Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05COLOMBO1034, SUPREME COURT OVERTURNS CONVICTIONS IN LANDMARK

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05COLOMBO1034.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05COLOMBO1034 2005-06-09 11:35 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Colombo
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 COLOMBO 001034 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR SA/INS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PHUM PGOV CE
SUBJECT: SUPREME COURT OVERTURNS CONVICTIONS IN LANDMARK 
HUMAN RIGHTS CASE 
 
 
-------- 
SUMMARY 
-------- 
 
1.  (SBU)  ON MAY 27, THE SUPREME COURT OF SRI LANKA 
EXONERATED THE FOUR REMAINING MEN CONVICTED OF PARTICIPATING 
IN THE BINDUNUWEWA MASSACRE OF OCTOBER 2000, WHICH LEFT 27 
TAMIL YOUTHS DEAD AND 14 INJURED AT A DETENTION CENTER IN 
BADULLA DISTRICT.  THE FIFTH SUSPECT WAS ACQUITTED IN JULY 
2004.  THE ORIGINAL CONVICTIONS HANDED DOWN BY THE HIGH 
COURT WERE OVERTURNED ON APPEAL, ON THE GROUNDS THAT THERE 
WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO CONVICT THE FIVE SINHALESE 
SUSPECTS.  AS A RESULT OF THE RULING, NO ONE HAS BEEN 
CHARGED IN THE HIGH PROFILE AND ETHNICALLY SENSITIVE CASE, A 
SIGN OF THE INABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM TO HOLD GUILTY 
PARTIES ACCOUNTABLE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.  THE 
FAILURE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF SRI LANKA (GSL) TO IDENTIFY THE 
PERPETRATORS AND PUNISH THEM WILL ADD TO THE GRIEVANCES OF 
THE TAMIL COMMUNITY AND COULD AGGRAVATE MISTRUST ACROSS 
ETHNIC LINES.  END SUMMARY. 
 
-------------------- 
SURPRISE ACQUITTALS 
-------------------- 
 
2.  (U)  ON MAY 27, THE SUPREME COURT OVERTURNED THE 
CONVICTIONS OF THE REMAINING FOUR SUSPECTS TAGGED WITH THE 
KILLINGS OF 27 TAMIL INMATES AT A DETENTION CENTER FOR 
UNDERAGE LTTE CADRES IN OCTOBER 2000.  THE INMATES INCLUDED 
THOSE WHO WERE SEEKING ASYLUM FROM THE LIBERATION TAMIL 
TIGERS EELAM (LTTE) AND THOSE SUSPECTED OF BEING LTTE CHILD 
SOLDIERS, RANGING IN AGE FROM 10 TO 31.  THE ATTACK OCCURRED 
ON OCTOBER 24, 2000, WHEN INMATES AT THE BINDUNUWEWA 
DETENTION CENTER IN BADULLA DISTRICT BEGAN TO COMPLAIN THAT 
THEY WERE BEING HELD PAST THEIR EXPECTED DATE OF RELEASE. 
AFTER THE COMPLAINTS ESCALATED INTO A PROTEST, A SHOT WAS 
FIRED BY A POLICE OFFICER AND AN INMATE ATTACKED ANOTHER 
POLICE OFFICER.  THE FOLLOWING MORNING, VILLAGERS INVADED 
THE CAMP AND CLUBBED, STABBED, AND BURNED INMATES ALIVE, 
KILLING 27 AND WOUNDING 14.  ACCORDING TO EYEWITNESS 
TESTIMONY, THE POLICE OFFICERS DID NOTHING TO PREVENT THE 
CROWD FROM ATTACKING THE INMATES AND SHOT SOME OF THE 
INMATES TRYING TO ESCAPE THEIR ATTACKERS.  FURTHERMORE, THE 
POLICE REPORTEDLY PLACED TEAR GAS IN A NEARBY QUARRY SEVERAL 
DAYS AFTER THE ATTACK, FAILED TO SUBMIT ALL PHOTOS TAKEN BY 
A POLICE PHOTOGRAPHER AFTER THE INCIDENT, AND HID THEIR DUTY 
LOGS IN AN ATTEMPT TO MASK THEIR INACTION AND MISTAKES. 
 
