Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05MANILA1909, PROPOSED MOU FOR THE "MAPP"

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05MANILA1909.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05MANILA1909 2005-04-27 08:37 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Manila
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 MANILA 001909 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR INL AND INL/AAE, DS/DSS/ATA, DS/IP/EAP 
STATE ALSO FOR S/CT/CHANDLER/FUJIMURA, EAP AND EAP/PMBS 
JUSTICE FOR ICITAP, OPDAT AND OIA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL KCRM SOCI KCOR PTER PGOV PINS ASEC RP
SUBJECT: PROPOSED MOU FOR THE "MAPP" 
 
REF: A. MANILA 1889 
     B. MANILA 1792 
     C. 04 MANILA 5502 
 
1.  (U) This is an action request -- see para 4. 
 
2.  (U) Noting that the Philippine National Police (PNP) -- 
at the instigation of Philippine Ambassador to Washington Del 
Rosario -- was now interested in pursuing a "Management 
Assessment of the Philippine Police" with the USG that would 
parallel the ongoing Philippine Defense Reform initiative, 
Police Chief Superintendent Luizo Ticman of the PNP's 
Directorate for Plans conveyed to Embassy a draft "Memorandum 
of Understanding (MOU) On the Conduct of the Management 
Assessment of the Philippine National Police (MAPP)," with a 
request for comments.  (Full text in para 5.)  Ticman 
specified that the PNP had prepared the MOU for possible 
signing during the May 17 meeting of Foreign Secretary 
Alberto Romulo with Secretary Rice.  Assistant Secretary of 
Foreign Affairs for American Affairs Ariel Abadilla and North 
American Affairs Director Marc De Borja separately confirmed 
the DFA's high interest in this project as an item at least 
discussion -- and possibly as an important deliverable -- 
during the Foreign Secretary's visit.  The GRP may also raise 
this request during Deputy Secretary of State Zoellick,s May 
10 discussions in Manila (ref a). 
 
3.  (SBU)  Comment:  We have explained to the PNP and DFA 
that the USG had not yet formally decided on how to proceed 
with this proposal from Embassy (ref c).  Embassy continues 
to view the MAPP as an essential next step in encouraging 
systemic reform within the PNP, our other key partner (in 
addition to the Armed Forces of the Philippines) in the 
Global War on Terror, as well as on counternarcotics 
programs, anti-trafficking in persons efforts, and other law 
enforcement issues.  The initiative of the DFA and PNP in 
trying to jump-start this project appears clearly to reflect 
the importance the GRP has already assigned to this effort. 
We believe the GRP will welcome this bilateral cooperation in 
devising a roadmap toward overdue systemic change in the PNP 
through the MAPP, and urge USG support.  We may wish, 
however, to insist on some level of PNP financial support for 
this project, as the Department of National Defense is 
providing in the PDR.  End comment. 
 
4.  (SBU) Action request:  Please provide by May 6 a response 
to this draft MOU as well as possible talking points for the 
Secretary's and Deputy Secretary's use in their May 17 and 
 
SIPDIS 
May 10 meetings with GRP counterparts, respectively. 
 
5.  (SBU) Draft text of the GRP draft MOU follows: 
 
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING MOU) BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF 
THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES GRP) AND THE UNITED STATES 
GOVERNMENT (USG) ON THE CONDUCT OF MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT OF 
THE PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE (MAPP) 
 
I.    Overview 
 
The Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) and 
the United States Government (USG) have established a strong 
bilateral relationship through their various cooperative 
efforts especially in the field of law enforcement.  However, 
the GRP's capacity to respond on the security and law 
enforcement concerns of the USG is primarily anchored on the 
former's capability to maintain an effective, efficient, and 
responsive police force ) the Philippine National Police 
(PNP). 
 
The GRP acknowledged that the PNP is experiencing 
institutional deficiencies, weak training system, poor 
internal controls, and unrealized strategic vision.  It is 
for this reason that a comprehensive framework is essential 
for the PNP to transform itself into a modern and 
professional police force, serving a democratic society. 
While it is also recognized that the PNP has undergone and is 
embarking on a series of reform efforts, it is understood 
that there still exists an opportunity to reinforce and 
accelerate these PNP reform initiatives. It is to be 
acknowledged that reforming the PNP will greatly contribute 
to national and regional stability. 
 
In view of the urgent need to come up with a comprehensive 
framework for PNP reform program, it is understood that both 
governments will jointly conduct a management assessment of 
the PNP. 
 
II.  Objectives of the MAPP: 
 
A joint RP-US &Management Assessment of the PNP8 (MAPP) 
shall endeavor to: 
 
1.  Identify and prioritize key PNP institutional weaknesses 
and lay out a road map on how to address them; 
2.  Identify institutional shortcomings and provide concrete 
recommendations for corrective action, covering the areas  of 
 human resource management (recruitment, selection, 
placement, training and education, promotion, retirement), 
budgeting and financial management, logistics management, 
organization, professional standards, operational procedures, 
policy development and implementation, strategic planning and 
management continuity; and 
 
3.  Develop an implementation plan. 
 
III.  Desired Outcomes: 
 
The MAPP is expected to: 
 
1.     Bring about a strategic framework in 
prioritizing/optimizing PNP resources and US assistance 
programs that will improve the law enforcement capacity of 
the PNP; 
 
2.     Allow better integration of all US law enforcement 
assistance programs and create synergies with other 
international donors' law enforcement assistance programs; and 
 
3.     Engage the GRP in committing to sustain the 
transformation of the PNP into a democratic and professional 
police force. 
 
IV.  Methods and Procedures in Conducting the MAPP: 
 
The MAPP must be a collaborative undertaking between the USG 
and the GRP through the pairing of experts.  The USG shall 
identify multi-disciplinary experts from its various law 
enforcement arms (Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug 
Enforcement Agency, Department of Homeland Security, among 
others) to work closely with PNP experts in conducting the 
MAPP.  A joint Assessment Team (JAT) shall be composed of 
these experts from both governments and shall be Co-Chaired 
by senior representatives from both sides.  The JAT shall be 
assisted by a secretariat composed of PNP personnel. 
 
The MAPP shall be conducted by comparing local conditions 
against those considered as law enforcement standards and 
&best practices8.  This will be undertaken through 
interviews, direct observations, focus group discussions, 
surveys, and task/process analysis. 
 
The GRP shall ensure the availability of all required 
personnel, documents and facilities  while the USG shall 
provide funding in the conduct of the MAPP. 
 
It also to be understood that the GRP shall endeavor to fully 
comply to the recommendations of the MAPP and the USG shall 
provide financial support in order to achieve the desired 
outcomes of the MAPP. 
 
V.     Time Frame: 
 
The MAPP shall be conducted for a period of three (3) months 
from the time this MOU is signed  by the representatives of 
both governments. It shall be conducted in three (3) phases: 
 
Phase I     - Management  Assessment (9 weeks) 
Phase II - Preparation of Report (2 weeks) 
Phase III - Validation (1 week) 
 
VI.  Limitations: 
 
This Memorandum of Understanding shall be implemented in 
accordance with each country's domestic laws and regulations 
and in accordance with their international obligations. 
 
VII.  Settlement of Disputes: 
 
Any dispute regarding the interpretation or implementation of 
this MOU shall be resolved through consultation and 
negotiation between the two governments through diplomatic 
channel and will not be referred to any Third Party or 
tribunal for resolution. 
 
For the Government of the United States of America: 
 
For the Government of the Republic of the Philippines: 
Ricciardone