Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 03COLOMBO1551, MEDIA PLAY: SRI LANKAN COLUMNIST SAYS U.S.,

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03COLOMBO1551.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
03COLOMBO1551 2003-09-08 05:35 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Colombo
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 001551 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/MR, I/RW, I/REC; PA SA/INS (CAMP, 
WALLER), SA/PD (SCHWARTZ, SCENSNY), SSA/PAS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KPAO OPRC KMDR OIIP CE
SUBJECT: MEDIA PLAY: SRI LANKAN COLUMNIST SAYS U.S., 
"BOGGED DOWN IN IRAQ, CRAWLS BACK TO UN" 
 
In a 9/7 iteration of his weekly piece, "Inside the glass 
house" Sri Lankan columnist Thalif Deen virulently attacked 
U.S. policy in Iraq.  The column, subtitled "Bogged down in 
Iraq, US crawls back to UN," says that the U.S., which "did 
not need the blessings of the United Nations to go into 
Iraq," is now "facing the hard reality that it needs the 
United Nations -- just to get out of Iraq."  But, Deen 
argues, "there will be hard political bargaining behind 
closed doors before any resolution sees the light of day," 
with the French and the Germans, plus, possibly, the Arab 
League and the NAM, leading the opposition.  The column 
closes:  "Amidst all this hoopla, nobody has bothered to 
ask whether the Iraqis would really welcome a multinational 
peacekeeping force.  Or will this force also go the way of 
the US-British coalition?" 
 
2. "Bogged down in Iraq, US crawls back to UN" follows 
verbatim: 
 
Quote. 
 
NEW YORK-- As the world's only superpower, the US did not 
need the blessings of the United Nations to go into Iraq. 
But six bloodied months later, it is facing the hard 
reality that it needs the United Nations-- just to get out 
of Iraq. 
 
The US is looking for an escape route out of a growing 
military quagmire in Iraq where 140,000 American troops are 
now bogged down in a war of attrition.  Madeleine Albright, 
a former US Secretary of State and an ex-US ambassador to 
the United Nations, says that the Bush administration once 
dismissed the world body as "bureaucratic, ineffective, 
undemocratic, anti-US and irrelevant". 
 
So why is the US crawling back to the United Nations 
seeking assistance from an Organisation it despised?  To 
gradually get its soldiers out of an increasingly deadly 
country where Americans are dying at an average of about 
one per day?  To get international economic assistance for 
the reconstruction of Iraq? 
 
All of this -- and more.  The war on Iraq -- and 
particularly its disastrous aftermath -- has turned out to 
be one of the Bush administration's biggest foreign policy 
debacles. 
 
One newspaper called the new US appeal to the UN a 
"humiliating" experience for the White House. 
 
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his neo-conservative 
hardliners in the Bush administration were the primary 
architects behind the war.  They were right in describing 
the war as a "cake walk" -- lining up some of the world's 
most sophisticated weapons against a militarily weak, 
sanctions-hit country. 
 
But they were dead wrong in assuming that in post-war Iraq 
American troops will be welcomed with "rose petals" in the 
streets of Baghdad.  The "rose petals" have turned out to 
be car bombs, landmines and explosive incendiary devices. 
 
While the US is still scrambling to put together an 
international peace keeping force -- described as "a 
coalition of the willing" -- the speculation is that there 
is already "a coalition of the willing" of all the world's 
terrorist groups who have assembled in Iraq to turn the 
country into a shooting gallery. 
 
President Bush's decision to return to the UN is also a 
defeat for Rumsfeld and a morale booster for Secretary of 
State Colin Powell.  Dangling carrots before the Security 
Council, the US last week tried to win support for a new UN 
resolution for a multi-national peacekeeping force in Iraq 
by pledging a time-table for elections and the restoration 
of sovereignty to the Iraqi people currently under American 
military occupation. 
 
After speaking to key members of the Security Council -- 
including France, Russia and Germany -- Powell told 
reporters that the proposed resolution will not only call 
for a new multinational force but also provide a specific 
time frame for elections in Iraq. 
 
According to the US, the new force will be under a unified 
US military command, not a UN command.  But there will be 
hard political bargaining behind closed doors before any 
resolution sees the light of day. 
 
The strongest opposition is expected to come from France 
whose President, Jacques Chirac, says the resolution does 
not go far enough.  Germany, a close ally of France in the 
Security Council, is equally hesitant.  German Chancellor 
Gerhard Schroder, who like Chirac opposed the US war on 
Iraq, is once again backing France against the US. 
 
Both countries want an end to the military occupation, full 
sovereignty to the Iraqi people and a larger political 
authority to the UN to rebuild the war-ravaged country.  If 
the US refuses to accede to French demands, the two 
countries may be heading on a collision course in the 
Security Council:  a replay of an earlier dispute between 
the two veto wielding members. 
 
The US was forced to go to war with Iraq without UN 
authorisation because France threatened to exercise its 
veto.  But so far Chirac has not made any threats.  The US 
has already indicated it wants the new resolution adopted 
before President Bush visits the UN to address the General 
Assembly sessions on Sep. 23.  But that may seem too 
optimistic and ambitious -- unless Washington caves into 
French and German demands. 
 
The 119-member Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), the largest 
single Third World political body at the UN, has not taken 
a stand on the creation of a new multinational force 
primarily because 22 Arab states who are members of NAM are 
abiding by a decision taken by the League of Arab States on 
the aftermath of the war on Iraq. 
 
The League has refused to recognise both the legitimacy of 
the Iraqi Governing Council -- whose 25 members have been 
described as US "puppets" -- or the US military occupation 
of Iraq.  Amidst all this hoopla, nobody has bothered to 
ask whether the Iraqis would really welcome a multinational 
peacekeeping force.  Or will this force also go the way of 
the US-British coalition? 
 
End quote. 
 
3. Comment.  Deen's column, "Inside the glass house," 
appears weekly in the SUNDAY TIMES (independent English 
weekender).  The TIMES is published by the Wijeya Group, 
publishers of the DAILY MIRROR (independent English daily), 
LANKADEEPA (independent Sinhala daily), and SUNDAY 
LANKADEEPA (independent Sinhala weekender).  The Wijeya 
Groups newspapers are among the most respected in Sri 
Lanka.  Nevertheless, Deen's column is resolutely anti- 
American. 
 
Lunstead