Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05COLOMBO1031, GSL AIMS FOR MID-SUMMER MCA COMPACT PROPOSAL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05COLOMBO1031.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05COLOMBO1031 2005-06-09 10:52 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Colombo
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

091052Z Jun 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 COLOMBO 001031 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR SA/INS; MCC FOR D.NASSIRY; TREASURY FOR C. CARNES 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAID ECON EFIN CE
SUBJECT: GSL AIMS FOR MID-SUMMER MCA COMPACT PROPOSAL 
FOLLOWING REVIVED CONSULTATIONS 
 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary: The Government of Sri Lanka (GSL) has 
begun to use provincial-level meetings to form local 
steering committees to review the GSL's Millennium 
Challenge Account (MCA) Concept Paper and provide feedback 
to the Finance Ministry.  The process has largely been an 
effort to get validation of the Government's main 
priorities, though it does offer the local representatives 
an opportunity to raise other ideas for projects to spur 
economic growth.  Comments during the initial organizational 
meetings have ranged from interest in pet projects, with 
only tangential relevance to the key question of economic 
growth, to skepticism about one of the concept paper's main 
projects - the rehabilitation of rural irrigation reservoirs. 
We expect this latest stage of the consultative process to 
last through mid-June, and expect the GSL to formulate its 
compact proposal by sometime in August.  Overall, Post has 
been disappointed in the GSL effort at consultations, but 
hopes this latest effort serves to better inform their compact 
proposal.  We are highly dubious of the irrigation rehab 
project, though there may be scope to use it to spur other 
needed agriculture sector reforms.  We do believe the effort 
on the part of the business community to press for small and 
medium enterprise (SME) development programs, however, 
merits further scrutiny.  End Summary 
 
Provincial-level Consultative Process 
------------------------------------- 
2.  (SBU) Following a lackluster initial effort to develop 
a concept paper for its MCA proposal, and the intervening 
tsunami, which sidetracked most normal Government 
 
SIPDIS 
operations for the better part of four months, the GSL has 
commenced island-wide meetings to discuss the concept paper 
presented to the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) and 
further develop its compact proposal. 
 
3.  (U) The plan involves provincial-level meetings 
conducted by the Department of Development Finance (DDF) of 
the Ministry of Finance.  A wide cross section of 
provincial level representatives is invited to these 
meetings including government officials, provincial council 
members, politicians, NGO representatives, academics from 
regional universities, and regional chambers.  These 
meetings are used to form provincial steering committees, 
which are responsible for conducting additional meetings to 
review the concept paper, discuss economic problems in the 
area and draft submissions for consideration by the 
national steering committee in Colombo.  The provincial 
chief secretary, who is a GSL civil servant, chairs the 
steering committee in each province. 
 
4.  (SBU) Already, the DDF has held six initial meetings in 
the following provinces: Central, North Central, Wayamba, 
Sabargamuwa, Uva and Western Provinces.  Emboffs have 
attended two of the meetings.  There were approximately 100 
participants at each meeting.  The meetings have provided 
information on the MCA (its intentions, requirements, and 
country selection) and the initial concept paper presented 
by the GSL, and appointed steering committees to continue 
discussions at the provincial level.  The meetings appear 
to be used primarily to ask for advice to fine tune 
existing project proposals, rather than discuss problems 
and approaches to solving underlying challenges to economic 
growth.  For example, the GSL's approach tends to be one of 
asking leading questions such as "which irrigation 
reservoirs are most in need of repair" or "which roads 
should we repair to give the greatest local benefit?" 
 
5.  (U) While these initial provincial-level meetings are 
not consultations, but planning meetings to start 
provincial level discussions, the audiences have mostly 
sought clarifications about the MCA program and funding 
opportunities.  In the two meetings Post attended, 
participants mostly inquired about funds for projects 
related to their personal interests.  For example, one 
person asked if funds would be available for housing; 
another, a medical practitioner, proposed assistance to 
improve the availability of health-related personnel, while 
a youth activist asked if funds could be used to build 
recreational facilities.   All suggested that their 
programs could have indirect benefits to economic growth. 
 
6.  (SBU) Unfortunately, the meetings do not appear to have 
been used to discuss fundamental issues like economic 
constraints in each province, reasons for persistent 
poverty or how best to overcome such problems.  We expect 
the appointed steering committees to look into these 
questions. 
 
Perceptions from Meeting Participants 
-------------------------------------- 
7.  (SBU) During the meetings, Emboffs had the opportunity 
to meet civil servants from the provinces, with wide 
ranging experience working in rural districts.  As for the 
GSL's favored irrigation reservoir rehabilitation program, 
the Provincial Planning Secretary for Sabaragamuwa province 
told Emboffs that supplying water to farmers in her area 
would not do much to lift farmers out of poverty. 
Subsistence farmers who have small plots and engage in low- 
tech farming methods do most of the farming in the area. 
She said that unless steps are taken to resolve land 
problems and improve agricultural productivity, an 
irrigation rehabilitation program alone would not 
substantially increase economic growth.  Such a limited 
program would more likely promote continued subsistence 
farming. 
 
