Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05PORTAUPRINCE1353, HAITI: SUPREME COURT ANNULS KEY PART OF RABOTEAU

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05PORTAUPRINCE1353.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05PORTAUPRINCE1353 2005-05-13 18:45 2011-07-21 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Port Au Prince
Appears in these articles:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/07/20/117940/wikileaks-show-us-calling-shots.html
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 PORT AU PRINCE 001353 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD 
WHA ALSO FOR USOAS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/05/2014 
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL HA
SUBJECT: HAITI: SUPREME COURT ANNULS KEY PART OF RABOTEAU 
TRIAL 
 
 
Classified By: Charge d'Affaires Douglas Griffiths, REASONS 1.5(B) AND 
(D). 
 
1. (C) Summary.  On May 9, the Haitian Supreme Court issued 
an unexpected ruling that effectively annulled one part of 
the 2000 Raboteau trial.  The decision, on procedural 
grounds, annuls the convictions of the 15 people who were 
actually present during the proceedings, but leaves unclear 
whether they can be retried.  The Court did not/not annul the 
convictions of the 37 people who were convicted in absentia, 
including senior officials of the Haitian army and FRAPH 
leaders Louis-Jodel Chamblain (currently in jail here) and 
Emmanuel "Toto" Constant (currently awaiting deportation in 
the U.S.).  The Gonaives prosecutor and the chief judge of 
the Gonaives court have connived in an effort to get 
Chamblain released illegally, but the IGOH has pledged not to 
do so.  Legitimate questions have been raised about the "show 
trial" aspects of the 2000 Raboteau trial and improper 
political interference from the then-Lavalas government in 
the judiciary, and there may indeed be technical merit to the 
Supreme Court's decision.  It has nonetheless reinforced 
perceptions that the judiciary under the current government 
is biased against Lavalas partisans and more focused on 
procedural matters than on justice.  End Summary. 
 
Raboteau: Haiti's Killings Fields 
-------------------------------- 

2. (U) From April 18-22 1994, members of the Haitian military 
and of the paramilitary FRAPH organization conducted a series 
of killings, rapes, house-burnings and other acts of violence 
in the seaside shanty neighborhood of Raboteau in Gonaives. 
The violence, targeted at supporters of then-President 
Aristide (in exile at the time), was one of the worst 
atrocities of the 1991-94 coup years, and has gone down in 
Haitian history as the "Raboteau massacre."  Aristide's 
return in 1994 led to the opening of an investigation, and 
ultimately to a trial that ran from September-November 2000. 
The GOH at the time leaned heavily on a team of lawyers and 
investigators from the U.S. and other countries, including 
the Bureau des Avocats Internationaux  (One prominent member 
of the BAI, Brian Concannon, now runs the Institute for 
Justice and Democracy in Haiti - IJDH).  The Raboteau trial 
resulted in the conviction in absentia of 37 military and 
paramilitary members, including Chamblain and Constant, and 
the conviction of 15 others present at the trial (including 
Jean Pierre alias "Jean Tatoune").  The latter 15 appealed 
and, four and half years later, the Supreme Court's decision 
is the result of that appeal. 
 
Sound legal basis, questionable result 
------------------------------- 

3. (U)  The Court's ruling, dated May 3 but not released 
until May 9, is a procedural one.  The Raboteau indictment 
bundled several counts together that, according to the 
Supreme Court, should not have been bundled, since some of 
them require a jury trial while others do not.  The Raboteau 
trial was a jury trial, but according to the Supreme Court, 
the prosecutor should have tried the two kinds of counts 
separately.  A Canadian lawyer who works closely with the 
Embassy and has long experience in Haiti told us May 12 that, 
in his judgment and that of several Haitian lawyers he 
consulted, the Supreme Court was correct in its basic 
decision.  However, he said legal experts were puzzled at the 
decision to go further and order the accused set free. Normal 
procedure would have been for the Supreme Court to annul the 
lower court ruling and then either re-try the case(s) itself 
or send them back to the Gonaives court for (proper) retrial. 
 The Supreme Court did neither, instead ordering the 
prisoners freed if there were no other cause.  Pierre 
Esperance of the National Network for the Defense of Human 
Rights (RNDDH, formerly NCHR) told PolCounselor May 12 that 
legally most of the accused would be required to stay in 
prison until their retrial. 
 
Chamblain shenanigans 
--------------------- 
 
4. (C) Esperance also confirmed reports from SRSG Valdes that 
the chief prosecutor and chief of the court in Gonaives had 
collaborated to produce a release order for Chamblain. 
(Note:  Chamblain has been in jail since his acquittal last 
August for the Antoine Izmery killing, awaiting a similar 
retrial on charges relating to the Raboteau killings.  He is 
being held at the same National Penitentiary annex as former 
Prime Minister Neptune).  He said the chief prosecutor 
(Commissaire du Gouvernement) for Port-au-Prince would have 
to approve any Chamblain release, and had given assurances 
that he would not do so.  Charge raised this issue with Prime 
Minister Latortue May 11.  Latortue assured us that that 
Chamblain would not be released, saying Minister of Justice 
Gousse agreed with him on this.  He repeated this twice, 
saying Chamblain would not be released as long as he was 
Prime Minister. 
 
Comment 
------- 

5.  (C) The Raboteau trial and convictions were viewed by 
many here (and in the U.S.) as a milestone victory for 
justice against the repressive military regime of the early 
1990's.  The process was not, however, free of political 
pressure from the Lavalas government at the time.  That plus 
the involvement of U.S. and other international lawyers led 
others in this polarized society to see the Raboteau process 
as a "show trial" in which the convictions were a foregone 
conclusion.  As in most things there, there is something to 
both sides.  Public reaction has been surprisingly muted. 
Human rights groups, with the exception of the RNDDH, have 
been largely silent, disappointingly so given the importance 
of the case.  Lavalas partisans have complained to us 
privately that this is another demonstration of the 
anti-Lavalas bias of the judicial system. 
 
6. (C) What counts now is how the government reacts, and 
whether it moves to retry the accused properly.  Latortue has 
publicly said the government would do so, but is not clear 
that his Justice Minister shares his enthusiasm for doing so. 
 Chamblain's release, particularly if it came while former PM 
Neptune remains incarcerated on far more questionable 
charges, would be a disaster.  The PM's assurances that he 
will not be released are important, but we will need to 
maintain pressure on him and his team to ensure that the 
government sticks to this commitment. 
GRIFFITHS