Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05BOGOTA6521, CODEL THOMAS DELIVERS HARD MESSAGE TO COLOMBIANS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05BOGOTA6521.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05BOGOTA6521 2005-07-12 17:53 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Bogota
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BOGOTA 006521 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
DEPT PLS PASS USTR FOR RVARGO AND BHARMAN 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ETRD EAGR FTA
SUBJECT: CODEL THOMAS DELIVERS HARD MESSAGE TO COLOMBIANS 
ABOUT ATPDEA AND THE FTA 
 
Sensitive but Unclassified -- please protect accordingly. 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary.  During his meetings in Bogota, Chairman 
Thomas delivered a clear message that ATPDEA will not be 
renewed and that the window for successfully negotiating a 
U.S.-Andean-FTA was closing rapidly. President Uribe, 
Agricultural Minister Arias and Trade Minister Botero all 
argued that the security situation in Colombia merited 
special consideration, but Chairman Thomas was clear that 
while we could be creative within the framework of the 
agreements already negotiated, new, special mechanisms were 
out of the question.  Chairman Thomas also held a press 
conference during which he repeated these assertions.  End 
Summary. 
 
The Chairman,s Message 
---------------------- 
 
2.  (SBU)  During his meetings in Bogota, Chairman Thomas 
delivered the same message:  he was visiting Colombia, Peru 
and Ecuador because he was worried about the current state of 
play of the FTA negotiations and he wanted to tell this to 
the leaders of the countries.  He added that ATPDEA would not 
be renewed by the U.S. Congress, therefore failing an Andean 
FTA, Colombia would face the worst scenario: no ATPDEA, no 
FTA, and Central America-DR, Mexico and Chile all enjoying 
free access to the U.S. market.  Thomas, third major point 
was that the window for negotiating an Andean FTA was really 
in late 2003 and early 2004.  After a tough CAFTA fight, he 
explained, it was difficult to imagine much support for 
pushing through the Andean agreement, with its similarities 
to CAFTA on sugar, labor, environment and agriculture. 
Finally, Chairman Thomas made clear that the U.S. Congress 
considered previous FTA,s as the template that had to be 
followed and it would be impossible to approve any agreement 
that featured radically different mechanisms, such as 
permanent safeguards against distortions caused by internal 
subsidies.  Democratic Codel member Stephanie Tubbs-Jones 
noted her opposition to CAFTA and was emphatic on the need 
for a strong labor chapter. Reps. Shaw, Weller and Nunes 
echoed the chairman,s messages. 
 
Minister Arias 
-------------- 
2.  (SBU)  Minister Arias emphasized the importance of 
gaining special treatment for Colombian agriculture due to 
the importance of the rural sector in the fight against drugs 
and terrorism.  Chairman Thomas responded by noting that 
there are many countries asking for special treatment for 
different reasons, but any agreement will have to fit into 
the overall framework of what we have agreed with other 
countries.   Min. Arias pressed for the need for real access 
to the U.S. market and a clear and agile mechanism for 
handling SPS issues.  He then concluded by complaining about 
the lack of response to Colombian agricultural and SPS 
proposals.  Chairman Thomas responded that as long as they 
are making proposals that don't fall into the framework of 
what was done previously in other U.S. FTA's, then the U.S. 
couldn,t move forward.  The U.S. wants to move, but it has 
to be in the context of opening the market.  The Chairman 
went on to say that delaying the negotiations is not to the 
advantage of Colombia.  Colombia has had a window of 
opportunity to negotiate the FTA, but this is closing fast. 
 
Minister Botero/Chief Negotiator Gomez 
-------------------------------------- 
3.  (SBU)  Minister Botero responded to Chairman Thomas, 
comments by stating that Colombia also faces political 
realities and has to negotiate a deal that could pass in its 
Congress.  Botero also stated that while Colombia had 
demonstrated political will to move the agreement forward, he 
had not seen comparable will on the part of U.S. negotiators 
due to the CAFTA approval process.  Botero, like Minister 
Arias, pointed out that the U.S. had yet to respond to many 
offers on the table and until the GOC saw U.S. engagement, it 
was difficult to put anything but the most conservative 
offers on the table.  Botero stressed the need for real 
access to the U.S. market for Colombian agriculture.  He 
stated that without this, and the SPS permanent committee 
needed to achieve this, then Colombia would gain very little 
in the agriculture sector under an FTA.   Chairman Thomas 
committed to getting a response from the U.S. on Colombia's 
agriculture proposals.  FTA lead negotiator Gomez added that 
the GOC was worried about the timetable and the lack of U.S. 
response.  He and Botero stated that the GOC was looking for 
pragmatic solutions to the remaining issues, but both sides 
had to engage to achieve those solutions and the U.S. was not 
engaging.  The key, according to Gomez, was a balanced 
agreement where one side does not get primary products and 
the other everything else.  Gomez added that Colombia 
understood it had to open up many markets, but in some areas 
of agriculture, they had to insure the survival of some 
domestic production to maintain the rural sector populated, 
or else face increasing instability and insecurity. 
 
