Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04WELLINGTON686, NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT PROPOSES TO BOTH RELAX AND

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04WELLINGTON686.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04WELLINGTON686 2004-08-11 01:19 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Wellington
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 WELLINGTON 000686 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EB/TPP AND EAP/ANP 
STATE PASS USTR-BWEISEL 
COMMERCE FOR GPAINE/4530/ITA/MAC/AP/OSAO 
NSC FOR MGOODMAN 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12356: N/A 
TAGS: EINV ECIN ECON ETRD NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT PROPOSES TO BOTH RELAX AND 
TOUGHEN RULES FOR FOREIGN INVESTMENT 
 
REF: 03 WELLINGTON 1247 
 
1. (U) Sensitive but unclassified - protect accordingly. 
 
2. (SBU) Summary: Proposed changes to the New Zealand 
government's review of foreign investments would reduce the 
scope of business deals requiring its review while 
tightening the screening of land purchases by foreigners. 
The government is trying to strike a balance between its 
desire to arrest a five-year slide in foreign investment and 
the public's wish to keep so-called iconic sites and large 
stretches of shoreline out of foreign ownership.  The rules' 
impact on U.S. business investors is expected to be slight, 
although they will complicate some land purchases by 
Americans.  End summary. 
 
3. (U) The proposed rules, approved by cabinet July 5 and 
announced July 20, must be incorporated into legislation and 
then face a parliamentary vote.  If approved, they most 
likely would take effect July 1, 2005, according to Stephen 
Dawe, chief executive officer of the New Zealand Overseas 
Investment Commission (OIC), which since 1973 has 
administered the government's foreign investment policies. 
The new rules would lift the threshold for scrutiny of 
proposed business purchases from NZ $50 million (US $32.6 
million) to NZ $100 million (US $65.2 million), where a 
foreigner is proposing to take control of 25 percent or more 
of a business. 
 
4. (U) For purchases of rural land of more than 12.35 acres 
and for land in certain sensitive or protected areas, 
foreigners would have to provide a management proposal 
covering any historic, heritage, conservation or public 
access matters and any economic development planned.  That 
proposal would have to be approved and made a condition of 
consent.  In addition, investors would be required to report 
at one- or two-year intervals on their compliance with the 
terms of the consent.  (The government's proposal continues 
existing rules requiring approval for acquisition of rural 
land of more than five hectares, or 12.35 acres, and for 
land in certain sensitive or protected areas, including most 
offshore islands or next to the foreshore.)  The rules would 
ease restrictions on purchases of urban land. 
 
5. (SBU) The new rules are expected to have minimal impact 
on decisions by U.S. investors to buy New Zealand 
businesses.  The proposed rules would have eliminated the 
required review of at least four U.S. proposals submitted in 
2003, or nearly 6 percent of all U.S. applications.  Among 
them would be Illinois-based Brunswick Corporation's US $33 
million acquisition of a 70 percent stake in Navman, a New 
Zealand company specializing in global positioning systems- 
based products and marine electronics. 
 
6. (U) Moreover, since 1984, the OIC has never rejected a 
foreign investment in New Zealand businesses, which was a 
reason cited by Finance Minister Cullen for changing the 
rules, according to Dawe.  Cullen felt as if he were rubber- 
stamping OIC decisions that should not have needed his -- 
nor the commission's -- consideration, Dawe said.  He noted 
that the OIC last year considered 206 applications by U.S. 
interests (including some applications submitted in prior 
years).  The commission rejected eight of those 
applications, which were for land acquisitions and had been 
submitted primarily by Americans who had come to New Zealand 
as tourists. 
 
7. (SBU) U.S. investment applications have declined 33 
percent since 1999, for reasons unrelated to the 
government's screening requirement.  While delays and 
compliance costs may deter some potential foreign investors, 
U.S. businesses cite other reasons for their reluctance to 
put their money in New Zealand.  These reasons include the 
government's energy and environmental policies, employment 
laws, excessive regulation in certain sectors and tax policy 
(reftel).  The stock of U.S. direct investment in New 
Zealand has shrunk by nearly two thirds in the last five 
years from U.S. $10.3 billion (NZ $15.809 billion) in fiscal 
1998 to an estimated U.S. $3.65 billion (NZ $5.596 billion) 
in 2003.  Nonetheless, the United States ranks second after 
Australia in terms of foreign direct investment in New 
Zealand. 
 
8. (U) In announcing a review of the government's foreign 
investment rules on November 10, Cullen stated his desire to 
provide greater protection to sites of special historical, 
cultural or environmental significance.  He also cited the 
need for attracting foreign capital if the country is to 
achieve the government's stated goal of returning to the top 
half of OECD rankings.  As a percentage of GDP, foreign 
direct investment in New Zealand peaked at more than 60 
percent in 1998.  It declined to about 40 percent of GDP by 
March 2003. 
 
9. (SBU) The review of investment rules was prompted in part 
by publicity indicating that the OIC may have been lax in 
monitoring compliance by foreign landowners with the 
consents imposed by the agency.  Among the most publicized 
cases was that of American Alan Trent, who bulldozed coastal 
cliff tops for a subdivision of expensive homes.  Americans 
are the leading foreign landholders, but the amount of land 
purchased by foreigners has declined since 1995.  In 2003, 
foreign land purchases fell by more than half from the 
previous year, with 181 foreigners buying 13,427 hectares. 
That drop may be due partly to the fact that there is less 
rural land available to purchase.  In addition, about 30 
percent of New Zealand's landmass, or 8 million hectares, 
lies outside the grasp of any private landowner.  These 
lands are managed by the Department of Conservation. 
 
10. (U) Under the government's proposal, the OIC's functions 
will be transferred to Land Information New Zealand.  The 
OIC's nine staff members will be offered the opportunity to 
transfer to the new unit. 
 
11. (SBU) Comment: While easing controls on non-land 
business purchases, the new rules on foreign ownership would 
leave in place a screening mechanism that is considered 
inconsistent with the WTO General Agreement on Trade in 
Services and with the notion that such regimes should be 
unnecessary in developed nations.  In fact, the New Zealand 
Treasury initially recommended scrapping all controls on 
foreign business acquisitions, except for competition 
provisions.  It then proposed raising the threshold to $250 
million (US $163 million), which cabinet ministers scaled 
back.  The go-slow approach may be dictated by politics. 
Leading up to the next election in 2005, the ruling Labour 
Party holds a slim lead in the polls and may need the 
support of the Green Party and New Zealand First -- both 
fervent proponents of keeping New Zealand property in New 
Zealand hands.  Members of the opposition National Party 
also have indicated they might make their desire to protect 
certain land areas from foreign ownership an election issue. 
 
Burnett