Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04HANOI1421, ADOPTIONS IN VIETNAM: PREVENTING ABUSES

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04HANOI1421.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04HANOI1421 2004-05-19 09:13 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Hanoi
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 HANOI 001421 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR CA/OCS, CA/OCS/CI, CA/OCS/ACS/EAP, 
CA/OCS/PRI, DEPARTMENT ALSO FOR CA/VO/F/P, EAP/BCLTV, AND 
L/EAP 
BANGKOK FOR DHS/DD 
HO CHI MINH CITY FOR CONS AND DHS OIC 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KOCI CVIS CASC PREL VM
SUBJECT:  ADOPTIONS IN VIETNAM:  PREVENTING ABUSES 
 
Ref:  A) Hanoi 891  B) Hanoi 0048  C) 03 Hanoi 3203  D) 03 
Hanoi 1759  E) 03 State 49491  F) 03 Hanoi 0218  G) 03 Hanoi 
0064  H) 02 Hanoi 3027  I) 02 HCM 1136  J) 02 Hanoi 2258  K) 
01 HCM 593  L) 01 HCM 580  M) 00 HCM 1363 
 
This is a joint ConGen HCMC-Embassy Hanoi cable. 
 
1.  (U) Summary:  As we wait for the GVN to make written 
revisions to the draft text left with them at the conclusion 
of the first round of adoption negotiations in March, we 
wish to take this opportunity to once again raise our 
concerns about the implementation of any agreement we 
eventually reach, and consider how we can improve adoption 
processing in Vietnam once adoptions resume.  Given the 
implementation regulations associated with the Hague 
Convention on Intercountry Adoptions, Mission recommends 
that the USG press the GVN, alone or in concert with other 
countries with the same concerns, to accede to the Hague as 
soon as possible in lieu of negotiating bilateral agreements 
with every country individually.  Otherwise we are concerned 
that we will return to a system with widespread fraud and 
abusive practices.  See Action Item para 11. 
 
-------------------------- 
PAST EXPERIENCE 
-------------------------- 
 
2.  (U) Prior to the passage and enactment of Decree No. 
68/2002/ND-CP, which halted intercountry adoptions within 
Vietnam until a bilateral agreement was reached with 
individual countries with prospective adoptive parents, U.S. 
parents accounted for over 750 orphan visa cases annually. 
While most of those cases seemed legitimate on the surface, 
discrepancies and irregularities appeared in many cases -- 
unanswered questions about the origins of the children and 
the circumstances of their relinquishments; the lack of a 
strong central authority governing the adoption process and 
matching children with families; and lack of documentation 
or even explanations regarding what fees were paid and to 
whom -- clouded each decision.  Add to the mix the high- 
fraud environment in Vietnam, where documents can easily be 
bought and manufactured and official corruption is endemic, 
and consular officers issuing orphan visas are almost never 
100 percent sure about the bona fides of these cases. 
 
3.  (U) This is not merely speculation or suspicion. 
Reftels K, L, and M list several cases of documented 
illegalities in the process.  Certain adoption facilitators 
are believed to have made millions of dollars in the 
adoption business by promising one child to adoptive parents 
with no intention of delivering that child (or, indeed, in 
one case, the child had already been adopted by another 
family), paying off government officials to doctor 
paperwork, and providing a combination of monetary 
incentives, false promises and scare tactics to pressure 
Vietnamese mothers to relinquish their children.  This 
coercion to give up children who are not truly in need of a 
home and family is real and duplicitous.  While $600 may 
seem like a small amount of money in U.S. terms, the average 
per capita income in Vietnam is roughly $480, and in poorer 
provinces where some children have been presented for 
adoption it is only about $200.  The money offered to the 
birth parent or parents is not an amount for reasonable 
medical expenses, but actually remuneration for buying the 
baby.  It is the rough equivalent of offering the average 
American $47,000 for a child over and above medical 
expenses, which are negligible in rural Vietnam. 
 