3.  (SBU)  ON MARCH 8, 2001, PRESIDENT CHANDRIKA 
BANDARANAIKE KUMARATUNGA APPOINTED A PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION 
TO INVESTIGATE THE BINDUNUWEWA MASSACRE TO DETERMINE THE 
INDIVIDUALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ATTACK.  THE REPORT ISSUED 
TO THE PRESIDENT BY THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDED 
THAT DISCIPLINARY ACTION BE TAKEN AGAINST THE FOLLOWING 
POLICE OFFICERS FOR DERELICTION OF DUTY: A.W. DAYARATNE, 
R.M.T.K. JAYANTHA SENEVIRATNE, S.J. KARUNASENA, N.G.S. 
WALPOLA, T. RATNAYAKE, K.W.C.N. ABEYNARAYANA, Y.K. 
ABEYRATNE, AND P. ABEYRATNE. 
 
4.  (U)  IN JULY 2003, THE HIGH COURT OF COLOMBO CONVICTED 
THREE VILLAGERS AND TWO POLICE OFFICERS OF PARTICIPATING IN 
AN UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY.  CIVILIANS D.M.S DISSANAYAKE, M.A. 
SAMMY, AND R.M. PREMANANDA WERE SENTENCED TO DEATH ALONG 
WITH POLICE OFFICERS J. KARUNASENA AND T. RATNAYAKE. 
ALTHOUGH IT WAS UNCLEAR WHETHER THE POLICE OFFICERS INDICTED 
ACTUALLY SHOT THE INMATES, THEIR FAILURE TO ARREST OFFENDERS 
AND PREVENT THE ATTACK LEGALLY MADE THEM PART OF THE 
UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY.  ALL FIVE APPEALED THEIR CONVICTIONS TO 
THE SUPREME COURT. 
 
5.  (U)  ON MAY 27, 2005, THE SUPREME COURT OVERTURNED THE 
COLOMBO HIGH COURT RULING, CITING A LACK OF EVIDENCE TO 
CONVICT THE FOUR MEN.  (SIMILARLY, THE SUPREME COURT HAD 
ACQUITTED T. RATNAYAKE IN JULY 2004 DUE TO INSUFFICIENT 
EVIDENCE.)   EYEWITNESSES CLAIMING TO HAVE SEEN THE 
CONVICTED MEN PARTICIPATE IN THE ATTACK RECANTED THEIR 
STORIES IN FRONT OF THE SUPREME COURT, THUS THE SUPREME 
COURT RULED THAT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT SUGGESTED GUILT 
ON THE PART OF THE FIVE SINHALESE INDIVIDUALS.  THE SUPREME 
COURT ALSO FOUND THAT THE HIGH COURT JUSTICES HAD MADE 
ERRORS IN HOW THEY ANALYZED THE WITNESSES' TESTIMONY. 
 
--------------- 
EXPERT OPINIONS 
--------------- 
 
6.  (U)  ON JUNE 2, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH (HRW) ISSUED A PRESS 
RELEASE URGING A REINVESTIGATION TO IDENTIFY THOSE 
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MASSACRE, INCLUDING TOP-LEVEL POLICE 
OFFICIALS.  THE HRW STATEMENT POINTED OUT THAT ALTHOUGH THE 
PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION CITED THE LOCAL POLICE COMMANDERS 
DAYARATNE AND SENEVIRATNE FOR DERELICTION OF DUTY, THESE 
OFFICERS HAVE NOT BEEN INDICTED OR PUNISHED.  THE HRW 
STATEMENT ALSO SAID THE GROUP IS CONCERNED THAT THE SUPREME 
COURT DID NOT EXERCISE IMPARTIALITY, ACCUSING THE JUSTICES 
OF BEING OPENLY HOSTILE TOWARDS THE PROSECUTION. 
 
