Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05PARIS3208, POLLS ON EU CONSTITUTION: ALL EVEN WITH LESS THAN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05PARIS3208.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05PARIS3208 2005-05-11 14:54 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Paris
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

111454Z May 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 003208 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
DEPT ALSO FOR EUR/WE, EUR/ERA, EUR/PPD, DRL/IL, INR/EUC AND 
EB 
DEPT OF LABOR FOR ILAB 
DEPT OF COMMERCE FOR ITA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV ELAB EU FR PINR SOCI ECON
SUBJECT: POLLS ON EU CONSTITUTION: ALL EVEN WITH LESS THAN 
3 WEEKS TO GO 
 
REF: A. (A) PARIS 3013 AND PREVIOUS 
 
     B. (B) PARIS 2085 
 
SUMMARY 
------- 
1.  (U) With less than three weeks to go before France's May 
29 referendum on the EU Constitution, several recent public 
opinion surveys put the race in a statistical dead heat.  One 
major poll shows an exact 50-50 split between 'yes' and 'no' 
among those who say they have decided how they will vote. 
Pollsters' estimates of the undecided vary between 30 and 20 
percent of likely voters.  Pollsters agree the electorate 
remains highly volatile, and that, for the moment, the 'yes' 
and 'no' are in unstable equilibrium with neither one gaining 
significantly on the other.  END SUMMARY. 
 
PHASES OF THE REFERENDUM CAMPAIGN 
--------------------------------- 
2.  (U) Since March 4, when President Chirac announced the 
May 29 date for the referendum, the referendum campaign has 
gone through four phases.  First, in a precipitous reversal 
of opinion, a 60/40 'yes'/'no' split became a 48/52 
'yes'/'no' split in less than two weeks (reftel B).  Second, 
from mid-March through most of April, the 'no' held the lead 
among decided voters by as much as 55 percent 'no' to 45 
percent 'yes'.  Third, after that high point (so far) in the 
third week of April, "the rising tide of 'no'" ebbed, with 
'yes' regaining a slight lead over 'no' at the very end of 
April.  Fourth, by the end of the first week of May, 'yes and 
'no' settled into their current, for all practical purposes, 
50/50 equilibrium, with pollsters detecting a "wait and see" 
attitude among many in the large number of undecided.  Also, 
pollsters are fond of pointing out that a significant portion 
of those who vote -- some use 20 percent as a rule-of-thumb 
-- don't make up their minds until the very day that they go 
to the polls. 
 
LATEST POLLS SHOW STATISTICAL DEAD HEAT 
--------------------------------------- 
3.  (U) In a survey published on May 9 by the IPSOS polling 
organization, the French electorate is shown to be split 
evenly right down the middle -- with 50 percent of decided 
voters claiming they will vote 'yes' and 50 percent claiming 
they will vote 'no.'  The preceding IPSOS poll, published one 
week earlier, showed a net advantage for the 'yes' camp by a 
margin of 53 to 47 percent.  Another poll, this one published 
over the week-end of May 7 - 8 by TNS-SOFRES, revealed a 
slight advantage for those favoring approval of the 
constitution, with 52 percent of decided voters reporting 
they will vote 'yes,' versus 48 percent reporting they will 
vote 'no.'  Also on May 9, the CSA polling organization 
published a poll showing a slight 51 to 49 percent advantage 
for the 'yes' camp; this is the third CSA poll in a row 
reflecting a slight edge for the 'yes' camp.  All three polls 
indicate that a significant percentage of voters (20-25 
percent) have yet to make up their minds, and might not do so 
until the day of the referendum. 
 
COMMENT: AGE, SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS AND DECISIVE ISSUES 
--------------------------------------------- ---------- 
4.  (SBU) Analysis of the poll results has identified trends 
among different socio-economic and age groups and also 
confirmed anecdotal evidence that voter response to a number 
of emotive issues unrelated to the constitution itself will 
be very important in shaping the results May 29. 
 
The key strengths of 'yes': 
 
-- older voters are overwhelmingly pro-Europe and turn out to 
vote; these voters have just been reminded by 60th 
anniversary commemorations of the end of WWII of the peace 
that is the deciding issue for them in favoring continuation 
of the European construction; 
 
-- younger voters, also strongly pro-Europe, are most likely 
to see Europe as an agent of positive change in their lives; 
 
-- the argument that only through a strong and united Europe 
can France effectively protect itself -- jobs, industries, 
social model, etc. -- in a global economy dominated by the 
"the U.S. and China;" 
 
-- the argument that voting 'no' is unpatriotic, weakening 
France's leadership role in a project -- European unification 
-- that the French have long supported by a 2/3 majority 
(according to decades of polling on the subject). 
 
The key strengths of 'no': 
 
-- the large majority of people of low and modest incomes are 
very apprehensive about their economic prospects; their 
instinct is to hold the line against change; 
-- particularly among center-left voters, being for 'no' is a 
"movement" -- a political commitment that brings solidarity 
with others and engages political emotions; 
 
-- 'no' is anti-establishment; popular dissatisfaction with 
France's ruling elites of both left and right runs very high, 
and voting 'no' vents anger and frustration that should not 
be underestimated.  END COMMENT. 
WOLFF