Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 03HANOI2047, FAMILY PLANNING POLICY AND PRACTICE IN VIETNAM

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03HANOI2047.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
03HANOI2047 2003-08-12 07:45 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Hanoi
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 HANOI 002047 
 
SIPDIS 
 
BEIJING FOR A/S DEWEY 
 
STATE FOR PRM, EAP/BCLTV 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: SOCI PGOV VM
SUBJECT:  FAMILY PLANNING POLICY AND PRACTICE IN VIETNAM 
 
1.  (U)  Summary.  A new ordinance on family planning 
enshrines individual choice of family size and timing, while 
"encouraging" small families and seeking "rational" 
population structure and distribution.  There is a clear 
concern about growing over-population in urban areas and a 
need to keep people in the countryside as much as possible. 
GVN officials admit uneven implementation of earlier 
decrees, including in some cases fines and other punishments 
not entirely prescribed by law.  The new ordinance may be in 
part to respond to potential international criticism.  Fines 
for violations of family planning policies are reportedly 
"abolished" but other Party and State statutes apparently 
retain this option privately.  End Summary. 
 
New legislation 
--------------- 
 
2.  (U)  The Standing Committee of the National Assembly on 
January 9 passed a new ordinance on population and family 
planning, which was promulgated by President Tran Duc Luong 
as Order No. 01/2003/L-CTN on January 22 and went into legal 
effect on May 1.  It builds on the resolution on population 
and family planning policy adopted at the Fourth Plenum of 
the 8th Communist Party of Vietnam's Central Committee in 
1993.  It also marks a more formal version of Prime 
Ministerial Decision No. 270-TTg of June 3, 1993, which had 
originally approved the "Strategy on Population and Family 
Planning to the year 2000," the "Strategy on Population and 
Family Planning to the year 2010," and related other 
instructions based on the party doctrine. 
 
3.  (U) Madame Le Thi Thu, Minister-Chairwoman of the 
National Committee on Population, Families and Children, 
told the media in February 2003 that the Ordinance was 
designed to ensure that actual practices by Ministries and 
local agencies were fully consistent with state policy and 
law.  Experience had demonstrated, she admitted, that 
implementation and awareness of policies and legal 
regulations on population and family planning differed from 
locality to locality.  She stressed that earlier State 
policies on population focused primarily on adjusting only 
population size via family planning, while the new ordinance 
also mandates State efforts to regulate population 
structure, quality, and physical distribution.  The passage 
of this ordinance should clarify policy and provide 
comprehensive, definitive guidance on population activities, 
she claimed. 
 
Individual choice, but. . . 
--------------------------- 
 
4.  (U)  The Ordinance explicitly guarantees that each 
couple or individual shall have the right to decide when to 
have a baby, the number of babies, the time between each 
child, and the preferred method of contraception.  At the 
same time, it emphasizes that all citizens have the 
"obligation" to practice family planning and to "build 
families with few children."  The ordinance prohibits any 
activities either to obstruct or to force family planning, 
to select the gender of unborn babies, to import or sell 
fake or faulty contraceptive devices, or to engage in human 
cloning.  It calls upon the State to take adequate measures 
to ensure gender equilibrium "according to natural 
reproduction law," as well as to encourage pre-wedding 
health checks and genetic tests for people "in danger of 
genetic defects or being affected with toxic chemicals." 
The State further is required to invest in "reproduction- 
supporting technology" to assist "sterile and sterilized 
people," and undertake measures to eliminate "all forms of 
gender discrimination" and to encourage the "preservation of 
multi-generational families." 
 
5. (U)  As part of its campaign to achieve "rational" 
population distribution, the Ordinance instructs State 
agencies to give priority investment to low population 
density areas, as well as generally to rural areas in order 
"to reduce the motive force for migration to urban centers." 
The State is also specifically called upon to adopt some 
policies (not described) to "restrict the concentration of 
"population in a few big cities."  The State will comment 
and/or reward all agencies, organizations, and individuals 
making "achievements" in population work, while reserving 
the right to discipline, administratively sanction (to the 
extent of possible penal liability), or seek compensation 
from those who violate the provisions or this Ordinance. 
 
6.  (U)  While the Ordinance prescribes the right of 
individual to decide the number of babies and the time 
between each child, a draft Government Decree to implement 
the Ordinance still states that "each couple is suggested to 
have only one or two children," and that "each couple is 
encouraged to make duration between births of children from 
three to five years." 
 
. . . more than two is dangerous for your health 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
 
7.  (U)  According to Ha Dinh Bon, a senior expert from the 
National Committee on Population, Families and Children, a 
1993 law on the protection of citizens' health -- which does 
prescribe that "each couple should have only one to two 
children" -- technically still takes precedence over the new 
Ordinance.  He opined that seemingly more flexible 
provisions of the Ordinance (i.e., the right of each couple 
to decide the number of babies and the time between each 
child) likely reflect the GVN's acknowledgement of 
international human rights concerns.  He also admitted that 
various local administrations and agencies had sometimes 
issued regulations not in conformity with State and Party 
policies and guidelines, including in many cases fines that 
are not prescribed by law.  He added that some "mistakes and 
wrongdoings are unavoidable at times."  The draft 
implementing Decree notably stresses that civil servants and 
Party members need strictly to abide by the Law on Civil 
Servants, as well as Party statutes, which require them to 
follow guidelines and instructions issued by individual 
agencies and Party organizations on issues including family 
planning.  According to family planning officials, this 
means that -- regardless of the provisions of the new 
Ordinance -- individual party cells, agencies, ministries, 
and localities nonetheless may in practice retain the right 
to impose limits on family size for their members/employees. 
 
8.  (U)  Separately, Deputy Director General Le Hoai Trung 
of the Foreign Ministry's International Organizations 
Department stressed to Pol/C on August 5 that the 2003 
ordinance was part of a new campaign by the GVN to lessen 
State interference in family life and to leave family 
planning decisions to individual families.  He claimed that 
henceforth the GVN's focus would be more on reproductive 
health, while continuing only to "encourage" responsible 
family planning practices.  He stressed that fines and 
punishment had been "abolished," tacitly admitting that such 
practices had long existed in various family planning 
efforts. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
9.  (U)  Billboards and other propaganda continue to 
highlight the importance of small families, and certainly in 
urban areas the lesson has largely been learned.  Anecdotal 
evidence indicates that average family size in rural areas, 
as well as in mountainous ethnic minority areas is also 
decreasing, although not as sharply as in more expensive 
urban settings.  Embassy in subsequent reporting from Hanoi 
and provincial travels will follow the success of 
implementation of the ordinance and relevant decrees, 
particularly to see whether fines continue to be assessed in 
violation of state policy and whether civil servants in 
particular face administrative punishment, or face loss of 
promotions and other benefits, when they exceed these 
"healthy" prescriptive norms. 
PORTER