Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05WARSAW1057, Poland Still Lobbying EU on Open Pension Fund

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05WARSAW1057.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05WARSAW1057 2005-02-25 11:21 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Warsaw
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS  WARSAW 001057 
 
SIPDIS 
 
 
Sensitive 
 
STATE FOR EUR/NCE TARA ERATH AND MICHAEL SESSUMS 
USDOC FOR 4232/ITA/MAC/EUR/JBURGESS AND MWILSON 
TREASURY FOR OASIA MATTHEW GAERTNER 
FRANKFURT FOR TREASURY JIM WALLAR 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EFIN ECON PREL PL EUN
SUBJECT:  Poland Still Lobbying EU on Open Pension Fund 
Classification as Part of its Convergence Strategy 
 
Ref: (A) 2004 Warsaw  3901 (B) 2004 Warsaw 2780 
 
 (U) This cable is sensitive, but unclassified, and NOT for 
Internet distribution. 
 
1. (SBU) Summary: Poland is concerned that it will not be 
able to meet the 2007 target date agreed with the EU for 
meeting the Maastricht criteria on the road to adopting the 
Euro if the EU does not change the way it counts pension 
fund assets.  In 2004, the EU's statistical agency, 
Eurostat, decided that individual accounts under Open 
Pension Funds had to be excluded from the calculation of 
government deficits.  In 1999, Poland enacted landmark 
pension reform which allows the creation of IRA's under 
Social Security, similar to reforms currently being 
considered in the United States.  These funds are currently 
generating a significant surplus which Poland wants to be 
included in the deficit calculation, which would help it 
meet Maastricht criteria.  This is not an idle statistical 
debate.  Excluding the revenue surplus currently generated 
by Polish pension funds would increase Poland's projected 
deficit-GDP ratio from 2.2% to 3.9% in 2007.  Poland is 
concerned that the EU definition would force it to make 
drastic cuts in spending at a time when it plans heavy EU- 
related expenditures.  Should Poland persuade the EU to 
change its definition, it would facilitate pension reforms 
in other EU countries.  End Summary. 
 
2. (U) On February 15, Ministry of Finance U/S Grzegorz 
Stanislawski told Econoffs that Poland continues to lobby 
the EU hard on the issue of how to classify Open Pension 
Funds (OFE in Polish).  Stanislawski explained that Poland 
is proud of its groundbreaking pension reform, introduced in 
1999, which set up a smooth transition for existing workers 
towards a system which would be able to finance pension 
benefits without busting the government's budget.  Under the 
reform, the government authorized the creation of individual 
retirement accounts (IRA's) for the first time.  It also 
created a system under which, over time, all workers will 
direct a portion of their mandatory pension deductions from 
their salary to IRA's.  The reform set out a transition 
period, dividing workers into three categories.  Those born 
before 1948 remained under the old pay-as-you-go (PAYG) 
system.  Those born between 1949 and 1968 had a choice of 
either remaining with the old PAYG system, or opting for the 
new system under which they can direct a portion of their 
deductions to an IRA (similar to reforms currently under 
consideration in the United States).  Those born after 1968 
must participate in the new system. 
 
How it Works: 
- - - - - - - - 
 
3. (U) Wages in Poland are subject to almost 39% in 
deductions, one of Europe's highest totals.  The pension 
component (19.52% of gross salary) is financed jointly by 
employees and employers (each paying 9.76%). The full amount 
of contributions from Poles under the PAYG system goes to 
the Social Insurance Office (ZUS), which transfers the money 
to the budget.  For those under the new system, ZUS sends 
12.22% of the combined employee and employer contributions 
to the budget, and 7.3% to an IRA in a pension fund as 
directed by the individual. 
 
What's in Dispute? 
- - - - - - - - - - - 
 
4. (U) Poland is concerned because only a few EU members 
have enacted pension reform (along with Sweden).  Because 
most EU countries remain in the pay-as-you-go system, 
Eurostat did not issue guidance until 2004 on how to 
classify these funds.  In 2004, Eurostat ruled that Poland 
(and other EU members) must exclude OFE's from the 
government sector because the government does not guarantee 
their returns. 
 
