Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04ANKARA4623, BOSPHORUS BYPASS AND THRACE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04ANKARA4623.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04ANKARA4623 2004-08-18 11:25 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Ankara
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 004623 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
COMMERCE PASS ALSO FOR NEWMAN 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ENRG EPET ETRD TU
SUBJECT: BOSPHORUS BYPASS AND THRACE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 
 
REF: A. A. ANKARA 3419 
     B. B. ANKARA 4443 
 
Sensitive But Unclassified - Please Handle Accordingly 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary:  Recognizing growing oil tanker congestion 
in the Bosphorus and associated environmental and safety 
risks, the Government of Turkey (GOT) has expressed support 
for construction of a bypass pipeline to avoid the Turkish 
straits, aiming to transport oil overland from the Black Sea 
to the Mediterranean (or Aegean or Adriatic) Sea.  At least 
three projects entirely in Turkey have sought permits from 
the GOT, so far without success.  Delays in granting permits 
appear to stem from concern about waiting for completion of 
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) and bureaucratic slowness and 
perhaps conflict.  USG has regularly called for the GOT to 
move forward quickly and transparently in providing 
conditional permits to allow the market to pick the best 
route or routes.  Thrace Development Company (with some 
American involvement) is concerned that a late-comer, copycat 
project across Thrace (supported by Transneft) may gain 
unfair advantage in the permitting process.  End Summary. 
 
The First Mover - Free Rider Dilemma 
------------------------------------ 
 
2.  (SBU) Ref A provided background on Bosphorus bypass 
projects; this cable provides an update on projects passing 
only through Turkey.  With the growth in crude oil shipped 
from Russia and the Caspian, oil tanker shipping of oil has 
increased to close to 3 million barrels per day, generally 
perceived as close to capacity.  The Montreux Convention 
guarantees free passage through the Straits, so Turkey has 
been limited in restrictions it can impose, but it has 
restricted night-time and bad-condition passage, which has 
created significant delay costs for tankers, particularly 
last winter.  A number of multiple-country cross Balkan 
pipelines have sought support and financing in recent years. 
More recently, three projects fully in Turkey have gained 
prominence, and have sought permits from the GOT.  Two have 
sought USG advocacy because of U.S. company involvement: 1) a 
trans-Thrace pipeline sponsored by Thrace Development Company 
(TDC), with participation by American Howard Lowe and Kazakh 
and Turkish interests, and 2) a Samsun-Ceyhan project with 
participation by American Enesco and Turkish Calik Energy. 
Because of American involvement in the potentially competing 
projects, USG has stressed the desire to leave choice of 
project(s) to the market.  In fact, some GOT officials have 
stated that Samsun-Ceyhan and trans-Thrace were not mutually 
exclusive.  Some observers note the special risk of the first 
investor or oil supplier committing to a new pipeline, in 
effect reducing delay costs for shippers who stay in the 
straits (free rider or first mover dilemma). 
 
Thrace Development Company Views 
-------------------------------- 
 
3.  (SBU) A second trans-Thrace project has recently splashed 
in the Turkish press, sponsored by Transneft and Turkish 
businessman Okan Tapan and the Anadolu Construction and 
Machinery Inc.  In recent press accounts, Tapan has claimed 
that the PM supports the project and has denied claims that 
the trans-Thrace route threatened environmentally sensitive 
zones (the terminus of Sarhos on the Aegean).  Russian 
support has been reported in the local and international 
press as on again off again, but state firm Transneft now 
appears to be actively supporting the project.  Thrace 
Development Company rep Yilmaz Oz expressed strong concerns 
to Econoff that what he called a copy-cat project filed one 
year after TDC might engender influence peddling or other 
non-transparent effects.  He pointed out potential pressure 
to seek deliverables in advance of Putin's visit in early 
September.  The TDC rep described his project's long and 
active permit application process since June 2003, and 
lamented that the Transneft project had filed its carbon copy 
application one year later.  According to the rep, the TDC 
application has been delayed at the "Council of Ministers" 
where he perceived that the MFA was holding it up.  Oz 
thanked the Embassy for previous messages to the GOT, but 
urged these to continue to come at the highest levels in 
light of the Transneft/Anadolu project's copycat nature and 
claims in the press. 
 
4. (U) The Sarhos proposals have sparked extensive 
environmental opposition from both local non-government 
organizations and international environmental groups.  A 
large rally was held in Sarhos at the beginning of August, 
with speakers loudly protesting the proposal.  GOT officials 
have noted that no infrastructure or deep water port exist 
for the proposed pipeline in Thrace, whereas the 
Samsun-Ceyhan pipeline would tap into some existing network 
and deep water port. 
 
Conflicting signals on permits 
------------------------------ 
 
5.  (SBU) Per Ref B and previous, in response to repeated USG 
queries, the GOT recently expressed the need to move forward 
on providing at least conditional permits on projects.  Some 
GOT interlocutors have admitted that a now-out-of-date 
"waiting for BTC" view had delayed the permitting process. 
Some energy officials have claimed that permit applications 
have been "thin", referring to lack of experience or 
through-put commitments.  More absurdly, some bureaucrats 
appear worried about too many pipelines, so mistakenly want 
to engage in "picking the winner".  Most likely, there is 
genuinely slow bureaucratic inertia, confusion, and special 
interests impingeing on how to manage development of viable 
bypass options.  Most recently a Ministry of Energy contact 
told Econoff, that the Minister of Energy was preparing a 
decision to clarify this process.  Embassy will continue to 
repeat its message to the GOT of the need to move forward in 
a timely and transparent way to provide conditional permits 
to let projects compete for financing and throughput 
commitments in order to let the market choose a winner.  The 
risk is that while the GOT is anxious to reduce shipments 
through the Bosphorus, procrastination on the permit issue 
could end up delaying any possible pipeline until a straits 
disaster forces the issue. 
EDELMAN