Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05TAIPEI3198, MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05TAIPEI3198.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05TAIPEI3198 2005-08-01 09:10 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

010910Z Aug 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 003198 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/RSP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - 
ROBERT PALLADINO 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS 
 
 
ΒΆ1. Summary: The major Chinese-language Taipei dailies, 
in addition to covering local politics July 30-August 
1, also carried extensive coverage of the Japan-Taiwan 
fishery talks, the aftermath of China's announcement 
regarding duty-free entry of Taiwan fruit, the outbreak 
of melioidosis in southern Taiwan, and a fire on a 
Taiwan ferry in southern Taiwan that killed four local 
people.  With regard to U.S.-China-Taiwan relations, 
the pro-independence "Taiwan Daily" carried a news 
story on its page two July 31 that was topped with the 
headline: "John Tkacik criticized the Pan-Blue alliance 
for acting in favor of China and opposing the arms 
procurement [budget]."  The newspaper also ran an 
editorial supporting Tkacik's remarks and cautioned 
U.S. officials stationed in Taiwan to pragmatically 
observe Taiwan's public opinion and not hold any 
unrealistic expectations about the Pan-Blue alliance. 
An editorial of the limited-circulation, conservative, 
pro-unification "China Post," on the other hand, 
criticized President Chen Shui-bian for showing no 
desire at all to talk with Beijing, regardless of the 
calls by some western leaders.  The "Taiwan Daily" ran 
another editorial during this time period that 
contrasted the Irish Republican Army's announcement 
that it would renounce violence with China's 
continuation of warmongering behavior.  The editorial 
said only when Beijing really renounces the use of 
force to resolve the "Taiwan issue" can both sides of 
the Taiwan Strait live in peace.  End summary. 
 
A) "U.S. Think Tank Scholars Have Seen Through the Pan- 
Blue Political Parties' Deviant Behaviors of `Joining 
Hands with China to Restrain Taiwan and Oppose the 
United States'" 
 
The pro-independence "Taiwan Daily" [circulation: 
150,000] commented in an editorial (8/1): 
 
"John J. Tkacik, Jr., senior research fellow at the 
`Heritage Foundation,' a renowned U.S. think tank, was 
recently invited to testify before the U.S. House of 
Representatives.  During his testimony, Tkacik 
criticized members of the Pan-Blue alliance in Taiwan 
for acting in favor of China and for deliberately 
blocking the arms procurement budget, and he suggested 
that the U.S. government cut ties with the pro-China 
Pan-Blue people in Taiwan. . 
 
"Pan-Blue political party leaders do not have to wait 
until they hear questions or criticism from the U.S. 
think tank scholars to realize that the Chinese 
government in Beijing is by no means a friendly or 
lovable country to Taiwan.  They should also understand 
that a country that has aimed hundreds of missiles at 
Taiwan has already turned cross-Strait ties to a 
hostile state.  The Pan-Blue political parties in 
Taiwan, in addition, have shown no intention at all to 
hide their attempt to `join hands with China to oppose 
the Untied States so as to restrain Taiwan' and have 
tried to lock Taiwan into the cage of `one China' by 
advocating the `both sides of the [Taiwan] Strait, one 
China' doctrine.  Such acts and intentions of Pan-Blue 
members are naturally viewed by U.S. think tank 
scholars, who believe in democracy, as some sort of 
deviant behavior that they can neither understand nor 
forgive. 
 
"No people of a democratic country that implements 
party politics will tolerate [having] the opposition 
parties in their country oppose their country's ideals 
and act in favor of the country's enemy. . The Pan-Blue 
parties are already scorned by those Taiwan people with 
a Taiwan-centered consciousness; how do they dare to 
think that they are entitled to seek support from 
democratic countries like the United States?  The U.S. 
officials stationed in Taiwan should also pragmatically 
observe and understand Taiwan's public opinion and 
should no longer hold any unrealistic expectations 
about members of the pro-China Pan-Blue alliance. ." 
 
B) "President Chen: A Minster No" 
 
The conservative, pro-unification, English-language 
"China Post" [circulation: 30,000] noted in an 
editorial (8/1): 
 
"Western leaders never tire of urging Beijing to talk 
to Taipei.  Condoleezza Rice, U.S. secretary of state 
did so again earlier last month.  Jose Manuel Barroso, 
new president of the European Commission, followed suit 
a little later when he met Chinese President Hu Jintao 
in Beijing.  They want Hu to start dialogue with 
President Chen Shui-bian.  They should save their 
breath, because Chen is a Mister No, albeit he, as an 
able defense lawyer, never says an outright `no' to 
anybody, who disagrees with him. . 
 
"We are sure that Washington by now knows full well 
President Chen does not want any government dialogue 
between Taipei and Beijing.  If the United States were 
truly interested in such dialogue, which would be in 
the interests of all concerned, more pressure - truly 
very hard pressure - should be brought to bear on 
President Chen.  In fact, Washington is capable of 
compelling him to go along. 
 
"Friendly persuasion will never work to make President 
Chen agree to talk with his Chinese opposite number 
[sic]. And the United States should stop calling 
Beijing to start talking with the `elected government' 
in Taipei and start tightening subtle screws on 
President Chen to accept the consensus of 1992." 
 
C) "The Irish Republican Army Could Replace Military 
Action With Political Negotiations, Why Can't China? - 
Not Until the Beijing Government Really Abandons the 
Use of Force to Settle the So-Called `Taiwan Problem,' 
Can Reciprocal Peace and Coexistence Be Created Through 
Equal Political Negotiations across the Taiwan Strait." 
 
The pro-independence "Taiwan Daily" [circulation: 
150,000] editorialized (7/30): 
"The Irish Republican Army (IRA) made a major 
announcement yesterday . [It] said it will end the 
armed campaign, and ordered its members dump their 
weapons, cease all military operations, and seek the 
independent status of North Ireland through peaceful 
means. . 
"If the Chinese authorities really cannot understand 
[the situation], nor follow the major trend in the 
international community, i.e. to adopt peaceful 
coexistence in place of military attacks, then it 
proves that the Chinese government is composed of 
another sort of force-loving terrorism.  Taiwan, the 
United States, Japan, and other democratic countries 
should closely examine the militant essence of the 
Chinese authorities in order to be prepared; the Taiwan 
people should clearly understand the militant essence 
of the Chinese authorities in order to get rid of 
China's military threat." 
 
 
PAAL