Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05RANGOON43, BURMA 2004 INVESTMENT CLIMATE STATEMENT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05RANGOON43.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05RANGOON43 | 2005-01-11 04:41 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Rangoon |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 RANGOON 000043
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV, EB/IFD/OIA
STATE PASS USTR
COMMERCE FOR ITA JEAN KELLY
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV KTDB BM OPIC USTR
SUBJECT: BURMA 2004 INVESTMENT CLIMATE STATEMENT
¶1. Table of Contents:
Summary
Preface: U.S. Investment in Burma Subject to Sanctions
Openness to Foreign Investment
Conversion and Transfer Policies
Expropriation and Compensation
Dispute Settlement
Performance Requirements and Incentives
Right to Private Ownership and Establishment
Protection of Property Rights
Transparency of the Regulatory System
Efficient Capital Markets and Portfolio Investment
Political Violence
Corruption
Bilateral Investment Agreements
OPIC and Other Investment Insurance Programs
Labor
Foreign Trade Zones/Free Ports
Foreign Direct Investment Statistics
Appendices:
Available on request
(Executive Orders and Sanctions Regulations)
¶2. Summary: Under U.S. law, new U.S. investment in Burma has
been prohibited since 1997. Sanctions imposed in 2003 ban
imports of Burmese products into the United States and
forbid all financial transactions between U.S. persons and
Burma. Burma is a country blessed with extensive natural
resources, low labor costs, and great potential for tourism.
It is also a member of ASEAN. However, even if U.S.
sanctions were removed, an extraordinarily hostile
investment climate would hold U.S. investment - as it has
held all other foreign investment - to a very low level.
Though local investment laws are liberal on the surface,
their implementation is racked, at all levels, with
corruption. The ruling military junta, the State Peace and
Development Council (SPDC), despite pledging itself to an
"open door" economic policy and urging foreign firms to
invest, regularly comes out with punitive and capricious
regulations, which make investment for foreigners difficult
if not impossible. The senior generals making the decisions
rarely consider the law when they take action for or against
investors.
Our view of the current investment climate is very dim. We
have not seen any movement toward reform in recent years and
expect none in the next year. In fact, if recent events are
any indication, the situation for investors could well
become worse before it improves. End summary.
¶3. Preface: U.S. Investment Subject to Sanctions
On May 20, 1997, by Executive Order 13047, the President
imposed economic sanctions prohibiting new investment by
U.S. persons or entities in Burma (Myanmar). Those
sanctions were based on the President's determination that
the Government of Burma has committed large-scale repression
of the democratic opposition. The Cohen-Feinstein Amendment
to the Foreign Operations Act of 1997 formed the legal basis
for the investment ban. The U.S. government every six
months reviews sanctions policy. Since the investment ban
was imposed in 1997, the State Department has found no
measurable progress toward political liberalization in
Burma.
Prior to the imposition of the investment ban, a number of
high-profile U.S. investors had already withdrawn from Burma
due to a hostile investment climate and poorer than expected
returns. An active anti-Burma consumer movement in the
United States and Europe caused investing in Burma to be
high risk in terms of corporate image. Federal sanctions
ban new investment but allow companies invested in Burma
prior to May 20, 1997 to remain.
In 2003, the President signed into law the Burmese Freedom
and Democracy Act and issued an accompanying executive order
barring imports of Burmese products into the United States.
The 2003 sanctions also prohibited U.S. persons from
providing financial services to Burma and seized the assets
of certain Burmese entities. The 2003 and 1997 economic
sanctions are in addition to a number of sanctions the
United States imposed against Burma following the military
crackdown against civilian democracy activists in 1988 and
the nullified election of 1990. The United States opposes
the extension of international financial institution
assistance to Burma, prohibits military sales, denies
bilateral economic aid and all commercial assistance
programs, bans the issuance of U.S. visas to members of the
military, political, and economic elite, and has downgraded
our representation in Rangoon from Ambassador to Charge
d'affaires. In addition, the United States continues to
engage in a vigorous diplomatic effort to promote political
and human rights reforms.
