Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04OTTAWA3305, MEETING OF U.S./CANADA AIR QUALITY COMMITTEE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04OTTAWA3305.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04OTTAWA3305 2004-12-09 15:26 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Ottawa
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 003305 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR OES/E: CLAUDIA MCMURRAY 
STATE ALSO FOR OES/ENV: DENNIS AND WHA/CAN: NELSON 
EPA FOR OAR/OAP: BRIAN MCLEAN 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: SENV ENRG EWWT CA
SUBJECT: MEETING OF U.S./CANADA AIR QUALITY COMMITTEE 
 
 
1.  Summary: The U.S./Canada Air Quality Committee met 
December 2 in Ottawa to review air quality issues affecting 
the two countries.  The meeting included discussions of acid 
rain, ozone, scientific cooperation and research, 
consultations and notifications, particulate matter, marine 
vessel emissions, border air quality projects, and health 
science initiatives.  The United States was represented by 
officials from the Environmental Protection Agency, the 
Department of State, and Embassy ESTOFFs.  Representing 
Canada were officials from the ministries of Environment, 
Health, Natural Resources and Foreign Affairs, as well as 
provincial officials from British Columbia, Ontario, and 
Quebec.  Bilateral meetings on air quality have taken place 
regularly since 1991, when the two countries signed the 
U.S./Canada Air Quality Agreement.  An Ozone Annex was added 
to the Agreement in 2000, and negotiation of a Particulate 
Matter Annex is under consideration.  End summary. 
 
Acid Rain 
--------- 
 
2.  Both countries reported considerable progress in reducing 
emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), 
the precursors of acid rain.  The U.S. SO2 and NOx emissions 
reduction programs were cited as major successes, with the 
United States achieving emissions reductions well beyond 
targets.  There was a slight increase in SO2 emissions in 
2003, as industry used "banked" allowances, but the overall 
emissions trend will continue to be downward.  U.S. SO2 
emissions in 2003 were 38 percent below 1980 levels, and NOx 
emissions in 2003 were 37 percent below 1990 levels. 
 
3.  Canada has also reduced SO2 and NOx emissions beyond the 
national targets, although Canada's strategy is to pursue an 
effects-based approach rather than the U.S. tradable 
allowance system.  SO2 emissions in Canada are down by 50 
percent from 1980 levels.  Environment Canada officials said 
they are concerned, however, about tests showing increased 
soil acidification in forests in Eastern Canada.  The two 
countries have prepared a joint proposal for an Acid Rain 
Symposium at the meeting of the Ecological Society of America 
(ESA) in October 2005 in Montreal, a venue which would 
provide a broader forum for discussion and publication of 
data. 
 
Ozone Annex Compliance 
---------------------- 
 
4.  The United States and Canada signed the Ozone Annex to 
the Air Quality Agreement in December 2000 to reduce NOx and 
volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, the precursor 
pollutants to ground-level ozone.  The affected areas, a 
transboundary region known as the Pollution Emission 
Management Area, or PEMA, includes most of the U.S. midwest 
and northeast and large portions of Ontario and Quebec.  In 
the United States, the NOx SIP (State Implementation Program) 
Call requires affected states to ensure that NOx emissions do 
not exceed specified seasonal levels.  Reduction strategies 
include implementing a cap and trade program for power plants 
and large industrial boilers, motor vehicle standards and low 
sulfur standards for fuels, as well as measures to address 
VOC controls on smaller sources. 
 
5.  Canada reported that it will meet its commitment to cap 
NOx emissions from power plants in Ontario and Quebec. 
Representatives from Ontario said that fulfilling the 
provincial government's pledge to close coal plants will 
enable the province to achieve targeted NOx emissions 
reductions, and that any new power plants in the province 
must be at least as clean as natural gas facilities.  The 
government of Ontario is also considering a Renewable 
Portfolio Standard, a requirement that a set percentage of 
electricity come from renewable sources, for any power 
imported into the province. 
 
Scientific Cooperation and Research 
----------------------------------- 
 
6.  In the last several years, joint air quality science 
efforts have focused on particulate matter (PM).  The United 
States and Canada recently completed a joint transboundary 
assessment report on PM, which may serve to guide future 
discussions regarding a possible PM Annex to the Air Quality 
Agreement (see paragraph 10).  The two countries have also 
made progress on developing emission inventories, as well as 
coordination of research and development of protocols and 
formats for sharing of data. 
 
