Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05MONTREAL323, CANADA DOWNGRADES ACCEPTANCE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05MONTREAL323.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05MONTREAL323 2005-03-15 12:22 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Consulate Montreal
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MONTREAL 000323 
 
SIPDIS 
 
FROM USMISSION ICAO 
STATE FOR DS/OFM, L/DL, and IO 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ODIP AORC EAIR CA ICAO
SUBJECT:  CANADA DOWNGRADES ACCEPTANCE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO 
ICAO FROM DIPLOMATIC TO INTERNATIONAL 
 
1.  Summary and action request.  The Government of Canada 
has instituted an "administrative change" in its 
"acceptance" of diplomats representing their governments to 
ICAO.  The category of acceptance (permission to remain in 
Canada) stamped in diplomatic passports has been downgraded 
from "diplomatic" to "international."  The unilateral 
change, for which no reason has been given, has angered 
Permanent Representatives to ICAO and has already resulted 
in at least one dispute involving a diplomat who was turned 
away from the diplomatic line at Dorval Airport.  The GOC 
has written to ICAO assuring that diplomatic privileges and 
immunities (Ps and Is) remain unchanged.  The Secretary 
General will be meeting with a GOC protocol officer on this 
matter the week of March 28th.  US Mission requests a 
Department reaction as soon as possible so it may feed US 
input to the Secretary General and to the Canadian 
Representative (in his host country capacity) in time for 
the meeting.  Department may also wish to consider a 
demarche to the GOC in Ottawa and in Washington.  End 
summary and action request. 
 
2.  At the March 9 meeting of the ICAO Council, the 
Ethiopian Permanent Representative announced that he had 
recently applied for a new diplomatic visa.  As required by 
ICAO's host country agreement, he submitted his application 
through ICAO's Office of External Relations (OER).  When his 
passport came back, instead of having "diplomatic" stamped 
as his category of acceptance by the GOC, it was marked 
"International."  He wanted to know if there had been an 
amendment to the host country agreement and if so, what this 
meant for his diplomatic status and privileges.  If there 
had been no amendment, he asked how the GOC had the right to 
unilaterally change the status notified by the Government of 
Ethiopia from "diplomatic" to "international."  A number of 
other delegates complained about the recent use of the 
"international" acceptance for their passports. 
 
3.  The Secretariat responded that ICAO had been advised by 
the GOC last Fall that an administrative change had taken 
place affecting the category of acceptance, but this would 
not affect the Ps and Is enjoyed by Representatives assigned 
to ICAO.  Delegates demanded to know why the OER had never 
informed member states.  The Secretary General promised to 
get back to the Council with more information. 
 
4.  On March 11, the SyG explained the following:  On 
October 27, 2004, the GOC had sent a letter to ICAO stating 
that as of that date, all diplomats accredited to ICAO would 
be categorized as "international."  In December, ICAO 
requested clarification of the term "international," and was 
told that there was no difference between the diplomatic and 
international categories.  The Ps and Is enjoyed by the 
diplomats would not change.  On February 9, 2005, the SyG 
wrote to Canada's Chief of Protocol expressing concern and 
asking for a return of the diplomatic stamp for 
Representatives to ICAO.  The GOC refused the request in 
writing.  On March 10 the Canadian Office of Protocol sent 
ICAO another letter reaffirming that there would be no 
change in privileges under the headquarters agreement, and 
informing that all airports and agencies had been instructed 
that Representatives to ICAO should be treated as diplomats 
when they enter the country.  The letter also said that if 
representatives encountered problems at the border, the 
Canadian Office of Protocol might be willing to re-examine 
the matter. 
 
5.  Quoting from the host country agreement, which grants 
diplomats to ICAO the same Ps and Is as those accorded to 
bilateral missions under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic 
Relations, Spain informed the Council that one of his 
colleagues had already been stopped from going through the 
diplomatic line at Dorval airport and was permitted access 
only after a lengthy debate with the Canadian official. 
 
6.  India, Chile, Australia, Peru, South Africa, Russia, 
Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Argentina, Colombia, Honduras, Pakistan 
and Ethiopia also intervened to complain about the change. 
They argued: Their governments had notified them as 
diplomats but the GOC had relegated them to a lesser status; 
it was inaccurate and confusing to categorize 
representatives to ICAO as international civil servants; the 
diplomats would now have to carry a letter from Protocol in 
addition to their passports to prove that they receive 
diplomatic Ps and Is and there was no guarantee that a 
border bureaucrat would accept the letter; since the GOC had 
not negotiated a change in the host country agreement, the 
GOC was not in a position to change the categorization of 
diplomats to ICAO.  They all wanted to know why ICAO hadn't 
advised the Council of the change that had been made five 
months earlier.  Egypt demanded a legal analysis of whether 
the GOC was within its rights absent renegotiation of the 
host country agreement.  The Director of the Legal Bureau, 
quoting Article 12 of the host country agreement, said that 
as long as ICAO representatives receive the same Ps and Is 
as diplomats under the VCDR, there was no violation.  He 
added, however, that ICAO would have to monitor the 
practical consequences of this change.   When the OER 
acknowledged that bilateral diplomats continued to receive a 
diplomatic stamp in their passports, while representatives 
to ICAO were now getting the same stamp as ICAO secretariat 
officials at the P-4 level and above, some delegations said 
this proved that, contrary to GOC assurances, there really 
were two different classes of diplomats serving in Canada. 
 
7.  Action Request.  The Secretary General reported that 
Canada's Office of Protocol would be sending a 
representative to Montreal the week of May 28th to discuss 
this issue.  Mission requests the Department's opinion on 
this matter before then so that we may provide the Secretary 
General with additional input for his meeting.  Depending 
upon the Department's analysis, it may also wish to consider 
a demarche to Ottawa and to the Canadian Embassy in 
Washington prior to the ICAO-GOC meeting. 
 
SERWER ALLEN