Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05RANGOON291, BURMA: RESPONSE TO FIFTH ANNUAL ANTI-TRAFFICKING
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05RANGOON291.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05RANGOON291 | 2005-03-08 07:41 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Rangoon |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 RANGOON 000291
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV; PACOM FOR FPA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM ELAB SMIG ASEC PREF KCRM KWMN KFRD BM
SUBJECT: BURMA: RESPONSE TO FIFTH ANNUAL ANTI-TRAFFICKING
IN PERSONS QUESTIONNAIRE
REF: STATE 273089
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The following report contains Post's
responses to the fifth annual anti-trafficking in persons
questionnaire contained in reftel requesting information on
trafficking in persons in Burma from March 2004 to March
¶2005. End Summary.
¶2. (U) Embassy point of contact on TIP is poloff Dean
Tidwell, E-mail: TidwellDD@state.gov. Approximate amount of
time required to prepare this report was: 1 hour by an FS-MC,
2 hours by an FS-OC, 2 hours by an FS-02, 1 hour by an FS-03,
38 hours by an FS-04 and 6 hours by an FSN-6, for a total of
50 hours.
BEGIN REPORT
------------
OVERVIEW OF ACTIVITIES TO ELIMINATE TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS:
--A. Burma is considered a &country of origin8 for
international trafficked persons with Thailand and China the
primary &destination8 countries. However, it is also a
destination country for &internally8 trafficked persons.
Trafficking of persons from rural areas to the major cities
occurs and widespread forced labor still continues throughout
the country.
Tachileik, Myawaddy, and Kawthoung are the key trafficking
exit points from Burma to Thailand. There are several routes
into China, with a key route being through Muse in northern
Shan State. The Myanmar Police Force,s (MPF)
Anti-Trafficking Unit has teams stationed in the border towns
of Muse, Tachileik Myawaddy, Lweje, and Kawthoung. Other
than an Anti-Trafficking Unit being based in Rangoon, it
appears that these units are focused on border activities
and not on the major cities of Burma.
There may be small numbers of persons who are trafficked
through areas outside the GOB,s control, e.g. through areas
controlled by the United Wa State Army and other ethnic
cease-fire groups, but the primary routes are believed to be
through the &gates8 that are under government control.
The Government of Burma (GOB) itself is a main information
source. The Ministry of Home Affairs has a Transnational
Organized Crime department and under this is a special
Anti-Trafficking Unit. UN agencies in Burma, foreign
missions, and NGOs also provide information on trafficking in
Burma.
Women and girls of ethnic groups are considered the most
vulnerable. They are mostly very poor and illiterate.
Unfortunately, because Burma is a very restrictive country,
it is impossible to obtain specific numbers of trafficked
persons. The GOB has provided some specific figures for
intercepted cases and prosecuted cases. The ILO has provided
figures on forced labor prosecution cases.
The GOB,s Preventive Working Committee on Trafficking was
formed in July 2002. Since then it has reported the
following activities:
Total cases: 474
Offenders: 939 persons
Convictions: 485 persons
Penalties (Sentences):
Life Sentence: 2 persons
10 years or more: 85 persons
5-10 years: 177 persons
Less than 5 years: 78 persons
Saved Victims: 2,629 persons (Females = 1,225)
According to an Australian expert in trafficking who has been
working closely with the MPF,s Anti-Trafficking Unit, these
figures include trafficked persons as well as smuggled
persons, who are by definition not technically trafficked.
He estimated that the majority of these figures represent
smuggling rather than trafficking cases.
--B. The persons are who are trafficked internationally come
primarily from Shan State, Karen State, Mon State, and
Tanintharyi Division. Trafficking cases to Thailand
primarily pass through Tachileik Myawaddy, and Kawthoung and
to China through Muse and other smaller entry points. The
MPF reports almost no cases of trafficking to India and
Bangladesh. (Such cases may exist, but the GOB has not
rescued many victims or apprehended perpetrators in those
areas.)
--C. We are not aware of any changes in the direction or
extent of trafficking. As long as Burma remains poor and the
economy is struggling, the &pull8 to more economically
vibrant Thailand and China, as to other countries in the
region, will likely continue.
--D. UNICEF and the Department of Social Welfare plan to
conduct a survey of children's issues in 12 townships in
¶2005. World Vision recently conducted surveys and obtained
useful data that will help document the extent and nature of
trafficking.