U.S. commercial policy toward Burma is to neither encourage
nor discourage U.S. exports.
¶4. Openness to Foreign Investment
With a view to attracting foreign investment, the Burmese
government instituted the Foreign Investment Law (FIL) on
November 30, 1988. The basic priorities of foreign
investment, according to the FIL, are as follows:
Promotion and expansion of exports;
Exploitation of natural resources that require heavy
investment;
Acquisition of high technology;
Support for production and services requiring large amount
of capital;
Expansion of employment opportunities;
Development of facilities that would reduce energy
consumption; and,
Regional development.
According to the State-Owned Economic Enterprises Law,
enacted in March 1989, state-owned enterprises have the sole
right to carry out the following economic activities:
Extraction of teak and sale of the same in the country and
abroad;
Cultivation and conservation of forest plantations with the
exception of village-owned firewood plantations cultivated
by the villagers for their personal use;
Exploration, extraction, sale, and production of petroleum
and natural gas;
Exploration, extraction, and export of pearls, jade and
precious stones;
Breeding and production of fish and prawns in fisheries
which have been reserved for research by the government;
Postal and telecommunications services;
Air transport and railway transport services;
Banking and insurance services;
Broadcasting and television services;
Exploration, extraction, and exports of metals;
Electricity generating services other than those permitted
by law to private and cooperative electricity generating
services; and,
Manufacturing of products relating to security and defense.
However, the law provides that the Myanmar Investment
Commission (MIC) may, "in the interest of the State," make
exceptions. Exceptions have been made in areas such as
banks (though not for foreign investors), petroleum and
natural gas extraction, and air services. This discretion,
though, like most else resides in the hands of the Cabinet
and senior generals.
According to the FIL, the MIC must review all potential
investment, either foreign or domestic. However, due to
corruption within the MIC, the ruling State Peace and
Development Council (SPDC) removed much of the MIC's real
influence at the end of 1999. Potential investors must
still work through the MIC, but it has lost the authority to
make a decision. Interested foreign companies still
approach and submit proposals through the MIC, which in turn
gets approval from either the Cabinet (chaired by Prime
Minister Lt. General Soe Win, though the PM must get
clearance from SPDC Chairman Senior General Than Shwe)) or
the Trade Policy Council (TPC, chaired by SPDC Vice Senior
General Maung Aye). The Cabinet and the TPC have the same
membership so the choice of decision-making body is made on
a case-by-case basis. Though the MIC has no power or
authority to protect foreign companies, we have no evidence
of overt discrimination by the MIC against foreign
investors.
Once the government grants permission to invest, a foreign
company must get a "Permit to Trade" - essentially a
business license - from the Ministry of National Planning
and Economic Development's Directorate of Investment and
Companies Administration (DICA). In a typical "Catch 22"
that has for all intents and purposes closed Burma to most
new foreign investment, since February 2002 the government
is no longer permitting DICA to issue new permits or renew
existing ones for foreign firms. This decision has
disrupted the business of many foreign investors, and forced
closure of several foreign manufacturing firms. In an
effort to overcome this obstacle, since 2002 some foreign
investors that have attempted to do business as local firms
under cover of Burmese partners have faced legal action and
difficulties divesting.
In theory once a company has the "Permit to Trade" it may
then use it to get residence visa status, lease cars and
real estate, etc., and to get import and export licenses
from the Ministry of Commerce. The Ministry of Commerce has
had a policy in place since the end of 2001, though there is
nothing in writing, to only issue import licenses to those
firms who are export earners. Companies without export
earnings must purchase "export dollars" from another firm at
an inflated exchange rate in order to apply for an import
license.
