Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 03BRASILIA3982, BRAZIL: UPDATES TO 2003 NTE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03BRASILIA3982.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03BRASILIA3982 | 2003-12-23 14:33 | 2011-07-11 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Brasilia |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 BRASILIA 003982
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EB/MTA/MST AND WHA/BSC
USTR FOR G. BLUE AND SUE CRONIN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD EFIN ECON EINV PGOV BR
SUBJECT: BRAZIL: UPDATES TO 2003 NTE
Ref: A) STATE 310953 B) JADAMS/LYANG EMAIL
¶1. Per Ref A, this cable transmits post's draft of the
2003 NTE. A separate copy is being emailed directly to
USTR (Cronin and Blue).
IMPORT POLICIES
Brazil's arithmetic average applied tariff was an
estimated 11.5 percent in 2003. Brazil currently
maintains no applied tariff rates in excess of 35 percent,
but does have safeguard measures in place for some
imports, such as toys. For example, Brazil imposes
tariffs between 4.5-16.5% on wood products and 22% on
motorcycles. In April 2002, the Brazilian government
approved a new tax law that dramatically increased the
duty on imported advertising materials and discriminates
between domestic and foreign producers. A number of
imports are prohibited, including various used goods such
as machinery, foreign blood products, refurbished medical
equipment, automobiles, clothing, and other consumer
goods.
Brazil and its MERCOSUR partners, Argentina, Paraguay and
Uruguay, implemented the MERCOSUR Common External Tariff
(CET) on January 1, 1995. The CET currently covers 9,626
items, with tariffs mostly ranging between zero and 21.5
percent. Within the CET, certain sectors are treated
separately and are organized on special lists. The list
for informatics and telecommunication goods contains 427
items with tariffs in 2002 ranging between zero and 26
percent; a tariff phase-down schedule should bring the top
tariff down to 16 by 2006. The automotive list covers 55
items (vehicles and parts) with a tariff rate of 35
percent; Brazil has negotiated automotive agreements with
third countries, which provide duty-free treatment within
quotas. A MERCOSUR suspension of duties ranging from 2 to
15.5 percent on some 550 pharmaceutical products has been
extended until December 31, 2003. Although the CET was
meant to be a comprehensive, common tariff schedule,
MERCOSUR countries have agreed to allow exceptions.
Brazil has 100 exceptions to the CET, with tariffs
reaching as high as 55 percent on coconuts and peaches.
In addition, after consulting with its MERCOSUR neighbors,
in November 1997 Brazil implemented a temporary three-
percentage point increase on most CET tariff items. For
almost all products, this additional tariff was reduced to
1.5 percent by the end of 2002, with its total elimination
expected at the end of 2003. Currently, 3450 CET items
are excluded, including 1152 capital goods. The CET
remains a significant barrier to increased U.S. exports of
agricultural products, distilled spirits, and computer and
telecommunications equipment. Brazil prohibits the
importation of second hand consumer goods. In addition,
significant barriers exist to U.S. textile exports. In
particular, Brazil applies additional import taxes and
charges that can effectively double the actual cost of
importing textile products into Brazil.
Virtually all imports from its MERCOSUR partners enter
Brazil duty-free. Notable exceptions are automobiles and
automobile parts, which are subject to out-of-quota
tariffs, and refined sugar, which is assessed a 17.5
percent tariff. Two-way trade between Brazil and its
MERCOSUR partners increased by 25 percent during January
to October 2003 compared with the same period a year
earlier, evidence of continuing economic improvement that
began in 2002. In a December 16, 2003 summit, MERCOSUR
leaders reaffirmed their commitment to strengthen the
customs union and work to fully integrate the MERCOSUR
common market by 2006. MERCOSUR plans to finalize free-
trade agreements with three Andean countries, Colombia,
Venezuela, and Ecuador. Peru and Bolivia are currently
associate members.