4.  (U) Adoption facilitators will often offer the money, 
with pictures of other children in well-furnished homes, and 
a promise that the relinquishing parents will be able to see 
their children again in the future.  Familial ties in 
Vietnam are quite strong and families in dire economic 
straits will often let their children be raised temporarily 
by other more economically prosperous members of the family, 
or place them in "nutrition centers" where they can visit 
the children regularly until they are back on their feet. 
The "relinquishment" in these cases is never promoted as a 
permanent separation, but rather predicated on the accepted 
belief that it is temporary.  We can never be sure in these 
circumstances whether parents are giving informed consent 
when signing a "relinquishment" document.  (Note:  we have 
seen several cases recently in HCMC's American Citizen 
Services Unit where parents of high school aged children who 
went to the U.S. on cultural exchanges have come in to sign 
and notarize U.S. court documents relinquishing parental 
authority over their children so they can be "adopted" by 
the host family in the U.S. and continue their education 
there free of charge.  When consular officers explain to the 
Vietnamese parents that this breaks the parent-child bond 
and they will no longer have any legal tie or claim to the 
child, they universally withdraw the notarial request.) 
 
--------------------------------------------- -------------- 
CURRENT EXPERIENCE OF THOSE WHO HAVE SIGNED 
--------------------------------------------- -------------- 
 
5.  (U) It is also our contention that the vast amounts of 
money that can be earned in the adoption process are 
actually "creating" orphans for intercountry adoption here 
in Vietnam.    Once the new decree went into effect, only 
France had an existing bilateral Agreement in effect with 
Vietnam and could thus resume intercountry adoptions right 
away.   The French Agreement is unique in that it specifies 
set amounts of money that can be paid at each step - not a 
small amount, but certainly less than U.S. adoptive parents 
said they were paying on average.  French Embassy officials 
report that there are nearly 1500 pending dossiers from 
French couples wanting to adopt for whom no children can be 
found.  The supply simply isn't there.  The informal word is 
that children are being "held" until the Americans come back 
into the game, since they will pay more money.  The fact 
that our participation in intercountry adoptions in this 
country is "creating" orphans is disturbing and confirms our 
worst fears about the source of many children who were 
identified as orphans in past cases. 
 
6.  (U) In addition, five other countries have also entered 
into bilateral agreements with the GVN (Belgium, Italy, 
Ireland, Sweden and Denmark) but none of them has resumed 
adoption processing due to difficulties with implementation 
of their agreements.  At first it appeared a new central 
authority, the Department on International Adoptions in the 
Ministry of Justice, would make the matches between the 
children and adoptive parents and have authority to license 
adoption providers and facilitators in country.  That 
process has now devolved back to the provincial level, with 
the new Department adding a new level of bureaucracy to the 
process but with seemingly no regulatory or enforcement 
mechanism to make changes binding on the provinces.  Under 
this scenario, which is still unfolding, it is increasingly 
apparent that we will return to status quo prior to the 
decree's implementation date in terms of processing adoption 
cases.  At the provincial level there is essentially no 
effective mechanism to prevent the kind of corrupt practices 
we have outlined. 
 
----------------------------------------- 
STUDY THE CHINESE MODEL 
----------------------------------------- 
 
7.  (U) During the negotiations, we raised the issue of 
implementation and gave to the GVN side a non-paper 
outlining our concerns.  Unfortunately, the negotiations 
became bogged down in title and form, and discussion of 
implementation was pushed to the back burner pending 
agreement on an actual document to discuss.  We do find it 
encouraging, however, that Mr. Vu Duc Long, Acting Director 
of the Department of International Adoptions and the lead 
negotiator for the GVN, is organizing a trip to China to 
study their adoption system, a model which we agree should 
be emulated here in Vietnam. 
 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
THE HAGUE AS A WAY FORWARD 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
 
