Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04BOGOTA3393, COLOMBIAN ARMY ATTACK ON POLICE UNIT SPARKS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04BOGOTA3393.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04BOGOTA3393 2004-04-01 22:59 2011-04-29 00:00 SECRET//NOFORN Embassy Bogota
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
id: 15607
date: 4/1/2004 22:59
refid: 04BOGOTA3393
origin: Embassy Bogota
classification: SECRET//NOFORN
destination: 
header:
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.



----------------- header ends ----------------

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 BOGOTA 003393 
 
SIPDIS 
 
NOFORN 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/29/2014 
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PTER PINR PINS PROP SNAR MOPS ASEC CO
SUBJECT: COLOMBIAN ARMY ATTACK ON POLICE UNIT SPARKS 
CONTROVERSY 
 
CLASSIFIED BY: Ambassador William B. Wood for reasons 1.4 
(b) and (d) 
 
------- 
Summary 
------- 
 
1. (C) The deaths on March 19 of eleven people -- seven anti- 
kidnapping police and four civilians -- at the hands of the 
Colombian Army (COLAR) in Narino department has sparked 
controversy.  The Colombian National Police (CNP) and Army have 
presented contradictory accounts of the 
incident, and President Uribe has asked the Ministry of Defense 
(MOD) to present him with a consensus account by April 2.  Over 
the past week, the press has focused on inconsistencies in the 
COLAR and CNP accounts of the incident, as well as on 
disagreements between the two security services.  To provide 
closure, at the very least the MOD's report would have to 
clarify whether: 1) the CNP were clearly identifiable as police; 
2) they were authorized to operate in the area; 3) the COLAR was 
operating on credible intelligence and acted responsibly; and 4) 
the COLAR appropriately handled the investigation immediately 
following the incident and did not attempt a cover-up.  Such a 
short-fuse report may not adequately address these and other 
questions, but the answers must eventually be found if the COLAR 
and CNP are to work together effectively.  End Summary. 
 
-------------- 
The "Incident" 
-------------- 
 
2.  (U) On the night of March 19, in what is being variously 
described as an ambush, an execution, or a friendly fire 
accident, the Colombian Army (COLAR) killed eleven people in a 
police convoy in the municipality of Guaitarilla, Narino 
department.  The victims, who included four civilians and seven 
members of a Colombian National Police's (CNP) Anti-Kidnapping 
Group (GAULAs), were traveling along a rural highway in an area 
with a heavy presence of illegal armed groups when they were 
fired on by about forty COLAR forces from the Third Division's 
Boyaca 
Battalion.  All eleven passengers were killed; COLAR forces 
suffered no casualties. 
 
3.  (C/NF) The incident has sparked controversy and confusion 
both publicly and within the Ministry of Defense (MOD). 
Initially, the COLAR and the CNP publicly offered markedly 
different accounts of the incident, and the President (who was 
in Washington, DC at the time) prohibited both institutions from 
commenting further in public.  Compounding difficulties the GOC 
faces in investigating an incident that occurred in largely 
hostile territory, no local eyewitnesses to the event have been 
identified.  Although the Prosecutor General's Office 
("Fiscalia") is conducting an investigation, President Uribe has 
demanded that the MOD submit its own internal report on the 
incident by April 2, in which the COLAR and CNP reach consensus 
on what occurred.  Uribe clearly hopes the report will put an 
end to public speculation. 
 
-------------------- 
Conflicting Accounts 
-------------------- 
 
4.  (C/NF) The COLAR claims its actions were based on 
intelligence about ongoing narcotics trafficking activities in 
the area.  According to the COLAR, its forces attacked vehicles 
carrying individuals in camouflage uniforms armed with 
revolvers.  Armed Forces Commander General Carlos 
Alberto Ospina and Army Commander General Martin Orlando Carreno 
have commented that the GAULA members' presence late at night on 
a rural road is suspicious, and Carreno has taken no 
administrative action against the COLAR members involved in the 
incident, pending an investigation. 
 