--E. The persons who are trafficked within the country are
trafficked for prostitution, domestic servitude, and forced
labor (by civilian authorities and by the military.)
Threats, intimidation, and debt bondage are used to keep the
victims compliant.
--F. Women and girls of ethnic groups are primary targets of
traffickers, although there may be limited numbers of men and
boys who are also trafficked. It is believed that the
majority of the traffickers are minor operators and not large
networks.
All of the above methods are used. Typically, the victims
are poor so they can easily be lured with offers to help them
get a job. Later they end up doing different jobs,
especially prostitution. There are reports of girls from
Shan State, following the banning of opium production, being
sold by their families into prostitution as a means of
survival.
In most cases, the victims do not have any kind of papers.
They are smuggled across borders, often with the knowledge of
border control officials who are paid to look the other way.
--G. A &very High Level Team8 from ILO visited Rangoon
February 21-23, 2005. The three-person team, headed by former
governor-general of Australia, Sir Ninian Stephen, came for
the express purpose of meeting with the highest levels of the
GOB to assess their commitment to stop forced labor by
civilian and military leaders. They were unable to meet with
the highest officials in the SPDC, nor were they able to talk
to defense officials, therefore they curtailed their
scheduled departure for February 25 and departed two days
earlier. They felt they had completed their technical talks
and the unavailability of the top leaders was a strong
indicator of their level of commitment to seriously address
the issue of forced labor.
Yes, there seems to be reasonably strong political will in
the central government to combat trafficking in persons,
although the attitudes of the senior-most officials is
unknown. After signing a bilateral Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between Australia and Burma, a project
called &Asia Regional Cooperation to Prevent Peoples
Trafficking8 (ARCPPT), was begun in December 2003. Funded
by AusAID, it is being implemented simultaneously in Burma,
Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand. An Australian law enforcement
expert directs the project in Burma. The project aims to
increase the capacity of the MPF to combat trafficking of
persons. An encouraging outcome is that 1/3 of the agents
are women, a new concept in Burmese law enforcement. In
role-plays and training, the women agents clearly
demonstrated to their male colleagues the effectiveness of
women working with women trafficking victims. The agents now
possess significantly improved investigative skills.
On the advice of ARCPPT, the Ministry of Home Affairs
established a division under the MPF to combat Transnational
Organized Crime. Under this department of the MPF is a
special Anti-Trafficking Unit. The unit is comprised of 40
agents of whom 32 have completed extensive training through
the ARCPPT program during 2004 in order to increase their
capacity to combat trafficking in persons.
In January 2004, the GOB established a taskforce, composed of
representatives from the Ministry of Home Affairs, the
Ministry of Social Welfare, the Ministry of Labor, the
Supreme Court, and the Attorney General,s office to draft a
&Prevention of Trafficking in Persons Law.8 Previously,
judges drew on colonial British laws to convict persons
believed to be engaged in trafficking. Some of these laws
included: 1861 Criminal Acts, 1947 Immigration Act, 1949
Prostitution Suppression Act, 1993 Child Law, and the 1999
Overseas Employment Act, that dealt with immigration and
smuggling.
In September 2004, the UN-Inter Agency Project on Human
Trafficking in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (UNIAP)
implemented a 2-day workshop to review the draft of the
trafficking law. UNIAP invited national and international
legal experts to participate and give their comments,
recommendations, and suggestions. Representatives of UNODC
and ARCPPT participated, as well as the key NGOs that are
involved in trafficking matters in Burma, e.g. Save the
Children (UK) and World Vision.
Following the workshop the taskforce accepted some of the
recommendations, including provisions for the rights of child
victims and to make the law more closely follow the
principles and guidelines of the UN Commission for Human
Rights and the Convention against Transnational Organized
Crime and its protocols. According to the MPF, the law will
ensure that the rights of trafficked victims are protected
and that traffickers receive the maximum penalty. It will
also allow the property of traffickers and their accomplices
to be frozen.
The draft law is now with the Ministry of Home Affairs, which
is taking the lead in drafting the law. The law must next be
submitted to the Attorney General,s office to ensure that
the terminology of the law is legally correct. After the
Attorney General,s office has completed its work the law
will be submitted to the cabinet for approval. UNIAP believes
the law will be enacted sometime during 2005, although they
admit that the installation of a new Home Affairs Minister in
late 2004 might result in delays.
