Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04ROME638, ITALIAN SENATE APPROVES FUNDING FOR MILITARY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04ROME638.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04ROME638 2004-02-20 14:43 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Rome
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ROME 000638 
 
SIPDIS 
 
 
    E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: MARR PREL PGOV MOPS EAID MCAP IZ IT IRAQI FREEDOM
SUBJECT: ITALIAN SENATE APPROVES FUNDING FOR MILITARY 
MISSIONS ABROAD 
 
 
1.  ON FEBRUARY 18, THE ITALIAN SENATE APPROVED THE 
GOVERNMENT DECREE EXTENDING UNTIL JUNE 30, 2004, FUNDING 
FOR ITALY'S PARTICIPATION IN ALL THE MILITARY MISSIONS IN 
WHICH IT IS CURRENTLY ENGAGED ABROAD, INCLUDING IRAQ. 
WHILE APPROVAL OF THE DECREE WAS ASSURED BY THE GOVERNING 
COALITION'S SOLID MAJORITY, THE DEBATE OVER CONTINUED 
PARTICIPATION IN IRAQ WAS HEATED AND CONTENTIOUS.  THE 
FINAL VOTE WAS 153 IN FAVOR, 42 AGAINST, AND ONE 
ABSTENTION, IN ERROR.  ALTHOUGH 83 SENATORS DID NOT 
PARTICIPATE IN THE VOTE, THEY DID NOT WALK OUT, AS 
THREATENED, EITHER.  (A WALK-OUT COUNTS AS A VOTE AGAINST 
UNDER SENATE RULES.)  THE DECREE WILL NOW GO TO THE CHAMBER 
OF DEPUTIES FOR DEBATE AND APPROVAL, WHICH IS TENTATIVELY 
SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF MARCH 8.  PARA 5 PROVIDES A LIST 
OF THE MISSIONS FOR WHICH FUNDING WAS APPROVED BY THE 
SENATE. 
 
2.  THE SENATORS WHO VOTED IN FAVOR WERE ALL FROM THE 
CENTER-RIGHT MAJORITY, SAVE RARE EXCEPTIONS.  THOSE WHO 
VOTED AGAINST INCLUDED, AS EXPECTED, THE GREENS, COMMUNIST 
RENEWAL (RC), THE COMMUNIST PARTY (PDCI), AND THE LEFT WING 
OF THE LEADING OPPOSITION PARTY, DEMOCRATS OF THE LEFT 
(DS).  UNEXPECTEDLY, THE NO'S ALS INCLUDED 16 MAINSTREAM 
DS SENATORS AND FOUR FROM EU COMMISSION PRESIDENT PRODI'S 
PARTY, THE DAISY.  THE 83 WHO DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE 
VOTE WERE ALL FROM WHAT IS COMMONLY REFERRED TO HERE AS 
    PRODI'S "TRICYCLE", I.E. THE COALITION WITHIN THE CENTER- 
LEFT OF DS, SOCIALISTS SDI, AND THE DAISY.  THEY DID NOT 
WANT TO FORMALLY ABSTAIN, BECAUSE IN THE SENATE FORMAL 
ABSTENTIONS ARE COUNTED AS NEGATIVE VOTES.  THEY DID NOT 
WALK OUT, BECAUSE THAT WOULD HAVE BLATANTLY SUGGESTED THE 
TROOPS DID NOT HAVE THEIR MORAL SUPPORT.  THEY STAYED, 
WITHOUT VOTING, TO SIGNIFY THEIR DISAGREEMENT WITH THE 
GOVERNMENT POSITION ON IRAQ.  THEY WANT THE UN TO 
IMMEDIATELY TAKE ON A LEAD ROLE IN IRAQ, A DEMOCRATIC 
CONSTITUTION NOW, A FIRM ELECTORAL CALENDAR TO BE 
ESTABLISHED, AND MULTINATIONAL TROOPS UNDER UN AUSPICES IN 
PLACE.  THEY ALSO WANT THE ITALIAN GOVERNMENT TO ADMIT THAT 
THE WAR WAS A MISTAKE AND THAT SENDING THE TROOPS HAS 
FUELED TERRORISM INSTEAD OF STOPPING IT. 
 
