Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04BOGOTA2020, TRADE MINISTER STATES COLOMBIA'S NEW MARKET BASED

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04BOGOTA2020.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04BOGOTA2020 2004-02-27 15:03 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Bogota
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BOGOTA 002020 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
DEPT PLS PASS USTR BHARMAN AND MLATTIMER; GENEVA FOR WTO 
MISSION 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ETRD EAGR ECON CO FTA
SUBJECT: TRADE MINISTER STATES COLOMBIA'S NEW MARKET BASED 
AGRICULTURAL IMPORT SYSTEM  WILL BE INCLUDED IN FTA 
NEGOTIATIONS 
 
Sensitive but unclassified -- please protect accordingly. 
 
1.   (SBU)  Summary. On February 16, 2004, the Colombian 
government implemented a new import system that provides 
tariff reductions for importers that purchase domestic 
production of corn (both white and yellow), grain sorghum, 
rice, soybeans and cotton.  The new system replaces the 
restrictive import licensing and domestic purchase 
requirements that were maintained for a wide range of 
agricultural products (including poultry, wheat, corn, 
barley, rice and oilseeds) under a WTO waiver that expired at 
the end of 2003.  Trade Minister Botero acknowledged at a 
February 23 meeting that the new system was not fully trade 
liberalizing, but emphasized that this was as far as the GOC 
could go at this time.  He added that the new system would be 
subject to discussion during the FTA negotiations. 
End Summary. 
 
2.    (SBU)  Trade Minister Botero met with Ambassador Wood 
on February 23 to discuss Colombia's new import system for 
six agricultural products (white and yellow corn, grain 
sorghum, rice, soybeans and cotton) formerly protected by 
restrictive import licensing requirements.  The voluntary 
system, implemented February 16, 2004, provides tariff 
reductions for importers that purchase local production and 
replaces a more restrictive system that required importers to 
demonstrate purchases of local production for a wide range of 
products (including poultry, wheat, corn, barley, rice and 
oilseeds) before they were authorized imports.  Colombia was 
obligated to dismantle the previous system when the waiver it 
had in the WTO expired on December 31, 2003.  Out-going Trade 
Vice Minister Claudia Uribe (soon to be Colombia's Ambassador 
to the WTO), Agriculture Vice Minister Andres Arias, Lead FTA 
Negotiator Amb. Hernando Jose Gomez and Ag negotiator Ricardo 
Torres also participated in the meeting.  AGATT and Econcouns 
accompanied the Ambassador. 
 
The New System 
-------------- 
 
3.  (SBU)  On February 16, the Ministry of Commerce Industry 
and Tourism published decree 430 establishing the Public 
Mechanism for Administration of Agricultural Quotas. As 
explained by Vice Ministers Uribe and Arias, the new, 
voluntary system will establish tariff-rate quotas (TRQ's) 
based on historical import levels for white and yellow corn, 
grain sorghum, soybeans, rice and cotton.  The TRQ levels 
will then be auctioned off at the existing Agricultural 
Commodities Board.  The bids must state the ratio of imports 
to domestic purchases that will be made by each importer. 
Those offering to purchase the most domestic production will 
win the right to purchase the imports bid at a reduced tariff 
rate, determined by a mathematical algorithm based on the 
ratio of domestic purchases to imports offered.  Imports 
beyond the TRQ are allowed, but face the general tariff rate 
(the Andean price band duty for corn, sorghum, and soybeans), 
and the MFN tariff rate for cotton (10 percent) and rice (80 
percent - the tariff was raised from 20 percent in December 
2003).  The Vice Ministers also presented copies of the new 
decree as well as a GOC analysis of the new program (faxed to 
the desk). 
 
GOC Rationale for New System 
---------------------------- 
 
4.  (SBU)  Minister Botero defended the new system as 
WTO-consistent because it eliminated previous absorption 
requirements and lowered the number of products benefited 
from 75 to 6.  He added that the new system was a transition 
to a more market-oriented approach, while acknowledging that 
the new system stopped short of free trade.  He then stated 
flatly that it was the best the GOC could do at this juncture 
given the political realities it faced.  Botero and Vice 
Minister Uribe both pointed out that the new system decreased 
the protection for some sectors, such as rice, where the 
previous combination of a small quota and restrictive import 
licensing requirements closed the sector to imports.  They 
also added that the products protected were the most 
politically sensitive in agriculture.  The new mechanism was 
a way to bring these protected sectors partially into the 
free market and thus prepare them for eventual free trade 
under an FTA. 
 
The system is open for negotiation under the FTA 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
 
5.  (SBU)  The Ambassador stated that we would review the new 
GOC policy, but noted that upon initial inspection it seemed 
that the GOC had created a new protective mechanism to 
replace a more restrictive one that had expired.  While 
noting that reducing the universe of items covered by the new 
system from 75 to 6 was indeed a positive step, the six 
remained protected and we had some questions about the WTO 
consistency of the new program.  The Ambassador added that 
taking such a measure, as well as increasing certain 
agricultural tariffs in late 2003, did not send a positive 
message about Colombia's willingness to open its markets on 
the eve of our FTA negotiations. 
 
6.  (SBU)  Minister Botero explained that he had requested 
this meeting to establish Colombia's good faith as a 
negotiating partner.  His intent was to explain the new 
system and highlight that it was a transitional measure aimed 
at introducing the market into previously protected areas. 
Botero repeated on several occasions that the new system was 
open to negotiation during FTA talks.  He added that the FTA 
talks would provide him the political cover to dismantle the 
protection that these sectors currently enjoyed.  In a 
negotiation, he would be able to open up these sectors by 
balancing those concessions with benefits gained.  Botero 
reiterated his personal commitment to liberalizing trade and 
underscored that the negotiating table would give him the 
political legitimacy to open up the Colombian economy. 
 
7.  (SBU)  Comment.  The political pressures Botero mentioned 
are real.  Both he and Vice Minister Uribe emphasized 
repeatedly that this was not a carefully planned move to 
raise protection on the eve of negotiations, but an effort to 
open up the heavily protected agricultural sector as much as 
the political atmosphere would bear.  The new system is, in 
fact, an improvement over the previous restrictive mechanism 
that expired.  Botero,s commitment to discuss this issue at 
the negotiating table is real, as is the assertion that 
negotiations provide him political cover to do so.  End 
Comment. 
WOOD