The FIL allows for FDI as a wholly foreign-owned venture or
a joint venture with any Burmese partner (private or state-
owned). Sole proprietorships or partnerships are equally
acceptable. Overall, the FIL requires that at least 35
percent of equity capital in all JVs and partnerships be
foreign-owned. The minimum foreign investment required in
practice, though not specified in the law, for manufacturing
investments is $500,000 in cash or kind. In addition, the
minimum cash-on-hand requirement in foreign currency
(calculated at the official rate of exchange of roughly 5.6
kyat = $1) is 300,000 kyat for a services company, 500,000
kyat for a trading company, and 1 million kyat for a
manufacturer.
The military, via the military economic enterprises, the
Myanmar Economic Holdings, Ltd. (MEHL) and the Myanmar
Economic Corporation (MEC), is involved in many economic
activities. To set up a joint venture, foreign firms have
reported that it is useful to be affiliated with MEHL or MEC
in order to receive the proper business permits.
Nonetheless, entering into business with MEHL or MEC does
not guarantee success for the foreign partner, and some
foreign investors report that their military partners are
parasitic, making unreasonable demands, providing no cost-
sharing, and sometimes muscling out the foreign investor
after an investment is profitable.
¶5. Conversion and Transfer Policies
According to the Foreign Investment Law (FIL), investors in
Burma have a guarantee that they can repatriate profits
(after taxes). The law also provides that, upon expiry of
the term of the contract, the investor of foreign capital
has the right to the foreign currency in which the
investment was made. However, due to the shortage of
foreign exchange it is in reality not easy for foreign
investors to legally transfer their net profits abroad.
Foreign currency can be transferred abroad only after
obtaining permission from the Foreign Exchange Management
Department of the Central Bank of Myanmar.
Likewise, multiple exchange rates in Burma make conversion
and repatriation of foreign exchange very complex and ripe
for corruption. The official rate of about 5.6 kyat to the
dollar is grossly overvalued. The government issues Foreign
Exchange Certificates (FEC) that trade somewhat closer to
the market rate (roughly 930 kyat = $1 at the end of 2004)
but are still overvalued. Generally speaking, companies get
rid of kyat earnings as quickly as possible. The government
requires foreign companies to use dollars or FEC to pay
utility and telephone bills (charged at a higher rate than
for local firms), and rental charges. The government allows
foreign firms to deposit dollars in a state bank for
withdrawal as FEC by the company's employees.
In Burma, only three state banks, the Myanma Foreign Trade
Bank (MFTB), the Myanma Investment and Commercial Bank
(MICB) and the Myanma Economic Bank (MEB) are allowed to
deal with foreign exchange transactions. In practice the
MFTB and MICB handle most of these transactions. The MFTB
mainly handles foreign currency transactions of government
organizations, businesses, and individuals, and the MICB
caters primarily to companies and joint ventures. MEB
handles foreign currency transactions in border trade
regions.
Restrictions on provisions of financial services by U.S.
banks have caused a serious disruption to the legal foreign
trading system, which has long been primarily dollar-
denominated. U.S. banks no longer offer trade facilitation
or correspondent banking services, making the use of U.S.
dollar letters of credit problematic. Traders and
government banks have shifted to euros as much as possible.
As of July 29, 2003, the correspondent accounts of MEB,
MFTB, and MICB in the United States are frozen, along with
all other assets and property.
Private banks had assumed a large share of banking activity
before a major banking crisis in February 2003 effectively
closed the private banking sector. However, at no point
were these banks permitted to deal in foreign exchange. In
2004 the government allowed some of the smaller private
banks to resume operations, though the sector remains
moribund. There is no indication that if the private
banking system is revitalized it will be given the right to
deal in foreign currency.
¶6. Expropriation and Compensation
The Burmese Foreign Investment Law (FIL) guarantees against
nationalization during the investment's "permitted period"
of investment. However, a number of foreign firms in
various sectors have been forced to leave the country when
the terms and conditions of their investment agreements have
not been honored. In the late 1990s, two large Japanese
firms exited Burma after they found they were not able to
operate as they had been led to believe. Additionally,
there have been cases where the government has seized the
assets of foreign and local investors (without
compensation), when the investment turned out to be very
profitable.
