Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05COLOMBO1158, SRI LANKA NOT OPPOSED TO SETHUSAMUDRAM SHIP CANAL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05COLOMBO1158.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05COLOMBO1158 2005-07-05 11:00 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Colombo
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 001158 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR SA/INS: JBRENNIG; NDEAN 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON PREL ETRD SENV CE ECONOMICS
SUBJECT: SRI LANKA NOT OPPOSED TO SETHUSAMUDRAM SHIP CANAL 
PROJECT 
 
1.  Summary: The Government of Sri Lanka (GSL) is reconciled 
to the implementation of the Sethusamudram project as it is 
within the territorial waters of Sri Lanka.  This project 
proposes the linking of the Arabian sea with the Bay of Bengal 
by dredging shallow waters to the north of Sri Lanka, thereby 
creating a navigable canal across the Indian Peninsula.  The GSL 
does not currently oppose the project but is awaiting further 
environmental studies to make a determination 
regarding its impact on Sri Lanka.  While no major economic 
implications for the shipping industry are anticipated by the 
GSL or the private sector, environmental implications have not 
been fully examined, according to officials at Ministry of 
Foreign Affairs (MFA) and Secretary of Environment.  End 
Summary. 
 
2. The Sethusamudram Project is aimed at creating a continuous 
navigation channel connecting the west and east coasts of India. 
Currently, domestic ships from the west coast of India as well 
as ships from western countries have to traverse around Sri 
Lanka to reach the east coast, due to the existing shallow 
waterway between the countries, which is not sufficient for 
movement of ships. 
 
3. The Managing Director (MD) of the Sri Lanka Ports Authority 
(SLPA) informed EconFSN that although some shipping business 
could be affected, it would not be significant.  Transshipment 
and large container vessels are not likely to be impacted due to 
the proposed draft of the canal (draft is the depth of water a 
ship draws when fully loaded).  The initial estimate of the 
draft of the proposed canal is approximately 10 meters with 
provision for subsequent expansion up to 12 meters according to 
the MD of SLPA.  Therefore, large ship traffic to Colombo will 
not be affected, unless the draft of the canal is increased to 
14.5 meters.  At a later period, if the draft of the canal is 
extended over 14.5 meters, the GSL would consider converting 
regional ports located in the northeast parts of the country for 
container traffic. 
 
4. Current expansion plans for the ports of Hambantota and 
Colombo will not change due to this project and will proceed as 
planned.   Existing plans call for Hambantota Port in southern 
Sri Lanka to be converted to a container port, while a port 
extension project in Colombo is being designed to accommodate 
more ships and larger ships. 
 
5.  A Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) source has informed Post 
that the External Affairs Minister of India has assured the GSL 
that India will ensure bi-lateral ties are not affected due to 
implementation of this project.  The Secretary to the MFA has 
been appointed chairman of an inter-ministerial committee to 
oversee the project. The MFA says that its immediate concern on 
Sethusumadram is that discussions between the joint India/Sri 
Lanka technical committee that was appointed to study 
environmental impact of the project continue.  The committee met 
in January 2005 and is scheduled to meet again in July. 
According to MFA, no conclusive research has been done that has 
allowed Sri Lanka to formulate a position either for or against 
the project.  MFA is waiting for baseline reports by GSL 
environmental agencies to make further determinations.  The 
Chairman of the Natural Aquatic Resources Agency (NARA) informed 
EconFSN that a Rapid Assessment Report has been submitted to the 
MFA on this project. 
 
6. Local environmentalists charge that this project could have 
several implications detrimental to Sri Lanka's ecosystem. Some 
of the concerns put forward include, change of currents that 
could cause varying water temperature, increased salinity, a 
rise in sea level, disturbance of sea beds -- having 
considerable negative consequences for fisheries industry, oil 
spills and pollution, dispersion of invasive species into 
currently protected seas, adverse affects of dredging, changes 
to currents and coastal erosion/depositions.  All of these 
problems pose risks to the marine ecosystem in the region, 
especially the western and south western coastal region of Sri 
Lanka -- one of the most valuable in terms of biodiversity in 
the Indian subcontinent. 
 
7.  NARA, on the other hand, claims that there is a dearth of 
data on existing ecosystems, which has to be established in 
order to evaluate the effects of the proposed project and 
evaluate proposed measures to mitigate negative impact.  A lack 
of information about areas such as coral reefs, aquatic plants, 
endangered fish, water exchanges and effect of extreme changes 
in ecosystems hampers proper review of the possible 
environmental impact.  NRA advocates a joint Sri Lanka/India 
Environmental Impact Assessment on the project. 
 
6. Senior private-sector shipping officials are of the view that 
this project was never intended to draw shipping business away 
from Sri Lanka, but rather for Indian security-related purposes. 
An MFA official also endorsed this view and stated that an 
increased Naval presence in the area could have a positive 
outcome for Sri Lanka.  The private sector claims the canal 
would save ships no more than 24-hour in travel time (by 
avoiding the more southerly route around Sri Lanka) and that 
ships will not be able to sail at maximum speed through the 
canal.  When combined with the probable need for pilots to 
navigate the canal, major international ship owners will likely 
not have much interest in using the proposed canal.  Domestic 
Indian shipping from east to west, however, will benefit from 
the project. 
 
7. Comment: While environmental groups have raised some concerns 
about Sethusamudram, there is not much apprehension on the part 
of the GSL or the shipping community regarding the 
implementation of the project. Unless subsequent studies reveal 
severe environmental impacts for the country, Sri Lanka is not 
likely to object to its implementation. 
 
LUNSTEAD