Burma was host for the Coordinated Mekong Ministerial
Initiative against Trafficking in the Greater Mekong
Sub-region: Senior Officials and Ministerial Meetings
(COMMIT) from October 27-29, 2004 in Rangoon. The
participating countries were Cambodia, China, Lao PDR,
Thailand, Vietnam, and Burma. Key outputs of the conference
were a COMMIT "MOU to Combat Trafficking", which was signed
by all the participating countries, and the approval of a
"Sub-regional Plan of Action to Combat Human Trafficking."
Burma had earlier approved its own TIP Plan of Action, so the
it is now in the process of revising the earlier plan to make
it compatible with the new Sub-regional plan.
--H. GOB officials at lower levels reportedly sometimes
facilitate or condone trafficking. Some government
officials, particularly along the borders, accept bribes from
traffickers. We are not aware of any punitive measures that
have been taken against officials who facilitate cross-border
trafficking.
In terms of internal trafficking, cases were lodged in civil
courts against local authorities for using forced labor to
construct roads. In a landmark decision, on January 31,
2005, four persons were found guilty by the Kawhmu Township
Court of Rangoon Division of using forced labor. Each
official was sentenced to 8 months in prison. (One official
was charged in two separate cases, so received two,
consecutive 8-month sentences.) Three other pending cases
that were raised by ILO concluded on February 28, 20054 in
Rakhine State. In these three cases a judge found four local
authorities guilty of committing forced labor and were meted
out 6-month sentences. These cases have set a precedent and
could bode well for reducing future abuses of forced labor by
civil authorities. The ILO feels that these convictions
would not have been handed down without authorization from
the highest levels of the SPDC.
However, reports of the use of forced labor by the Burmese
army continue to come in. In Mon, Karen, Kayah, and southern
Shan States, civilians are forced to build barracks for the
army, to carry ammunition and supplies, and in some cases to
act as human minesweepers. The ILO has also raised some
forced labor cases in Chin State. The MPF has correctly
pointed out that its officials have no control over and
cannot comment on alleged forced labor or child conscription
cases by the military.
--I. A lack of commitment by the top-levels of the SPDC
constitutes a serious constraint on tackling trafficking in
persons. This apparent lack of commitment may explain why
there is also a chronic lack of GOB funds available for
trafficking issues. Although an Anti-Trafficking Unit has
been set up and their personnel have received training by
Australian professionals, the unit comprises only 40 persons,
so their ability to curb trafficking on a nationwide-basis is
limited.
--J. Self-monitoring of its anti-trafficking efforts remains
a weakness of the government. Once the 40 members of the
new Anti-Trafficking Unit are deployed to the field,
activities to prosecute, prevent, and protect victims may be
more effective. Burma is cooperating both with China and
Thailand to curb trafficking to those countries.
The GOB has established a Trafficking Working Group (TWG)
that meets every 6 weeks to discuss and coordinate
trafficking-related matters. The TWG is multi-sectoral and
includes the Supreme Court, Ministry of Home Affairs
(including the MPF), Ministry of Labor, Ministry of Social
Welfare, Relief and Resettlement, Ministry of Immigration and
Population, Myanmar Women Affairs Federation, and Myanmar
Maternal Child Welfare Association. It is an attempt to
promote greater cross-ministerial cooperation and
coordination.
--K. Prostitution is not legal in Burma. Prostitutes, pimps,
and procurers are subject to punishment, but there is no
specific law against clients. However, the laws against
prostitution are unevenly enforced and may be enforced
according to the whims of the police. In some of the Shan
State border areas with China, there are large casinos with
attached brothels. It appears that most of the casino staff
and prostitutes are imported from China and other countries
and most, if not all, of the clients are Chinese. The
prostitutes at these establishments are reportedly subject to
harassment and blackmail by police.
PREVENTION:
--A. Yes, the GOB acknowledges that trafficking of Burmese
citizens to Thailand and China is a problem and they are
drafting laws and upgrading their enforcement agencies to
combat the problem. The MPF readily admits that there have
been forced labor violations by civil authorities and now the
courts are finally starting to punish the offenders.
However, the MPF stated frankly that what the military does
regarding forced labor or conscripting child soldiers is
outside their jurisdiction.
In a grudging acknowledgment that the recruitment of child
soldiers is a problem, on January 5, 2004 the SPDC formed the
Committee for Prevention of Military Recruitment of Under-age
Children. This committee is chaired by Secretary-1 of the
SPDC and its stated purpose is &to prevent the forced
recruitment of under-age children as soldiers; to protect the
interests of under-age children, and to ensure adherence to
the orders and instructions issued for the protection of
under-age children.8 A Plan of Action was drafted involving
some participation by UNICEF.