The most recent example we know of is the case of a Swiss
cement importer and distributor that was forced out
ostensibly because it was not operating according to its
permit. In reality, the government turned the company out,
after it had made a significant investment in plant and
equipment, because it was able to sell better quality,
cheaper cement than its government-controlled competitors.
In another case in 1999-2000, the government confiscated a
large brewery that an expatriate Burmese businesswoman had
made profitable and turned it over to the Ministry of
Industry (1). The local courts were not helpful and the
investor was unable to get compensation from the GOB.
¶7. Dispute Settlement
Private and foreign companies are at a disadvantage in
disputes with governmental and quasi-governmental
organizations. Arbitration is addressed under the 1944
Arbitration Act. Foreign investors generally prefer to use
international arbitration, though the Burmese government
will try to stipulate local arbitration in contracts it
signs with foreign investors. If arbitration is handled
locally, difficulties arise since the central leadership
controls the whole legal mechanism. The courts are not
independent and cannot make free and fair decisions. There
is no recourse available for companies who face an adverse
administrative decision. Burma is not a member of the
International Center for the Settlement of Investment
Disputes nor is it a party to the New York Convention.
The legal system in Burma is ostensibly under the control of
the Attorney General's Office and the Supreme Court.
However, neither the Attorney General nor the Supreme Court
is independent. Burmese criminal and civil laws are modeled
on British law as practiced during the colonial period,
which ended in 1948. Every Township, State, and Division
has its own law officers and judges. However, the township,
state and divisional SPDC branches have supreme authority
over judicial decisions at the local level.
There is no bankruptcy law in Burma.
Foreign companies have the right to bring cases, and defend
themselves, in local courts. However, as the SPDC ruling
junta controls all the courts, foreign investors who have
had conflicts with the local government, or even had their
business illegally expropriated, have had little luck
getting compensation.
¶8. Performance Requirements and Incentives
Officially, companies covered under the Foreign Investment
Law (FIL) are entitled to a tax holiday period of three
consecutive years. Under the law this tax holiday can be
extended with permission of the Myanmar Investment
Commission (MIC). Investors are also eligible, at the MIC's
discretion, for a number of other incentives including:
accelerated depreciation of capital assets, a waiver of
customs duties and taxes on imported machinery and spare
parts during the period of construction, or on imported raw
materials during the first three years of commercial
production, etc. Though the MIC issues the permission, the
TPC and the Cabinet, not the MIC, make decisions on these
incentives and extensions.
There are no official performance requirements for new
foreign investors in Burma, but the government does require
an investor purchase local machinery, fire, marine, and
personal liability insurance. Unofficially, the government
often requires companies to commit to a certain level of
exports before being allowed to invest. The government then
requires compliance reports every three months with evidence
of export or explanation why the goals were not met. We
have no evidence that action is taken against firms that do
not meet their initial export targets.
There is no requirement that foreign investors buy or hire
from local sources. Technology transfer is not generally a
pre-requisite for investment.
Any enterprise operating under the FIL or the Myanmar
Companies Act must pay a 30 percent income tax rate.
Withholding tax on royalties and interest is 15 percent for
resident foreigners and 20 percent for non-resident
foreigners. Tax collection in Burma is very lax, but
foreign investors are an easy target for the cash-strapped
tax authorities. The Burmese fiscal year ends March 31 and
tax returns are due by June 30.
A surprising reversal of the government's mantra of "open
door economy" came in a February 2002 verbal directive which
outlawed the issuance of new, or renewal of existing,
"Permits to Trade" for trading firms owned by foreigners (or
by foreigners and Burmese). This was done ostensibly to
promote local trading firms, but has served only to further
distort the local marketplace. The authorities have not
published any official notice of this directive but it is
being enforced, including against foreigners who have tried
to evade the directive by listing their company under the
name of a Burmese colleague or friend.
