Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05SOFIA187, BULGARIAN DEFENSE MINISTER SIGNS SUSPECT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SOFIA187.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05SOFIA187 2005-01-31 15:53 2011-05-05 19:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Sofia
Appears in these articles:
http://www.bivol.bg/wlarmy.html
http://balkans.blog.lemonde.fr/2011/05/05/et-la-bulgarie-renonca-aux-corvettes-francaises/
http://www.capital.bg/politika_i_ikonomika/bulgaria/2011/05/05/1085393_kak_se_pileiat_pari_v_otbranata/
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L  SOFIA 000187 
 
SIPDIS 
 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/31/15 
TAGS: MASS PREL BEXP ETRD KCOR BU NATO
SUBJECT: BULGARIAN DEFENSE MINISTER SIGNS SUSPECT 
EUROCOPTER DEAL DESPITE EMBASSY PROTEST 
 
REF: 04 SOFIA 2295 
 
(U) CLASSIFIED BY AMBASSADOR JAMES PARDEW, FOR REASONS 
1.4 (B) AND (D). 
 
1. (C) SUMMARY. Despite a letter from the Ambassador 
questioning the adequacy of the process used to select 
the winning bidder, Defense Minister Svinarov signed 
January 28 a deal worth up to USD 400 million for the 
purchase of 18 Cougar and Panther helicopters from 
EADS.  Sikorsky Helicopter was the runner-up in the 
competition.  We recommend that SecDef Rumsfeld raise 
the lack of transparency in defense procurement when 
he meets Svinarov in Washington later this week.  End 
summary. 
 
2.(C)  Svinarov and EADS Vice President Luc Berrier 
signed the contract despite assurances to us by the 
Ministry of Finance that funding had not been 
authorized.  The Eurocopter deal has been shadowed by 
allegations of a predetermined outcome almost since 
its inception.  The MOD rushed the entire tender 
through in just two months (reftel), leaving Sikorsky 
to play catch-up in a competition that many believe 
was decided in advance.  The agreement with EADS 
brings to three the number of multi-million dollar 
procurement contracts completed in a hurried and non- 
transparent manner over the last year, the other two 
being for Pilatus aircraft and Daimler-Chrysler 
vehicles.  The next major procurement decision will 
likely be for new transport aircraft.  In this tender, 
the Spanish firm CASA is competing against a 
consortium of Lockheed Martin and the Italian firm 
Alenia.  Lockheed and Alenia co-produce the C-27.  The 
MOD is also negotiating to purchase four corvettes for 
the Bulgarian navy. 
 
3. (C) Bulgaria's Public Procurement Act allows the 
MOD to award no-bid contracts for orders bearing on 
national security.  The law is an open invitation to 
corruption, and is widely cited as a cover for 
kickback schemes and sweetheart deals.  In cases where 
tenders are conducted, such as the helicopter deal 
cited above, they are often pro forma exercises 
designed only to give the impression of fair 
competition. 
 
4. (C) In a letter to Svinarov on December 14 (text 
below), the Embassy protested the manner in which the 
helicopter tender was handled.  We ask SecDef Rumsfeld 
to make a similar point regarding transparency in 
procurement when he meets Svinarov later this week. 
Suggested talking points follow: 
 
-- We are concerned by the lack of transparency in 
defense procurement. 
 
-- Your recent decision to purchase the Eurocopter was 
the result of a truncated and opaque tender process. 
 
-- Tenders such as this one can only tarnish the 
reputation of the Ministry of Defense and lead to 
speculation that factors other than price and 
capability led to the outcome. 
 
-- It is important that your military procurement 
process be subject to internationally recognized 
standards of openness and transparency. 
 
5. (U) Following is the text of the Ambassador's 
December 14 letter to MOD Svinarov: 
 
Dear Mr. Minister: 
 
The modernization of the Bulgarian Armed Forces is a 
vital component of Bulgaria's ability to become a 
security contributor within NATO.  The purchase of new 
equipment for the Bulgarian military plays an important 
part in that modernization process. 
 
We are seriously concerned that the present mechanisms 
for tenders to re-equip the Bulgarian Armed Forces do not 
meet accepted international standards of open and fair 
competition.  The process to choose major equipment, 
including the recent tender for new helicopters, is 
unrealistically hasty and lacks the necessary 
transparency to verify fairness. 
 
Normally, a procurement process on the scale of the 
recent helicopter purchase is an 18-24 month process; 
 
 
however in this case, the entire process - from tender 
offer to conclusion - lasted only two months. Below is a 
timeline summary of this hasty tender process: 
 
18 August 2004 - First contact between Sikorsky and 
Government of Bulgaria officials 
21 September - Letter of Interest received by Sikorsky 
27 September - Official Sikorsky Presentation to the 
Ministry of Defense 
13 October - Document announcing Tender received 
2-10 November - Technical Negotiations 
11-12 NovemberQ- Price Negotiations 
16 November - Committee recommendation to the Minister of 
Defense 
24 November 2004 - Minister Svinarov publicly announces 
the conclusion of the deal 
 
When technical negotiations began on November 2, Sikorsky 
was required to translate 712 pages of technical 
documentation within a 10 day-period, even though the 
other company involved in the bid obviously had advance 
notice of this procurement (Their pricing volume was as 
large as the entire technical documentation package from 
Sikorsky). 
 
During this period, the Ministry of Defense sent no 
personnel to inspect or fly Sikorsky's aircraft despite 
numerous offers on behalf of the company.   We find it 
highly unusual that a major defense equipment expenditure 
of up to $500 million was based on two-week technical and 
price negotiations without even a physical evaluation of 
Sikorsky's aircraft. 
 
While we are always happy to see American products win a 
tender; however, my interest in this case is less on who 
won the tender than on how it was conducted.  Such 
tenders should be thorough, open, fair and transparent. 
There are internationally recognized procedures for major 
procurements that ensure transparency and guarantee 
Bulgaria receives the best value for its procurement 
money.  This seems especially important as Bulgaria 
begins its military modernization process with limited 
resources. 
 
A major procurement handled in such a rushed manner 
inevitably leads to questions about the legitimacy of the 
process and damages Bulgaria's reputation in the American 
business community.  We urge you to carefully review your 
procurement policies as you move forward with your 
modernization plans. 
 
Please accept, Mr. Minister, the assurances of my highest 
consideration. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
 
James W. Pardew 
Ambassador