7.  (U)  ON MAY 30, THE ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION (AHRC) 
RELEASED A STATEMENT CALLING FOR THE RESIGNATION OF THE 
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (IGP) CHANDRA FERNANDO, IF HE 
FAILS TO INVESTIGATE THE DERELICTION OF DUTY BY POLICE 
OFFICERS IN THE BINDUNUWEWA MASSACRE.  THE AHRC ACCUSES THE 
SRI LANKAN JUSTICE SYSTEM OF BEING DEFECTIVE AND ENSURING 
IMMUNITY FOR OFFENDERS.  IN ADDITION, THE STATEMENT OF AHRC 
ENCOURAGED THE SRI LANKAN PEOPLE TO SPEAK OUT AGAINST WHAT 
IT DESCRIBES AS THE BIASED JUDICIAL SYSTEM. 
 
8.  (SBU)  SALIYA PIERIS, ATTORNEY-AT-LAW OF THE SUPREME 
COURT OF COLOMBO, TOLD A POLITICAL INTERN THAT HE BELIEVES 
THE RULING IS FAIR BECAUSE OF A LACK OF EVIDENCE.  THE 
INVESTIGATION SHOULD HAVE BEEN MORE THOROUGH AND THE 
INVESTIGATIVE UNIT SHOULD BE INDICTED, ACCORDING TO PIERIS. 
WHILE HE BELIEVES DISCIPLINARY ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 
AGAINST POLICE OFFICIALS, THEY SHOULD NOT BE CHARGED WITH 
PARTICIPATION IN AN UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY.  THE POLICE HAD TRIED 
TO CONTROL THE CROWD, ALTHOUGH THEY DID NOT EXPECT AND WERE 
NOT PREPARED TO HANDLE THE FEROCITY OF THE SITUATION, 
EXPLAINS PIERIS. 
 
9.  (SBU)  ACHALA WENGAPPULI, STATE COUNSEL OF THE ATTORNEY 
GENERAL'S OFFICE OF COLOMBO, TOLD POLOFF THAT HE AGREED WITH 
THE RULING THAT THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE FOR 
CONVICTIONS.  WENGAPPULI STATED THAT A RE-INVESTIGATION 
COULD BE LAUNCHED TO TRY TO LOCATE THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE 
MASSACRE, BUT IT IS UNLIKELY THAT ANY NEW EVIDENCE WOULD 
SURFACE.  HE ALSO SAID THAT THE IGP, WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY 
TO TAKE PUNITIVE ACTION AGAINST POLICE OFFICIALS, WILL NOT 
EXERCISE HIS DISCIPLINARY POWER SINCE HE HAS NOT DONE SO IN 
REGARD TO THIS CASE TO DATE.  ANOTHER OPTION, WHICH 
WENGAPPULI THINKS WOULD LIKELY BE MORE FRUITFUL, IS FOR THE 
VICTIMS' FAMILIES TO BRING THE BINDUNUWEWA CASE BEFORE THE 
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE IN GENEVA.  (THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL 
ALLOWS THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE TO CONSIDER VIOLATIONS OF 
HUMAN RIGHTS EXPERIENCED BY INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE NOT 
REDRESSED BY HIS OR HER DOMESTIC GOVERNMENT.) 
 
10.  (SBU)  IN A JUNE 3 MEETING, RADHIKA COOMARASWAMY, 
CHAIRPERSON OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION IN SRI LANKA, 
TOLD A POLITICAL INTERN THAT SHE BELIEVES THE POLICE 
OFFICERS ARE GUILTY OF UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY IN THEIR FAILURE TO 
STOP THE ATTACK.  HOWEVER, SHE LAMENTED THE DIFFICULTY OF 
SUCCESSFULLY PROSECUTING CASES AGAINST POLICE OFFICERS. 
LIKE WENGAPPULI, SHE THINKS THE BEST OPTION IS FOR THE 
VICTIMS' FAMILIES TO BRING THE CASE TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS 
COMMITTEE TO SEEK COMPENSATION. 
 