Import Licensing/Customs Valuation
The Secretariat of Foreign Trade (SECEX) implemented a
computerized trade documentation system (SISCOMEX) in
early 1997 to handle import licensing. All importers must
register with SECEX to access SISCOMEX; registration
requirements are onerous, including a minimum capital
requirement. In addition, fees are assessed for each
import statement submitted through SISCOMEX. As a general
rule, imports into Brazil fall within an "automatic import
license" process. Originally, Brazil's non-automatic
import licensing system was used only in cases of specific
imports that require special authorization from specific
ministries/agencies: beverages (Ministry of Agriculture);
pharmaceuticals (Ministry of Health); arms and munitions
(National Defense Ministry); etc. In 1998, the Brazilian
government stopped publishing a list of products subject
to non-automatic licenses; the only method available now
for determining if a product requires an import license is
to check the SISCOMEX system, which is available only to
registered importers. Under Brazil's non-automatic import
licensing system, U.S. suppliers have no means of finding
out in advance which products require import licenses and
whether they are subject to minimum price and payment
terms as a condition of receiving a license.
Under Brazilian customs regulations, a "gray line" process
exists for enhanced scrutiny of suspected fraudulent
imports. This process is opaque and burdens some
categories of U.S. exports. A related concern has been
the possible use of the gray line process to impose
minimum reference prices. In November 1999, the United
States actively participated as an interested third party
in EU WTO consultations on the issue, and in July 2000,
the United States held its own WTO consultations with
Brazil. The Brazilian Government denies the use of minimum
reference prices and reportedly has modified its customs
regime in response to these consultations.
Product registrations from the Ministry of Health are
required for imported processed food products and food
supplement products, and as of March 1, 2000, the term of
validity for registration was shortened. Registration
fees for these imports, as well as for medical and
pharmaceutical products, have increased significantly.
The U.S. Government also has received complaints relating
to Brazilian practices that lead to non-transparent
preferences for Brazilian products in procurement bids for
government and nonprofit hospitals, and cause bias against
the import of refurbished medical equipment when
domestically produced "similars" exist. Implementation of
such import measures continues to have a negative impact
on U.S. exports, especially given the high tariffs on
medical equipment. Although some progress in increasing
the transparency of the process was made at the end of
2001, problems for U.S. exporters still exist. U.S.
companies continue to complain of a variety of customs-
related non-tariff barriers.
The U.S. Government has received complaints that the ICMS
value-added tax collected by individual states is
sometimes set to favor local companies, constituting a
non-tariff trade barrier. Similarly, some U.S. companies
have raised concerns about the arbitrary application of
various non-automatic import licensing procedures, such as
authorizations from the Federal Police and the Nuclear
Regulatory Agency.
STANDARDS, TESTING, LABELING AND CERTIFICATION
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures
Progress has been made in the area of sanitary and
phytosanitary (SPS) measures. On March 15, 2001, the
Ministry of Agriculture lifted the ban on U.S. Soft Red
Winter, Hard Red Spring, and Hard Red Winter wheat shipped
from non-west coast ports. The ban remains on Durum and
White wheats and wheat from the states of Washington,
Oregon, Idaho, California, Nevada, and Arizona due to
phytosanitary concerns. The U.S. Government continues to
work with the Brazilian government to resolve the
remaining import restrictions.
Despite progress, SPS measures remain significant barriers
in several cases. Brazil continues to prohibit the entry
of poultry and poultry products from the United States
based on an alleged lack of reciprocity, contrary to WTO
rules which dictate that sanitary and phytosanitary
determinations be based upon sufficient scientific
evidence. Attempts to import seed potatoes into Brazil
have been blocked by unresolved permit issues based upon a
delayed and non-transparent pest risk assessment (PRA)
before commercial market access is granted. Brazilian
legislation also bans the importation of beef produced
with growth hormones; however, beef imports from the
United States have been allowed on a waiver basis since
¶1991.
Biotechnology
The biotechnology debate has captured public attention in
Brazil with frequent and polemical reports in the press
presenting various aspects of the issue. Regulation of
the biotech sector remains essentially frozen because of a
1998 court case that is still pending in a federal court
in Brasilia, filed by environmental NGOs against the use
of Monsanto's Roundup Ready soybean variety. The case
addresses not only the requirement to conduct
environmental impact studies on GMO products, but also the
constitutional authority of the Government's CTNBio
commission to approve biotech products.
In the absence of a definitive court ruling on this case,
President Lula made considerable progress in 2003 towards
a new legal framework for production and marketing of
biotech soybean crops. Law 10,814 was enacted on December
15, 2003 after being approved by Congress, and legalizes
the planting and marketing biotech soybean crops for the
2003/2004 harvest. On October 31, 2003, President Lula
sent to Congress the long-awaited draft of a Biosecurity
Law that will provide a long-term regulatory regime for
the biotech sector. The current text of the bill
envisions a complicated mechanism for approval of biotech
products by a national commission attached to the
President's office that would consider political and
economic, as well as scientific factors. It is likely
that the bill will undergo substantial revision before
passage, which is expected in April 2004.