¶9. Right to Private Ownership and Establishment
By law, foreigners may not own land, and may only rent
property on a short-term basis.
A private entity can establish, buy, sell, and own a
business only with the review and approval of the MIC (and
by proxy the top leadership).
¶10. Protection of Property Rights
Burma does not yet have adequate IPR protection. Patent,
trademark, and copyright laws and regulations are all
deficient. Nonetheless, the GOB has stated it will meet its
WTO TRIPS obligations before 2006. After Burma joined ASEAN
in 1997, it agreed to modernize its intellectual property
laws in accordance with the ASEAN Framework Agreement on
Intellectual Property Cooperation. However, an IPR law,
first drafted in 1994, still awaits approval and
implementation. A Patents and Design Act was introduced in
1946, but never brought into force. Thus the Indian Patents
and Designs Act of 1911, which was enacted under British
colonial rule, continues to govern the registration of
patents and designs.
Piracy of music CDs, video CDs, CD-ROMS, DVDs, books,
software, and designs is evident nationwide, especially in
the border regions and in the two major urban centers of
Mandalay and Rangoon. However, given the small number of
customers (most Burmese are too poor), and the lack of
adequate infrastructure (e.g., reliable electricity), we do
not believe piracy has a significant adverse impact on U.S.
products, which, are in any case, not readily available. We
assume that most if not all consumers of IT products,
private and governmental, are using pirated software. .
Burma has no trademark law, though trademark registration is
possible. Some firms place a trademark caution notice in
the local English newspaper, declaring ownership of their
trademarks. Once this notice has been published, criminal
and/or civil action can be taken against trademark
infringers. Title to a trademark depends on use of the
trademark in connection with goods sold in Burma. While a
Copyright Act was promulgated in 1914, no means to register
a copyright was ever instituted. There is thus no legal
protection in Burma for foreign copyrights.
In the vast majority of cases, real estate is purchased with
cash or using regular bank loans, though the latter are
difficult to obtain (and not available directly to
foreigners).
¶11. Transparency of the Regulatory System
Burma is notorious among foreign businesspeople for its
complete lack of regulatory and legal transparency. All
existing regulations, including those covering foreign
investment, import-export procedures, licensing, foreign
exchange, etc., are subject to change, with no advance
notice, at the whim of the senior ruling generals. The
economic decision-makers here are influenced strongly by
whimsy, wealthy cronies, the demands of state-owned
enterprises, and of the military-controlled Myanmar Economic
Corporation and the Myanmar Economic Holdings, Ltd. The
government also regularly issues new regulations with no
notice and with no opportunity for review or comment by any
non-governmental domestic or foreign market participants.
Furthermore, new regulations or regulatory changes are
rarely published. Instead, they are communicated verbally
to interested parties. If a new regulation or law is
published it will appear in the government's mouthpiece
newspaper, the New Light of Myanmar (Myanma A'Lin) or in the
Burma Gazette.
Burma's health, environmental, tax, and labor laws as
written do not impose a major burden on investment.
However, the protean nature of the regulatory and legal
situation - and the irregular enforcement of existing laws -
makes investment tricky without good, and well-connected,
local legal advice.
See "Openness to Foreign Investment" section for further
details of the legal and regulatory system.
¶12. Efficient Capital Markets and Portfolio Investment
Burma has no true equity or debt markets, and the notion of
portfolio investment is not well understood by the average
person. Burmese authorities have said in the past that the
existence of capital markets is essential for the
development of a well-functioning financial system. To this
end, the Myanmar Economic Bank (MEB) and Japan's Daiwa
Institute of Research Co. Ltd. established a joint venture,
the Myanma Security Exchange Centre Ltd., to set up a stock
exchange. This exchange is in existence, though moribund,
with only one listed company - a forestry joint venture. A
few companies have also begun to sell bonds privately and on
a very small scale. Private companies, both foreign and
domestically controlled, are generally small and thus their
shares are closely held by a small number of people or
entities - often within a family. There is no securities
law.