President Uribe 
--------------- 
4.  (SBU)  The President welcomed the Codel and thanked the 
chairman for his efforts to support Colombia, especially 
during the renewal of ATPDEA.  He stressed the important link 
between agricultural employment and security and explained 
this was the reason why Colombia needed additional 
flexibility to protect a basic group of products (corn, 
chicken leg quarters, rice, beans, and oilseeds).  The rural 
sector was also important because it was a quarter of the 
Colombian population, and there were many more in the cities 
that depended on the sector and agro-industry for their 
livelihood.  Uribe added that he understood that a bilateral 
FTA could not hinder the U.S.,s ability to use internal 
supports for agriculture, but he felt that the agreement must 
then allow countries some mechanism to offset the 
distortionary effects of those subsidies.  Chairman Thomas 
responded that the Congress would simply not approve such 
mechanisms, but he pledged to work with Colombia and use all 
his creativity to find solutions for these issues that fell 
within the existing framework created by previous agreements. 
 President Uribe also asked the Chairman,s assistance in 
obtaining U.S. responses to the Colombian agricultural, SPS 
and intellectual property offers.  Chairman Thomas promised 
to contact USTR upon his return to get the process moving. 
Uribe also made a geopolitical argument about the importance 
of the FTA, stating that Colombia was a strong supporter of 
the U.S. while Brazil was trying to supplant the U.S.,s 
leadership and Venezuela was trying to buy a leadership role 
with cheap oil.  Uribe also pointed out the instability in 
the region and the negative signal that would be sent if the 
U.S. were unable to conclude an FTA with as strong an ally as 
Colombia. 
 
5.  (SBU)  Congressman Weller asked President Uribe about 
implementation of the peace and justice law.  The President 
responded that over 12,000 members of terrorist groups had 
turned themselves in, of which 55 percent were AUC and 45 
percent guerillas.  The President defended the law, stating 
that this time there would be penalties and no amnesty, like 
there was for the M-19.  Moreover, those who were solely 
narco-traffickers would not have any benefits under the law, 
and those who committed human rights abuses would have to 
serve sentences and would have no amnesty or pardon.  The 
President also stated that extradition would be permitted 
under the law and used the case of AUC leader Salvatore 
Mancuso to demonstrate his point.  The President suspended 
the GOC,s consideration of the extradition so long as 
Mancuso lived up to the terms of his demobilization.  If he 
were to violate them, then the President would allow the 
extradition process to move forward. 
 
6.   (SBU) Congresswoman Tubbs-Jones raised the issue of 
labor violence with the President.  He responded that the 
cornerstone of his administration was the concept of security 
for everyone.  He related that when he took power in 2002, 
161 labor leaders were killed and 400 of 1096 mayors could 
not exercise their duties because of guerilla threats. 
Today, there might be one or two mayors that are having such 
security problems and the Colombian government is doing 
everything in its power to eliminate these problems.  The 
President added that this year only five labor leaders have 
been killed, but that is five too many.  His goal was to 
eliminate violence against labor leaders, against mayors, and 
against the civilian population.  According to the President, 
the only way to ensure continued support for his democratic 
security program was to make sure that everyone shared in its 
benefits. 
 
Press Play 
---------- 
 
7.  (U)  Chairman Thomas, comments during his press 
conference received wide coverage in both print and 
television.  Front-page headlines in top business dailies 
repeated his statement that ATPDEA would not be renewed and 
his concern that the negotiations were not moving fast 
enough.  Minister Botero, in a statement published on the 
presidency,s website, characterized the visit as positive 
and highlighted the Chairman,s promise to seek U.S. 
responses to Colombian offers on agriculture.  The 
Chairman,s message has also resonated with the business 
community, who appreciated his frank appraisal of the 
situation. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
8.  (SBU)  Overall the visit was successful in ensuring the 
GOC understands the political realities of trade 
liberalization in Washington.  Chairman Thomas' clear 
explanation of what the U.S. was seeking helped the ministers 
and President Uribe see our positions in a realistic light. 
Post has already followed up with the Codel's Colombian 
interlocutors to reinforce the message starting with a phone 
call by the Ambassador to Minister Botero.  We will continue 
to follow-up before the next round in Miami.  End Comment. 
WOOD