Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04ABUJA2135, GON AVIATION MINISTER PROTESTS EMBASSY PRESS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04ABUJA2135.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04ABUJA2135 2004-12-23 15:58 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Abuja
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ABUJA 002135 
 
SIPDIS 
 
PASS DOT FOR OIA, ALSO FAA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAIR EINV PREL NI
SUBJECT: GON AVIATION MINISTER PROTESTS EMBASSY PRESS 
BRIEFING ON VIRGIN NIGERIA AIRLINES 
 
REF:  (A) ABUJA 2118, (B) ABUJA 2119, (C) ABUJA 2121 
 
1.  Following is the proposed letter to Nigeria's Minister 
of Aviation mentioned in ref A. 
 
2.  Begin text. 
 
Mr. Minister: 
 
Thank you for your letter of December 21, 2004 in response 
to the media briefing on Virgin Nigeria by the U.S. 
Embassy's Economic Counselor on December 16 
(FMA/20/2004/1/152).  You have protested the briefing  -- 
which the newspaper This Day publicized on December 17 -- 
for it was, in your words, an "unwholesome development 
whereby confidential governmental business and diplomatic 
matters are made subject of newspaper discourse." 
 
Your assertion surprised me, since your Ministry's position 
on Virgin Nigeria has often been reported by your country's 
media services.  On December 16, for example, The Guardian 
reported that at "the signing of a Memorandum of 
Understanding..., [Minister] Yuguda said that Virgin Nigeria 
would be granted an unspecified period of protection on the 
plum routes as [an] incentive for the investors."  The 
Guardian further noted that you "ordered that the clause 
[conferring a seven year monopoly] be included in the 
agreement signed with Virgin Atlantic Airways, when the 
British carrier insisted it would not close the deal unless 
the demand was acceded to." 
 
In your letter, you also referred to one dated October 14 
(FMA//LU/2004/1/19) to which you said you were awaiting a 
reply.  In the fourth paragraph of that letter, you stated 
that "I consider it most pertinent to provide further 
clarifications on the matter as certain representations... 
are unfortunately not reflective of the situation at hand." 
You then explained why you believe Virgin Nigeria Airways is 
substantially owned and effectively controlled by your 
government.  You therefore expressed "deep concern about the 
attempts being made by the United States to link Virgin 
Nigeria... with the U.K. registered Virgin Atlantic 
Limited." 
 
Toward the end of your letter of October 14, you asked my 
"understanding and cooperation in enlightening further the 
Government of the United States, its relevant authorities 
and agencies on the true position of the matter with a view 
to... paving the way for the prompt acceptance of the 
designation of the Nigerian flag carrier."  Unfortunately, I 
did not conclude from your remarks that you were expecting a 
reply from me.  On the other hand, U.S. Government officials 
consulted among themselves following their receipt of the 
detailed report on the meeting that you and the Embassy's 
Economic Counselor had on September 27.  Those consultations 
led to the U.S. officials' decision to recommend the press 
briefing, the subject of your protest. 
 
Mr. Minister, in paragraph nine of your letter of December 
21 you stated that the "emphasis apparently being placed by 
the U.S. Government... is that the airline is an entirely 
Virgin Atlantic [UK]... matter.  The newspaper report 
regrettably goes on to name some foreign airlines, which the 
United States expects Nigeria to partner with... without 
considering the issue of the sovereign rights of Nigeria to 
make its own decision on the choice of a suitable partner." 
 
I assure you that the U.S. Government understands that 
Virgin Nigeria is not "entirely" a Virgin Atlantic affair. 
We know that the latter holds 49 percent of the equity.  The 
U.S. Government also respects the right of the Government of 
Nigeria to choose its own partners in whatever ventures. 
The exercise of such rights may have implications for third 
parties, however.  The Embassy Counselor mentioned foreign 
airlines nominally during the briefing to emphasize that 
those implications have greater or lesser import depending 
on the airlines' normal places of doing business. 
 
In paragraph 11 of your letter of December 21, you indicated 
that "suffice it to state at this juncture that the report 
further referred to the proposed operations of Continental 
Air into Nigeria by April 2005 without taking into 
consideration the principle of reciprocity in the bilateral 
air transport relations between the two sovereign countries. 
Such proposals by the United States in respect of its own 
designated airline may legitimately be attended on a quid 
pro quo basis."   I infer that you meant to establish a 
direct link between Nigeria's recognition of Continental 
Airlines as a designated carrier by the United States, and 
the latter's recognition of Virgin Nigeria as your 
government's designated carrier, under our bilateral 
aviation services agreement (open skies).  Establishing such 
a link would be neither in the spirit of our agreement nor 
in the interests of our respective countries. 
 
Continental Airlines is substantially owned by citizens of 
the United States and under their "effective control." 
Effective control is a term employed by the U. S. Department 
of Transportation (DOT) in determining whether an airline 
meets the US citizenship requirements of US aviation law. 
DOT uses a two-pronged test for citizenship: whether at 
least 75 percent of the voting stock of the carrier is owned 
by US citizens (as well as the president and two-thirds of 
the board of directors of the carrier being US citizens), 
and whether the carrier is under the "effective control" of 
US citizens. The first prong is an objective numerical test. 
The second prong is subjective because there is no fixed 
legal definition of "effective control"; DOT looks at all of 
the factual circumstances involved in the management of the 
carrier and determines case by case where "effective 
control" lies.  Generally, DOT distinguishes "apparent" 
control from "actual" control and, as a general proposition, 
it usually decides that the party that actually makes, or 
has the authority to make, the day-to-day operational 
decisions for the carrier is the party that is in "effective 
control" of the company. 
 
In exercising its discretion, DOT considers public-policy 
factors including the impact of its determination on 
domestic and international competition.  The latter point is 
important because the focus of U.S. aviation policy is to 
promote competition to benefit U.S. consumers.  Because the 
relevant U.S. statute gives DOT discretion to define "actual 
control," DOT takes into account whether the United States 
has a liberal aviation relationship with the country the 
nationals of which want to do business with the United 
States.  DOT interprets ownership and control requirements 
differently depending on the level of access U.S. carriers 
enjoy to the relevant foreign market.  DOT does this to 
prevent free riding by a carrier from a country with which 
the United States has restrictive airline rights.  As noted 
in paragraph five of your letter of December 21, the United 
Kingdom is a country whose aviation restrictions are 
adversely affecting the interests of the United States.  The 
Ministry does not contest that Virgin Atlantic Limited, 
which holds 49 percent equity in Virgin Nigeria, is a UK- 
registered airline. 
 
Mr. Minister, I hope I have clarified the U.S. Government's 
position to your satisfaction.  I assure you that it, too, 
is committed to the faithful implementation of our Open 
Skies Agreement of August 2000.  In your own words, we look 
to its being implemented "in the true spirit of the cordial 
relationship that exists between our two governments." 
 
End text. 
 
FUREY