A large bank run in February 2003, and the subsequent
decision by the government to avoid bailouts, has
effectively cut off the private banking system from the
market. The state-owned and semi state-owned banks were not
impacted by this crisis. Though a few of the smaller
private banks resumed their operations in 2004, government
instructions and internal bank policies have made it
impossible for the largest private banks to take in new
deposits or loans, and weekly withdrawals are capped. The
future of these banks is uncertain.
Burma remains on the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF)
list of non-cooperating countries and territories for
failures to enact an adequate anti-money laundering regime.
The U.S. Treasury Department, in April 2004, issued a rule
prohibiting U.S. banks from doing business with Burmese
banks or their overseas branches because of concerns of
money laundering in Burma and specifically at Asia Wealth
Bank (the largest pre-crash private bank) and Myanmar
Mayflower Bank. The government announced it was
investigating these two banks under a 2002 money laundering
law, though no progress is evident.
Foreign firms do not have access to bank loans since the
banks require collateral of land or real estate, neither of
which foreigners can own. Since mid-2002 the government has
forbidden the use of gold as collateral. Loans in kyat are
available for local companies and individuals from state and
active private banks. Interest rates are currently running
about 15 percent per year with inflation about twice that.
Because of these negative real interest rates, a lack of
adequate supervision, and a shortage of banking experience
the private banking system, even at its peak, was very
unstable. Private banks engaged in reckless lending and
suffered high levels of non-performing loans. Though
statistics are not available, it is likely that public
banks, forced to bankroll the regime's pet projects and
personal needs, also have an extremely large percentage of
non-performing loans.
A 1990 banking law permitted foreign banks to open branches
in Burma but not to conduct business in the local market.
These offices may serve as a trade and commercial liaison
for local and foreign clients. For a variety of reasons,
including the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s, the
slow local business climate, and the lack of liberalization
of the banking sector, most of the original 49 foreign banks
have left Burma, or downgraded their representation, in the
past several years. Under U.S. law, U.S. persons may not
provide financial services to Burma.
In 2004, in the absence of a government policy, the Myanmar
Accountants Council issued its own standard accounting
system - the Myanmar Accounting Standards - based very
closely on International Accounting Standards (IAS).
¶13. Political Violence
In May 2003, government-affiliated thugs ambushed a convoy
carrying pro-democracy opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi
while she was traveling in northwest Burma. Dozens were
killed or wounded in the attack. Several small bombs went
off in downtown Rangoon in early 2003 and in mid- and late-
2004, and authorities regularly claim to discover improvised
explosive devices in Rangoon and various locations
throughout Burma.
Burma experienced major political unrest in 1988 when the
military regime jailed and/or killed an undetermined number
of Burmese democracy activists. In 1990, the military
government refused to recognize the results of an election
that the opposition won overwhelmingly. Burma experienced
major student demonstrations in 1996, and demonstrations
occurred in August and September of 1998. Popular unrest
and violence continue to be possible.
For the last decade there has been sporadic anti-government
insurgent activity in various locations, such as an attack
on a natural gas pipeline in the Tanintharyi Division and
bomb attacks against family members of senior military
officials in Rangoon. The Thai-Burma border area in Burma's
southern Shan, Mon, Kayah, and Kayin States and in
Tanintharyi Division, have continue to see sporadic fighting
between government forces and various insurgent groups. In
February 2001, several people were killed and some tourists
left stranded during shelling and cross-border gunfire in
the town of Tachileik, Shan State. The Thai-Burma border is
closed from time to time due to increased insurgent
activity, most recently for a period in 2002.
¶14. Corruption
Corruption is systemic in Burma and is considered by
economists and businesspeople to be one of the most serious
barriers to investment and doing business in Burma. Because
of the Byzantine and capricious regulatory environment, rent-
seeking activities are rampant and very little can be
accomplished, from the micro to the macro, without paying
"tea money." We think this problem will only get worse at
all levels as inflation further impoverishes government
bureaucrats and as senior leaders seek additional income
from a shrinking number of investment projects.
