Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04QUITO2769, EMBASSY VIEWS ON GOE LABOR DECREE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04QUITO2769.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04QUITO2769 2004-10-18 15:10 2011-05-02 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Quito
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 QUITO 002769 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR BUD CLATANOFF AND BENNET HARMON, 
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR FOR ILAB: JORGE PEREZ-LOPEZ AND CARLOS 
ROMERO, DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/AND, WHA/PPC, DRL/IL AND EB 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ELAB PGOV EC
SUBJECT: EMBASSY VIEWS ON GOE LABOR DECREE 
 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary:  The publication on October 14 of the 
presidential decree on subcontracting is an important if not 
ideal step forward that comes at some political cost to 
President Gutierrez and Labor Minister Raul Izurieta. 
Ecuadorian and U.S. private sector interests are already 
attacking the decree, confirming our view that this attempt 
to regulate subcontracting will raise the costs to employers 
of abusing subcontracting to curtail worker rights.   Though 
not ideal, we believe the decree represents a good faith 
effort by the GoE to fulfill one of its commitments under the 
ATPDEA.  We firmly agree that more substantive labor reform 
is needed and will require a sustained USG effort to support 
and Congressional action.  The decree drafting process shows 
that will not be easy; we can best advance the prospects for 
reform by welcoming the decree and supporting further reform. 
 End Summary. 
 
Despite Delays and Disappointments... 
------------------------------------- 
 
2.  (SBU) We have been as frustrated as our colleagues in 
Washington by the agonizing process of change and missed 
deadlines that plagued the drafting of this decree.  Delay 
and disappointment with regard to decrees, far from being 
exceptional, are the norm here, where any presidential action 
has the potential to destabilize a weak and unpopular 
government.  Labor rights, as elsewhere, are inherently 
sensitive political issue here, alternately able to alienate 
powerful economic interests and to mobilize the labor sector. 
 The 75% limitation on subcontracted employees is much higher 
than labor unions wanted, but any limitation is too much for 
business.  The treatment of contracting by individuals in 
agriculture may open an unfortunate loophole, but the extent 
to which that loophole really allows for abuses will not be 
clear until we see how the decree is applied. 
 
...We See Progress 
------------------ 
 
3.  (SBU) Although all of our concerns have most definitely 
not been met, it does seem that the decree is a significant 
step forward and limits the scope for abuse of subcontracting 
to curtail labor rights.  Local AFL-CIO Solidarity Center 
representative Patricio Contreras characterized it as 
positive to LabOff on October 15, although we understand the 
AFL-CIO is still considering its position.  The decree 
imposes regulation specific to subcontracting for the first 
time in Ecuador.  Registration and reporting requirements 
will allow the Ministry to get a handle on subcontracting and 
to resolve abuses.  Another indication the decree has merit 
is the fact that business lawyers are working overtime on the 
constitutional challenge they say will be presented within 
days (it will focus on the 75% rule and the fines being 
levied per worker affected by a violation, rather than per 
violation).  A U.S. business leader came in to see the 
Ambassador before the decree was published to request Embassy 
assistance to prevent the issuance of what he considered a 
"anti-democratic" labor regulation.  In our view the decree 
will make it significantly more costly and more difficult for 
employers in Ecuador to use subcontracting as a way of 
thwarting employees in the exercise of their rights. 
 
4.  (SBU) The GoE's efforts on child labor this year have 
been even more impressive.  We asked for new child labor 
inspectors to be appointed by the end of the year.  Given 
Ecuador's track record, one might have expected appointment 
on December 31 followed by months of wrangling about 
salaries, transportation, and other facilities.  Instead, the 
GoE moved very rapidly to appoint and has been working on the 
logistical issues diligently ever since.  They are not 
resolved, but they may be by the end of the year. 
 
The Way Ahead 
------------- 
 
5.  (SBU) There is no doubt that issuing the decree was 
difficult for this government, and we believe the effort 
demonstrates the GoE's commitment to labor reform.  The 
decree comes from a very weak government and in the face of 
staunch opposition from the business community.  We know the 
GoE worked hard to come up with a decree which would meet 
U.S. concerns and be acceptable to labor and business here. 
Minister of Labor Izurieta has invested his personal 
credibility in the effort, as has the President.  With all 
his flaws, we believe Izurieta is an ally of labor reform and 
a star in this government.  Any replacement would be very 
unlikely to be an improvement.  Izurieta is now going to pay 
a political price for his efforts, with the constitutional 
challenge from the business community.  In this context, it 
is essential to carefully calibrate our reaction to the 
decree to maximize the prospects for labor reform as we go 
forward. 
 
6.  (SBU) This Embassy defers to and respects the interagency 
process to set policy on ATPDEA labor petitions and FTA labor 
strategy, and offers the following points for your 
consideration.  Real labor reform will take time for labor 
and business to develop common ground.  We believe the USG 
can best help focus debate by making it clear that labor 
reform is a necessary condition for any FTA with the U.S., 
while being very careful not to convey this message as an 
ultimatum.  Concluding the review on last year's petitions 
would turn the page on the decree, and allow the GoE to move 
toward legislative reforms.  Accepting the new ATPDEA 
petitions for review would also help leverage the reform 
process. 
 
KENNEY