3.  THE OPPOSITION WOULD HAVE PREFERRED TO VOTE ON FUNDING 
FOR THE IRAQ MISSION SEPARATELY FROM THE OTHER MILITARY 
MISSIONS; IT WOULD THEN HAVE APPROVED ALL THE MISSIONS 
EXCEPT IRAQ, AS IT DID DURING THE PREVIOUS VOTE EXTENDING 
FUNDING IN JULY 2003.  THE GOVERNMENT REJECTED THAT 
COMPROMISE APPROACH THIS TIME AND INSISTED ON ONE VOTE ON 
THE ENTIRE PACKAGE.  AS CENTER-RIGHT FORZA ITALIA SENATE 
GROUP LEADER SCHIFANI TOLD THE FLOOR, ITALY DID NOT FIGHT 
THE WAR IN IRAQ, NOR DID IT AUTHORIZE THE USE OF ITS BASES 
FOR DIRECT ATTACKS ON IRAQ.  ALL THE MILITARY MISSIONS 
ITALY IS CURRENTLY ENGAGED IN, HE SAID, ARE PEACE MISSIONS, 
AND ALL SERVE TO HOLD WAR BACK.  HENCE THE REASON FOR THE 
GOVERNMENT'S DECISION NOT TO SPLIT THE VOTE IN TWO. 
 
4.  COMMENTING ON THE RESULTS OF THE VOTE AND THE DIVISIONS 
IT PRODUCED WITHIN THE CENTER-LEFT, MOD MARTINO REGRETTED 
    THERE WAS NOT WIDER CONSENSUS, SAYING THE OPPOSITION WAS 
STILL LOOKING AT THE PAST, INSTEAD OF PROJECTING ITS VISION 
TO THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE.  MARTINO CITED GERMAN FM 
FISCHER, WHO AT THE 40TH MUNICH CONFERENCE ON SECURITY 
POLICY FEBRUARY 7 SAID, "REGARDLESS OF OUR OPINION OF THE 
WAR, WE HAVE TO WIN THE PEACE TOGETHER, BECAUSE OTHERWISE 
WE WILL LOSE TOGETHER.  WE HAVE TO LOOK FORWARD....  THE 
FORCES OF VIOLENCE AND TERROR IN IRAQ MUST NOT WIN THE 
UPPER HAND." 
 
5.  THE SUM TOTAL APPROVED BY THE SENATE IS A LITTLE OVER 
EURO 550.640.000 (ABOUT USD 700,415,000).  BREAKING IT 
DOWN, FUNDS FOR THE MILITARY MISSION IN IRAQ BY ITELF 
AMOUNT TO A LITTLE OVER EURO 209.000.000 (ABUT USD 
265,848,000), WHILE FUNDS FOR THE HUMANITRIAN AND 
RECONSTRUCTION MISSION THERE TOTAL A LITLE OVER EURO 
11.627.000 (ABOUT USD 14,789,500).  MILITARY PARTICIPATION 
IN ALL THE OTHER INTERNATONAL MISSIONS ADDS UP TO JUST 
UNDER EURO 293.000000 (ABOUT USD 372,696,000).  BELOW IS A 
LIST OF THE MILITARY, CIVILIAN, AND POLICE MISSIONS FOR 
 
ROME 00000638  001.2 OF 002 
 
30, 2004, FUNDING 
FOR ITALY'S PARTICIPATION IN ALL THE MILITARY MISSIONS IN 
WHICH IT IS CURRENTLY ENGAGED ABROAD, INCLUDING IRAQ. 
WHILE APPROVAL OF THE DECREE WAS ASSURED BY THE GOVERNING 
COALITION'S SOLID MAJORITY, THE DEBATE OVER CONTINUED 
PARTICIPATION IN IRAQ WAS HEATED AND CONTENTIOUS.  THE 
FINAL VOTE WAS 153 IN FAVOR, 42 AGAINST, AND ONE 
ABSTENTION, IN ERROR.  ALTHOUGH 83 SENATORS DID NOT 
PARTICIPATE IN THE VOTE, THEY DID NOT WALK OUT, AS 
THREATENED, EITHER.  (A WALK-OUT COUNTS AS A VOTE AGAINST 
UNDER SENATE RULES.)  THE DECREE WILL NOW GO TO THE CHAMBER 
OF DEPUTIES FOR DEBATE AND APPROVAL, WHICH IS TENTATIVELY 
SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF MARCH 8.  PARA 5 PROVIDES A LIST 
OF THE MISSIONS FOR WHICH FUNDING WAS APPROVED BY THE 
SENATE. 
 