Corruption is a jailable offense in Burma, and has been
since 1948. However, the anti-corruption statute is applied
only when the senior generals want to take action against
some official who has become an embarrassment - most notably
in October 2004 when the SPDC arrested then Prime Minister
General Khin Nyunt, and many of his family members and
allies, for corruption. In all other cases corruption is
considered a very normal practice - indeed a requirement for
survival. The major, though by no means only, areas where
investors run into corruption are: when seeking investment
permission, taxation, when applying for import and export
licenses, and, when negotiating land and real estate leases.
¶15. Bilateral Investment Agreements
Burma has signed bilateral investment agreements, known as
"Protection and Promotion of Investment" agreements with the
Philippines, the PRC, and Vietnam. Except for increasing
investment from the PRC (see "Foreign Direct Investment
Statistics" section), these agreements have had little
impact on incoming investment from Vietnam or the
Philippines.
¶16. OPIC and Other Insurance Programs
Due to U.S. law, OPIC programs are not available for Burma.
Burma is not a member of the World Bank's Multilateral
Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA).
¶17. Labor
In 1989, the United States withdrew Burma's eligibility for
benefits under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP)
due to the absence of internationally recognized worker
rights. Labor unions are illegal in Burma. Workers are
unable to organize, negotiate, or in any other way exercise
control over their working conditions. Although regulations
set a minimum employment age and wage, and maximum work
hours, these are not uniformly observed, especially in
private factories and other establishments. The government
uses forced labor in infrastructure construction and
porterage for the military in active combat zones. These
labor practices are not consistent with Burma's obligations
under ILO Conventions 29 and 87, and thus explain why the
ILO imposed sanctions against Burma in 2000. The United
States strongly supported this decision.
Burma's cost of labor is very low, even compared to some of
its Southeast Asian neighbors. Burmese over the age of 40,
and particularly those over 65, tend to be very well
educated. However, a sad side effect of the repeated
closing of Burmese universities over the past 15 years is
that the current 15-30 year old demographic is sorely
lacking in technical skills. Many Burmese, though, speak at
least some level of English. Many educated Burmese studied
English in mission schools during the British colonial and
early independence period. After the nationalization of
private and mission schools in 1964, the socialist
government mandated English courses in school starting from
middle school. Soon thereafter then-dictator General Ne Win
ordered that English instruction begin in kindergarten after
his daughter allegedly failed an English exam and was
rejected for studies in the U.K.
The government does not publish unemployment figures.
However, anecdotal evidence and the recent divestment by
many foreign companies, support the assumption of a very
high level of unemployed and underemployed in formal, non-
agricultural sectors. An average worker in Burma will make
about 500-800 kyat (roughly $0.50 to $0.80) per day.
¶18. Foreign Trade Zones/Free Ports
The government has set aside as "industrial zones" 19 large
tracts of land surrounding Rangoon, Mandalay, and several
other major cities. However, these zones are merely zoned
for industry and do not come with any investment incentives.
There are no free trade zones in Burma.
¶19. Foreign Direct Investment Statistics
Note: Investment figures compiled by the Burmese government
include only investment approved by the Myanmar Investment
Commission (MIC). The figures do not include investments
not submitted for MIC approval, such as a myriad of small
and medium Chinese projects. Since the end of 2003, the MIC
has stopped providing investment figures to other
organizations and individuals. Current figures are
calculated based on the Monthly Economic Indicators
published by the Central Statistical Organization (CSO).
According to government figures at the end of March 2004,
cumulative foreign investment approved by the MIC totaled
379 projects, valued at $7.59 billion. This amount is 1.2
percent higher than the cumulative total listed at the end
of March 2003. However, it should be noted that this
cumulative number does not factor in subsequent divestment,
or investment that was approved but that did not actually
enter the country.
