Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04HANOI2609, Ambassador's September 17 Meeting with Vice

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04HANOI2609.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04HANOI2609 2004-09-17 09:50 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Hanoi
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 HANOI 002609 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV 
 
For OBO/REPM/ACQ - Mike Lash 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL PGOV PHUM PINR ABLD AMGT VM
SUBJECT:  Ambassador's September 17 Meeting with Vice 
Foreign Minister Le Van Bang 
Ref: A) Hanoi 2149      B) State 
 
161328     C) State 159268     D) Hanoi 25951. 
 
(SBU) Summary and Comment:  The Ambassador met September 17 with Vice 
Foreign Minister Le Van Bang.  Bang's first piece of 
business was to inform the Ambassador that the President had 
agreed to receive the Ambassador's credentials "earlier than 
normal," specifically "later this month."  VFM Bang agreed 
that the acquisition of the new Embassy compound was a 
critical issue that required both sides' attention and urged 
the USG to talk with the Russians, just as the GVN would 
continue to do.  All that was left was to "sign the deal" 
with them, Bang claimed.  The VFM expressed his hope that he 
and the Ambassador would be able to meet regularly to "sort 
out" issues and added that, regardless of what might arise, 
at the end of the day it was the bilateral relationship that 
was most important.  Bang's tone was upbeat; surprisingly, 
he passed on the opportunity to raise the recent designation 
of Vietnam as a "Country of Particular Concern."  End 
Summary and Comment.2. (SBU) The Ambassador, accompanied by 
DCM and Pol/C, met September 17 with Vice Foreign Minister 
Le Van Bang.  This was the Ambassador's first meeting with 
VFM Bang since the late 1980s.  VFM Bang opened by recalling 
that he had first met the Ambassador when the latter was 
Deputy Director of the Office of Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia 
Affairs and had traveled to Vietnam in 1989 and 1990 for 
humanitarian discussions.  Bang expressed his hope that the 
Ambassador would be able to continue to improve relations as 
he had done during his previous contacts with Vietnam.  VFM 
Bang informed the Ambassador that, although Vietnam's 
President normally accepted the credentials of new 
ambassadors only four times a year -- with the next ceremony 
scheduled for November -- MFA had learned September 16 that 
the Ambassador and several other newcomers would have the 
opportunity to present their credentials "later this month." 
Bang noted that this was a "privilege" and quickly added 
that one of his responsibilities was state protocol.3. (SBU) 
In response to the Ambassador's question about his other 
responsibilities beyond U.S.-Vietnam relations and state 
protocol, Bang said that he was also in charge of 
international organizations and U.N. affairs, as well as the 
administrative, financial and budget issues of foreign 
missions.  As such, he had a key role to play in the USG's 
desired acquisition of land for a new Embassy compound (NEC) 
(Refs A, B, C, and see para 7 for background).  Bang 
complained that he had tried to work with the Russians, but 
they seemed to be having problems coming to closure on the 
deal.  The Ambassador remarked that time was not on our 
side, noting that the money earmarked for the project would 
not be available forever and that the Hanoi People's 
Committee appeared to be shopping around the property.  Bang 
said that Vietnam was equally interested in acquiring 
property in Washington, D.C. (for $10 million) and agreed 
with the Ambassador that this was an issue of reciprocity. 
MFA's Legal Department Director General, who was in charge 
of the NEC negotiation, had informed Bang September 16 that 
he planned to speak with the Russian Ambassador about this 
issue and ask that they "resume" their deal as soon as 
possible.  Both sides had agreed on a price last December, 
and all that was left was to sign.  The GVN would continue 
to work with the Russians, but the USG should also weigh in 
with the Russians, Bang suggested. 
4. (SBU) Bang said that there were many other issues on 
which both he and the Ambassador would have to focus their 
attention and expressed his hope that they would be able to 
sit down soon and "sort them out" the way he had down with 
Ambassadors Peterson and Burghardt.  Although he himself had 
been dealing with American issues since 1989, it seemed 
that, in the American system, people moved in and out of 
jobs every two or three years, he observed. 
 
