 
again citing confidential minutes taken by an MFAT official 
at the January 2004 meeting (reftel), Goff claimed that 
delegation head Senator Don Nickles had responded that the 
"(nuclear-free policy) was an internal issue for New Zealand, 
and as such should be left to a New Zealand think tank." 
Goff said that the United States recognized, as Smith had 
not, that it was inappropriate for U.S. interests to 
intervene in New Zealand's domestic affairs.  ACT MP Rodney 
Hide promptly duly remarked that this claim completely 
contradicted Labour's previous innuendoes that Washington is 
funding National's campaign.  (Comment: We note that no one 
in Parliament or the media has asked how much the Labour 
government has spent lobbying the U.S. Congress for a Free 
Trade Agreement.  End Comment.) 
 
3.  (SBU) The new public allegation against Smith escalates 
the Labour Party's effort to paint the National Party as 
seeking to change the landmark legislation that bans nuclear 
arms and nuclear-propelled vessels from New Zealand.  The 
story commanded top billing in New Zealand's print media and 
led morning reports on radio.  It therefore handily pushed to 
the margins coverage of the trial that began this week in 
Christchurch for 5 policemen and a civilian driver accused of 
driving at speeds of up to 170 km to get Prime Minister Clark 
to the airport in time to catch a flight to a rugby match 
last July.  (The PM will not be asked to testify: she claims 
she was reading at the time and failed to notice the speed.) 
 
4.  (C) National has strongly denied the Government's claims, 
but its unclear whether the response will resonate with the 
public.   During Goff's barrage, Smith hotly denied he had 
made any proposal for a U.S.-funded campaign to change 
anti-nuclear legislation.  He challenged Goff to table the 
entire transcript of the Codel meeting, which Goff refused to 
do, arguing that he needed to protect the confidentiality of 
the Senators' remarks.  (Comment: Apparently, Goff believes 
that former Senator Nickles' remarks are no longer covered by 
that policy.  End Comment.)  In a radio interview this 
morning, Smith said that what he was trying to address was a 
need to bring enough information to the public that they can 
make an informed decision about whether the legislation, and 
the current problems in US-NZ relations, are in New Zealand's 
interests.  National Leader Don Brash told one TV journalist 
yesterday evening that he could not recall if Smith made the 
alleged comment, noting that it was a long time ago.  The 
Prime Minister, quipped Brash, cannot recall whether her 
motorcade was speeding and that was only a year ago.  He did 
own that "it would be inappropriate for any foreign think 
tank or lobby groups to be used to influence public opinion 
in New Zealand."  He reiterated -- often -- that National has 
pledged not to alter the nuclear legislation without a 
referendum.  Brash left out (no doubt intentionally) that the 
party has also previously said it might change the 
legislation if elected on a platform that pledged to do so. 
 
5.  (C) In a supplementary question, Ken Shirley MP of the 
ACT Party asked Goff if the anti-nuclear legislation banned 
nuclear electricity generation or a small nuclear reactor 
that has been operating in suburban Wellington since the 
1960s.  Goff responded that nothing in the legislation 
"prohibits a nuclear power plant, but no party in this House 
has ever been stupid enough to advocate that."  Goff's 
comment represents the Government's  clearest acknowledgment 
to date that there are notable exceptions to the New 
Zealand's nuclear-free legislation and its associated 
policies. 
Burnett