Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04ABUJA315, NIGERIA AND BIOTECHNOLOGY PUBLIC DIPLOMACY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04ABUJA315.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04ABUJA315 2004-02-24 13:33 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Abuja
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

241333Z Feb 04
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ABUJA 000315 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EB/TPP/ABT/BTT FOR DEBORAH MALAC, JACK BOBO 
LAGOS FOR PAS, EB AND FAS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON TBIO EAGR KPAO NI
SUBJECT:  NIGERIA AND BIOTECHNOLOGY PUBLIC DIPLOMACY 
 
REFTEL:  STATE 15050 
 
1.  Summary.  The U.S. Mission in Nigeria would like to 
propose several projects to expand biotechnology awareness 
and acceptance in Nigeria; all are consistent with the 
Mission's biotechnology collaborative efforts with the 
National Agency for Biotechnology Development and Assistance 
(NABDA) and broader USG objectives in the sector of economic 
development.  We propose three workshops for legislators, 
government officials, and journalists in Nigeria and a press 
tour in the United States for Nigerian journalists.  Total 
financing requested is $110,000.  End Summary. 
 
Biotechnology and Nigeria 
------------------------- 
 
2.  The U.S. Mission's proposal for biotechnology aims at 
dispelling the false impressions many Nigerians have 
regarding biotechnology and the safety of genetically 
modified organisms (GMOs) by helping a broad cross-section 
of government officials, members of parliament, and the 
media better understand the benefits of biotechnology. 
Nigerians have learned about GMOs primarily as a result of 
the U.S.-European debate over GMOs and packaging 
requirements.  The issues of GMO safety for human 
consumption as well as their possible threat to local 
environmental diversity are issues that have received 
treatment in the Nigerian press, and ones that could easily 
retard acceptance of GMOs by Nigerian farmers.  Nigerian 
journalists who have participated in mission programs on 
biotechnology as well as officials of the Nigerian Agency 
for Biotechnology Development and Assistance (NABDA) have 
suggested that anti-Western elements may latch onto 
biotechnology and unnecessarily raise people's fears. 
Nigerian audiences, based on their comparatively lower 
educational levels than in the U.S., are less conversant in 
scientific matters in general, let alone biotechnology.  The 
Internet is very popular in Nigeria, but Internet material 
is often used to misinform - as much as inform - public 
debate.  Nigerian officials and other supporters of 
biotechnology require training and further information in 
order to explain biotechnology to the Nigerian public as 
well as promote acceptance. 
 
3.  Nigeria is poised to take advantage of the potential of 
biotechnology to improve agricultural productivity because 
it has a supportive national biotechnology policy, a 
biosafety framework, and the scientific capacity to conduct 
and apply biotechnology research.  There exist already 
strong linkages with a number of U.S.-based institutions. 
USAID/Nigeria is assisting Nigeria in developing its 
biotechnology capacity through technical training to members 
of the National Biosafety Committee, establishing 
collaborative research projects with Ahmadu Bello 
University, National Root Crops Research Institute and other 
key Nigerian research institutes, and providing balanced 
information on biotechnology to policy makers, the public 
and other key stakeholders. The research goal of the Nigeria 
project is to develop insect-resistant cowpea, which would 
eliminate the need for farmers to apply pesticides, and 
increase the yield of this staple food crop by 5-10 times. 
The project is scheduled to debut in April 2004, but already 
anti-GMO groups have been speaking out in Nigeria. 
 
U.S. Mission Proposal 
--------------------- 
 
4.  Biotechnology research in Nigeria is coordinated through 
the NABDA, and USAID's program receives oversight and 
support from a steering/advisory committee chaired by NABDA 
and comprised of members of research and academic 
institutions, relevant ministries, and the U.S. Mission.  On 
February 19, the steering committee met to discuss public 
awareness and education issues, and the urgent need to lay 
the groundwork for the introduction of the biotech form of 
cowpea.  One of the first steps, however, is to train 
relevant segments of the Nigerian government who will be 
called upon to present biotechnology and explain its 
benefits to the public.  To this end, three workshops are 
proposed: 
 
--  A series of workshops/seminars for elected officials at 
the Federal and State levels; i.e., National Assembly 
members as well as State Assembly members, plus members of 
the key ministries involved in biotechnology.  We envision 
about two weeks of programming (two- or three-day programs) 
to cover approximately 200 people.  Trainers from the U.S. 
might include a biotechnology resource person (academic 
researcher), a staff member of a U.S. state assembly who 
could explain how constituents' concerns are handled in the 
U.S. where biotechnology is concerned, and a public policy 
specialist who can advise on strategies to assist Nigerian 
elected officials in the public policy debate over 
biotechnology in Nigeria.  Estimated cost:  $35,000 
 
--  A series of workshops to enhance the capability of 
ministry, NABDA, NAFDAC (Nigerian equivalent of the U.S. 
Food and Drug Administration) university, and other keys 
spokespersons to deal with the press and NGOs on the subject 
of biotechnology.  We envision approximately ten days 
programming (four-day sessions) to include approximately 40 
people.  Trainers might include a public affairs member of 
the FDA, a representative from the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, and a media specialist who can provide the 
journalists' perspective.  A key element of the workshop 
will be for participants to give mock press conferences and 
be critiqued for their presentations and ability to respond 
to questions.  Estimated cost:  $25,000 
 
--  A third workshop will focus on journalists and training 
for the media.  Nigeria has an incredibly large and diverse 
pool of journalists covering television, radio and print. 
We would like to do four workshops outside Abuja and Lagos 
to provide training to many of the state and regional media 
personnel who will be handling biotechnology reporting as it 
is introduced to farmers in the rural areas.  We envision 
two to three weeks of programming (two- to three-day 
programs) to cover roughly 80 people.  A trainer could be a 
journalism professor or another expert conversant in 
biotechnology issues.   Estimated cost:  $10,000 
 
--  A tour for six Nigerian media participants to visit the 
United States for a thorough introduction to biotechnology. 
A tour might include stops in Washington, D.C., St. Louis, 
MO (Monsanto and the Danforth Institute), Cornell or 
Tuskegee University, etc.  Estimated cost:  $40,000 
 
5.  Nigeria can benefit greatly from biotechnology. 
Formerly a net food exporter within the West African region, 
Nigeria now imports food, including basic staples such as 
rice.  Lack of investment in the agricultural sector by 
successive governments has left Nigeria with a still 
rudimentary system of subsistence agriculture, with most 
farmers unable to afford fertilizer and improved seeds.  The 
Nigerian government anticipates that biotechnology may help 
to jumpstart Nigeria's neglected agricultural sector to not 
only feed Nigeria but also become once again the bread 
basket of West Africa by enhancing food security in the 
region.  However, Nigeria's farmers as well as the general 
public will need to be educated on the benefits of 
biotechnology, and the Nigerian government requires 
assistance in taking the lead.  Nigeria threw off decades of 
military rule in 1999, but vestiges of authoritarian 
practices are still evident throughout the political system. 
Nigerian officials, many of whom served under military 
leaders, are not used to engaging the public and defending 
policy choices.  The proposed workshops will go far to 
ensuring they can adequately defend the inevitable charges 
that this is a dangerous USG initiative forced upon the 
Nigerian public.  Nigerian journalists also require training 
so they will have a basic grounding in the facts regarding 
biotechnology and will not easily be misled by the vast 
amount of negative material that is available on the 
Internet.  The U.S. Mission appreciates EB consideration of 
its proposal at a very critical time for biotechnology 
efforts in Nigeria. 
 
ROBERTS