Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 03HANOI2860, VIETNAM'S EXPERIENCE WITH HUMAN RIGHTS DIALOGUES

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03HANOI2860.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
03HANOI2860 2003-11-07 02:35 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Hanoi
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HANOI 002860 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV and DRL 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PHUM PREL PGOV SW SZ AS NO VM HUMANR
SUBJECT: VIETNAM'S EXPERIENCE WITH HUMAN RIGHTS DIALOGUES 
 
Ref:  Hanoi 2175 
 
1. (SBU) Summary:  Vietnam's series of human rights 
dialogues with foreign governments are broad-based and 
generally non-confrontational.  Many are linked to ongoing 
aid programs related to governance reform, but few dialogues 
result in -- or are expected to - produce concrete short- 
term results.  Third-country diplomats in Hanoi nonetheless 
value these dialogues as an opportunity to encourage long- 
term grassroots changes, as well as to convey concerns about 
human rights issues and sometimes about individual cases to 
a host government that appears increasingly sensitive to 
international criticism.  End Summary 
 
Norway 
------ 
 
2. (SBU) Norway established relations in Vietnam in 1997, 
and has held bilateral human rights dialogues in November 
2001 in Oslo and January 2003 in Hanoi.  The Norwegian MFA 
and GVN are currently planning for their third dialogue, 
scheduled for April or May 2004 in Oslo.  A Norwegian 
diplomat described the first two meetings as "getting to 
know each other" and dealing with issues in only a "very 
general" manner.  In the first dialogue, the Vietnamese 
delegation was headed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs 
(MFA), but included representatives from the Ministry of 
Justice, Ministry of Public Security (MPS), Supreme People's 
Court, and the National Assembly.  Topics of discussion were 
"non-confrontational;" the Norwegians addressed the need for 
GVN adherence to United Nations conventions, and the GVN 
requested Norway describe its criminal justice system.  The 
GVN group spent a week in Oslo, with one day for the 
dialogue, followed by visits to Norwegian judicial 
facilities and discussions with NORAD - the Norwegian aid 
agency - on identifying areas for aid in promoting good 
governance, a primary theme in Norwegian development 
assistance. 
 
3. (SBU) The Norwegian return visit to Hanoi in 2003 was led 
by the MFA's Director General of Humanitarian Affairs, Human 
Rights, and Democracy (equivalent to Assistant Secretary 
Craner), and included representatives from NORAD, the 
Norwegian Supreme Court, and an criminologist from the 
University of Oslo.  Issues were a continuation of those 
from the first dialogue.  The Norwegians did not raise 
specific cases of concern with the Vietnamese.  In planning 
the third dialogue, the Norwegian diplomat expressed a hope 
the meeting will become "more substantive" and that NORAD 
could reach agreement on some aid projects developed from 
themes discussed in the dialogue, notably criminal law 
reform.  The diplomat also assessed that the dialogues had 
already helped develop a level of some trust on human rights 
issues between the GVN and Government of Norway.  He noted 
that he had recently been allowed by the MPS to visit a 
Vietnamese prison (which U.S. poloffs have done twice; a 
third request has been outstanding for almost one year). 
 
SWEDEN 
------ 
 
4. (U)  Sweden not only participates in the EU - GVN human 
rights dialogue (para 6) but also deals with a number of 
human rights issues in its annual bilateral review of 
development cooperation.  Sweden established relations with 
Hanoi in 1968, and has the longest standing diplomatic 
relations of any Western country.  Considered a "friend of 
Vietnam," it nonetheless published a human rights report in 
January 2003 that was critical of the GVN's record (earlier 
year's reports had not been made public).  Through its 
bilateral review, Sweden also targets aid to what it sees as 
human rights-related areas.  These are broadly defined, and 
the current theme, established at the request of the GVN, is 
anti-corruption (ref a).  In 2002, Sweden invited Vietnam as 
an observer to the Sweden-Canada-China regional issues 
dialogue, held that year in Jakarta.  The Swedes considered 
it an "eye-opening" experience for Vietnam to see the 
relatively open way China addresses human rights 
accusations. 
 