On April 24, 2003 the Brazilian Government published
Decree Number 4680, which formally implemented the
provisions of a 1990 law (law 8,078 of September 1990)
that requires labeling of GMOs. The decree requires
labeling of GMOs and products containing GMOs, including
meats from animals fed with GMO feed. The label must
include a special logo created by the Ministry of Justice
in October 2003. The requirement does not apply to
packaged food products containing less than one percent of
genetically modified organisms.
GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT
Brazil is not a signatory to the WTO Plurilateral
Agreement on Government Procurement, and transparency in
the procurement process could be improved. Remaining
limitations on foreign capital participation in
procurement bids can reportedly impair access for
potential service providers in the energy and construction
sectors. Brazilian federal, state and municipal
governments, as well as related agencies and companies, in
general follow a "buy national" policy. Although Law 8666
of 1993, which covers most government procurement other
than informatics and telecommunications, requires
nondiscriminatory treatment for all bidders regardless of
the nationality or origin of product or service, the law's
implementing regulations allow consideration of non-price
factors giving preferences to certain goods produced in
Brazil and stipulating local content requirements for
eligibility for fiscal benefits. Decree 1070 of March
1994, which regulates the procurement of information
technology goods and services, requires federal agencies
and parastatal entities to give preference to locally
produced computer products based on a complicated and
nontransparent price/technology matrix. However, Brazil
permits foreign companies to compete in any procurement-
related multilateral development bank loans and opens
selected procurements to international tenders.
EXPORT SUBSIDIES
The Government of Brazil offers a variety of tax, tariff,
and financing incentives to encourage production for
export and the use of Brazilian inputs in exported
products. An export credit program known as PROEX was
established in 1991. PROEX is intended to equalize
domestic and international interest rates for export
financing and to directly finance production of tradable
goods. Exporters enjoy exemption from withholding tax
for remittances overseas for loan payments and marketing,
as well as from the financial operations tax for deposit
receipts on export products. Several PROEX programs have
been found to be countervailable under U.S. law in the
context of specific countervailing duty cases. In 1999, a
WTO panel found PROEX interest equalization payments used
to finance the sale of regional aircraft manufactured in
Brazil to be a prohibited export subsidy. The WTO
Appellate Body upheld this finding. The Government of
Brazil states that it has modified PROEX so as to bring it
into conformity with WTO subsidy rules. Canada challenged
this position in the WTO, but subsequently reached a
negotiated settlement with Brazil, obviating the need for
a WTO ruling on the merits of the case. Changes to PROEX
were announced most recently in 1999, expanding the
program. In 2003, roughly $808 million was budgeted for
PROEX, with $400 million slated for equalization and $408
million for direct financing. Actual spending on PROEX
during 2003 is expected to have been about half of the
amount budgeted.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) PROTECTION
Patents and Trademarks
Brazil's industrial property law, covering patents and
trademarks, took effect in May 1997. The law improved
most aspects of Brazil's industrial property regime,
providing patent protection for pharmaceutical products
and processes, agrochemical products and other inventions.
However, concerns continue about a provision that
prohibits importation as a means of satisfying the
requirement that the patent be "worked" in that country.
This issue was the subject of a Dispute Settlement
proceeding at the WTO, which was terminated without
prejudice in June 2001. The dispute was terminated based
on Brazil's commitment to hold talks with the U.S. should
it deem necessary in the future to grant a compulsory
license for failure to work a patent.
On December 14, 1999, the Brazilian Government issued a
Provisional Measure that became Law 10,196 in 2001, which
includes some problematic provisions, including a
requirement that Health Ministry approval be obtained
prior to the issuance of a pharmaceutical patent. This
would appear to conflict with Article 27 of the TRIPS
Agreement, and U.S. officials have raised this concern
with their Brazilian counterparts. "Pipeline" protection
is provided for inventions not previously patentable in
Brazil because of limitations on patentable subject
matter, if these inventions were patented in another
country and not marketed in Brazil. While Brazil's patent
office, the National Institute for Industrial Property
(INPI), is addressing its backlog of both pipeline and
regular patent applications, the resources and support
necessary to effectively and consistently manage the
processing of patent applications still appear to be
insufficient. As of December 2003, industry sources
reported that INPI had granted fifteen pipeline patents
and fifty-seven regularly filed pharmaceutical patents. At
the same time, unauthorized copies of pharmaceutical
products have received sanitary registrations relying on
undisclosed tests and other confidential data, in apparent
violation of TRIPS Article 39.3.