5.  (S/NF) The CNP, on the other hand, claims its troops were 
involved in an approved anti-extortion operation, and were 
accompanied by at least one civilian informant and two or more 
civilian detainees.  According to the CNP, its troops were on 
their way to Pasto, capital of Narino department, to process the 
detainees when they were attacked.  Money the COLAR found in the 
vehicles was being used by the informants as part of a sting 
operation.  Contrary to COLAR reporting, the CNP says its 
members were wearing standard issue police uniforms and carrying 
rifles.  The CNP also alleges that the COLAR cordoned off the 
area after the incident and, rather than immediately informing 
the CNP about the tragedy, publicly announced a successful 
operation against paramilitaries and only told the CNP about its 
officers' deaths the following day.  Upon learning of the 
incident, the CNP Deputy Director asked that the COLAR wait for 
the Prosecutor General's Office to 
arrive before tampering with the scene. According to CNP 
sources, the COLAR ignored this request and instead flew the 
bodies back to Pasto in helicopters, where they were delivered 
to the victims' families.  The source goes on to say that all of 
the victims' clothing and jewelry were missing, except for one 
GAULA hat left in a vehicle. 
 
--------------- 
Inconsistencies 
--------------- 
 
6.  (C/NF) In trying to piece together the incident, GOC 
investigators and the press have uncovered many inconsistent, 
suspicious, and/or confusing details. 
 
--  (U) The Prosecutor General's Office (Fiscalia) says the 
bodies appear to have been tampered with.  In addition, ten 
bodies were found on the ground outside their vehicles and shot 
at point-blank range, suggesting they were not killed in an 
ambush, as the COLAR claims. 
 
--  (U) The CNP claims the GAULAs had authorization from CNP 
leadership in Bogota to travel through the area.  However, the 
military was apparently not notified.  Some observers find it 
suspicious that such a small number of police would be traveling 
on official business on a rural road in the middle of the night 
in an area with a large presence of illegal armed groups.  At 
the very least, it is clear that the CNP and COLAR did not 
adequately coordinate operations. 
 
--  (U) The GAULAs were not accompanied by a prosecutor and were 
operating outside a metropolitan area, both of which violate 
regulations for local GAULA units.  The CNP has explained away 
this concern by asserting that four of the officers were 
assigned to the national unit. 
 
--  (C/NF) Two alleged police survivors of the incident have 
come forward, contradicting the first military justice official 
to arrive on the scene, who claimed there were no survivors. 
According to the first of these, the GAULAs were in the area 
conducting an anti-drug trafficking operation.  If this were the 
case, it would explain COLAR 
reports that drugs were found in the vehicles, but 
simultaneously raises questions about why the GAULAs -- an anti- 
kidnapping and anti-extortion unit -- were conducting an anti- 
narcotics operation.  However, serious questions have been 
raised about this individual's credibility, and 
some reports now claim he is actually a police informant who 
came forward two days after the incident with a bullet wound 
that doctors determined was received just hours earlier. 
 
--  (U) According to press reports, a second alleged survivor, 
who is reportedly entering the Prosecutor General's witness 
protection program, claims the 11 persons were murdered after 
exiting their vehicles and conversing with COLAR forces.  This 
witness claims he exited one of the vehicles and hid in the 
underbrush when he noticed a suspicious roadblock ahead.  From 
there, he made two cell phone calls to his brother, one of the 
civilian informants in the groups, who said the GAULAs were 
arguing with the soldiers about turning over their weapons. 
Shortly thereafter, he heard shots and could no longer 
communicate 
with his brother.  The credibility of this witness has yet to be 
determined. 
 
------- 
Comment 
------- 
 
7.  (C) It is important that the GOC resolve this incident as 
soon as possible in order to minimize the damage already caused 
to traditionally strained relations between the CNP and the 
COLAR.  The MOD's report to the President may adequately explain 
what happened on the night of March 19.  However, given the 
short timeframe for delivery of the report and the complicated 
nature of the incident, this is unlikely. 

=======================CABLE ENDS============================