In 2004, the GOB organized two visits by UNICEF to army
recruitment centers. While UNICEF admits that these were
public relations events staged by the military and the visits
did not uncover any child soldiers, UNICEF feels that the
importance of the visits is the fact that the military has
finally agreed to open a dialogue on child soldier issues.
Previously, the military would not even discuss it, claiming
it did not exist.
--B. The primary GOB agency involved in anti-trafficking
activities is the MPF of the Ministry of Home Affairs. Under
the division of Transnational Organized Crime is a special
Anti-trafficking Unit. The unit currently consists of 40
persons who have undergone intensive training to increase
their capacity to monitor and enforce anti-trafficking.
(See paragraphs "G" and &J8 in the previous section.)
--C. The Myanmar National Committee on Women's Affairs
(MNCWA) has initiated information, education, and
communication (IEC) campaigns through various media,
including: training workshops, educational talks, radio
broadcasts, production of pamphlets, posters, comic books,
and video plays. Some of these materials have been published
in ethnic languages and some attempts have been made to visit
ethnic areas to educate women and girls at the grass roots.
We do not know of any GOB sponsored campaigns that target
&clients.8
ARCPPT has provided some awareness training to judges and
local authorities in some states and divisions.
UNIAP has facilitated the publication of a newsletter on
trafficking in persons. To date there have been three
issues, the first being printed in December 2003 and the
latest in August 2004. The newsletter provides interesting
news and documentation on TIPS in Burma and publishes a
calendar of TIPS events and activities.
The GOB says that it has conducted a total of eight TIP
awareness workshops at State and Division levels and has
mobile IEC teams that travel around the country. The GOB
claims that nearly 700,000 persons have been educated on TIP
issues.
--D. The GOB has provided skills training to help
rehabilitate trafficked women who have returned to Burma from
Thailand and to hopefully prevent their return to Thailand.
However, the number of women who have officially returned and
who have undergone training is small.
The GOB established a special Reception Center at Myawaddy in
February 2002 to receive trafficking victims who return from
Thailand. According to official government figures, as of
July 31, 2004, as many as 13,738 returnees had passed through
this center. Of these 10,218 were male, 3,520 were female,
and 331 were children. The preponderance of males compared
to female returnees raises questions of whether these were
really trafficking victims or smuggling cases.
--E. The GOB has not allocated significant funds to support
prevention programs. The ARCPPT project, which is supported
by funds from AusAID and other agencies, is designed to
increase the capacity of the police to prevent trafficking
and to properly investigate trafficking cases, but it is
still too early to measure any significant results of this
capacity building.
--F. The MPF, through its Anti-trafficking Unit, and the
MNCWA, are the key GOB agencies working to eliminate
trafficking.
The MNCWA is chaired by the Deputy Minister of Home Affairs
and collaborates with both the Ministry of Home Affairs and
the Ministry of Social Welfare, Relief and Resettlement. It
focuses its efforts on prevention, prosecution, and
rehabilitation of trafficking victims and tries to support
the victims through research, capacity building, awareness
raising, and networking. MNCWA networks with government
ministries, UN agencies, and NGOs.
There are several committees formed by MNCWA that deal with
trafficking issues. Two of these committees are the
Preventative Working Committee for Trafficking in Persons
(PWCTIP), formed in 2002, and the Control Committee for
Illegal Migrant Workers, formed in July 2004. The Myanmar
Women's Affairs Federation (MWAF) was established as a GONGO
in December 2003 with a major objective to reduce cases of
trafficking in women and children. The MNCWA uses the MWAF
as an implementing partner in combating trafficking. (The
MWAF is considered the turf of the wives of the leading
generals. After the purge of Prime Minister General Khin
Nyunt in October 2004, other generals, wives replaced the
ladies on this committee and the group has continued.)
Both of these government agencies are involved in the UN
Inter-agency Project on Human Trafficking in the Greater
Mekong Sub-region (UNIAP), which includes the countries of
Cambodia, China, Laos, Burma, Thailand, and Vietnam. These
governments, UN agencies, and local and international NGOs
are working together to combat trafficking. In Burma, other
UN agencies that are involved are UNICEF (Child Protection)
and UNDP/FAO (Food Security). UNICEF conducted a workshop on
Monitoring and Combating Commercial Sexual Exploitation of
Children and Trafficking in Rangoon on May 18-19, 2004.
