Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 03ZAGREB2268, USDOC VISIT STEPS UP HEAT ON CROATIA OVER

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03ZAGREB2268.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
03ZAGREB2268 2003-10-21 13:35 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Zagreb
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS  ZAGREB 002268 
 
SIPDIS 
 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED 
 
USDOC FOR 4232/ITA/MAC/EUR/OEERIS/CEED/MROGERS 
USDOC FOR 3150/USFCS/OIO/EUR/CEENIS/PBRADLEY 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ETRD KIPR HR
SUBJECT: USDOC VISIT STEPS UP HEAT ON CROATIA OVER 
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MOU 
 
REF: ZAGREB 2176 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED, PLEASE HANDLE ACCORDINGLY. 
 
Summary 
------- 
 
1.  (SBU) USDOC Market Access and Compliance Office 
Director, Susanne Lotarski, delivered a strong message 
to the Croatian government to forward the long-stalled 
bilateral MOU on intellectual property rights.  During 
an October 14-15 visit to Zagreb, she urged authorities 
to ratify the MOU or face possible trade sanctions under 
the U.S. Special 301 process.  Lotarski also emphasized 
the relation between strong IP protection, business 
ethics and rule-of-law -- all of which investors judge 
when evaluating a country.  Her warning came on the 
heels of a similarly forceful warning by the Ambassador, 
most recently with Deputy Prime Minister Simonic 
(reftel).  End Summary. 
 
"Ashamed" MOU Did Not Move Forward 
---------------------------------- 
 
2.  (SBU) In her October 14 meeting with Minister of 
Economy Ljubo Jurcic, Lotarski noted that a lack of 
progress on the part of the Croatian government on the 
intellectual property memorandum of understanding 
endangered some of the positive aspects of the bilateral 
relationship.  She said the U.S. is disappointed in the 
failure of the government to include data exclusivity in 
the recent drug law -- especially since protection of 
confidential test data is required by the WTO and the 
 
SIPDIS 
EU.  There was a good chance Croatia would be moved up 
on the 301 list during a fall out-of-cycle review.  This 
was an escalation in a process that could lead to trade 
sanctions, such as removal of GSP benefits -- and not 
only on pharmaceuticals. 
 
3.  (SBU) Jurcic said the Ministry of Economy supported 
WTO principles and the U.S. position on the MOU.  The 
Ministry of Health, on the other hand, supported 
Croatian pharmaceutical producers and Croatian 
consumers.  However, the visit of the Ambassador to the 
Deputy Prime Minister and the delivery of the non-paper 
had made an impression on the government, and the issue 
was being revisited. 
 
4.  (SBU) Acting Deputy Economy Minister Olgica Spevec, 
also at the meeting, recalled that she had assured the 
Embassy last fall that the MOU would probably make it to 
the parliament early in 2003.  She was frankly ashamed 
that the GOC had not lived up to its obligations, and 
noted that lately the Ministry of Economy had been left 
out of meetings on this issue, perhaps because the 
government did not like its stance.  Spevec asked 
whether the U.S. would consider amending the agreement, 
or at least adding a phase-in period.  We noted that the 
phase in contemplated in the MOU had already expired -- 
in 1999.  Lotarski reported that all EU accession 
countries had accepted strong IP provisions.  Even 
Poland, with whom we had had the most trouble, had 
implemented data exclusivity, if not for as long a 
period as we would like. 
 
MOH: Cheap Drugs the Priority 
----------------------------- 
 
5.  (SBU) Lotarski met the same day with Minister of 
Health, Ivo Vlahusic, and Director of Drug Approvals, 
Csaba Dohoszky, to deliver the same message.  Vlahusic 
was forthright in saying that as Minister of Health, 
with primary responsibility for the welfare of 
Croatians, he had to oppose the MOU.  However, as a 
member of the ruling coalition, if the government told 
him to go along with the MOU, he would.  (Note:  the 
Ministry of Health did indeed allow data exclusivity 
language to be inserted into the recent drug law.  It 
was, we were told, a call from Pliva to the Prime 
Minister that resulted in the yanking of that 
provision.) 
 
