Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04WELLINGTON833, NEW ZEALAND: LUKEWARM RESPONSE TO CITES

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04WELLINGTON833.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04WELLINGTON833 2004-09-30 04:55 2011-04-28 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Wellington
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 WELLINGTON 000833 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR EAP/ANP, OES/OMC 
BANGKOK FOR ESTH 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/29/2014 
TAGS: SENV EFIS TBIO ETRD NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND: LUKEWARM RESPONSE TO CITES 
"INTRODUCTION FROM THE SEA" PROPOSAL FOR COP13 
 
REF: STATE 195377 
 
Classified By: POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC COUNSELOR KATHERINE B. HADDA, 
FOR REASONS 1.5 (B,D) 
 
 1. (C) Summary: The GoNZ is unlikely to support the U.S. 
draft resolution that aims to clarify the term "Introduction 
from the Sea."  New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and 
Trade (MFAT) interlocutors expressed skepticism that the 
draft submission as written will address illegal, unregulated 
and unreported (IUU) fishing.  They are also not sure that 
CITES is an appropriate forum for a discussion of flag state 
responsibilities.  Despite these reservations, the GoNZ would 
likely support the U.S. proposal if it appeared that a 
majority of other member states agreed.  End summary. 
 
2. (U) Post delivered reftel demarche to the Environment 
Division of the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and 
Trade (MFAT.)  MFAT discussed the U.S. proposal at a 
September 27 roundtable that included representatives from 
the Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Fish.  On 
September 28, Poloff discussed the roundtable's views with 
Emma Kerslake, an Australian Department of Foreign Affairs 
and Trade official seconded to MFAT's Environment Division, 
(NB: Kerslake did not attend the roundtable, but was given a 
read-out to convey to us.) 
 
3. (C) Kerslake noted that the roundtable participants were 
unclear on the motivation behind the U.S. proposed draft 
resolution, and asked what specifically the U.S. hopes to 
achieve by its passage.  Kerslake noted that if the desired 
result was truly a desire to achieve better scientific data 
collection, there were more effective mechanisms.  Poloff 
responded that the resolution would assist in addressing IUU. 
 While agreeing that IUU is a serious concern for NZ, 
Kerslake was skeptical that this proposal would enhance the 
accuracy of CITES trade data and specimen tracking, believing 
that a broader catch documentation scheme would be more 
effective.  Kerslake then noted that the proposed resolution 
would have no impact on the NZ fishing industry, as they do 
not have any need for IFS certificates ) neither harvesting 
endangered species nor allowing foreign flagged vessels to 
use NZ as a port of first landing for Article II species. 
 
Specific Questions 
------------------ 
 
4. (C) Kerslake highlighted the following specific areas of 
concern and questions which she said were raised by GoNZ 
officials at the roundtable: 
 
-- Kerslake said the officials expressed concern over the 
proposal to allow agreements between the Management Authority 
of a State of first landing and a flag State, questioning why 
a flag state would be in a better position to regulate than a 
landing authority.  She acknowledged, however, that it might 
be valuable for a landing authority to be able to request 
information from a landing vessel's government. 
 
-- Para. 13:  Is CITES the best forum for a discussion of the 
responsibilities of flag states? 
 
-- Para. 19:  Would the landing authority be empowered under 
the proposal to get this information from the flag state? If 
so, GONZ agrees this would be an advantage in combating IUU. 
 
-- Para. 21:  While applauding the intent, Kerslake noted 
GONZ reservations at the ability of this resolution to impose 
on non-party states a determination by a regional or 
international management organization that a particular 
landing is detrimental. 
 
We can be convinced 
------------------- 
 
5. (C) Kerslake noted that the GoNZ would likely support the 
U.S. proposal if it appeared that a majority of member states 
agreed.  However, should the resolution appear unlikely to be 
passed, she suggested the U.S. consider proposing as a 
separate resolution a definition of "in the marine 
environment not under the jurisdiction of any State." 
Kerslake said the GoNZ would support this. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
6. (C) As noted, Kerslake is an employee of the Australian 
DFAT, and has previously worked on fisheries issues for 
Australia, although she is not familiar with CITES in 
particular.  She was very forthright during the meeting, and 
admitted that her interpretation might be more direct than 
that intended by New Zealand interlocutors.  It is likely 
that the GoNZ delegation in Bangkok will appear to be more 
conciliatory, and may not couch their concerns in the same 
language.  However, it appears that the GoNZ's skepticism 
about the need for and the language in the U.S. resolution is 
genuine. 
Burnett