Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05TAIPEI3116, MEDIA REACTION: PENTAGON'S REPORT ON PRC

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05TAIPEI3116.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05TAIPEI3116 2005-07-22 08:42 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 TAIPEI 003116 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/RSP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - 
ROBERT PALLADINO 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: PENTAGON'S REPORT ON PRC 
MILITARY POWER, RENMINBI REVALUED 
 
1. Summary: The major Chinese-language dailies in 
Taiwan July 22 focused on the appreciation of China's 
Renminbi (RMB) and the Pentagon's annual report on the 
PRC's military power.  The pro-independence "Liberty 
Times" (Taiwan's biggest daily), the centrist "China 
Times," and the pro-unification "United Daily News" all 
reported under banner headlines on their front pages 
that the RMB has for the first time in about a decade 
appreciated by two percent. These newspapers also spent 
their first few inside pages discussing the reasons 
behind China's move to revalue the RMB and its impact 
on Taiwan's currency and stock market.  The pro- 
independence "Taiwan Daily," in addition to carrying 
the news story on the Chinese currency, also printed a 
banner headline on its front page that said "Bian: 
China's rise poses threats to world peace."  The 
newspaper also spent its whole page three on news 
stories related to the Pentagon's report on China's 
military power, and the top news story on the page 
carried the following headline: "The United States will 
go to war to protect Taiwan?  Rumsfeld: Of course we 
are capable of doing that."  The "United Daily News," 
however, covered this wire service news story from a 
different angle with the headline: "[The United States] 
is willing to fight for Taiwan?  Rumsfeld dodged 
[talking about] war but talked about peace."  The sub- 
headline added: "Following the release of the report on 
PRC military power, U.S. Defense Secretary replies to 
journalists that `we are capable of doing what we have 
indicated we have the capability of doing.'" 
 
2.  Several newspapers continued to editorialize on the 
Pentagon's report on the PRC's military power while 
only one news analysis discussed the appreciation of 
the RMB.  A "Liberty Times" news analysis said the 
Pentagon's report has accidentally cut into the 
achievements KMT Chairman Lien Chan claimed he had made 
during his trip to China.  An "United Daily News" 
editorial said the report revealed that the United 
States believes China's `rise' is a fixed fact, but it 
is really up to Washington to tell whether it is a 
`peaceful' rise or not.  An editorial in the limited- 
circulation, conservative, pro-unification, English- 
language "China Post" said for Taiwan, an independence 
ideology is more dangerous than an arms shortage.  An 
editorial of the limited-circulation, pro-independence, 
English-language "Taiwan News," however, said the DPP 
administration's call on the Taiwan Legislature to 
approve the special arms procurement bill is a 
responsible action to prevent a rapid and dangerous 
imbalance in the cross-Strait military equation.  With 
regard to the appreciation of the RMB, a "United Daily 
News" news analysis said the U.S. reaction to this move 
by Beijing is worth further observation.  End summary. 
 
1. Pentagon's Report on PRC Military Power 
 
A) "U.S. Report Accidentally Slashes the Achievements 
Lien Chan Made during His China Trip" 
 
Journalist Tsou Jiing-wen noted in a news analysis of 
the pro-independence "Liberty Times" [circulation: 
800,000] (7/22): 
 
"Following the release of the U.S. Department of 
Defense's annual report on China's military power, the 
reactions of two sets of people [to the report] are 
especially notable: The first is that of [the Chinese 
authorities accused in the report] whose [reaction] was 
that of outrage and [who] turned to criticize 
Washington for intervening and sowing discord [in the 
Taiwan Strait].  The other are some Pan-Blue members in 
Taiwan, who claimed in reaction that the report is 
Washington's best packaging for its arms sales to 
Taiwan. . 
 
"The old [leadership] in the KMT that is to step down 
in August has [attempted to] create a scene . . That 
is, during the recent meeting between members of the 
International Democracy Union and U.S. President George 
W. Bush, [KMT Chairman] Lien Chan claimed that Bush had 
expressed approval of his China trip.  To Lien's 
surprise, Washington's reference in the Pentagon's 
report to the special arms procurement bill which is 
currently stuck in the Legislative Yuan was in reality 
a move to vote against the KMT's boycott action, which 
was done under Lien's leadership. ." 
 
B) "`Rising' in China, But Whether It Is `Peaceful' Or 
Not Is up to the United States?" 
 
The pro-unification "United Daily News" [circulation: 
600,000] editorialized (7/22): 
 
"The U.S. Department of Defense's `2005 Annual Report 
on the Military Power of the People's Republic of 
China' was finally released.  In general, this report 
gives people the core impression that the United States 
believes China's `rise' is a fixed fact, but it is 
really up to the United States' evaluation to tell 
whether it is `peaceful' rising or not. . 
 