In Myanmar, UNIAP is &housed8 in the UNICEF office. It
receives financial support from a variety of donors,
including the UN Foundation, AusAID, the Netherlands, SIDA,
the United States, New Zealand, UNDP, and ADB.
From 2004-2006 UNIAP,s goals are to 1) build a knowledge
base, 2) strategic analysis and priority setting, 3) target
interventions and research, and 4) advocacy.
Key UNIAP activities for this same period will include: 1)
establish a reference center of human trafficking, 2) produce
a trafficking newsletter on a regular basis, 3) update
mapping of anti-trafficking projects in Myanmar, 4) identify
areas for research, 5) capacity building of local NGOs and
strengthening networks, 6) training on gender, trafficking,
and other related issues, 7) provide secretariat services to
the Informal Working Group on trafficking, 8) support
innovative public awareness, and 9) facilitate bilateral and
multi-lateral cooperation among participating countries.
Key NGOs partners in Burma include Save the Children (UK),
World Vision, and others who are promoting increased
surveillance, awareness, and prevention of trafficking in
persons.
--G. The GOB,s monitoring of its borders for trafficking is
very inadequate. The border areas are very remote and poorly
patrolled. Guards and other agents posted to border
crossings are preoccupied with controlling trade and
maintaining security and have little time for tracking
trafficking issues. This situation may improve once the
Anti-trafficking Unit is able to deploy its staff to key
border points and is able to conduct awareness raising
training among border control personnel.
--H. Yes, the Trafficking Working Group was mentioned under
paragraph &B8 in the previous section. The
Anti-Trafficking Unit is under the MPF,s division of
Transnational Organized Crime, which deals with a variety of
issues besides trafficking, including money laundering, drug
smuggling, etc.
Although corruption is illegal, we are not aware of a
&public corruption8 task force that monitors corruption in
general. Corruption is rampant in Burma from low-level
government employees up through top military officers, and
their families, who control much of the business activity.
However, corruption is tolerated as a fact in Burma, and
senior officials appear to be &immune8 from corruption
charges, as long as they do not run afoul of their military
cronies. Otherwise, the SPDC cracks down on corruption
whenever they wish to expose a colleague or try to shut down
a politician or political organization of which they
disapprove.
--I. Yes, the GOB actively participates in multinational
working groups on trafficking. Reference has already been
made to their participation in UNIAP. In addition, Burma
hosted a meeting in Rangoon of the Coordinated Mekong
Ministerial Initiative Against Trafficking (COMMIT) on
October 27-29, 2004. This meeting included the Greater
Mekong Sub-region countries of Burma, Cambodia, China, Laos,
Thailand, and Vietnam.
--J. Yes, the GOB has a national plan of action. However,
following the COMMIT conference when six countries agreed to
a joint plan of action, Burma has been revising its plan of
action to bring it into line with the regional plan. Once
the revised plan of action has been approved it will
disseminate it to the relevant government ministries, civil
authorities, and judicial system. We are not aware of any
NGO participation in the revision of the Plan of Action.
UNICEF believes that the plan of action may have been shown
to an international expert who participated in the workshop
to study the draft TIP law.
--K. The Ministry of Home Affairs is the lead agency in
trafficking issues. The MPF,s Department of Transnational
Crime, through its Anti-Trafficking Unit, is the focal point
for enforcement. Other ministries, including the Ministry of
Labor and the Ministry of Social Welfare, are also involved.
INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKERS:
--A. See paragraph &G8 in the first section for a summary
of progress on drafting the "Prevention of Trafficking in
Persons Law.8
In the absence of a specific anti-trafficking law,
traffickers have been prosecuted under laws dealing with
immigration and smuggling. The Australian law enforcement
expert who has been managing the ARCPPT project and who has
worked on the draft law states that it is probably the best
anti-trafficking law of the four countries (Burma, Cambodia,
Laos, and Thailand) where the project is being implemented.
However, he admits that the overall legal system in Burma has
many gaps, so while the law may be good, its legal foundation
is not solid, thus enforcement will be problematic.
On April 28, 2004, the GOB enacted the &Mutual Assistance in
Criminal Matters Law.8 This is potentially an important law
for interstate cooperation in fighting transnational
organized crime, including trafficking in persons, although
it has not yet been tested. The GOB issued the regulations
for this law on October 14, 2004.