Extrapolating from the latest government statistics on FDI
flow for Burmese FY 2003-04 (April-March), we estimate a
4.6 percent year-on-year increase in the value of new FDI
approvals ($91.17 million) in five sectors compared with
total new investment approvals in FY 2002-03 ($86.95
million). The new investments came from Canada ($1.45
million in mining), China ($2.82 million in manufacturing),
Hong Kong ($3 million in transport), South Korea ($ 32.3
million in oil and gas and $2.6 million in fisheries),
Thailand ($22 million in oil and gas), and the United
Kingdom ($27 million in transport).
The trickle of approved new investment since 1997 has come
almost exclusively from Asian countries. Western countries
have largely stayed away from the Burma market. New U.S.
investment has been zero since 1997 when the U.S. government
imposed an investment ban.
According to GOB statistics, in stock terms, the United
States is the fifth largest foreign investor in Burma with
16 approved projects totaling $582 million. U.S. investment
approved prior to May 1997, which was grandfathered under
U.S. investment sanctions, is largely centered in oil and
natural gas exploration. South Korea was first in new FDI
approvals in 2003-04 (according to Burmese government
statistics). These official statistics do not take into
consideration considerable new investment, some of it state-
financed, from the PRC.
Major non-U.S. foreign investors in Burma are: Petronas
(Malaysia), Total (France), Ivanhoe Mines (Canada), PTT,
Plc. (Thailand), Shin Satellite (Thailand), Keppel Land
(Singapore), Daewoo (South Korea), China National
Construction and Agricultural Machinery Import and Export
Co. (PRC), and the China International Trust and Investment
Corporation (PRC).
So far there is no concrete evidence of large-scale
investment abroad by Burmese companies. However, we believe
that some wealthy Burmese individuals and small family
businesses have made a few investments in neighboring ASEAN
countries.
FOREIGN INVESTMENT OF PERMITTED ENTERPRISES AS OF
3/31/2004 BY SECTOR
(US$ million)
Approved In percent of Total
No. Particulars No. Amount Approved Amount
¶1. Oil and Gas 59 2,457.47 32.4
¶2. Manufacturing 151 1,606.89 21.2
¶3. Hotels and Tourism 43 1,059.66 14.0
¶4. Real Estate 18 1,025.14 13.5
¶5. Mining 53 528.19 7.0
¶6. Livestock and Fisheries 24 312.36 4.1
¶7. Transport and Communications 16 313.27 4.1
¶8. Industrial Estates 3 193.11 2.5
¶9. Construction 2 37.77 0.5
¶10. Agriculture 4 34.35 0.4
¶11. Other Services 6 23.69 0.3
Total 379 7,591.90 100.0
FOREIGN INVESTMENT OF PERMITTED ENTERPRISES AS OF
3/31/2004 BY COUNTRY
(US$ Million)
No. Particulars No. Approved Amount
¶1. Singapore 72 1,572.73
¶2. U.K.* 38 1,431.01
¶3. Thailand 51 1,312.20
¶4. Malaysia 33 660.75
¶5. U.S.A. 16 582.06
¶6. France 3 470.37
¶7. Indonesia 12 241.50
¶8. The Netherlands 5 238.83
¶9. Japan 23 212.57
¶10. The Republic of Korea 34 191.31
¶11. Hong Kong 30 165.72
¶12. Philippines 2 146.67
¶13. Australia 14 82.08
¶14. Austria 2 72.50
¶15. China 14 66.97
¶16. Canada 17 61.23
¶17. Panama 1 29.10
¶18. Germany 1 15.00
¶19. Denmark 1 13.37
¶20. Cyprus 1 5.25
¶21. India 1 4.50
¶22. Macau 2 4.40
¶23. Switzerland 1 3.38
¶24. Bangladesh 2 2.96
¶25. Israel 1 2.40
¶26. Brunei Darussalam 1 2.04
¶27. Sri Lanka 1 1.00
Total 379 7,591.90
*Inclusive of enterprises incorporated in British Virgin
Islands, Bermuda, and the Cayman Islands.
MCMULLEN