Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05KINSHASA205, INTER-INSTITUTIONAL SEMINAR UNREALISTIC ON

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05KINSHASA205.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05KINSHASA205 2005-02-07 09:46 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Kinshasa
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KINSHASA 000205 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL PINS KDEM EFIN ECON CG
SUBJECT: INTER-INSTITUTIONAL SEMINAR UNREALISTIC ON 
ELECTIONS FINANCE 
 
REF: KINSHASA 183 
 
1. (U) Summary: The Elections Finance Committee of the Feb 
2-4 Inter-Institutional Seminar highlighted the $100 million 
gap in funding for elections in the DRC. While committee 
discussion tended to focus on increased funding from the 
international community, plenary debate concentrated on 
general criticism of the government for thus far coming up 
with a paltry $2.1 million contribution to a process 
estimated to cost $285 million. Final recommendations urge 
the GDRC to up its contributions to about $28 million, or 10 
percent of the total. At the end of the seminar, Electoral 
Commission President Malu Malu told the Ambassador that he 
understands the government has already upped its planned 
contribution to $15 million in response to the criticism, and 
pressure will be maintained to do more. End summary. 
 
Looking for Funding Everywhere 
------------------------------ 
 
2. (U) The Elections Finance Committee of the Feb 2-4 
Inter-Institutional Seminar highlighted the $100 million gap 
in funding for elections in the DRC. Not one minister was 
present at the Feb 3 meeting, though, the Minister of Budget 
did address the opening plenary on Feb 2. Little to no 
emphasis was placed on utilization of funds already released 
by donors. Focus was squarely placed on increasing funding 
from the international community to fill the financing gap, 
despite general acrimony over the GDRC's embarrassing $2.1 
million contribution to an elections process estimated to 
cost $285 million. 
 
3. (SBU) EU Ambassador Carlo di Filippi forcefully rejected 
the delegates' attempts to blame donors for not providing 
more funds. He cited the 40 million euros the EU has already 
released and also told the delegates that actions should be 
taken with the money already available instead of waiting for 
additional funding to begin programs. 
 
Recommendations 
--------------- 
 
4. (U) The Committee initially developed several 
recommendations, none of which dealt with elections planning 
or utilization of money already disbursed. They included 
looking for new sources of finance (i.e. from the 
international community), cutting spending in the GDRC (e.g. 
for official missions abroad), accelerating the delivery of 
funds promised by donors, and accelerating the disbursement 
of funds from the GDRC budget to the Independent Electoral 
Commission (CEI). A recommendation was also made during the 
course of the day that top officials in the GDRC donate 10 
percent of their salaries to election financing. 
 
5. (U) The recommendations as presented to the plenary 
session on Feb 4 included the following: 
 
--The GDRC and the Parliament should make elections a budget 
priority for 2005 and should increase its contributions to 10 
percent (or $28 million) of the total elections cost. 
 
--The GDRC needs to decrease government expenses in order to 
increase its contribution to elections. Savings of 
approximately $9 million and $5.5 million can be made on 
foreign missions and institutional spending, including the 
Presidency's budget, respectively. 
 
--The Ministries of Finance, Budget and Public Works should 
make available and/or rehabilitate buildings throughout the 
country country for use by the Independent Electoral 
Commission (CEI). 
 
--The GDRC should seek new sources of income, such as taxes 
on non-essential products like beer and cigarettes, as well 
as requesting voluntary contributions by the population. 
 
--The GDRC needs to accelerate budget mechanisms to give CEI 
access to "sovereign" (national) fund. 
 
--The CEI should try to revaluate and rationalize expected 
electoral expenditures to reduce expenditures. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
6. (SBU) While the Committee's discussion seemed to 
disproportionately focus on the international community 
funding, plenary discussion in the opening and final phases 
of the Seminar featured heavy criticism of the GDRC's 
inadequate funding support to-date. Indeed, the Committee 
recommendation to target a roughly $28 million contribution 
made it onto the final Seminar proposals, along with various 
other suggestions for funding schemes through assessments on 
senior officials, cutbacks in other parts of the GDRC budget, 
and a system to handle voluntary contributions. Malu Malu's 
report that the government is already working to increase its 
funding reflects a beneficial effect already of this 
pressure. The real import of the Committee's discussion and 
the Seminar generally, was to begin to involve 
parliamentarians, and by extension the press and public, into 
work addressing specific questions regarding the nuts and 
bolts of election preparations. Public dialogue regarding 
elections from the time of the Sun City accord until now has 
progressed little beyond platitudes, and the Seminar marks a 
conscious effort of parliamentary leaders and the Electoral 
Commission to draw in political leaders to look at the 
specifics of what already has been done, and of more 
importance the substantial work that still remains, and the 
financial costs associatied with it. End comment. 
 
7. (U) Bujumbura minimize considered. 
MEECE