--B. According to the GOB, the penalties for trafficking in
persons range from 3 years to life in prison. Recent
sentences for offenders of forced labor have ranged between
6-8 months.
--C. The penalty for rape ranges from 10 years to life in
prison. The minimum penalty for trafficking appears to be
less than for rape, but the maximum penalty is the same.
--D. As noted in paragraph &H8 of the first section, in
January a local court actually sentenced four local
authorities to eight months in jail for using forced labor on
a road-building project. This was a first for Burma and sets
a precedent for future cases that may be lodged in court. In
a follow-up decision a month later four additional local
authorities were sentenced to six months in prison for using
forced labor. The ILO believes that this landmark decision
may embolden other victims of forced labor to take their
local authorities to court. We understand that the convicted
persons have started serving their sentences.
--E. We do not have any specific information about who
exactly is behind the trafficking. The MPF says that most of
the traffickers are minor operators. According to UNIAP,
they frequently are, or use, women to gain the confidence of
the victims, who are usually girls or women. We do not have
any specific information that front agencies are posing as
legitimate businesses for the purpose of trafficking. GOB
officials are involved, particularly with regard to internal
forced labor, but they may also be involved by accepting
bribes to ¬ see8 cross-border trafficking activities
taking place.
--F. Yes, the GOB does actively investigate cases of
trafficking and through recent training by ARCPPT, their
investigative skills are improving. However, the vast
numbers of trafficking cases that the government claims to
have investigated are actually migrant smuggling cases.
We believe that the police are not hampered with regulations
that specifically prevent the use of certain techniques for
investigating suspected cases.
--G. The valuable role of the ARCPPT project in training the
MPF,s Anti-Trafficking Unit has already been mentioned.
This training specifically addresses recognition and
investigation of TIP cases. As for prosecution, a few judges
have participated in awareness training of TIP issues and
ARCPPT plans to focus more on training judges and local
authorities in its future activities.
--H. Burma has been establishing links with China and
Thailand to cooperate in investigations of transnational
crime. Burma and China already have cases where they turned
over drug trafficking suspects to the other country and
similar cooperation is planned for trafficking in persons.
Bilateral cooperation has resulted in the arrest of 33 drug
dealers in China last year, according to Chinese sources.
Burma and China have already established three border liaison
offices for countering drug trafficking. This bodes well for
future cooperation on cross-border trafficking in persons.
We do not have any quantifiable data on cooperative
international investigations on trafficking in persons.
Burma is also a partner of the COMMIT MOU that was signed by
Burma, Cambodia, China, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam. Burma
has expressed a written commitment to work with these
countries to prevent trafficking in persons and to prosecute
criminals who engage in trafficking.
--I. Where suspects have been deported to another country the
GOB is handing over citizens of the receiving country, not
Burmese nationals. This normally takes place through police
to police actions and not through any legal extradition
process.
--J. Yes, there is clear evidence of local government
authorities being involved in using citizens for forced
labor. The recent court convictions of eight local
government leaders in forced labor cases provide ample
evidence.
--K. Officially, the GOB tells its officials not to use
forced labor. At the same time these same officials receive
orders to carry out public works projects, although they do
not always receive a budget to complete the project. Thus,
the officials are tempted to utilize forced labor to carry
out the directives. However, in January and February 2005
eight local officials were found guilty of using forced labor
in public works projects. Four of them received 6-month
sentences. Three received 8-month sentences and one received
a 16-month sentence (two consecutive, 8-month sentences).
--L. Burma has not been specifically identified as having a
child sex tourism problem. We are aware of a German citizen
who was arrested, tried, and imprisoned in Burma for
pedophilia.
--M. Burma is not yet a party to ILO Convention 182
concerning the prohibition and immediate action for the
elimination of the worst forms of child labor.
Burma signed ILO Convention 29 in on the March 4, 1955.
However, to bring domestic legislation in line with this
convention, Burma has taken additional &legislative,
executive, and administrative measures and has issued two
legislative orders; Order No. 1/99 and Supplementary
Notification to Order No. 1/99. These orders were printed in
Burmese and English and were also translated into major
ethnic languages and distributed. An implementation
committee for ILO Convention 29 was formed in March 2001.