Following the WTO agreement on access to medicines in
September 2003, President Lula issued a decree revising
the implementation of Article 71 of Brazil's 1996 patent
law, which governs the granting of compulsory licenses in
cases of national emergency or public interest. The
decree essentially allows for the importation of copies of
medicines from producer countries where patent protection
does not exist in cases where local production of the
medicine in not feasible. The Brazilian government has
yet to make use of the decree, but has publicly stated its
intention to do so as a last resort in price negotiations
with pharmaceutical companies supplying antiretrovirals to
the country's National AIDS Program.
On December 17, 2002, the Brazilian Congress passed Law
10,603 on data confidentiality. The law covers
pharmaceuticals for veterinary use, fertilizers,
agrotoxins, their components and related products; the law
does not cover pharmaceuticals for human use. The law
provides data protection for only 10 years from the date
of registration with the competent regulatory authority
for products utilizing new chemical molecules or new
biological organisms or until the first release of the
information by the registration owner, with a minimum
guaranteed period of protection for one year. For
products not utilizing new molecule or organisms, the
period of protection is five years or until the first
release of information with a one-year minimum period of
protection. Data demanded by the regulatory authority
after registration will be protected for the duration of
the protection period granted to the data used to gain the
registration, or for one year after being presented,
whichever is longer. If the product is not commercialized
within two years of the date of registration, third
parties may request use of the data for registration
purposes. The regulatory authority may make compulsory
use of the data in cases of national emergency or in
certain circumstances relating to unfair competition.
The 1997 industrial property law also added provisions for
the protection of "well-known" trademarks, but contains a
long list of categories of marks that cannot be
registered. U.S. industry has expressed concern with the
continued high level of counterfeiting in Brazil. A bill
(PL_1787) on the protection of layout designs of
integrated circuits (required by TRIPS) was introduced in
April 1996 and is still progressing through committees
within the Brazilian Congress.
Copyrights
A copyright bill that included amendments to bring Brazil
into compliance with the Berne Convention and TRIPS was
signed by President Cardoso in February 1998. A software
law was signed by President Cardoso that same month,
protecting computer programs as "literary works,"
increasing the term of protection to 50 years, and making
software infringement a fiscal and an intellectual
property crime. Copyright enforcement in Brazil continues
to be uneven, and losses from piracy remain significant.
As a result of this concern, on January 10, 2001, the U.S.
Government accepted a petition, submitted by the
International Intellectual Property Alliance, to review
the GSP status of Brazil. This petition was reviewed as
part of the 2003 Annual Generalized System of Preferences
Product and Country Eligibility Review. A Country
Practices Review of Brazil was held in October 2003. The
U.S. industry reports that in 2002 its trade losses from
copyright piracy in Brazil were over $771 million, the
largest amount of losses due to copyright piracy in the
hemisphere.
Problems have been particularly acute with respect to
sound recordings and videocassettes, and virtually all
audiocassettes sold are pirated copies. Brazil accounts
for over half of the market for sound recordings in Latin
America and is one of the world's largest markets for
videos. Vigorous industry and Brazilian Government anti-
piracy campaigns have had a positive impact and general
awareness among the populace has increased significantly.
In June 2003, the Brazilian Congress launched a
Parliamentary Investigative Commission (CPI) on Piracy,
which has gained wide support from industry for its
action-oriented nature, as well as its willingness to
address the official corruption inherent in piracy.
Several Deputies on the CPI have pressed law enforcement
officials to achieve notable apprehensions of perpetrators
and counterfeited goods ranging from cigarettes to CDs.
