Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05ZAGREB510, DRAFT GMO LAW BRINGS ANTI-BIOTECH FEELINGS BACK TO

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05ZAGREB510.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05ZAGREB510 2005-03-31 12:31 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Zagreb
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

311231Z Mar 05
UNCLAS  ZAGREB 000510 
 
SIPDIS 
 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
C O R R E C T E D C O P Y 
 
VIENNA FOR QUINTIN GRAY AND SARAH HANSON 
BUDAPEST FOR KARYN POSNER-MULLEN 
DEPARTMENT PLEASE PASS USTR 
USDA FOR PAUL SPENCER, BEVERLY SIMMONS, AND PETER SCHMEISSNER 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR SENV ETRD PGOV HR
SUBJECT: DRAFT GMO LAW BRINGS ANTI-BIOTECH FEELINGS BACK TO 
THE SURFACE 
 
REF: 04 ZAGREB 2196 
 
SUMMARY AND COMMENT 
------------------- 
 
1.  (SBU) A proposal to consolidate Croatia's restrictive legislative 
framework for the introduction of genetically modified seeds has 
brought public outrage at the thought of GMOs in Croatia back to the 
surface.  While Parliament seems set to institutionalize a 
precautionary principle approach for seed imports, some vocal MPs 
have seized the opportunity to call for an outright ban on all GMO 
product raising the prospect of a national referendum on the GMO 
question. Despite the controversy, the draft law would change little, 
moving coordinating responsibility from the Ministry of Culture to the 
equal disinterested Ministry of Health and establishing a testing and 
licensing regime so restrictive it constitutes a de facto ban. 
Legislation on GMO foods remains unchanged.  Limited lab capacity will 
challenge the GoC's ability to implement testing thresholds and compel 
a very selective and subjective method of choosing samples for 
testing. While GoC officials acknowledge legal obligations to open 
their agricultural market to foreign imports, most openly acknowledge 
that Croatia is positioning itself as a GMO-free, "healthy" tourist 
destination.  END SUMMARY AND COMMENT. 
 
PARLIAMENT SENDS DRAFT BILL BACK FOR REDRAFTING 
--------------------------------------------- -- 
 
2.  (SBU) A draft GMO law currently before Parliament has done nothing 
to cool tempers over the highly emotional GMO issue in Croatia.  On 
March 22, the Parliamentary Committee on Agriculture and Forestry 
debated and rejected upon second reading a draft GMO law.  Members of 
the governing Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) and opposition Social 
Democratic Party (SDP) supported the draft, while most other parties 
have openly opposed any measure short of an outright ban.  Meeting 
the afternoon with the DCM, Committee Chairman Bozidar Pankretic 
stated that the problem with the legislation was not that MPs lacked 
sufficient scientific advice but rather that science had reached no 
definitive conclusions on the safety of GMO seeds.  Pankretic was 
realistic about Croatia's WTO obligations, but acknowledged most MPs 
are very responsive to public fears that the bill is excessively 
permissive.  Key concerns included cross-contamination of non-GMO 
fields, squeezing out small domestic farmers while leaving the entire 
sector vulnerable to foreign seed providers, and a lack of proof that 
modified genes in crops cannot "jump" to digestive bacteria.  Several 
MPs for the first time raised the issue of a nation-wide referendum 
on banning all GMO seed imports.  Looking ahead, Pankretic left open 
the possibility that the GoC might still approve the draft text 
without further edits. 
 
