Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04BRASILIA2774, BRAZILIAN HIGH COURT STRIKES DOWN EXCEPTION TO

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04BRASILIA2774.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04BRASILIA2774 2004-11-08 11:34 2011-07-11 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Brasilia
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BRASILIA 002774 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR WHA/BSC 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV SOCI PHUM BR
SUBJECT: BRAZILIAN HIGH COURT STRIKES DOWN EXCEPTION TO 
ABORTION BAN 
 
REF: BRASILIA 1670 
 
1. SUMMARY.  On October 20, after a stormy debate, Brazil's 
Supreme Federal Tribunal struck down a temporary injunction 
issued in July that created a narrow exception (only the 
third) in Brazil's abortion ban.  The exception would allow 
abortions in cases of anencephaly (where the fetus has no 
brain).  Threat to the life of the mother and pregnancy 
resulting from rape are the two existing exceptions. 
Anencephaly is linked to maternal nutritional deficiencies 
and has a 100% mortality rate within minutes of birth.  Last 
July, when a judge issued the injunction it sparked a heated 
public debate from medical, legal, religious, and human 
rights officials.  The case is not over: this ruling only 
strikes down the injunction on technical grounds but does not 
decide the underlying case.  The high court must now decide 
whether it will hear arguments on the merits or leave the 
issue to legislators --who have shown little interest in 
being drawn into the debate.  END SUMMARY. 
 
HIGH COURT STRIKES DOWN INJUNCTION 
---------------------------------- 
2.  On 1 July 2004, a judge on Brazil's Supreme Federal 
Tribunal (STF), Marco Aurelio Mello, issued a temporary 
injunction that allowed anencephaly cases (where the fetus 
has no brain) to become only the third exception to Brazil's 
ban on abortion (reftel).  Threat to the life of the mother 
and pregnancy resulting from rape are the two existing 
exceptions.  That injunction remained in force until October 
20 when, after tempestuous debate, the full Court struck it 
down by a 7-4 vote.  Mello and Judge Joaquim Barbosa nearly 
came to blows during the arguments.  The case is not over: 
the full court decision struck down the injunction on 
technical grounds but did not decide the merits of the 
underlying case. 
 
3.  Anencephaly is linked to maternal nutritional 
deficiencies and has a 100% mortality rate within minutes of 
birth.  Thus, when Judge Mello issued the injunction in July, 
he kicked off a broad public debate over abortion rights with 
jurists, health providers, women's rights activists, and 
religious leaders lined up on both sides of the issue.  After 
the ruling, one attorney who argued in support of the 
injunction noted that the Catholic Church "inundated the 
judges' computers with e-mails".  On November 7, speaking in 
Rome to a group of Brazilian pilgrims, the Pope said, "I hope 
that in every moment (Brazilian) officials continue defending 
life from conception until its natural end".  According to a 
World Health Organization study Brazil has the world's fourth 
highest anencephaly rate (8.6 per 10,000 births).  In a 
survey conducted in Sao Paulo a week before the high court 
decision, 67% of respondents supported the right to terminate 
an anencephalic pregnancy. 
 
4.  The only woman on the high court, Judge Ellen Gracie, 
voted with the majority in striking down the injunction, but 
noted that she did so on a legal technicality and was not 
issuing an opinion on the underlying issue.  If the merits of 
the case come before the court, she is seen as likely to 
support establishing anencephaly as a third exception to the 
abortion ban.  Judge Gracie has noted that the abortion ban 
--like most of Brazil's criminal law-- was codified by the 
1940 Penal Code, whereas the Constitution was written much 
later, in 1988, after the end of the military dictatorship. 
Thus, there remain issues on which the law and the 
constitution need to be harmonized.  In addition to Gracie, 
three other judges (including Chief Justice Nelson Jobim) who 
voted to strike down the injunction are seen as possibles to 
vote in favor of a third exception to the abortion ban.  If 
they all change their vote, the anencephaly exception would 
be legalized by an 8-3 majority.  However, the high court may 
also refuse to hear arguments on the merits, thus leaving the 
current ban in place and leaving further action to Congress. 
The Court's decision on whether to hear the case is expected 
before year's end. 
 
5.  There are currently 24 abortion-related bills in various 
stages of inactivity in the Chamber of Deputies (lower 
house), but only two deal with cases of fetus inviability or 
malformation.  One of these was drafted in 1996 by the 
current Mayor of Sao Paulo, Marta Suplicy.  None of the bills 
have any particular momentum at this time.  Another bill, in 
the Senate, which would have narrowly legalized abortion only 
in cases of anencephaly was recently withdrawn by its author, 
Senator Duciomar Costa (PTB-PA), under pressure from the 
Catholic Church. 
 
COMMENT - LAWS THAT "DON'T TAKE HOLD" 
------------------------------------- 
6.  Since 1989, judges have authorized abortions in hundreds 
of anencephaly cases (on a case-by-case basis) and at least 
ten more were conducted in the wake of the July 1 injunction. 
 Brazil's books are full of laws that "don't take hold" ("nao 
pega"), and the abortion ban is one.  Studies in the late 
1990s showed that as many as 31% of Brazilian pregnancies end 
in abortion and that the majority of abortion patients are 
married women who can afford private health plans.  Poorer 
women, more likely to have anencephalic fetuses, are also 
more likely to utilize public health care where the ban on 
abortions is more strictly observed.  Thus, whether or not 
the practice violates the letter of the law, abortions are 
likely to continue to be accessible to many Brazilian women. 
DANILOVICH