11.  (SBU)  M. REMADIOUS, ATTORNEY-AT-LAW AT THE CENTER FOR 
HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEVELOPMENT, TOLD US THAT HE FEELS THE 
POLICE SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE MASSACRE AND 
SHOULD BE INDICTED.  HE CLAIMS THERE WAS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE 
SINCE A POLICE PHOTOGRAPHER TOOK PHOTOS OF THE AFTERMATH OF 
THE ATTACK.  HOWEVER, NOT ALL OF THE PHOTOS WERE SUBMITTED 
AND ONLY CUT-UP COPIES OF NEGATIVES WERE SUBMITTED FOR 
EVIDENCE, HE ACKNOWLEDGED.  REMADIOUS ASSERTS THAT IT IS NOT 
POSSIBLE TO BRING THIS CASE BEFORE THE HUMAN RIGHTS 
COMMITTEE BECAUSE IT IS AN "INTERIOR CRIMINAL CASE," AND 
THUS THERE IS NO BASIS TO TAKE THE CASE OUT OF THE COUNTRY. 
ALSO, HE NOTES THAT FIVE OF THE INMATES' BODIES WERE NOT 
IDENTIFIED SO IT WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE TO COMPENSATE THESE 
VICTIMS' RELATIVES. 
 
12.  (SBU)  RORY MUNGOVEN, HEAD OF THE FIELD PRESENCE OF THE 
UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION IN SRI LANKA, TOLD A 
POLITICAL INTERN THAT THE BINDUNUWEWA CASE COULD BE BROUGHT 
BEFORE THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE. THE VICTIMS' FAMILIES 
WOULD HAVE TO SHOW THAT ALL NATIONAL REMEDIES HAVE BEEN 
EXHAUSTED AND THAT THE GSL HAS FAILED UNDER THE UNITED 
NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COVENANT TO REDRESS THE GRIEVANCES OF 
THE VICTIMS, MUNGOVEN EXPLAINED.  HE PREDICTED THAT THE 
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE WOULD FIND IN FAVOR OF THE INMATES. 
IN THE PAST, THE GSL HAS FOLLOWED THE COMMITTEE'S 
SUGGESTIONS, SO MUNGOVEN BELIEVES THAT THE GSL WOULD 
COOPERATE AGAIN AND ISSUE COMPENSATION TO THE FAMILIES OF 
THOSE MASSACRED. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ------------- 
NORTH EAST SECRETARIAT ON HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES APPEAL TO UN 
--------------------------------------------- ------------- 
 
13.  (U)  THE LTTE-AFFILIATED NORTH EAST SECRETARIAT ON 
HUMAN RIGHTS (NESOHR) ISSUED AN URGENT APPEAL TO THE UNITED 
NATIONS HIGH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ABOUT THE 
BINDUNUWEWA CASE ON JUNE 8.  A STATEMENT BY THE NESOHR PUTS 
FORTH ITS CLAIM THAT A PATTERN HAS DEVELOPED IN RECENT YEARS 
IN WHICH THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM HAS RULED IN FAVOR OF SINHALESE 
DEFENDANTS ACCUSED OF COMMITTING VIOLENT ACTS AGAINST 
TAMILS.  THE FEW INVESTIGATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS 
HAVE YIELDED EVEN FEWER CONVICTIONS OF POLICE OFFICERS, THE 
NESOHR CONTENDS IN THE PRESS RELEASE. 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
14.  (SBU)  IT IS HARD TO BELIEVE THAT SUCH A HORRIFIC 
INCIDENT, WITH SO MANY PARTICIPANTS AND SO MANY SURVIVING 
VICTIMS, HAS PRODUCED NO RELIABLE EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY OR 
EVIDENCE TO CONVICT THE PERPETRATORS.  EVEN IF THE POLICE 
DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE ATTACK, THE POLICE OFFICERS IN 
CHARGE WOULD SEEM TO BEAR SOME RESPONSIBILITY FOR FAILING TO 
HALT THIS ATTACK.  THE FAILURE BY THE GSL TO PROSECUTE THESE 
GRISLY MURDERS WITH THEIR OBVIOUS ETHNIC OVERTONES WILL DO 
LITTLE TO PROMOTE TAMIL COMMUNITY CONFIDENCE IN GSL 
IMPARTIALITY. 
LUNSTEAD