5. (SBU) Bang noted that in light of the early October ASEM 
5 Summit in Hanoi and November APEC Summit in Santiago, he 
was "very busy."  However, he would see the Ambassador again 
on the occasion of the presentation of his credentials and 
agreed that they should try to find time to meet again soon. 
The Ambassador noted that Ambassador Burghardt had always 
valued the chance to work quietly and constructively with 
Bang and, although not always seeing eye-to-eye, they were 
able to solve some issues and to keep others under control. 
Bang agreed, saying that it was important to work together 
officially, unofficially, privately, or "otherwise," 
because, at the end of the day, it was the bilateral 
relationship that was most important.6. (SBU) Comment: 
Bang's tone was upbeat and forward-looking.  In contrast 
with the Ambassador's conversation the day before with 
Assistant Foreign Minister Hung (Ref D), there was no 
mention of the religious freedom issue or the Department's 
designation of Vietnam as a country of particular concern.7. 
(U) NEC Background:  Embassy Hanoi officers met July 29 with 
Le Van Bang.  This was the Ambassador's first meeting with 
VFM Bang since the late 1980s.  VFM Bang opened by recalling 
that he had first met the Ambassador when the latter was 
Deputy Director of the Office of Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia 
Affairs and had traveled to Vietnam in 1989 and 1990 for 
humanitarian discussions.  Bang expressed his hope that the 
Ambassador would be able to continue to improve relations as 
he had done during his previous contacts with Vietnam.  VFM 
Bang informed the Ambassador that, although Vietnam's 
President normally accepted the credentials of new 
ambassadors only four times a year -- with the next ceremony 
scheduled for November -- MFA had learned September 16 that 
the Ambassador and several other newcomers would have the 
opportunity to present their credentials "later this month." 
Bang noted that this was a "privilege" and quickly added 
that one of his responsibilities was state protocol.3. (SBU) 
In response to the Ambassador's question about his other 
responsibilities beyond U.S.-Vietnam relations and state 
protocol, Bang said that he was also in charge of 
international organizations and U.N. affairs, as well as the 
administrative, financial and budget issues of foreign 
missions.  As such, he had a key role to play in the USG's 
desired acquisition of land for a new Embassy compound (NEC) 
(Refs A, B, C, and see para 7 for background).  Bang 
complained that he had tried to work with the Russians, but 
they seemed to be having problems coming to closure on the 
deal.  The Ambassador remarked that time was not on our 
side, noting that the money earmarked for the project would 
not be available forever and that the Hanoi People's 
Committee appeared to be shopping around the property.  Bang 
said that Vietnam was equally interested in acquiring 
property in Washington, D.C. (for $10 million) and agreed 
with the Ambassador that this was an issue of reciprocity. 
MFA's Legal Department Director General, who was in charge 
of the NEC negotiation, had informed Bang September 16 that 
he planned to speak with the Russian Ambassador about this 
issue and ask that they "resume" their deal as soon as 
possible.  Both sides had agreed on a price last December, 
and all that was left was to sign.  The GVN would continue 
to work with the Russians, but the USG should also weigh in 
with the Russians, Bang suggested. 
4. (SBU) Bang said that there were many other issues on 
which both he and the Ambassador would have to focus their 
attention and expressed his hope that they would be able to 
sit down soon and "sort them out" the way he had down with 
Ambassadors Peterson and Burghardt.  Although he himself had 
been dealing with American issues since 1989, it seemed 
that, in the American system, people moved in and out of 
jobs every two or three years, he observed. 
 
Diplomatic Services Bureau General Director Xuong, at which 
time he stated a "strong desire" to settle the NEC matter 
with the Russians before September 30 (the end of the GVN's 
fiscal year).  Xuong claimed that the GVN's efforts to 
finalize the agreement with Russia were stymied by a 
reorganization of the Russian Foreign Ministry.  He 
explained that it was unclear which Russian MFA 
directorate/vice-minister had responsibility for this 
particular initiative.  When asked if the GVN would consider 
starting "informal" discussions with the USG regarding 
possible acquisition costs, protocols, etc., Ambassador 
Xuong reiterated the Vietnamese position that it would not 
commence direct GVN-USG negotiations until his government 
had regained full legal rights to the property.  Note:  the 
GVN and Russian MFA appear to have already agreed a price 
($2 million) to offset Russian infrastructure improvements 
to the site.  End Background.MARINE