5. (U) The only portion of this system under dispute with 
Eurostat is how to account for the 7.3% contributions to 
IRA's under the new system.  Currently, these contributions 
are generating a significant surplus, as pension funds will 
not begin paying benefits until 2010.  Meanwhile, they are 
taking in close to one billion Zloty a month ($330 million), 
which they are investing in government and local bonds and 
in the stock market.  The Ministry of Finance expects that 
 
 
the current surplus should gradually dissipate as the funds 
under the new system begin to pay benefits after 2010.  As 
the surpluses diminish, Finance expects the issue will 
become less sensitive with Eurostat.  In the meantime, 
Eurostat argues that these surpluses should not be included 
in calculating deficit ratios, while Poland argues that they 
should. 
 
6. (SBU) This is not just an idle statistical debate, but a 
critical issue in determining when Poland will meet the 
Maastricht Criteria to adopt the Euro.  Poland forecasts 
that its deficit to GDP ratio will be 2.2% in 2007 if OFE's 
are included, and 3.9% if they are excluded.  Excluding 
OFE's will increase the projected public debt to GDP ratio 
from 45.4% to 51.9% in 2007.  Excluding them will require 
the GOP to come up with much more drastic public spending 
cuts to meet the 3% deficit limit, and will likely delay 
Poland's entry into the ERM II by at least a year, in 
MinFin's estimation. 
 
Tactics: 
- - - - 
 
7. (SBU) Poland regards the 2004 Eurostat decision as the 
opening of discussions within the EU, setting out the 
framework for debate.  In September, Eurostat published a 
paper outlining some of the statistical issues at stake.  In 
that paper, it recognized that some countries, like Poland 
and Sweden, had invested considerable resources in pension 
reform several years earlier.  As a result, it granted 
Poland a transition period until 2007, through which time 
OFE revenue will be included in the deficit calculation. 
Poland is concerned about what happens afterwards. 
 
8. (SBU) Poland is hoping that the EcoFin council will make 
a final decision on this difficult issue at its March 
meeting.   Finance believes that the UK and Sweden already 
support Poland's position, and that a number of countries 
contemplating pension reforms, including Italy and Germany, 
are increasingly sympathetic.  Stanislawski understands some 
finance ministers are concerned that accepting Poland's 
argument would open the door to a range of subsidies. 
Stanislawski said Poland understands those concerns, and 
opposes loosening fiscal discipline as well.  Poland 
disputes the notion that this is a subsidy for the pension 
system.  Should the EU insist on excluding OFE's, 
Stanislawski said this would be tantamount to insisting 
Poland renationalize its pension funds, which would 
significantly weaken the stability of Poland's budgets over 
the longer term.  If the EU refuses to budge, Poland will 
request a further derogation until the end of 2009, to match 
the period when OFE's will begin to pay pensions. 
 
Convergence Issues: 
- - - - - - - - - - 
 
9. (SBU) Stanislawski said there has been considerable 
discussion about possible changes to the Stability and 
Growth Pact within EcoFin, including increasing the deficit- 
GDP ratio to 3.25% or 3.5%.  The GOP will stand by its 
target of 3% or less by 2007, as outlined in its convergence 
plan.  In its latest assessment, the EU moderated its 
criticism of Poland, although it expressed concern that the 
planned savings under the Hausner plan looked doubtful (ref 
b), and questioned whether Poland would meet its GDP growth 
projections over the next three years (5%, 4.8% and 5.6%). 
 
Comment: 
- - - - - - - 
 
10. (SBU) Poland implemented landmark pension reform at 
considerable political cost in 1999 to deal with a 
demographic shift which will see ever more retirees and 
fewer workers over the next decades.  The Polish Government 
correctly forecast that future governments would not be able 
to increase payroll taxes beyond their already high levels 
to sustain a pay-as-you-go system.  Poland has been very 
pleased with the results of this reform, which have allowed 
pension funds to develop as major sources of domestic 
investment.  The GOP would be very upset if the EU would 
effectively penalize them by excluding OFE assets from 
deficit calculations.  One of the most important effects of 
the pension reform was to reduce a major threat to the long- 
term stability of the Polish budget.  It would be ironic 
 
 
indeed if the EU forced Poland back into a less fiscally 
sustainable position to accommodate the EU's narrow 
definitions under the Stability and Growth Pact.  We expect 
Poland will continue to push this issue over the next month 
with other EU officials.  Should Poland prevail, it will 
improve prospects for pension reforms in other EU members. 
 
Munter 
 
 
NNNN 

 2005WARSAW01057 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED