Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04BRASILIA2069, CRITICISM CAUSES BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENT TO RETHINK

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04BRASILIA2069.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04BRASILIA2069 2004-08-17 10:02 2011-07-11 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Brasilia
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BRASILIA 002069 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
DEPT FOR WHA/BSC AND WHA/PD 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PHUM SCUL ECON BR
SUBJECT: CRITICISM CAUSES BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENT TO RETHINK 
PROPOSED JOURNALISM RULES 
 
REF: A. BRASILIA 1987 
 
     B. BRASILIA 2052 
 
1. (SBU) SUMMARY.  The Lula administration last week proposed 
a journalism law that created a stir in the Brazilian press. 
The Journalism Council bill would create a national oversight 
body with authorities to regulate and discipline the press. 
It created such controversy --including charges of 
"Stalinism" from some overwrought editorialists-- that 
congressional leaders quickly pushed it to the back burner. 
The bill may be the fruit of some residual statist tendencies 
in the Workers' Party (PT), but it also reflects a GoB 
frustration with sensationalism and inaccuracies in the 
press.  It is probably not coincidental that it was announced 
in the middle of two controversies involving questionable 
journalistic ethics:  the Banestado money-laundering scandal 
and a journalist's confession that a 1993 story that led to 
the expulsion of a Federal Deputy contained errors.  Lula's 
advisors may give the journalism bill token support, but it 
seems unlikely to come to a vote in Congress this year, if 
ever.  A second controversial measure, an audiovisual bill to 
regulate film and TV, is still being drafted and has not been 
sent to Congress.  END SUMMARY. 
 
JOURNALISM BILL SENT TO CONGRESS 
-------------------------------- 
2. (SBU) Since 1967 and the dictatorship era, Brazil's Labor 
Ministry has been nominally responsible for overseeing the 
profession of journalism but has done nothing more than 
maintain a registry of professional journalists.  The 
National Journalists Federation (FENAJ) claims to represent 
30,000 journalists from 31 unions but does not provide 
oversight.  (FENAJ is loosely associated with President 
Lula's Workers' Party (PT) and most of its directors are PT 
members.)  The Lula administration saw a gap in this 
structure: a lack of legal authority to oversee and regulate 
the field.  So, with FENAJ's input, the Labor Ministry 
drafted a bill to create a Federal Journalism Council (CFJ) 
and five subordinate Regional Councils (CRJs).  Lula sent the 
bill to Congress on August 6, and as soon as the text became 
public it sparked controversy.  Under the bill's rules, 
journalists would have to register and pay dues to the 
councils and would elect the councils' members.  The councils 
would create and enforce an ethics code, oversee the 
profession, and discipline journalists.  Lula's Press 
Secretary, Ricardo Kotscho, noted that the bill is 
 
SIPDIS 
"negotiable" and was designed to "open the debate".  FENAJ 
announced that "the CFJ is an essential instrument for the 
profession" and would "protect journalists from manipulation" 
by private interests. 
 
MANY JOURNALISTS ARE RESOLUTELY OPPOSED 
--------------------------------------- 
3. (SBU) Journalists were quick to react.  The Brazilian 
Press Association (ABI) and the major newspapers railed 
against the bill.  An editorial in conservative "Estado de 
Sao Paulo" called it an "authoritarian offensive" and noted 
that the GoB is "showing its dictatorial face".  Popular TV 
newscaster Boris Casoy called the bill "abominable" and an 
"obvious attempt to control journalists and the press".  The 
international press picked up comments in "Folha de Sao 
Paulo" that the bill is "authoritarian" and "Stalinist" and 
recalled last May's episode when President Lula threatened to 
expel a New York Times reporter for an unflattering article. 
The circle of critics eventually expanded to include leading 
political and intellectual figures within the PT party and 
across the ideological spectrum. 
 
CONGRESS WILL MOVE VERY SLOWLY 
------------------------------ 
4. (SBU) The bill is now in the Chamber of Deputies, where it 
faces a slow march through three committees before going to 
the floor.  In the unlikely event it passes the Chamber, it 
would face a similar trek through the Senate.  The PT 
Chairman of the Chamber's Labor Committee said he favored the 
creation of the Journalism Council if it is done in a 
"democratic spirit", adding that national councils already 
exist for lawyers and doctors.  But Chamber Speaker Joao 
Paulo Cunha announced that he will allow a "full debate", 
i.e., the bill will move very slowly.  Cunha noted that the 
administration could have saved itself the trouble, since a 
similar bill, sponsored by Deputy Celso Russomanno (PP-SP), 
has been pending in the Chamber since 2002. 
 
