Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04BOGOTA8906, CONCERNS FROM THE U.S. FLAG CARRIERS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04BOGOTA8906.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04BOGOTA8906 2004-09-02 14:00 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Bogota
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BOGOTA 008906 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAIR CO
SUBJECT: CONCERNS FROM THE U.S. FLAG CARRIERS 
 
REF: A. REF A: BOGOTA 8026 
     B. REF B: BOGOTA 8515 
 
Sensitive but unclassified -- please protect accordingly. 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary.  At the midyear point, the three U.S. flag 
airlines, American, Continental, and Delta, all report higher 
earnings in 2004 than in 2003.  All three managers voiced 
concerns over the civil aviation authority, Aeronautica Civil 
(CAA), the association of Colombian travel agencies (ANATO), 
and the Avianca-Synergy deal.  End Summary. 
 
---------------------------------- 
Sales Increase But Problems Remain 
---------------------------------- 
 
2.  (U) 2004 is shaping up to be a good year for U.S. flag 
carriers, with sales revenues up from five to ten percent 
over 2003 levels.  Local station managers attributed this 
increase to sustained economic growth, an increase in foreign 
investment, a rise in corporate, leisure and student travel, 
and the free trade negotiations.   The ramp up to the free 
trade negotiations, as well as the negotiations themselves, 
have significantly increased business travel not only from 
Colombia to the U.S., but also from the U.S. to Colombia. 
American Airlines' Manager informed Econoff that the increase 
in business travel has allowed American to fly five times per 
week to Medellin and directly compete against Avianca. 
However, the airlines still face restrictions and expensive 
tax legislation, high travel agency commissions, a new 
administrative fee - (Ref B), and high fuel prices. 
 
-------------------- 
CAA and the Airlines 
-------------------- 
 
3.  (SBU) All three U.S. carriers expressed discontent with 
CAA's regulatory behavior.  American Airlines is the most 
vocal, stating Colombia is the most regulated airline market 
in Latin America.  CAA's regulatory behavior affects airline 
fares for internet programs, gate access, routes, and 
negotiations between private entities, such as travel 
agencies and airlines (Ref B).  Continental privately voiced 
concerns with CAA's response time to Continental's official 
complaints, pointing to one example where CAA responded to a 
complaint only after the event was a non-issue.  Continental 
and Delta publicly state, however, they have good relations 
with CAA.  The airlines did note that CAA was helpful with 
security and airport operations. 
 
----------------- 
ANATO's Influence 
----------------- 
 
4.  (SBU) ANATO, the Colombian travel agency association, has 
far greater influence with CAA than Colombia's airlines 
associations, ALAICO and ATAC, because of strong relations 
(and some business ties) with the Colombian Congress and the 
travel agency industry's support for political campaigns. 
ANATO's influence in CAA policy is readily seen in the rules 
regulating internet tickets for airlines (long delays in 
processing the requests) and in the newly created four 
percent administrative fee for travel agents (Ref B). 
ANATO's fight to survive in an era of internet tickets and 
reduced commissions for travel agencies is clearly 
demonstrated in an email, recently made public by American 
Airlines.  American's Station Manager in Colombia said the 
email, authored by the VP of ANATO, stated ANATO members 
should divert their sales principally towards Avianca and 
Delta because of Avianca's support for ANATO and American's 
lobbying efforts to lower travel agent commissions.  American 
Airlines has filed a lawsuit against ANATO as a result of the 
communication. 
 
--------------------------- 
Concern Over Avianca's Sale 
--------------------------- 
 
5.  (SBU) Avianca has been in Chapter 11 proceedings since 
March 21, 2003 (Ref A).  Avianca chose to pursue bankruptcy 
protection in the U.S. because U.S. laws are more lenient and 
less political than existing Colombian laws.  Avianca's goal 
was to search for a buyer that would absorb its debt, 
currently over USD 300 million, inject capital to the 
cash-strapped company, and install a better management team. 
By April 2004, Avianca had two bidders, the Brazilian company 
Synergy and Continental-Copa.  According to American 
Airlines' Station Manager in Colombia, Avianca chose Synergy 
mainly because Avianca felt that Continental-Copa would 
eventually absorb all of Avianca's operations and eliminate 
Avianca altogether.  Continental's Station Manager in 
Colombia stated that the Avianca-Synergy deal is worrisome to 
the Colombian aviation industry because Synergy has no real 
experience in operating a major international airline and 
fears that future Avianca-Synergy troubles may cause a 
price-war, where all airlines will lose out (however, CAA 
sets minimum and maximum price limits for the airline 
industry).  On 24 August, a New York Bankruptcy Court Judge 
said Avianca's restructuring plan, featuring a purchase by 
Synergy (which runs a successful regional airline in Brazil), 
complied with the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.  This crucial passage 
allows Avianca to release the plan to its creditors on 3 
September.  The confirmation hearing will occur on 14 October 
and Synergy hopes Avianca will exit Chapter 11 by the end of 
the year.  The judge granted 60 days for Avianca to obtain 
the necessary votes from the creditors to approve the 
restructuring plan. 
 
6.  (SBU) Comment.  The CAA's efforts to protect Avianca and 
ANATO are due to the political influence of both entities. 
The CAA has repeatedly refused Open Skies negotiations for 
fear that entering U.S. carriers would undermine Avianca's 
chances of survival.  In addition, it has not challenged even 
the most self-serving requests from ANATO.  Rumors in the 
aviation community suggest that CAA's director Velez has 
political aspirations (hoping possibly to follow in the 
footsteps of another former CAA director, President Uribe) 
and therefore does not want to burn any bridges with Congress 
nor ANATO.  End Comment. 
DRUCKER