2.  THE SENATORS WHO VOTED IN FAVOR WERE ALL FROM THE 
CENTER-RIGHT MAJORITY, SAVE RARE EXCEPTIONS.  THOSE WHO 
VOTED AGAINST INCLUDED, AS EXPECTED, THE GREENS, COMMUNIST 
RENEWAL (RC), THE COMMUNIST PARTY (PDCI), AND THE LEFT WING 
OF THE LEADING OPPOSITION PARTY, DEMOCRATS OF THE LEFT 
(DS).  UNEXPECTEDLY, THE NO'S ALSO INCLUDED 16 MAINSTREAM 
DS SENATORS AND FOUR FROM EU COMMISSION PRESIDENT PRODI'S 
PARTY, THE DAISY.  THE 83 WHO DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE 
VOTE WERE ALL FROM WHAT IS COMMONLY REFERRED TO HERE AS 
    PRODI'S "TRICYCLE", I.E. THE COALITION WITHIN THE CENTER- 
LEFT OF DS, SOCIALISTS SDI, AND THE DAISY.  THEY DID NOT 
WANT TO FORMALLY ABSTAIN, BECAUSE IN THE SENATE FORMAL 
ABSTENTIONS ARE COUNTED AS NEGATIVE VOTES.  THEY DID NOT 
WALK OUT, BECAUSE THAT WOULD HAVE BLATANTLY SUGGESTED THE 
TROOPS DID NOT HAVE THEIR MORAL SUPPORT.  THEY STAYED, 
WITHOUT VOTING, TO SIGNIFY THEIR DISAGREEMENT WITH THE 
GOVERNMENT POSITION ON IRAQ.  THEY WANT THE UN TO 
IMMEDIATELY TAKE ON A LEAD ROLE IN IRAQ, A DEMOCRATIC 
CONSTITUTION NOW, A FIRM ELECTORAL CALENDAR TO BE 
ESTABLISHED, AND MULTINATIONAL TROOPS UNDER UN AUSPICES IN 
PLACE.  THEY ALSO WANT THE ITALIAN GOVERNMENT TO ADMIT THAT 
THE WAR WAS A MISTAKE AND THAT SENDING THE TROOPS HAS 
FUELED TERRORISM INSTEAD OF STOPPING IT. 
 
3.  THE OPPOSITION WOULD HAVE PREFERRED TO VOTE ON FUNDING 
FOR THE IRAQ MISSION SEPARATELY FROM THE OTHER MILITARY 
MISSIONS; IT WOULD THEN HAVE APPROVED ALL THE MISSIONS 
EXCEPT IRAQ, AS IT DID DURING THE PREVIOUS VOTE EXTENDING 
FUNDING IN JULY 2003.  THE GOVERNMENT REJECTED THAT 
COMPROMISE APPROACH THIS TIME AND INSISTED ON ONE VOTE ON 
THE ENTIRE PACKAGE.  AS CENTER-RIGHT FORZA ITALIA SENATE 
GROUP LEADER SCHIFANI TOLD THE FLOOR, ITALY DID NOT FIGHT 
THE WAR IN IRAQ, NOR DID IT AUTHORIZE THE USE OF ITS BASES 
FOR DIRECT ATTACKS ON IRAQ.  ALL THE MILITARY MISSIONS 
ITALY IS CURRENTLY ENGAGED IN, HE SAID, ARE PEACE MISSIONS, 
AND ALL SERVE TO HOLD WAR BACK.  HENCE THE REASON FOR THE 
GOVERNMENT'S DECISION NOT TO SPLIT THE VOTE IN TWO. 
 