8.  (U) Pending final approval of a bilateral document 
between the U.S. and Vietnam, we strongly believe now is the 
time to discuss how we can improve implementation of that 
agreement.  Certain changes to the current adoptions process 
in Vietnam will offer a way to reduce the abuses of the 
past, and the USG should press the GVN, alone or in concert 
with other countries with the same concerns, to accede to 
the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoptions as soon as 
possible, in lieu of negotiating bilateral agreements with 
every country individually.  It should be apparent to them 
at this point that their plans to implement each agreement 
with completely new and different provisions for every 
country are untenable.  We believe we can garner support 
from other foreign missions in Vietnam to approach the GVN 
with a joint demarche on this subject. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ------ 
OTHER ACTIONS IN LIEU OF HAGUE 
--------------------------------------------- ------ 
 
9.  (U) If that approach is unsuccessful, we should strongly 
urge the GVN to take the following actions immediately: 
 
- Give the Office of International Adoptions the sole 
responsibility for matching children with prospective 
adoptive parents and responsibility for licensing and 
regulating of all adoption service providers operating 
within country. 
 
- Publish transparent, consistently applied processing 
regulations, directed by the Central Authority, which do not 
vary from region to region.  Clear processing instructions 
should be provided to all adoptive parents of all countries, 
who will know exactly what they need to do at every step; 
how much the various fees are for the adoption processing; 
which office is responsible for what authorizations; 
requirements for post-adoption monitoring, etc. 
 
- Provide a specific point of contact for the Central 
Authority for the U.S. government to call when concerns or 
problems arise under the agreement.  That point of contact 
should provide a timely, written response to those 
concerns. 
 
- The Central Authority should provide information on the 
circumstances under which the Central Authority is prepared 
to revoke an individual adoption and to provide in writing 
notice that the irregularity is in violation of Vietnamese 
adoption law. 
 
- The Central Authority should develop regulations 
governing licensing or accreditation of adoption agencies 
operating in Vietnam, a mechanism for revoking the license 
or accreditation of agencies that engage in illegal 
practices, and a list of agencies currently authorized to 
process adoptions in Vietnam.  Such regulations should 
apply throughout the country and should apply equally to 
all adoption agencies, regardless of country of origin. 
 
- The Authority should set and provide a list of fees that 
cover every step in the adoption process in Vietnam and to 
provide transparent, consistent fees that all adoptive 
parents must provide and for which they receive a receipt. 
Fees should not vary from province to province. 
 
- The Central Authority should provide a list of 
institutions that will be permitted to place children for 
international adoption. 
 
- There should be a regular forum for information exchange 
about bilateral adoption processing issues and both sides 
should commit to participation. 
 
10.  (U) These changes are incumbent upon the Government of 
Vietnam to set up for themselves.  But as the second largest 
foreign country recipient of Vietnamese adopted children, it 
should be our obligation to push the GVN to adopt these 
measures to ensure the integrity of the process and protect 
the interests of children who are vulnerable to potential 
exploitation for profit.  This would also be in the best 
interests of the birth and adopting parents.  The process of 
obtaining some form of bilateral agreement on adoptions in 
Vietnam is close to entering its third year.  At this point, 
failure to put into place mechanisms that will provide any 
improvement on the worst abuses of the past could call into 
question our claims over the past two years to be working 
towards an agreement that will protect the interests of all 
the parties. 
 
-------------------------- 
ACTION REQUEST 
-------------------------- 
 
11.  (U) Action Request:  Embassy seeks Department 
authorization to approach other embassies in Vietnam who 
share our concerns on adoptions processing to prepare a 
joint demarche to the Vietnamese Government, urging them to 
sign the Hague Agreement, with the understanding that some 
assistance may be available to help them accede fully to 
that Agreement.  Mission also seeks authorization to open a 
more formal discussion with the Ministry of Justice 
regarding implementation issues before we come to a final 
agreement on the text of a bilateral protocol. 
BURGHARDT