Consultations and Notifications 
------------------------------- 
 
7.  Officials from Environment Canada expressed satisfaction 
with notification protocols regarding transboundary issues, 
citing the example of the Algoma Steel Mill Consultation 
Group.  The mill, located on the border in Sault Ste. Marie, 
Ontario, is responsible for depositing pollutants on the U.S. 
side, as well as having an affect on visibility in a National 
Park on Michigan's Upper Peninsula.  The consultation group 
provides an opportunity for stakeholders on both sides of the 
border, including tribal governments, to address the problem 
cooperatively.  Similarly, the consultation process has 
provided a framework for the United States to express its 
concerns regarding a proposed petroleum coke gasification 
power plant in Thunder Bay, Ontario, about 50 kilometers from 
the U.S. border. 
 
Particulate Matter 
------------------ 
 
8.  According to EPA officials, PM is now one of the highest 
U.S. air quality priorities.  There are significant health 
effects from PM, and EPA expects that many areas of the 
United States will be exceeding the National Ambient Air 
Quality Standards for fine PM in 2004.  The current U.S. 
focus is on inorganic precursors of PM, such as sulfates. 
Analysis of the pending U.S. proposal to further reduce fine 
PM has shown that health benefits far outweigh the cost of 
controlling PM. 
 
9.  Canadian officials said they are compiling database links 
to track PM sources such as wood burning, cement and steel 
manufacturing, and vehicle emissions.  Canada is also 
studying the contributions of agricultural ammonia to PM, and 
officials said that this year's drastic culling of chickens 
in British Columbia because of the Asian Bird Flu is serving 
as the basis of a study to compare PM concentrations from 
ammonia before and after the cull. 
 
10.  The two countries agreed to hold an informal meeting 
before September 2005 to identify issues of common interest 
regarding PM, including steps towards consideration of a PM 
Annex to the Air Quality Agreement. 
 
Marine Vessel Emissions 
----------------------- 
 
11.  Both the United States and Canada cited the need to 
institute stricter emissions standards for large marine 
vessels.  The problem is evident in the Georgia Basin/Puget 
Sound area, where both Seattle and Vancouver operate 
competitive port facilities as well as large fleets of 
passenger ferries.  According to Canadian officials, a 2000 
study showed marine vessels contributing to 33 percent of SO2 
and 22 percent of NOx emissions in the lower Fraser Valley, 
where Vancouver is located. 
 
Border Air Quality Strategy Pilot Projects 
------------------------------------------ 
 
12.  The United States and Canada are currently conducting 
three pilot projects under the Border Air Quality Strategy 
announced in June 2003.  The projects include the U.S.-Canada 
Emissions Trading Feasibility Study, the Georgia Basin-Puget 
Sound International Airshed Strategy, and the Great Lakes 
Basin Airshed Management Framework.  The latter has focused 
on the Detroit-Windsor area, with a U.S./Canada steering 
committee and four subgroups addressing airshed 
characterization, policy needs, voluntary early actions, and 
outreach/communications.  Both the United States and Canada 
are conducting joint air quality modeling, sharing data, and 
looking at the feasibility of transboundary emissions 
trading.  For the Georgia Basin/Puget Sound project, 
activities currently center on conducting airshed 
characterization of ozone, PM, and visibility patterns. 
 
Health Science Initiatives 
-------------------------- 
 
13.  Officials on both sides acknowledged significant gaps in 
the understanding of health effects of specific types of air 
pollution, especially PM.  Canada is conducting a study in 
Windsor, Ontario, on the effects of PM on children, while the 
United States is conducting a complementary study in Detroit, 
just across the border. 
 
Next Steps 
---------- 
 
14.  In addition to preliminary discussions in September 2005 
regarding a PM Annex and the possibility of an Acid Rain 
Symposium in October 2005, the two countries tentatively 
agreed to hold next year's Air Quality Committee meeting the 
week of November 9 in Washington.  The Committee also 
accepted the recently released 2004 Air Quality Agreement 
Progress Report, which may be accessed at 
http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/usca/2004report /html. 
 
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at 
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa 
 
CELLUCCI