The CPI's 6-month mandate has recently been extended. An
outgrowth of the CPI, a Congressional caucus on piracy and
tax evasion was formed in September 2003. Efforts in
2003 resulted in many prosecutions, but the number of
convictions for intellectual property rights violations
remains too low to act as a deterrent. While anti-piracy
actions in 2003 resulted in several large seizures of
pirated CDs, the sound recording industry estimates that
the piracy rate for CDs in 2002 was 55 percent. Even with
piracy raids and more prosecutions, the number of cases
prosecuted and sentenced in Brazilian courts remains low,
frustrating efforts at deterrence. In July 2003,
President Lula signed a law that doubled the minimum
penalty for copyright violations. The law also codifies
procedures to seize and destroy contraband and gives
judges authority to dispose of seized goods to ensure they
will not be used for commercial purposes. Brazil has
increased inspections at border crossings increased, but
significant amounts of pirated material continue to enter
Brazil from Paraguay.
The Federal Government of Brazil to date has not given
police adequate tools or training to effectively enforce
the law. Further, fines provided for in the penal code are
too insignificant to create a true deterrent; and the
court and judicial process is often unresponsive and slow.
The generally inefficient nature of Brazil's courts and
judicial system has complicated the enforcement of
intellectual property rights. The Brazilian Government is
working to streamline the judicial process. In early
2001, the Government created an interagency IPR committee,
coordinated by the Ministry of Justice, to improve anti-
piracy enforcement. After two years of very limited
activity due to lack of resources and the 2002 national
elections, the committee made progress in 2003 with a
national public awareness campaign and the start of IPR
training at the National Federal Police Training Academy.
Brazil has not yet ratified the WIPO Treaties on Copyright
and Performances and Phonograms.
SERVICES BARRIERS
Telecommunications
Privatization within the telecommunications sector, which
is based on the General Telecommunications Law of 1997,
has presented regulatory challenges. In the fixed-line
sector, interconnection charges and other incumbency
advantages have provided strong barriers for entry, and
the companies created during a transitional duopoly stage
have not fared well. There was also heavy involvement on
the judicial side during 2002 and 2003, as some incumbent
companies used court injunctions to forestall competition.
Brazil has not yet implemented its original WTO basic
telecommunications commitments. In 2001, Brazil withdrew
its schedule of commitments in view of concerns raised by
certain WTO members that it maintained the right of the
Brazilian President to revoke concessions in the case of
national emergency, in contravention of the WTO Basic
Telecommunications Agreement. This presidential right is
contained in Brazil's 1997 General Law on
Telecommunications and is inscribed in Brazil's
constitution. Brazil has not sought the constitutional
change required to allow a revision of its schedule.
Nonetheless, the current regulatory environment generally
reflects commitments made by Brazil under the WTO Basic
Telecommunications Agreement.
Maritime
The Government of Brazil considers the bilateral Maritime
Agreement signed in October 1999 to be expired. Bilateral
consultations should result in a new agreement in 2004,
and in the interim the regulatory agencies of Brazil and
the United States have agreed to continue implementing the
provisions of the 1999 agreement on a reciprocal basis.
Key provisions of this agreement commit the parties to
afford fair and nondiscriminatory access for national-flag
carriers and third-flag carriers to competition on
commercial cargo and provides equal and nondiscriminatory
access to government cargos. A 25 percent merchant marine
tax on freight puts U.S. agricultural products at a
competitive disadvantage to MERCOSUR products.
Audio Visual Services
Foreign ownership of cable companies is limited to 49
percent. The foreign owner must have a headquarters in
Brazil and have had a presence in the country for the
prior 10 years. Foreign cable and satellite television
operators are subject to an 11 percent remittance tax;
however the tax can be avoided if the programmer invests 3
percent of its remittances in co-production of Brazilian
audio-visual services. National cable and satellite
operators are subject to a fixed title levy on foreign
content and foreign advertising released on their
channels.
Provisional Measure 2,228 1/01 and later Law 10,454 aim to
promote the national film industry through creation of the
National Film Agency (ANCINE) and through various
regulatory measures. Under Law 10,454, published on May
14, 2002, a fixed title levy is imposed on the release of
foreign films in theaters, foreign home entertainment
products, and foreign programming for broadcast
television. Remittances to foreign producers of
audiovisual works are subject to a 25 percent tax.
Brazilian distributors of foreign films are subject to a
levy equal to an 11 percent tax of their withholding
taxes. This tax, called the CONDECINE (Contribution to
the Development of a National Film Industry), is waived
for the Brazilian distributor if the producer of the
foreign audiovisual work agrees to invest an amount equal
to 70 percent of the tax on their remittances in co-
productions with Brazilian film companies. The CONDECINE
tax also levied on any foreign cinematographic or
videophonographic advertisement. The fee may vary
according to the advertising content and the transmission
segment.