DRAFT GMO LAW SPARKS CONTROVERY BUT CHANGES LITTLE 
--------------------------------------------- ----- 
 
3.  (SBU) At the GoC's request, the Ministry of Culture recently 
drafted legislation that would consolidate several laws (reftel) 
governing biotechnology into a single GMO law.  The proposed language 
only addresses the introduction into nature of genetically-modified 
seeds, currently covered under the extant 2003 Law on Nature 
Protection; the import and licensing of GMO foods will continue to be 
governed by the 2003 Law on Food and Feed.  The draft language moves 
responsibility for coordinating Croatia's GMO policy from the 
Ministry of Culture Division for Nature Protection to the Ministry of 
Health Division for Sanitary Inspection.  The law would also establish 
a scientific advisory council consisting of an expert committee for 
contained use and one for introduction into the market.  Though the 
draft law would on the surface establish a legislative framework for 
the import, licensing, and planting of seeds containing GMO content 
in Croatia, according to key GoC officials the language is 
"cumbersome" enough to constitute a de facto ban on seed imports. 
The threshold for GMO content in seeds is 0.0%.  The law also 
contains numerous safeguard clauses prohibiting planting of GMO 
seeds in any 
protected nature are national park, or other area of ecological 
importance undefined by any legislation.  Lastly, the law for 
the first time introduces a break clause allowing the GoC to 
temporarily or even permanently suspend the import or planting of 
GMO seeds if it believes doing so would protect public health or the 
environment. 
 
FOOD REGULATION VIRTUALLY UNCHANGED 
----------------------------------- 
 
4.  (U) The 2003 Law on Food and Feed will continue to govern the 
possible import, licensing, and labeling of any foods containing GMO 
content.  Under the law, the threshold for GMO content in food depend 
upon whether or not the product has previously been tested and 
licensed in the EU.  If the product has been accepted by an EU member 
state, it does not need to be labeled for sale on the Croatian market 
provided separate tests within Croatia confirm the product contains 
less than 0.9% GMO content.  The threshold drops to 0.0% for products 
that have 
 
 
not yet been accepted by an EU member.  All new foods will require a 
risk assessment concluded by a licensed Croatian institution; foreign 
(even EU) risk assessments will not be accepted for licensing foods 
containing GMO content.  A recently created Food Agency, directed by 
Dr. Boris Antunovic, will be responsible for coordinating testing, 
licensing, and labeling of novel foods. Post has recently nominated 
D Antunovic for a European regional IV program on biotechnology and 
food safety. 
 
TESTING CAPABILITIES OUT OF SYNCH WITH LEGISLATION 
--------------------------------------------- ----- 
 
5.  (SBU) Dr. Peter Schmeissner, a biotech specialist at USDA, recent 
visited Zagreb from March 21-23 for a biotech-themed IIP Speaker's 
Program.  During Dr. Schmeissner's visit, he had a chance to tour 
Croatia's single laboratory (housed at the Institute for Public 
Health and overseen by IV returnee Dr. Krunoslav Capak) capable of 
testing both foods and seeds for GMO content.  According to Dr. 
Schmeissner, the lab was of acceptable quality but has a severely 
limited capacity meaning the Institute must be very selective when 
deciding what products to test.  Dr. Schmeissner also questioned 
whether the lab's equipment allowed for accurate enough results to 
enforce a 0.9% threshold for food.  A large circulation daily 
recently 
carried a large article criticizing the lab for not yet receiving ISO 
certification a process that by this point is mostly a question of 
time rather than further financial investment.  The article noted with 
disapproval that the GoC's 9 million kuna ($1.6 million) investment in 
the IPH lab has yet to translate into a national facility capable of 
reliably testing for GMO content. 
 
GMOS AND THE MARKET FOR "HEALTHY" FOOD 
-------------------------------------- 
 
6.  (SBU) In separate meetings, interlocutors at the Ministry of 
Agriculture, the Ministry of Health, and the Institute for Public 
Health acknowledged the draft GMO law constitutes a virtual ban on 
GMO 
seeds, offering that anything else would be politically impossible. 
The top Ministry of Health official for biotechnology, who will take 
over umbrella coordination under the new legislation, told Emboffs 
that the GoC sees little need to implement a procedure to allow GMO 
seed imports given a lack of agricultural problems (rain, pests, or 
soil) 
that might justify their usage.  The official explained that Croatia 
clearly sees its future as a "niche market for healthy food" (NOTE: 
In Croatian, the word "healthy" encompasses everything from 
conventional organic to non-GMO products.) Opponents to GMOs in 
Croatia have been emboldened by the perceived success of Austria, 
Slovenia, and to a degree Italy in standing up to the European 
Commission on GMOs; complying with EU regulations has little meaning 
so 
long as Croatia can position itself within a regional group of 
"healthy," GMO-free market. 
 
DELAWIE 
 
 
NNNN