"The PRC believes that to handle the Taiwan issue, it 
requires the heightened and international level of 
military attentiveness [of the People's Liberation 
Army] and that without such preparedness, China can not 
possibly maintain a deterrence force that is capable of 
`attacking [Taiwan] the moment it declares 
independence.'  The U.S. side, however, believes that 
military preparedness by the PRC has posed an 
international threat.  Washington thus reminded the 
Beijing authorities that China is now standing at a 
`strategic crossroad' in an attempt to turn [China's 
military buildup] into a matter that is beyond `Taiwan 
independence.'  Thus, in terms of the `Taiwan 
independence' issue, Beijing [believes that it] can 
remain peaceful as long as it maintains [its principle 
of] `attacking [Taiwan] the moment it declares 
independence,' but for the United States, it also 
enjoys the liberty of which it could seize a pretext to 
make it [i.e. China's rise] not so peaceful. 
 
"It is noteworthy that the `National Security Report' 
that President Chen Shui-bian is currently working on 
also focuses on China's `peaceful rise.'  In the 
report, [Chen] also seeks to expound China's rise as a 
threat to the Asia-Pacific region and to the world, and 
[he even attempts] to imply that the rise of China will 
pose a threat to the United States' position as a sole 
superpower.  Such a perception is obviously the one 
that is generally held by the Western hegemonies toward 
China, and it is also a perception that treats Taiwan 
as a foot soldier attendant going before these Western 
hegemonies.  This perception may not really meet the 
true reality . of China's rise and it may even fail to 
meet the strategic views of Taiwan's multiple 
interests. ." 
 
C) "Independence Ideology More Dangerous Than Arms 
Shortage" 
 
The conservative, pro-unification, English-language 
"China Post" [circulation: 30,000] commented in an 
editorial (7/22): 
 
". Observers in Taiwan indicated that one of the 
purposes of the Pentagon report is to lure Taiwan into 
purchasing more U.S.-made weapons and to force Taiwan's 
lawmakers to approve the Chen Shui-bian 
administration's plan to buy NT$618 billion in military 
equipment from the U.S. . 
 
"In fact, a fundamental reason that Taiwan faces a 
grave threat from the mainland is the ruling Democratic 
Progressive Party's independence ideology. .  This 
tendency [to make Taiwan an independent state] is the 
main contributing factor to the tensions in the Taiwan 
Strait. 
 
"As long as Taiwan is ruled by independence-minded 
politicians, the island will continue to face a serious 
military threat from across the strait, regardless of 
how much it spends on improving its military arsenal." 
 
D) "Facing the Reality of PRC Armed Threat" 
 
The pro-independence, English-language "Taiwan News" 
[circulation: 20,000] editorialized (7/22): 
 
". We believe that the reality of the PRC's rising 
military clout and its declared willingness to even its 
nuclear capabilities to prevent what it defines as a 
`Taiwan independence event' cannot be ignored.  The 
people of Taiwan cannot blithely assume that either 
Washington or Tokyo will risk - or will be allowed by 
their citizens to risk - their lives for the sake of 
defending Taiwan form PRC attack for any reason 
whatsoever. 
 
"Therefore, any Taiwan government must place the 
defense of our democracy and autonomy as the highest 
priority, exercise considerable caution in dealing with 
cross-strait relations and should refrain from 
unnecessarily provoking Beijing's Chinese Communist 
Party regime while working to strengthen Taiwan's 
political, economic, social, culture, diplomatic and 
defense fundamentals. . 
 
"While we do not believe that more weapons offer 
absolute protection, we also believe that the DPP 
administration's call on the opposition-dominated 
Legislature to approve the draft special law for 
defensive military procurements is also a responsible 
action to prevent a rapid and dangerous imbalance in 
the cross-strait military equation. ..." 
 
2. Renminbi Revalued 
 
"[Renminbi] Slightly Appreciates Two Percent in 
Response to the United States' Call" 
 
Journalist Wang Li-chuan wrote in a news analysis of 
the pro-unification "United Daily News" [circulation: 
600,000] (7/22): 
 
". Since the beginning of 2005, the international 
community, especially the United States, has been 
demanding for the appreciation of renminbi.  At last, 
Beijing was no longer able to withstand the pressure 
and let renminbi appreciate for a small percentage. 
This move can be accounted as giving `a response' to 
the United States.  It is also meant to express China's 
sincerity in improving the U.S.-China trade deficit. 
On the surface, China has to demonstrate that it is not 
succumbing to U.S. pressure.  The reevaluation is 
taking the `Chinese pace.'  It is following the 
principle of `proactiveness, controllability, and 
gradualism,' as instructed by Premier Wen Jiabao.  The 
scale of the appreciation is quite small.  Whether the 
United States will accept this or will continue to 
exert pressure is the focus for observation. ." 
 
PAAL