5. (SBU) The opposition PSDB and PFL parties immediately 
pounced.  Jose Carlos Aleluia, the PFL's floor leader, could 
be seen in Congress last week toting a book with Hitler's 
face on the cover.  He told the press, "I hope that President 
Lula is not taking the same path as Stalin and Hitler.  The 
bill is a clear demonstration of the authoritarian roots of 
the government.  The press should oversee the government, and 
not vice versa."  Aleluia promises to use parliamentary 
tactics to block the bill.  Sao Paulo Governor Geraldo 
Alckmin (PSDB) added, "Sometimes this government has an 
authoritarian relapse." 
 
GOB'S LATENT STATIST TENDENCIES 
------------------------------- 
6. (SBU) The administration did not help its own cause when 
Lula's Communications Secretary Luiz Gushiken announced that 
freedom of the press is "not absolute".  This is not the 
first time Gushiken has criticized the press: in April he had 
to retract a comment that the press ought to be focused on a 
"positive agenda" rather than "fomenting discord", and in May 
he suggested that the critical New York Times reporter was 
working for the US government.  Lula's Chief of Staff Jose 
Dirceu struck back at critics in remarks before an August 14 
PT party gathering, calling opponents "terrorists" seeking to 
"limit the debate by shouting".  He also slammed this week's 
edition of VEJA magazine that has a cover with an ominous PT 
party eyeball over the title 'Authoritarian Temptation'. 
Dirceu said, "we struggled for democracy against many of 
those who are shouting now, including some of these magazines 
that openly supported the military dictatorship." 
 
BANESTADO AND IBSEN PINHEIRO 
---------------------------- 
7. (SBU) Two recent cases have brought the issue of 
journalistic ethics into focus.  The first is the Banestado 
scandal, a long-running congressional inquiry into a massive 
money-laundering scheme.  In recent weeks there has been a 
steady stream of leaks --both substantiated and not-- from 
confidential banking records collected by the inquiry. 
 
SIPDIS 
Central Bank President Henrique Meirelles and Bank of Brazil 
President Cassio Casseb are among those being tarred by the 
press for alleged misdeeds (ref A).  Workers' Party and 
administration officials have charged that the PSDB Senator 
who chairs the inquiry is leaking information for political 
ends, and that the press is tacitly complicit by not 
verifying the anonymous allegations.  In the second case, 
this week's "ISTO E" magazine carries a cover story in which 
a former reporter admits that an error he made in a 1993 
story about corruption wrongly led to the expulsion from 
Congress of Federal Deputy Ibsen Pinheiro.  Ironically, the 
congressional staffer who gave the journalist the false 
information was none other than Waldomiro Diniz, who in 
February 2004 was fired from his job as a senior political 
advisor in Lula's office for soliciting bribes from a numbers 
racketeer.  This fact fuels opposition claims that in the 
past the PT used anonymous leaks to attack political 
opponents but now, in power, seeks to stifle the practice. 
 
COMMENT - JOURNALISM BILL UNLIKELY TO PASS 
------------------------------------------ 
8. (SBU)  Some of Brazil's older journalists remember the 
days of self-censorship under the military regime, and they 
are quick to condemn government efforts to restrict the 
press.  Thus, sensitivity to perceived attempts to limit the 
press is a healthy part of the consolidation of Brazil's 
democracy, even if some of the criticism about the Journalism 
bill comes across as a bit hysterical.  And the bill is not 
necessary.  The press here has its strengths and weaknesses, 
and there are well-used libel laws to address the latter. 
The national papers are reasonably good, represent a range of 
editorial perspectives, and have a healthy competition for 
readers.  Thus there is not a pressing need for a set of 
nationwide councils to "orient, discipline, and oversee" 
journalists. 
 
9. (SBU) Even before the formal debate has begun in Congress, 
the bill has generated staunch opposition both within the 
government coalition and in the opposition parties.  It is 
unlikely to ever win a congressional majority.  Its most 
likely fate is to waste away, unmourned, in a committee or to 
be pulled out of Congress by the administration for "further 
review".  Politically, the bill is not worth the grief that 
the administration is getting for it, particularly in advance 
of October's municipal elections, and when there is good 
economic news and Lula's popularity has rebounded (ref B). 
The administration is now drafting an Audiovisual bill to 
promote domestic film and TV content.  The text is not yet 
public and has not been sent to Congress, but industry 
critics say it also injects government interference into 
broadcasting content.  Look for this bill to be watered down 
considerably if it ever is sent to Congress. 
DANILOVICH