Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05DHAKA2570, Media Reaction: Koran Desecration and NewsWeek; Dhaka

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05DHAKA2570.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05DHAKA2570 2005-06-05 07:24 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Dhaka
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 DHAKA 002570 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR I/FW, B/G, IIP/G/NEA-SA, B/VOA/N (BANGLA SERVICE) 
ALSO FOR SA/PAB, SA/PPD (LSCENSNY, SSTRYKER), SA/RA, INR/R/MR, 
DEPT PASS TO USAID FOR ANE/ASIA/SA/B (WJOHNSON) 
CINCPAC FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR, J51 (MAJ TURNER), J45 
(MAJ NICHOLLS) 
USARPAC FOR APOP-IM (MAJ HEDRICK) 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KMDR OIIP OPRC KPAO PREL ETRD PTER ASEC BG OCII
SUBJECT: Media Reaction: Koran Desecration and NewsWeek; Dhaka 
 
 
Summary:  The readers are mature enough to understand that 
the retraction of the story was not because of violent 
demonstrations by angry Muslim crowds in a number of 
countries because that could have been foreseen. It is 
obvious to them that tremendous pressure was brought to bear 
on Newsweek to plead guilty by powerful quarters. By 
capitulating to extraneous pressure Newsweek has seriously 
impaired the trust and confidence of many of its readers. 
Great damage has been done to the image of the magazine, not 
because of publishing the story about abuse of the Holy 
Quran but by retracting the story under duress.  The paper 
has been exposed as being afraid of telling the truth in the 
face of coaxing and cajoling. Readers don't have to be told 
what `anonymous source' exerted pressure. By capitulating to 
that `source', Newsweek will now lack credibility in respect 
of many of the stories it they might publish in future. For 
this breach of trust with the readers the magazine can only 
blame itself. 
 
Following are excerpts from the op-ed article: 
------------------------------ 
Koran Desecration and Newsweek 
------------------------------ 
"Newsweek's News" 
Independent English language newspaper "New Age" op-ed 
article by columnist Hasnat Abdul Hye comments (6/5/05): 
 
For a newsmagazine that brings news and publishes comments 
on current national and international affairs it must have 
been a humbling experience to be in the limelight across the 
world. That the publicity it received after a news scoop led 
to violent demonstrations, bloody crackdowns by authorities 
and widespread condemnation of the act reported in the news 
scoop, could only have enhanced its embarrassment. The 
saving grace for Newsweek was that those who showed their 
indignation after the publication of the news did not kill 
the messenger. They targeted the American Administration as 
the perpetrator of the sacrilegious act. But Newsweek had to 
pay a price for spilling the beans because those who were 
exposed by the news wanted the readers of Newsweek to 
believe that there was no beans to spill and it was all 
rumor. Newsweek retracted the news and apologized to the 
readers and to the families of those who had died in the 
protest demonstrations set off by the news. This is 
extraordinary for a new magazine that has been savvy in 
handling news, particularly sensitive ones. Its selection of 
news, particularly news scoops, goes through a rigorous 
process of checks and re-cheeks. 
 
Given this sensitivity of the editorial board, it is 
unthinkable that the news in question just slipped through 
the normal scrutiny of senior editors of Newsweek. The fact 
that the news involved Guantanamo Bay (Gitmo) detainees and 
the Holy Quran make it highly improbable that Newsweek's 
board of editors did not realize the potential of world wide 
repercussions among the Muslims over the news about 
desecration of Holy Quran in Gitmo. Like every other agency 
in America, Newsweek knew very well that America's 
credibility and honor had gone down sharply in the past two 
years in the Muslim world where the militants never fail to 
miss an opportunity to give vent to their anger against 
their antagonist through violent attacks. It is impossible 
to think that the editorial board of Newsweek did not know 
about the serious consequences that the publication of the 
news would have. But this knowledge did not deter them from 
revealing the truth because they thought that such 
revelation is in the highest tradition of media that is 
built on the trust of readers. 
 
Newsweek enhanced the trust of majority of its readers by 
publishing the news about guards flushing down the Holy 
Quran in toilets in Guantanamo Bay. It was an unpleasant 
truth to be told by an American news magazine because it 
knew that its publication would bring the wrath of the 
Muslim world against the American administration and by 
extension, the American people. It took a lot of courage and 
moral certitude to stick to the truth. 
 
The news scoop on the defilement of the Holy Quran was made 
by Michael Issikoff who had unearthed the Clinton - Lewinsky 
scandal and won praise for accuracy and objectivity. He is 
by now an old hand in dealing with anonymous and 
confidential sources for breaking news. So it cannot be 
 
SIPDIS 
suspected that he was amateurish and rash in using the 
confidential source before writing the story in `Newsweek's 
 
SIPDIS 
Periscope column about desecration of the Holy Quran by 
guards in Guantanamo Bay detention center(Gitmo) to 
humiliate and unnerve the hardcore detainees. In fact the 
new was already known to Defense department officials who 
were briefed by the International Committee of the Red Cross 
(ICRC) about prison personnel disrespecting or mishandling 
copies of the Holy Quran at Gitmo as early as 2002. 
According to a spokesperson of ICRC, the organization had 
provided several instances that it believed were credible. 
 
The contradiction and pusillanimity in the (Newsweek's 
retraction) statement is mind-boggling. If the story was 
written `ethically' and `professionally', relying on a 
`historically reliable government source' and `provided to 
senior defense department officials who did not object to 
the allegations', why should Newsweek feel guilty about the 
publication of the story? What is the mistake involved in 
taking the defense official's silence for confirmation of 
the story? That is how stories are checked and conclusions 
drawn by the media. Newsweek's hand wringing and retraction 
of the story following the furors that erupted in the Muslim 
world amount to almost intellectual dishonesty. Having gone 
through a process of checking and getting confirmation about 
the news meticulously there was no scope and necessity of 
mea culpa. 
 
Very few would deny that Newsweek maintained the highest 
standard of news gathering in this case. There was no lapse 
on its part in following the traditional procedures for news- 
gathering of this type. There is, of course, always room for 
improving the standard for the use of anonymous sources, as 
the Editor-in-Chief has mentioned in his letter. But it does 
not mean that he or his magazine has to disown what was done 
in good faith and with due diligence. For publishing a 
straightforward and honest news story it earned great esteem 
and confidence from the readers who could appreciate the 
risk it was taking by telling the truth. The readers are 
mature enough to understand that the retraction of the story 
was not because of the violent demonstrations by angry 
Muslim crowds in a number of countries because it could not 
be unforeseen. It is obvious to them that tremendous 
pressure was brought to bear on Newsweek to plead guilty by 
powerful quarters. By capitulating to extraneous pressure 
the Newsweek has seriously impaired the trust and confidence 
of many of its readers. Great damage has been done to the 
image of the magazine, not because of publishing the story 
about abuse of the Holy Quran but by retracting the story 
under duress. The paper has been exposed as being afraid of 
telling the truth in the face of coaxing and cajoling. The 
readers don't have to be told what is the `anonymous source' 
from where pressure was exerted. By capitulating to that 
`source', Newsweek will now lack credibility in respect of 
many of the stories it they might publish in future. For 
this breach of trust with the readers the magazine can only 
blame itself. 
 
Chammas