Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04RANGOON894, BURMA NGOS LAY OUT CONSERVATION PRIORITIES

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04RANGOON894.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04RANGOON894 2004-07-15 06:22 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Rangoon
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 000894 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV, OES 
BANGKOK FOR ESTH 
USPACOM FOR FPA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: SENV PGOV BM NGO
SUBJECT: BURMA NGOS LAY OUT CONSERVATION PRIORITIES 
 
REF: 2004 OESI FUNDING PROPOSAL FOR "CONSERVATION 
 
     GATEWAY" 
 
1. (SBU) Summary: A team of locally based environmental NGOs, 
backed by local experts, has produced a comprehensive 
analysis of Burma's most pressing priorities for biodiversity 
conservation.  The report is the first of its kind that we've 
seen and is realistic in its objectives and its assessment of 
the key barriers to success: weak civil society, limited 
resources, and poor government policies.  We think the USG 
can help address some of the report's central challenges 
without violating restrictions on passing assistance to the 
GOB.  End summary. 
 
First, Identify the Problem 
 
2. (U) A Rangoon-based contractor for UK NGO BirdLife 
International led a small team of Rangoon-based INGOs in 
drafting a comprehensive assessment of Burma's conservation 
priorities (pouched to EAP/BCLTV).  The report, entitled 
"Investment Opportunities in Biodiversity Conservation by 
Civil Society in Myanmar," was drafted at the behest of a 
group of local environmental NGOs and academics following an 
August 2003 roundtable discussion of the critical situation 
for Burma's biodiversity.  The Chief of Mission (COM) and 
econoff attended a July 9 briefing on the results of the 
assessment. 
 
3. (U) The group, and subsequent draft report, identified in 
Burma 72 priority sites, ten priority corridors, and at least 
145 globally threatened species in Burma.  The major threats 
to these areas and species were: (1) overexploitation of 
certain animal species for food and the international 
wildlife trade (mostly to China), (2) habitat loss (from 
logging and infrastructure projects), (3) conversion to farm 
land (especially oil palms); and, to a lesser degree, (4) 
invasive species and (5) pollution.  The report's authors 
were cautious not to put too much blame on the GOB for these 
situations, though they did clearly mention the negative 
impact of poor administration of environmental policies, 
anemic GOB spending on conservation, and environmentally 
unfriendly development and land-use policies. 
 
Next, Be Realistic 
 
4. (U) The NGOs and experts responsible for the report agreed 
that considering the poor state of civil society and a dearth 
of funding it was unrealistic to expect positive 
"conservation outcomes" for each of these priority areas. 
Thus, the report's authors established a more manageable list 
of areas where conservation partners could focus their 
energies. 
 
5. (U) In the final analysis, the experts chose seven 
priority corridors.  Within these corridors the authors 
identified 37 priority sites and four additional sites 
outside the corridors (because they contained globally 
endangered species or globally threatened species endemic to 
Burma).  Finally, the experts narrowed the list of species to 
38 -- including 11 globally endangered species and nine 
globally threatened species endemic to Burma. 
 
Better Coordination and Education Needed 
 
6. (U) The report also stressed the need for a better 
conservation infrastructure in Burma.  These "thematic" or 
strategic priorities included making biodiversity and 
conservation a part of broader GOB policy decisions, building 
civil society's capacity to participate in conservation, and 
improving coordination among local and international NGOs to 
most efficiently use limited resources. 
 
Who'll Foot the Bill? 
 
7. (U) One of the most important obstacles to achievement of 
the report's "conservation outcomes" is lack of funding.  The 
report blamed sanctions by "western governments" for 
discouraging investment in this area and also the GOB for not 
attaching enough budgetary importance to conservation.  The 
GOB as a signatory to the Convention on Biological Diversity 
has committed to providing financial support for biodiversity 
protection, however little has materialized.  Likewise local 
civil society and private sector actors have provided 
basically nothing for conservation.  Though the funds are 
lacking for effective protection, the report rightly 
recognizes the GOB's improving attitude toward conservation 
with its recent decisions to set aside two large areas of 
land as protected areas. 
 
8. (U) The report identifies the Japanese government and the 
UN as the largest bilateral and multilateral donors to Burma, 
though neither spend particularly much on conservation 
programs.  The multilateral development banks (MDBs) are not 
active in Burma due to Burma's arrears to the World Bank and 
U.S. opposition to MDB programming in Burma.  Likewise large 
private environmental funds, such as the Critical Ecosystem 
Partnership Fund, do not offer grants for Burma because they 
often receive significant contributions from the World Bank 
and other private foundations that will not support anything 
in Burma. 
 
9. (SBU) In this thrifty environment, the UN resident 
coordinator in Rangoon is taking the lead to try and respond 
to the the report's challenge to find investment.  In a 
sidebar conversation with the COM, representatives of the 
German and Japanese Embassies, and several INGOs, during the 
July 9 briefing, the UN official said he intends to approach 
the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) to see about getting 
GEF funding into Burma.  He cited the recent success of 
getting money approved for Burma from the Global Fund for TB, 
Malaria, and HIV/AIDS as evidence that proper monitoring and 
accountability mechanisms are in place here to receive 
disbursements of GEF funds.  The GEF focal point for Burma is 
the director of the National Commission for Environmental 
Affairs, a 1986 Humphrey Fellow and close Embassy contact. 
 
Comment: There's Merit, But Not Money 
 
10. (SBU) We welcome the report as the first in-depth 
analysis of the country's conservation priorities.  The 
report is comprehensive and realistic in its scope and its 
prescriptions.  Finding funding will be a challenge, though 
the GEF may be a good (though longer-term) partial solution. 
In the more immediate term, we think the USG can help this 
worthy cause in a small way without violating restrictions on 
assisting the GOB.  Two of the report's strategic priorities 
(building civil society and improving NGO coordination) are 
precisely the objectives driving a proposed local 
"Conservation Gateway" NGO that would act as a clearinghouse 
for information, allow coordination among environmental NGOs 
already on the ground, and integration of new entrants (ref 
memo).  Minimal USG funding, either from OES or EAP 
resources, would get this Gateway up and running in short 
order.  End comment. 
Martinez