Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05OTTAWA706, CANADIAN OPPOSITION LEADER HEARS DISAPPOINTMENT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA706.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05OTTAWA706 2005-03-04 21:22 2011-05-18 03:30 CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN Embassy Ottawa
Appears in these articles:
http://aptn.ca/pages/news/2011/05/18/u-s-asked-weapons-firm-to-twist-canadian-arms-on-missile-defence-diplomatic-cables/
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
id: 28178
date: 3/4/2005 21:22
refid: 05OTTAWA706
origin: Embassy Ottawa
classification: CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
destination:
header:
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
----------------- header ends ----------------
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 OTTAWA 000706
SIPDIS
NOFORN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/04/2013
TAGS: PREL MARR PGOV CA
SUBJECT: CANADIAN OPPOSITION LEADER HEARS DISAPPOINTMENT
RATHER THAN "SOLIDARITY" ON MISSILE DEFENSE
Classified By: DCM John Dickson. Reason 1.4 (b) and (d).
1. (C/NF) Summary: Ambassador Cellucci met March 4 with
Conservative Party Leader Stephen Harper, at the latter's
request. Although the original reason for the meeting was to
explain and gain understanding for the Opposition Party's
position on Missile Defense, the Senate vote to keep the
border closed to live Canadian beef and the murder of four
Canadian police officers by a drug dealer in Alberta also
came up. The Ambassador took the opportunity to raise
concerns over lack of leadership in both major parties in
their handling of Missile Defense. End Summary.
2. (C/NF) The Opposition leader first raised the hot topic
of the Senate vote on beef exports to the U.S. and asked
about the current status of the minimal risk rule. The
Ambassador explained the process and pointed out the
announcement by the President to veto any measure that came
from Congress to overturn that ruling. This was about as
strong a signal as anyone could get that there is no linkage
between trade issues and Ottawa's rejection of Canadian
participation in missile defense. (NOTE: Newly arrived
Canadian Ambassador to Washington Frank McKenna, in a recent
interview, had hinted at possible linkages between trade
problems and Canadian public attitudes toward cooperation
with the U.S. END NOTE.) It was a not subtle message,
comparing a leader who knew what was in the best interests of
the U.S. and was not shy about expending political capital in
standing up for it.
3. (C/NF) Harper asked the Ambassador for his take on the
government's handling of the Missile Defense issue. The
Ambassador pointed out that the two reasons he heard from
Martin were that he could not trust the Conservatives for
their support and he wanted to avoid an anti-American debate.
Harper said that he never heard that there was a specific
proposal on the table, and the Conservatives were unprepared
to support a project or a proposal whose contents had not
been revealed or even discussed.
4. (C/NF) The Ambassador dismissed this as playing politics
with North American security. He pointed out his dismay that
when the government, in response to a NATO request, was
considering sending a small number of Canadian trainers to
Iraq to help train the Iraqi army, the Conservatives were the
first to launch a shrill protest against boots on the ground
in Iraq. Harper countered weakly that they needed to do this
because the Liberal election campaign had effectively
targeted them as being hawks on Iraq. The Ambassador also
pointed to the last-minute Conservative renege in Parliament
on the bill to split International Trade from the Department
of Foreign Affairs that caused the government its first
legislative defeat. Harper tried to correct the record by
saying that they had never promised their support over this
bad idea and that, even when they had come out in support of
Liberal initiatives (the budget, e.g.), government insiders
planted critical leaks in the press that made the
Conservatives look bad.
5. (C/NF) On the Missile Defense decision, the Ambassador
reiterated his disappointment that Canadian leaders on both
sides of the House of Commons had refused to provide the
leadership needed to do what was in Canada's interest. The
White House was not happy with the way the issue was handled,
and Washington officials, especially in Defense, were
questioning Canada's reliability as a partner. For the first
time Canada and the U.S. were out of step on North American
defense. With respect to NORAD, the Ambassador expected that
we would move forward with the renewal process, but in a more
limited, cautious manner than might have been the case with
Canadian participation in Missile Defense. He found it odd
that Canadians at NORAD would now be able to help identify
and analyze an incoming missile threat to North America, but
would presumably have to leave the room when decisions were
made on what to do about it.
6. (C/NF) The Ambassador then commented favorably on what
appeared to be a significant and meaningful increase in
Canadian defense spending, calculated to at least to begin to
reverse a decade long decline. His impression was that this
funding was serious and was locked into a procurement cycle,
and wondered if his optimism were justified. Harper said
that if the decision rested with the Conservative Party, it
would be a guaranteed deal, but he couldn't say the same
about the Liberals. Down the road, you could never be sure
which way the Liberal wind would be blowing.
7. (C/NF) Ambassador Cellucci expressed his and Washington's
condolences on the loss of the four Mounties gunned down the
day before while conducting a marijuana grow-op investigation
in Harper's home province of Alberta. He asked Harper if
this would have any effect on the government's plans to
decriminalize marijuana. Harper thought that it would
probably put the brakes on the pending legislation to
decriminalize small amounts of marijuana. The Liberal party
stance on drugs, however, especially marijuana, tended to be
soft. Passage of the bill might be slowed, but it would
likely move forward later in the year.
8. (C/NF) Comment: The leader of the Opposition came
looking for understanding and solidarity in criticism of the
Martin government, but the Ambassador's message was blunt:
Canada's handling of the Missile Defense issue reflected a
basic lack of principled leadership on the part of both the
government and the Opposition. The latter, sticking to the
line they were not expected to lead, never laid out a
principled position in support of North American defense, and
instead used this issue to try to divide the Liberal party.
And the Liberal government, given its minority status and the
need to stop the hemorrhaging of votes in pacifist Quebec and
left-leaning urban ridings in Ontario, also based its
decision on political expediency. In terms of security
policy, however, both sides knew that at least symbolic
participation in missile defense was where Canada should be
heading. End Comment
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
CELLUCCI
=======================CABLE ENDS