Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05RANGOON209, SPECIAL 301: BURMA'S IPR SITUATION WORTH WATCHING

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05RANGOON209.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05RANGOON209 2005-02-17 05:43 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Rangoon
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

170543Z Feb 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 000209 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV, EB/IPE SWILSON 
STATE PASS USTR FOR JCHOE-GROVES, USPTO JURBAN, LOC STEPP 
COMMERCE FOR JBOGER, ITA JEAN KELLY 
TREASURY FOR OASIA 
USPACOM FOR FPA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR PGOV PREL BM
SUBJECT: SPECIAL 301: BURMA'S IPR SITUATION WORTH WATCHING 
 
REF: STATE 25660 
 
1. (SBU) Summary: This cable is in response to reftel 
request.  Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are not 
adequately protected in Burma.  There is insufficient 
legislative protection and basically no law enforcement 
attention to the problem.  There are unverified rumors of 
unregulated optical media plants inside Burma, though output 
is likely small relative to production elsewhere in the 
region.  Because the impact of Burmese piracy on U.S. exports 
is small, and the GOB claims it is on track to meet its TRIPs 
requirements in 2006 (with improved legislation and law 
enforcement), we think it is one or two years premature to 
put Burma on any formal or informal list of countries of 
serious IPR concern.  However, it is not too early to raise 
our concerns with the GOB. End summary. 
 
Background: Sanctions Limit U.S.-Burma Trade 
 
2. (U) In May 1997, the United States imposed investment and 
other sanctions against Burma, including the suspension of 
commercial assistance programs.  In July 2003, legislation 
barred the import of Burmese products into the United States 
and an executive order outlawed the export of U.S. financial 
services to Burma.  U.S. commercial policy toward Burma is to 
neither encourage nor discourage legal exports.  U.S. exports 
to Burma in 2004 were about $11.6 million.  Given this 
limited trade and economic relationship with Burma, Post does 
not submit National Trade Estimate reports. 
 
IPR: Legislative Framework and Enforcement Weak 
 
3. (U) Burma does not yet have adequate IPR protection. 
Patent, trademark, and copyright laws and regulations are all 
deficient.  A Patents and Design Act was introduced in 1946, 
but never brought into force.  Thus the Indian Patent and 
Designs Act of 1911, which was enacted under British colonial 
rule, continues to govern the registration of patents and 
designs.  There are rumors that a comprehensive IPR law is in 
the works to make Burma compliant with its WTO TRIPs 
obligations in 2006 (Burma is designated a least-developed 
country for purposes of TRIPs compliance).  After Burma 
joined ASEAN in 1997, it agreed to modernize its intellectual 
property laws in accordance with the ASEAN Framework 
Agreement on Intellectual Property Cooperation and subsequent 
2004-2010 action plan.  However, there has been little 
evident action in this direction. 
 
4. (SBU) Lack of adequate legal protection, very poor 
understanding of IPR among consumers and policymakers, and a 
cash-strapped populace and business community spell trouble 
for IPR protection.  Piracy of optical media (music and video 
CDs, CD-ROMS, and DVDs), books, software, and designs is 
evident nationwide -- especially in the Thai and Chinese 
border regions and in the two major urban centers of Rangoon 
and Mandalay.  The vast majority of consumers of IT products, 
private and governmental, are using pirated software.  Much 
of the pirated U.S.-origin optical media and software is 
imported from China and Thailand.  There have been reliable 
reports in the past that unregulated optical media plants are 
operating inside Burma.  However, we cannot verify this 
information, and output, if it exists, is likely small 
relative to regional production. 
 
5. (U) Burma has no trademark law, though trademark 
registration is possible.  Some firms place a trademark 
caution notice in the regime's official newspaper, declaring 
ownership.  Once this notice has been published, criminal 
and/or civil action can be taken against trademark 
infringers.  Title to a trademark depends on use of the 
trademark in connection with goods sold in Burma.  While the 
Copyright Act was promulgated in 1914, no means to register a 
copyright was ever instituted.  There is thus no legal 
protection in Burma for foreign copyrights. 
 
6. (U) Burmese law enforcement officials do not prosecute 
piracy of domestic or foreign IPR except incidentally when 
such activity breaks other laws.  For instance, the existence 
of domestically pirated or illegally imported optical media 
and books, in particular, are of concern to Burma's military 
regime (the State Peace and Development Council or SPDC) 
because the material has not passed the GOB's censorship 
board.  Recently authorities have been cracking down on 
vendors of unlicensed foreign CDs and DVDs, with the 
unintended consequence of punishing purveyors of pirated 
goods. 
 
Comment: Is Burma Fit for the List? 
 
7. (SBU) U.S. industry is correct in pointing out that Burma 
is at risk of becoming a serious IPR problem.  Porous, 
remote, and, in some cases, relatively lawless border 
regions, combined with rampant corruption and active 
narcotics trafficking organizations inside Burma make the 
movement of optical piracy plants to Burma a real threat. 
Likewise, it is true that the GOB has yet to meet its TRIPs 
requirements or sign the WIPO Internet Treaties or other 
international accords.  However, we note that the scale of 
the local problem is still very small compared to neighboring 
countries.  Given a limited number of likely domestic 
customers (most Burmese are too poor) and a chronic lack of 
adequate infrastructure (e.g., reliable electricity) in most 
of the country, we do not believe Burmese consumption of 
domestically produced pirated products has a significant 
adverse impact on U.S. exports. 
 
8. (SBU) (Comment, cont.) As Burma is not yet required to 
meet TRIPs requirements, we also think it may be too early to 
start officially critiquing a lax law enforcement response. 
Thus, we think it's one or two years premature to add Burma 
to any formal or informal listing of countries of IPR 
concern.  Nonetheless, it is not too early to raise our 
concerns with the GOB over IPR violations in Burma. End 
comment. 
Martinez