This committee is headed by Deputy Minister for Home Affairs
and comprises 33 members.8
On January 18, 2005 (just prior to the sentencing of four
local officials for forced labor abuses) the Ministry of
Labor issued a directive to thoroughly investigate complaints
of forced labor, and if found to be true, to take necessary
legal action.
Burma has not signed ILO Convention 105 on forced or
compulsory labor. (The only other ILO convention that Burma
has signed is Convention 87.)
The GOB Burma signed the Convention of the Rights of the
Child (CRC) on July 16, 1991 and enacted its own Child Law on
July 14, 1993. However, Burma has not signed the Optional
Protocol to the CRC on the sale of children, child
prostitution, and child pornography. Both UNIAP and UNICEF
have informed us that this optional protocol is under
consideration by the GOB.
Burma acceded to the Convention against Transnational
Organized Crime on March 30, 2004, as well as its protocols
to prevent, suppress, and punish trafficking in persons, and
to combat smuggling of migrants.
PROTECTION AND ASSISTANCE TO VICTIMS:
--A. This does not apply to Burma, since it is not considered
a major &destination country8 for internationally
trafficked persons.
The GOB established a Reception Center for returnees at
Myawaddy border post in February 2002, as an
inter-ministerial project. During 2004 the center received
5,274 returnees and has received a total of 15,831 persons
since its establishment. To date the GOB has spent a total
of 19,200,000 Kyat (USD 21,333) for living, health care,
food, etc. at the Myawaddy Reception Center.
--B. The GOB is supportive of the work of World Vision and
Save the Children (UK) in the area of trafficking of persons.
The GOB does not provide funding to these NGOs, but it
facilitates their work and uses their services for trafficked
persons. According to government figures, since 2001 there
have been 283 trafficking victims who were repatriated to
their families. These victims were supported and
rehabilitated by Save the Children (142), World Vision (115),
and UNIAP (26).
--C. Since Burma is not considered a major &destination
country8 this is not an issue.
--D. World Vision, Save the Children (UK), IOM, and other
agencies who are involved in repatriation of trafficking
victims have taken efforts to ensure that the GOB does not
arrest the victims when they return to Burma. Also, we are
not aware of any arrests of returnees who have arrived at the
Myawaddy Reception Center.
--E. Now that the Anti-Trafficking Unit has received training
in investigative procedures, they are more aware of victims,
rights and their ability to help law enforcement fight the
crime.
Yes, as the recent cases that resulted in sentences against
eight perpetrators of forced labor show, victims can file
civil suits and might receive justice.
In the past victims of forced labor were sometimes pressured
to withdraw their cases, but with the recent successful
prosecution of forced labor violators, the ILO expects that
there will be more cases filed and probably less pressure put
on victims to remain silent.
--F. Short of placing the victims and witnesses in jail for
their protective custody, not very much protection is
afforded by the government. As far as we know, the Myawaddy
Reception Center is the only such facility currently in
existence. According to the GOB, it spent $21,333 for the
Myawaddy center during the past three years. This probably
does not include the initial cost of establishing the center.
--G. Other than the training that has been done by ARCPPT,
UNIAP, and MNCWA and its affiliates, we do not know of any
other GOB sponsored training inside or outside the country.
--H. See paragraphs &A8 and &F8 of this section.
--I. World Vision and Save the Children (UK) are two
international NGOs that have active programs for trafficking
victims in Burma. World Vision initiated projects related to
trafficking in persons about four years ago. Their emphasis
is primarily on prevention through awareness raising. They
try to identify and target vulnerable families who have
daughters who might be susceptible to being trafficked. Then
they work with these families to make them aware of the
dangers of trafficking and provide micro-credit loans or
other assistance to help to stabilize the families. World
Vision also implements general community awareness programs
and focuses on the rights and dignity of people and makes
people aware of exploitative situations. Sometimes returning
traffic victims are used as &peer alert raisers8 to help
others avoid the pitfalls of being trafficked.
World Vision works with trafficked persons who come back from
Thailand so that they are not arrested and gives them
counseling, life skill training, and helps them to be
reunited with their families. They or their families often
receive loans or other assistance to help them in their life
in Burma. World Vision says about 60 percent of the
returnees it assists settle down and do not return to
Thailand. World Vision works in six key border points
located between Tachileik and Kawthoung. Save the Children
(UK) operates a similar program in Burma. UNIAP has also
helped to rehabilitate a limited number of trafficked
victims. IOM has facilitated the repatriation of trafficked
victims to Burma.
END OF REPORT.
Martinez