4.  COMMENTING ON THE RESULTS OF THE VOTE AND THE DIVISIONS 
IT PRODUCED WITHIN THE CENTER-LEFT, MOD MARTINO REGRETTED 
    THERE WAS NOT WIDER CONSENSUS, SAYING THE OPPOSITION WAS 
STILL LOOKING AT THE PAST, INSTEAD OF PROJECTING ITS VISION 
TO THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE.  MARTINO CITED GERMAN FM 
FISCHER, WHO AT THE 40TH MUNICH CONFERENCE ON SECURITY 
POLICY FEBRUARY 7 SAID, "REGARDLESS OF OUR OPINION OF THE 
WAR, WE HAVE TO WIN THE PEACE TOGETHER, BECAUSE OTHERWISE 
WE WILL LOSE TOGETHER.  WE HAVE TO LOOK FORWARD....  THE 
FORCES OF VIOLENCE AND TERROR IN IRAQ MUST NOT WIN THE 
UPPER HAND." 
 
5.  THE SUM TOTAL APPROVED BY THE SENATE IS A LITTLE OVER 
EURO 550.640.000 (ABOUT USD 700,415,000).  BREAKING IT 
DOWN, FUNDS FOR THE MILITARY MISSION IN IRAQ BY ITSELF 
AMOUNT TO A LITTLE OVER EURO 209.000.000 (ABOUT USD 
265,848,000), WHILE FUNDS FOR THE HUMANITARIAN AND 
RECONSTRUCTION MISSION THERE TOTAL A LITTLE OVER EURO 
11.627.000 (ABOUT USD 14,789,500).  MILITARY PARTICIPATION 
IN ALL THE OTHER INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS ADDS UP TO JUST 
UNDER EURO 293.000.000 (ABOUT USD 372,696,000).  BELOW IS A 
LIST OF THE MILITARY, CIVILIAN, AND POLICE MISSIONS FOR 
 
ROME 00000638  002 OF 002 
 
SION TO GUARANTEE CONDITIONS OF SECURITY FOR THE 
HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION AND THE STABILIZATION PROCESS. 
-- BOSNIA: JOINT FORGE AND OVER THE HORIZON FORCE. 
-- BOSNIA AND KOSOVO: MULTINATIONAL SPECIALIZED UNIT (MSU). 
-- KOSOVO AND FYROM: JOINT GUARDIAN (INCLUDES KFOR). 
-- FYROM: NATO HEADQUARTERS SKOPJE (NATO HQS). 
-- KOSOVO: UN MISSION IN KOSOVO (UNMIK) AND CRIMINAL 
INTELLIGENCE UNIT (CIU). 
-- ALBANIA: ALBIT, ALBANIA 2, AND NATO HEADQUARTERS TIRANA 
(NATO HQT). 
-- TERRITORIES: TEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL PRESENCE IN HEBRON 
(TIPH2). 
-- ETHIOPIA AND ERITREA: UN MISSION IN ETHIOPIA AND ERITREA 
(UNMEE). 
-- AFGHANISTAN: ENDURING FREEDOM, ACTIVE ENDEAVOUR, 
RESOLUTE BEHAVIOR, INTERNATIONAL SECURITY ASSISTANCE FORCE 
(ISAF). 
-- EX-YUGOSLAVIA: EU MONITORING MISSION (EUMM). 
-- SOMALIA AND SUDAN: PARTICIPATION IN PEACE NEGOTIATIONS 
AND MONITORING MISSION ON SUDAN'S NUBA MOUNTAINS. 
-- ALBANIA AND BALKANS: STATE POLICE PARTICIPATION IN 
POLICE COOPERATION PROGRAMS. 
-- BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: STATE AND MILITARY (CARABINIERI) 
    POLICE PARTICIPATION IN EU POLICE MISSION (EUPM). 
-- FYROM: STATE AND MILITARY (CARABINIERI) POLICE 
PARTICIPATION IN EU MISSION (EUPO PROXIMA). 
 
6.  CPA BAGHDAD MINIMIZE CONSIDERED. 
 
SKODON 
 
NNNN 
 2004ROME00638 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED