Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05PARIS1800, EUROPEAN CFO VIEWS ON SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 404

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05PARIS1800.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05PARIS1800 2005-03-17 16:05 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Paris
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 001800 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE PASS FEDERAL RESERVE 
STATE PASS SEC (DONOLAISEN, BOONE) 
STATE FOR E, EB, AND EUR 
TREASURY FOR DO/IM SOBEL, RHARLOW, LHULL 
TREASURY ALSO FOR DO/IMB AND DO/E WDINKELACKER 
USDOC FOR 4212/MAC/EUR/OEURA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EFIN ECON FR
SUBJECT: EUROPEAN CFO VIEWS ON SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 404 
 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED, NOT FOR INTERNET DISTRIBUTION 
 
 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1. (SBU) The Ambassador hosted a discussion on March 15 at 
the Embassy, led by the SEC's Chief Accountant, Donald 
Nicolaisen, with Chief Financial Officers of SEC-listed 
companies operating in France.  The CFOs expressed 
particular concerns about the high costs of complying with 
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation, as well as 
the lack of specificity in SEC guidance and the extreme 
positions being taken by the PCAOB.  Most companies urge 
eventual SEC action to accept accounting statements 
conforming to new European standard IFRS accounts, rather 
than U.S. GAAP accounts.  END SUMMARY. 
 
OVERVIEW 
-------- 
 
2. (SBU) At the invitation of the Ambassador, Securities and 
Exchange Commission (SEC) officials Donald Nicolaisen, SEC 
Chief Accountant, Sherman Boone, International Affairs 
Assistant Director, and Erika Sulkowski, Special Advisor, 
led a discussion on March 15 at the Embassy among SEC-listed 
companies based in France (and one in Germany) about Section 
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation, dealing with 
management certification of internal financial controls. 
The discussion was the capstone to ongoing talks Embassy has 
been holding with interested parties, soliciting suggestions 
on Sarbanes-Oxley in order to facilitate continued 
investments in the U.S. capital markets.  Also participating 
in the meeting were representatives from several local law 
firms, accounting firms, auditors, and French government 
officials. 
 
3. (SBU) After Mr. Nicolaisen made opening remarks on the 
origins and implementation of Sarbanes-Oxley, company 
representatives spoke of the effects of Section 404.  One 
CFO noted that audits now have a freezing effect: at the end 
of the year, new projects tend to be put on hold until after 
internal controls are completed and signed off.  Another 
spoke of the chilling legal environment: whether or not a 
CFO discloses a material weakness, personal legal liability 
may still attach, but with disclosure the lifespan of the 
CFO with the company may be short.  Another spoke of the 
need for balance, and the need for specificity.  Questions 
were also raised questions about process (the SEC has 
delayed section 404 for a year, but not Section 302, so what 
happens?) and about progress toward U.S.-European mutual 
recognition (a question a GOF official also later took up). 
A number of firms made the observation that with the SEC 
extension, foreign issuers will undertake compliance with 
two years of International Financial Reporting Standards 
(IFRS) experience under their belt, and urged the SEC to 
consider mutual recognition of European and U.S. accounting 
standards. 
 
COSTS, AND PCAOB RULE-MAKING 
---------------------------- 
 
4. (SBU) A big question is one of cost, according to several 
company representatives.  One executive suggested that the 
SEC should have a procedure to take costs into account when 
setting compliance standards, and argued that costs are 
higher for foreign issuers.  Another pointed out that the 
underlying issue is the SEC role in relation to the Public 
Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).  Reacting to 
liability laws and pending U.S. court cases, PCAOB rules 
push private auditors to go beyond SEC rules.  The auditors 
in turn are forcing their rules upon issuers, creating 
something akin to Sarbanes-Oxley in extremis.  Some 
companies argued that PCAOB "excessiveness" constrains 
companies from creating or implementing what may be best 
practices.  This complaint was echoed by another CFO, who 
said the PCAOB is in effect pressuring companies to do 
things they would not reasonably do otherwise. 
 
5. (SBU) A number of firms urged the SEC to come up with 
guidance for Sarbanes-Oxley that would curb PCAOB excess, 
arguing that the PCAOB, in the absence of such guidance, is 
drafting rules for the worst-case scenario.  One major 
French firm told Econ MinCouns recently that the PCAOB is 
creating a situation where one "can't see the forest for the 
trees."  PCAOB rules are so detailed and resource-intensive 
that firms may lose sight of the overall "due diligence" 
oversight function in struggling to comply with the 
"arcania" of PCAOB rules.  In the end, according to this 
company, the costs of compliance may turn out to be higher 
than the potential frauds against which the legislation is 
designed to protect. 
 
CONVERGENCE/MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS 
--------------------------------------------- --------- 
 
6. (SBU) One CFO urged the SEC to get more input from 
investors.  Another remarked that it never gets any 
questions from potential U.S.-based investors about U.S. 
GAAP, implying that U.S. investors are comfortable with 
European accounting standards and have no requirement for 
reconciled (European-to-U.S. GAAP) accounts.  Several 
executives urged the SEC to continue work toward regulatory 
convergence regarding the European IFRS standard and U.S. 
GAAP. 
 
7.  (SBU) One large French company told Econ MinCouns in a 
separate conversation that European companies view PCAOB 
interpretations as overly onerous and rigid, touting form 
over substance, with no determination (or, meaningful 
definition) of materiality.  European issuers face 
additional problems reconciling differing demands from 
different regulators. 
 
THE "BIG 4" STIFLES COMPETITION 
------------------------------- 
 
8.  (SBU) Company executives also noted that the SEC might 
do more to encourage the creation of more than the four 
existing big auditing firms (which creates something of a 
oligopoly).  Yet another noted sardonically the suspicion 
that Sarbanes-Oxley is a plot to make auditors rich, citing 
an anecdote of an auditor who is charging in excess of USD 
1500 an hour for the services of the firms' partners.  The 
lack of competition among external auditing companies also 
poses potential conflict of interest problems, as firms must 
be careful to keep at least one of the Big 4 in reserve for 
potential auditing needs. 
 
WHERE TO GO FROM HERE? 
---------------------- 
 
9.  (SBU) The Ambassador and the SEC officials encouraged 
companies to participate in the April 13 roundtable in 
Washington organized by the SEC, which will be open to 
foreign issuers.  Companies were also offered the option of 
submitting additional comments directly to the SEC via 
letter or online submission, or via the U.S. Embassy. 
 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
10.  (SBU) Embassy greatly appreciates SEC participation in 
the March 15 event, which received well-deserved praise and 
appreciation from the private sector participants.  It was 
clear to participants that the SEC and the U.S. Government 
are interested in their views -- a number of executives 
commented on the fact that recent French legislation on new 
accounting rules was implemented with no such opportunity 
for input from French firms.  Turnout for the event was 
quite high (two-thirds of French firms listed in the U.S.), 
reflecting the strong local interest in making practical 
suggestions to alleviate the more costly and rigid of 
Section 404's requirements. 
LEACH