Brazil also requires that 100 percent of all films and
television shows be printed locally. Importation of color
prints for the theatrical and television markets is
prohibited. A theatrical screen quota for local films is
maintained at 28 days per calendar year. Quotas on
domestic titles for home video distributors, while not
currently enforced, present another potential hindrance to
commerce.
Foreign firms had been prohibited from owning capital in
the "open broadcast" (non-cable) television sector.
However, in October 2002, President Cardoso issued
Provisional Measure 70, which was subsequently approved by
the Congress, which permits up to 30 percent foreign
ownership in Brazilian media. This law covers print as
well as the open television sector. Open television
companies also have a regulation requiring that 80 percent
of their programming content be domestic in origin. All
broadcast media material that enters the country must pass
through the Ministry of Justice, which retains rights to
censure and edit content.
Express Delivery Services
A bill (PL 1491/99) that would reorganize the National
Postal System remains under discussion in the Brazilian
Congress. The current proposal creates a regulatory
agency for postal services as well as a new Postal Company
of Brazil, owned and operated by the federal government.
Although the bill would end the government monopoly over
postal services after a ten-year period, it would also
create a monopoly on the delivery of certain types of
correspondence and parcels that are not now subject to
regulation, such as express delivery packages, thereby
significantly inhibiting market access by U.S. firms.
Insurance
Brazil is potentially South America's largest insurance
market, and earnings from premiums have grown rapidly in
recent years. In 1996, Brazil eliminated the distinction
between foreign and domestic capital, and many major U.S.
firms have since entered the market, mainly via joint
ventures with established companies. The Brazil
Reinsurance Institute (IRB) is a state monopoly. While a
1996 constitutional reform ostensibly abolished the
monopoly, private reinsurers have been precluded from
operating in Brazil pending the IRB's privatization, which
has been delayed indefinitely by a court decision. A
2003 Constitutional amendment allows for the regulation of
the reinsurance sector, including market entry. If
Brazilian shipping companies wish to obtain foreign hull
insurance, they must submit information to IRB
demonstrating that the foreign insurance policy is less
expensive than that offered by Brazilian insurers.
Brazilian importers must obtain cargo insurance from
insurance firms resident in Brazil, although the firms may
be foreign-owned.
Banking and Other Financial Services
Brazil has not ratified the WTO Financial Services
Agreement, formally known as the Fifth Protocol to the
GATS, which is necessary to bring Brazil's commitments
under the Agreement into force. The Financial Services
Agreement is still pending approval in the Brazilian
Congress. U.S. service exports to Brazil are impeded by
restrictive investment laws, lack of transparency in
administrative procedures, legal and administrative
restrictions on remittances and sometimes arbitrary
application of regulations. Service trade opportunities in
some sectors have been affected by limitations on foreign
capital participation.
In negotiating the 1997 WTO Financial Services Agreement,
Brazil made commitments in almost all service sub-sectors
for non-insurance financial services, including banking
and securities services. Brazil's constitution
precludes the expansion of foreign-owned banks until new
financial sector legislation is issued. For practical
reasons, new legislation has not been issued, but the
President of Brazil has the authority to authorize new
foreign participants on a case-by-case basis. In practice,
Brazil has approved most plans by foreign service
suppliers to enter the market or expand existing
operations. As of December 2002, foreign-owned or
controlled assets accounted for one third of Brazil's
total financial sector equity, and over 18 U.S. financial
service suppliers had established significant operations
in Brazil.
During 2002, a U.S. company involved in credit bureau
activities raised national treatment concerns regarding
the refusal by Receita Federal, Brazil's internal revenue
service, to provide it with information that was being
obtained by its local competitors.
INVESTMENT BARRIERS
In addition to restrictions discussed above, various
prohibitions limit foreign investment in internal
transportation, public utilities, media and other
"strategic industries." Foreign ownership of land
adjacent to national borders remains prohibited under
Brazilian law, unless approved by the National Security
Council. Despite investment restrictions, U.S. and other
foreign firms have major investments in Brazil, with the
U.S. accounting for more than one third of total foreign
investment. There is no Bilateral Investment Treaty
between the United States and Brazil.
HRINAK