8.  (SBU) The Planning Secretary also noted that although 
the Sabaragamuwa province is endowed with many natural 
resources, such as scenic locations, rainforests and 
waterfalls, such locations have not been developed as 
tourist attractions.  Developing those locations and 
providing road access might be more useful for diversifying 
the local economy and promoting broader based growth.  We 
also heard similar sentiments from a divisional secretary 
of the Central province.  He suggested vegetable farmers in 
his area would benefit from a new highway connecting the 
district to business centers. 
 
Next Steps 
---------- 
9.  (U) The Finance Ministry expects to receive provincial 
comments on the MCC proposal by mid-June and hopes to 
submit a revised proposal to MCC in July or August 2005. 
The plan is for the provincial steering committees to feed 
ideas to the Finance Ministry, which would perform a series 
of financial and economic analyses to rate the project 
proposals and then submit the ideas for consideration by a 
centralized steering committee, comprised of GSL officials, 
representatives from business chambers and NGOs.  This is 
the body that provided the initial inputs for the concept 
paper. 
 
Likely Areas of Focus 
--------------------- 
10.  (U) Based on our conversations with the Finance 
Ministry's action officers for MCA, we expect the 
Government's initial compact proposal to focus primarily on 
rehabilitating rural irrigation reservoirs - a politically 
charged issue that was a primary campaign promise of the 
GSL's Marxist-Nationalist coalition partner the Janatha 
Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) - and SME development through firm- 
level assistance programs.  These have been the most 
consistently mentioned projects by GSL officials and the 
SME program seems to have the support of the country's 
primary business chambers. 
 
Outside Involvement in the Consultative Process 
--------------------------------------------- -- 
11.  (SBU) This current round of consultations has been 
assisted by The Asia Foundation (TAF) and the American 
Chamber of Commerce (Amcham), though the GSL, after seeking 
Asia Foundation and Amcham support, has largely run its own 
process and has sought a much faster timeframe than either 
Amcham or TAF felt prudent. Both organizations have 
continued to suggest participants for the consultative 
process, however. 
 
Comment: 
------- 
12.  (SBU) The GSL resisted initial efforts to channel MCA 
funds into tsunami reconstruction, which is largely 
oversubscribed, and has elected to focus on pre-tsunami 
needs, which should help alleviate inequity between 
tsunami-related and pre-existing development problems. 
 
SIPDIS 
That said, it continues to pursue outreach through an over- 
centralized, Colombo-driven approach that focuses primarily 
on GSL-initiatives, rather than potential projects 
identified through broad-based consultation.  The GSL 
claims it has undertaken consultations through its network 
of village-level government officials.  If this is so, they 
need to produce evidence of these consultations and 
village-level input. 
 
13.  (SBU) There is certainly value in focusing on the 
larger sectors the GSL is interested in - rural development 
is lagging in Sri Lanka and agricultural productivity is a 
key problem. Similarly, SMEs face significant structural 
problems in their efforts to deal with economic challenges, 
particularly the expiration of the multi-fiber agreement, 
and its ensuing impact on small and medium sized garment 
manufacturers and their suppliers.  However the GSL has, so 
far, failed to paint the "bigger picture" of how MCA fits 
into a larger development plan.  This is further hampered 
by the fact the GSL has rejected the poverty reduction 
strategy of the previous government, but has yet to present 
its own alternative, except in the most general terms. 
 
14.  (SBU) We have tried many ways to help the GSL better 
understand the importance to the larger bilateral 
relationship of taking advantage of the MCA opportunity. 
We have also tried to get them to think "outside the box" 
in the development of their proposals.  Both issues will 
become increasingly important given the cuts to USAID 
funding that have been imposed as a result of Sri Lanka 
becoming MCA-eligible, despite the lack of any connection 
between MCA priorities and USAID initiatives (Note: This is 
in direct contravention to USG statements that MCA funding 
would be wholly separate from, and would not reduce, other 
development assistance, an inaccuracy we will need to deal 
with sooner rather than later should the current 
allocations prevail. End note).  Nonetheless, MCA's new 
approach and the diversion of the December 26 tsunami has 
slowed the GSL response and forced them to rethink their 
standard operating procedures.  At this stage, we 
anticipate a compact proposal sometime before the end of 
August and we expect it to focus on the two areas outlined 
above - SME development and the rehabilitation of 
irrigation reservoirs. 
LUNSTEAD