Australia 
--------- 
 
5. (U)  Australia holds the "Australia-Vietnam Bilateral 
Dialogue on International Organizations and Legal Issues, 
including Human Rights," which its diplomats characterize as 
an annual "non-confrontational" discussion of issues.  The 
meeting, along with talks with Iran and China, is one of 
only three dialogues Australia holds worldwide.  The most 
recent dialogue - the second - was held on June 27 in 
Canberra, and included GVN representatives from the MFA, the 
MPS, the Supreme People's Procuracy, and Supreme People's 
Court.  In these dialogues, the Australians have provided 
the GVN with a list of specific cases, and have been 
relatively pleased with responses they receive.  The 
Government of Australia does not link aid programs to issues 
discussed in the meetings.  After the Canberra round, the 
GOA sponsored a group of GVN officials to a human rights 
course in Australia, followed by a study tour.  The next 
round of meetings is anticipated to take place in Hanoi in 
August 2004. 
 
EU 
-- 
 
6. (SBU) The European Union's dialogue has been held at a 
lower level that Australia and Norway's, but on a biannual 
basis.  The EU and GVN have held three dialogues so far - 
all in Hanoi - with the most recent one in June and the next 
one scheduled for November 26.  The meetings are planned by 
a working group of all EU embassies in Hanoi along with the 
Delegation of the European Commission, but at the dialogue 
itself the EU is represented by the "Troika" ambassadors. 
One EC representative was guardedly positive about the June 
meeting, noting some GVN responses provided in response to 
the EU's prisoner list.  However, a British diplomat said 
separately that that the dialogues have been relatively 
disappointing: discussions have been unfocused, the GVN was 
represented by relatively low-level officers from the MFA 
only, and the impression was that the Vietnamese were "just 
going through the motions." 
 
7. (SBU) According the British diplomat, EU member countries 
consider advancing human rights in Vietnam a "real 
priority," pointing out that Foreign Minister Straw had also 
raised the issue with Foreign Minister Nien during their 
September bilateral meeting in London.  Some EU member 
embassies in Hanoi hope to revitalize the dialogue in its 
upcoming session, by trying to raise the GVN representation 
to the department director general-level, and to include 
representatives from a number of different GVN ministries. 
The EU is also planning better to structure the talks, and 
will present the MFA with a list of topics ahead of time; 
what will be on the list is still being hashed out in 
working groups.  According the British diplomat, the EU 
nonetheless hopes to keep the dialogue "non-threatening" for 
the GVN.  Rather than confront the GVN with a list of 
accusations, the goal is to frame EU concerns in positive 
terms such as "promoting religious tolerance" in lieu of 
"ending religious oppression." 
 
Switzerland 
----------- 
 
8. (U) One likely additional participant in human rights 
dialogues with the GVN is Switzerland.  The Swiss held 
bilateral dialogues in 1998 and 1999, but discontinued them 
due to a lack of resources.  On a visit in late August, 
Deputy Prime Minister Vu Khoan proposed restarting of the 
human rights dialogue.  The Swiss Department of Foreign 
Affairs is currently studying the issue, and diplomats here 
have indicated it is likely Switzerland will agree to resume 
the exchanges.  Switzerland has some fears that the GVN has 
sought the renewed dialogue only because Switzerland has 
limited interests in Vietnam.  At the same time, the Swiss 
view themselves as neutral and free of the biases they 
believe Vietnamese see in other countries - notably the U.S. 
and Australia.  Any new dialogue would have to involve a 
range of GVN ministries - not just the MFA - and deal with 
specific and controversial issues to satisfy the Swiss, 
according to a diplomat in Hanoi.  At the same time, 
Switzerland is prepared to look for a "longer-term" and 
broad range change in attitudes rather than immediate 
results.  The dialogue would also likely be twinned with a 
development strategy of technical programs and exchanges, 
developed around two or three issues identified in the 
dialogue. 
9. (SBU) Comment: Vietnam remains committed to the process 
of dialogue, even on issues like human rights when they know 
full well they will face criticism - direct or indirect - 
from all of their interlocutors.  Most third country 
participants in these dialogues share U.S. frustrations with 
a lack of specific results, but nonetheless claim to value 
the exchanges as one of the few conduits in which they can 
get information from the GVN, and make clear their concerns 
while not expecting overnight change. 
BURGHARDT