Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05PARIS2516, KEY ISSUES IN FRANCE'S EU CONSTITUTION DEBATE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05PARIS2516.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05PARIS2516 2005-04-13 15:47 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Paris
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

131547Z Apr 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PARIS 002516 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT ALSO FOR EUR/WE, EUR/ERA, EUR/PPD, DRL/IL AND INR/EUC 
AND EB 
DEPT OF LABOR FOR ILAB 
DEPT OF COMMERCE FOR ITA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV ELAB EU FR ECON SOCI PINR
SUBJECT: KEY ISSUES IN FRANCE'S EU CONSTITUTION DEBATE 
 
REF: A. (A) PARIS 2205 
 
     B. (B) PARIS 2006 
     C. (C) PARIS 1998 
     D. (D) PARIS 1649 
     E. (E) PARIS 1106 
     F. (F) PARIS 1014 
 
SUMMARY 
------- 
1.  (SBU) The direction taken by France's debate on the 
proposed EU Constitution has left many observers perplexed: 
what, if anything, do unemployment and loss of purchasing 
power, Turkey's possible accession to the EU, public service 
unions unhappy with proposed reforms to 35 hour work week, 
and widespread dissatisfaction with France's governing 
institutions have to do with a decision about a proposed 
Constitutional treaty for Europe?  The debate over the 
Constitution has become a lightening rod for the electorate's 
discontent, and, for many voters, a plebiscite on Jacques 
Chirac's leadership.  What follows are capsule descriptions 
of some of the issues that the French are talking about in 
the context of the Constitutional vote.  END SUMMARY. 
 
LATEST POLLS 
------------ 
2.  (SBU) According to a poll released April 12, the 'no' 
vote continues to hold its lead among those who have decided 
how they will vote -- by a margin of 53 percent to 47 
percent.  Between a fourth and a third of likely voters 
remain undecided, although there have been at least thirteen 
successive major polls since mid-March showing that a 
majority of those who say they have made up their minds plan 
to vote 'no'.  When the 'no' overtook the 'yes' in the polls 
March 18, it energized the campaigns of each camp.  Since 
then, as the debate has widened into TV appearances by 
leading advocates of both camps, the main issues motivating 
voters are becoming clear. 
 
REFERENDUM AS PLEBISCITE ON CHIRAC 
------------------------------------- 
3.  (SBU) A number of constituencies -- for example, public 
sector employees in the transportation, health and education 
sectors, as well as some government research center academics 
and unionized workers in key ministries (including at the 
Foreign Ministry) -- militantly support voting 'no' because 
they are opposed to specific reforms proposed by the Raffarin 
government.  The nationwide general strike on March 10 
(reftel C), led by public sector unions revealed the range 
and variety of the constituencies opposed to specific reform 
proposals of the Raffarin government, and, beyond that, 
opposed to the economic liberalism and market mechanisms 
(timidly) implicit in these reforms.  Many of these voters 
and their sympathizers are also intent on "voting against" 
Jacques Chirac and the Raffarin government for partisan 
reasons.  Chirac now faces the real possibility that voters 
will take the opportunity of the referendum to answer an 
entirely different question -- whether the French people 
continue to have confidence in him.  (The historical 
precedent, De Gaulle's failed referendum in 1969 which led to 
his political demise weighs heavily on the French President.) 
 This evolution of the referendum into a plebiscite is 
getting additional impetus from a rising populist tide 
seeking to punish France's  inaccessible, inbred, political 
class no matter what temples are brought down in the process. 
 