6.  (SBU) Dohoszky asserted that "Croatia is not the 
only country where intellectual property protection is 
not what the big multinationals want."  While Croatia 
did not face the same problems that under-developed 
countries did, generics are still vital to its health 
system.  Lotarski countered that the USG was not anti- 
 
 
generic, but it did demand a level playing field.  It 
was not fair that an innovative company had to submit 
test data, which was then used by a generics company as 
a basis for the latter's registration.  To add insult to 
injury, in Croatia, the (Croatian) generics company was 
likely to get its registration months, sometimes years, 
before the innovative company for the same drug, while 
benefiting from the innovative company's test data.  It 
came down to whether Croatia wanted to be known as a 
country with good business ethics and rule-of-law. 
 
7.  (SBU) Lotarski also pointed out that Croatia had 
received U.S. support for its WTO entry in return for 
the MOU.  "It would be fair to ratify the MOU, Vlahusic 
admitted, adding, however, that the promise to ratify 
the MOU in exchange for your support for our WTO entry 
was an "oral agreement."  Nevertheless, the Minister 
promised to contact the Croatian pharmaceutical industry 
and ask whether it would maintain its position in the 
face of possible trade sanctions.  He would also consult 
with the MFA and the government.  Commercial Counselor 
Beryl Blecher urged Vlahusic to meet with the foreign 
pharmaceutical producers as well. 
 
8.  (SBU) Dohoszky highlighted a problem that he said 
could be more acute than data exclusivity -- that is, 
"retroactive patent protection," otherwise known as 
pipeline protection.  "We all know that data exclusivity 
is inevitable, but this pipeline protection could really 
bust the health care budget if there is a big 
retroactive effect."  Would it be possible, the drug 
approval director asked, to modify the MOU or add a 
supplement to take the sting out of the pipeline 
protection provision?  Lotarski citing the importance of 
pipeline protection to the U.S., reported that Hungary 
had raised the same objections, but resolved its issues. 
 
MFA Will Try to Push Rock Back Up Hill 
-------------------------------------- 
 
9.  (SBU) Lotarski met also with Drazen Margeta, MFA 
Assistant Minister for Non-European countries.  Margeta 
emphasized the importance the GOC placed on its 
relationship with the U.S., highlighting recent joint 
military exercises.  Lotarksi described the threat that 
the failure to forward the MOU to the parliament posed 
to the relationship.  Margeta said his Ministry would 
try to forward the MOU to the Cabinet for approval -- 
again.  The MFA completed the procedure earlier this 
year, only to have the MOU shelved at the Cabinet level, 
apparently because of opposition from Croatian industry. 
 
10.  (SBU) Miro Kovacic, head of the Americas Desk, also 
said that pipeline protection had been raised as an 
important issue by Croatian drug makers.  They were 
floating the figure of 100 million euro as the extra 
cost to the Croatian health system of data exclusivity 
and pipeline protection.  Lotarski noted that other 
Central European countries had been asked to provide 
this protection, and found it worthwhile, when looking 
at the overall economic effect.  Competition and the 
health care system suffered if innovative drug makers 
did not want to bring new drugs into the market.  At the 
end of the day, a country could not use theft to balance 
its health care books, and a country had to live up to 
its word, even when governments changed. 
 
MOU is Not EU Accession Problem 
------------------------------- 
 
11.  (SBU) Lotarski's final meeting was with Orsat 
Miljenic, Deputy Minister of EU Integration.  Miljenic 
noted that the Ministry saw no reason to object to 
ratification of the MOU.  Updated intellectual property 
protections were clearly required by the EU, and his 
ministry wanted to meet EU standards as soon as possible 
-- regardless of Croatia's EU accession date. 
Convergence with EU standards wase good for Croatia 
regardless, he said, noting that Croatia aspired to be a 
"virtual member" of the EU, even before entry. 
 
Comment and recommendation 
-------------------------- 
 
12.  (SBU) With elections expected on November 23, 
action on the MOU is unlikely in the very short term, 
but a new government could take up the issue in January. 
Although the Parliament was dissolved on October 17 in 
 
 
anticipation of elections, we would like to see the new 
government -- which will likely be in place by early 
January -- act on this issue quickly.  Only increased 
outside pressure will move this issue forward in the 
face of fierce resistance from the local generics 
manufacturers.  To keep up the pressure, we would 
recommend accepting an out-of-cycle U.S. industry 
petition for Croatia and urge that Washington agencies 
move Croatia to the Priority Watch List. 
 
FRANK 
 
 
NNNN