THE "LIBERAL" VS. THE "SOCIAL" EUROPE AND FRANCE 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
4.  (SBU) Social and economic issues, particularly 
unemployment and loss of purchasing power, are principal 
preoccupations for some voters.  The debate over the proposed 
Constitution (reftel A) has so far focused both on what to do 
about domestic social and economic problems and disagreement 
about how the Constitution might constrict France's options 
in dealing with them.  This core disagreement over a 
"liberal" versus a "social" Europe and France catalyzed the 
French assault on the Bolkestein directive (reftel B).  NOTE: 
In French usage, a "liberal" society is characterized by 
individualism, relatively unregulated markets, largely 
private sector provision of social services, and low taxes; a 
"social" society is characterized by heavy regulation of 
markets and environment, state responsibility for health, 
education, etc. social services, and high taxes.)  END NOTE. 
The outcry in France over the Bolkestein directive reflected 
both opposition to its "liberal bias" and to its imposition 
by an ever more "foreign" Brussels.  "Social" opponents of 
the directive see it as epitomizing the proposed 
Constitution's "liberal bias."  Concerns about an 
increasingly "foreign," liberal Europe are also often 
associated with a retrospective questioning of the EU's 
enlargement, which has reduced its political cohesion and its 
potential as an international political heavyweight. 
 
WIDESPREAD 'NO' TO TURKEY 
------------------------- 
5.  (SBU) Considerable anti-Constitution sentiment among 
voters is dominated by association of the proposed 
Constitution with fear of uncontrolled Muslim immigration 
from Turkey and worries over the headlong expansion of 
Europe.  The issue of Turkey reflects France's continuing 
difficulties assimilating a large Muslim minority, widespread 
popular rejection of an expanded Europe, and popular 
resentment at not having been consulted about questions 
relating to the "European construction."  According to a poll 
of the motivation of 'no' voters released March 26, 31 
percent of those intending to vote 'no' say they plan do so 
primarily because they "are opposed to Turkey's entry into 
the EU." 
 
DISMAY AT GOVERNMENT INEFFECTIVENESS 
------------------------------------ 
6.  (SBU) Beyond dissatisfaction with current policies and 
partisan opposition to the current government, a deeper 
dismay at French institutions' inability to bring about 
reform and make progress solving France's problems is also 
fueling vote 'no' sentiment.  Cutting across the entire 
electorate, there is disappointment at long-standing 
government ineffectiveness -- unemployment, for example, has 
hovered at around 10 percent since well before President 
Chirac's last re-election in 2002 -- which has led many to 
give up hope that politicians and politics can solve the 
problems that ordinary people consider the most important 
ones.  May has traditionally been a month of political 
activism in France, prompting some 'yes' supporters to fear 
the worst: that diffuse but widespread unhappiness with the 
system as a whole could harden -- and be expressed as 'no' 
votes on May 29. 
 
THE U.S. AND THE REFERENDUM DEBATE 
---------------------------------- 
7.  (SBU) How the proposed Constitution would (or would not) 
in time make the EU an independent, political and military 
world power -- "equal to the U.S. and China" is the most 
common formulation -- comes up in the debate persistently but 
less prominently than had been expected.  Contrary to the 
expectations, of the PS in particular, calling on voters to 
support the proposed Constitution because it makes for a 
"strong Europe facing the United States" has so far met with 
little traction (reftels D, E and F).  If anything, the 'no' 
argument of both far-right "France First" sovereignist and 
far-left anti-Americans, that the proposed Constitution 
creates an "Atlanticist Europe dominated by the United 
States," has had a higher profile. 
 
FRANCE'S LEADERSHIP ROLE IN EUROPE 
---------------------------------- 
8.  (SBU) The effect on France's traditional leadership role 
in Europe, particularly damage to it should 'no' sentiment 
prevail, is becoming a key preoccupation of 'yes' voters. 
All pro-Constitution advocates, particularly President 
Chirac, Prime Minister Raffarin and their supporters in the 
press and parliament, stress that a 'no' victory May 29 would 
severely undermine France's traditional leadership role in 
Europe.  It remains to be seen if appeals to vote 'yes' to 
continue France's influence in shaping Europe will outweigh 
widespread sentiment that the new Constitution represents the 
opposite -- ratification of an enlarged and enlarging Europe 
over which France has less and less of a political grip. 
 
COMMENT 
------- 
9. (SBU) France's debate over the proposed constitution has 
generated linkages for voters among very disparate questions 
-- with most having very little directly to do with the 
Constitution.  It has done so as the country's social and 
economic problems have become more acute, and national 
confidence that they can be solved has diminished.  We will 
elaborate further on these and other issues as the countdown 
continues towards Referendum Day, May 29.  END COMMENT. 
LEACH